Answer: Great Britain
Explanation: Once he had a foothold in France he thought he could use France as a place to launch an invasion on Great Britain from. When he tried this he failed.
Who plays Lincoln in history of the world 2?
Michael Jai White plays Lincoln in the second installment of the History of the World series. Michael Jai White is an American actor and martial artist known for his roles in the Tyler Perry films and the Spawn movie.
He has also made appearances in popular television shows like The Dark Knight, ER, and The Game. Michael Jai White has won several awards for his martial arts and acting prowess and is one of the few actors to play a major role in both the martial arts and acting fields.The film is a comedy that parodies several historical periods and events, but it does not have a plot that revolves around Abraham Lincoln or any other American president.Instead, the movie has several unrelated skits and segments that spoof different historical periods, such as the Stone Age, the Roman Empire, and the French Revolution.
The movie was directed and co-written by Mel Brooks, a well-known comedian and filmmaker, who also appears in several roles throughout the film.As such, if you were expecting to see Abraham Lincoln portrayed in a comedic fashion, you will be disappointed, as the movie does not feature this character. However, if you enjoy absurdist humor and parodies of different historical eras, you might still find the movie entertaining.
For such more questions on Michael J:
brainly.com/question/14767013
#SPJ11
In April 1975, Khmer Rouge, Pol Pot's group, occupied Phnom Penh in Cambodia. The city's 2 million people were exhausted by years of fighting. They welcomed the invaders. They hoped that they would be able to build a new society with these heavily armed men. Unfortunately, that was not the case. Within days, the Khmer Rouge drove them all into the countryside to become workers in agricultural communes. They emptied Cambodia's other towns and put an end to money, markets, schools, newspapers, religious practices, and private property. The Khmer Rouge hated anyone with money or education. They believed in the empowerment of the rural poor. What kind of government is Khmer Rouge? OA. a legislative government B. a limited government OC. OD. a judicial government O an unlimited government
After other smaller German states had instituted liberal reforms in their territories, a confrontation occurred between revolutionaries and the Prussian army in Berlin. As a result, King Frederick William of Prussia
After other smaller German states had instituted liberal reforms in their territories, a confrontation occurred between revolutionaries and the Prussian army in Berlin.
As a result, King Frederick William IV of Prussia, who had initially promised to support the liberal cause, ultimately rejected the demands of the revolutionaries and instead implemented more conservative policies.
The confrontation in Berlin took place in March 1848, when a group of revolutionaries demanded that the king grant civil liberties, including freedom of the press and the right to assemble. The king initially agreed to these demands, but as the situation became more volatile, he changed his stance and began to crack down on the revolutionaries. The Prussian army was called in to restore order, and a number of people were killed or injured in the ensuing conflict.
After the confrontation, Frederick William IV issued a new constitution that was more conservative than the one demanded by the revolutionaries. The new constitution granted some civil liberties, but also strengthened the power of the monarchy and restricted the ability of the people to participate in government. This marked the end of the liberal reforms that had been sweeping through Europe in the wake of the French Revolution and the beginning of a period of conservatism and reaction that would last for several decades.
To know more about liberal reforms here
https://brainly.com/question/471976
#SPJ4
why miriam ferguson ran for governor of texas after her husband?
Miriam Ferguson ran for Governor of Texas after her husband, James Ferguson was unsuccessful in getting his name on the ballot in the 1924 gubernatorial election.
Who is Miriam Ferguson?Miriam Amanda Wallace Ferguson ( 1875 – 1961) popularly known as "Ma" was the wife of James Edward Ferguson (the governor of Texas from 1915-17 who was impeached for embezzlement of funds).
She ran the race for the Texas governorship after her husband lost in the 1924 governorship election.
Miriam Ferguson won the election and became the first female Governor of Texas from 1925 to 1927, and from 1933 to 1935. She was also the second female to be governor of a U.S. state, after Nellie Tayloe Ross.
As governor, she tackled some of the difficult issues of the day and worked to improve education and transportation systems. She pardoned so many convicts and supported New Deal legislation.
Read more about the first female Governor of Texas at brainly.com/question/12268645.
#SPJ1
What is an example of militarism in World War 1?
Answer:
Germany is an example of militarism in WWI because Germany began competing with the British for having the largest navy in the world, as well as developing new weapons like poison gas and submarines, the latter being a great tool in surprise attacks.
Explanation:
Congress struck a blow against organized labor with the passage of the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act. Which of the following were features of this legislation?
feature of the Taft-Hartley Act
-granted the president the ability to suspend strikes
-forced union officials to swear that they were not communists
-prohibited mandatory union membership in unionized workplaces
Last option . The features of the Taft-Hartley Act: prohibited mandatory union membership in unionized workplaces
What did the Taft-Hartley Act do?The Taft-Hartley Act, also known as the Labor Management Relations Act, was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1947. The legislation was designed to restrict the power of labor unions and strengthen the position of employers in labor disputes. Some of the key features of the Taft-Hartley Act included:
Prohibition of mandatory union membership in unionized workplaces: This meant that workers could not be forced to join a union in order to work in a unionized workplace.
Granting the president the ability to suspend strikes: The act allowed the president to order a cooling-off period of up to 80 days in cases where a strike threatened national security or the public welfare.
Forcing union officials to swear that they were not communists: The act required union officials to sign an affidavit stating that they were not members of the Communist Party or any other organization that advocated the overthrow of the U.S. government.
The Taft-Hartley Act was controversial at the time it was passed and remains a contentious issue today. Supporters of the act argue that it helped to balance the power between employers and unions, while opponents argue that it unfairly restricted the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively.
Read more on Taft-Hartley Act.
https://brainly.com/question/10748899
#SPJ1
a context that helps to explain the development discussed in the excerpt is that, after 1920, americans were debating ___
A context that helps to explain the development discussed in the excerpt is that, after 1920, Americans were debating: the appropriate gender roles for women in society.
What is context of the debate over appropriate gender roles for women?The context of the debate over appropriate gender roles for women in society in the aftermath of 1920 can help explain various social and political developments during that period.
In particular, the 1920s marked a significant turning point for women's rights and gender relations in the United States. In 1920, the 19th Amendment was ratified, granting women the right to vote, and this opened up new possibilities for women's political and social participation.
Overall, the context of the debate over gender roles in the 1920s helps to explain the larger social and cultural changes of the time and highlights the ongoing struggle for women's rights and gender equality in American society.
Learn more about gender role for women here:https://brainly.com/question/12225393
#SPJ1
how does a block of data on a blockchain get locked?
A block of data on a blockchain gets locked through a process called "mining."
The process occurs like this:
1. Transaction Validation: The first step is to validate the transactions within the block, ensuring they are legitimate and follow the rules of the blockchain network.
2. Block Creation: Next, the validated transactions are grouped together into a new block, which is added to the existing chain of blocks.
3. Proof of Work: To lock the block, a miner needs to solve a complex mathematical puzzle called Proof of Work (PoW). This requires significant computational power and energy.
4. Adding Nonce: The miner adds a random number, called a "nonce," to the block. This nonce is used as an input in the mathematical puzzle.
5. Hashing: The miner then calculates the hash (a unique string of characters) of the block using a cryptographic hash function. The hash should meet certain criteria set by the network, usually a specific number of leading zeros.
6. Puzzle Solution: If the hash meets the criteria, the miner has successfully solved the puzzle. If not, the miner changes the nonce and tries again until they find a valid hash.
7. Block Verification: Once the puzzle is solved, the block is considered locked. Other nodes in the network verify the block's validity by checking the hash and confirming it meets the required criteria.
8. Consensus: If the majority of the network nodes accept the block as valid, it gets added to the blockchain, and the miner is rewarded with newly minted cryptocurrency or transaction fees.
In summary, a block of data on a blockchain gets locked through the mining process, which involves solving a mathematical puzzle (Proof of Work) and obtaining consensus from the network nodes.
To know more about blockchain click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31080398
#SPJ11
Who was Macuilxochitl and how does she describe herself?
She describes the Tenochtitlan (Aztec) conquest of Tlacotepec as “forays for flowers [and] butterflies.” What does this mean?
She writes that Axayacatl spared the Otomi warrior partly because he brought a piece of wood and deerskin to the ruler? What does this tell you?
How does the artist use art and design emphasize and demonstrate the importance of tribute?
CRITICAL THINKING
How does this biography of Macuilxochitl support, extend, or challenge what you have learned about the state and economy in Mesoamerica in this period?
Macuilxochitl's biography supports what we know about the state and economy in Mesoamerica during this period. The tribute system was a crucial aspect of the Aztec economy, and Macuilxochitl's account provides valuable insights into how tribute was collected and distributed within the empire.
Who was Macuilxochitl?Macuilxochitl was a female noble from Tlacotepec, a city in the Toluca Valley of central Mexico during the Aztec Empire. She was a member of the Otomi ethnic group and was married to the Aztec noble Tetlepanquetzatzin. Macuilxochitl is known for her writings that provide valuable insights into the Aztec Empire's social and political structures.
In her writings, Macuilxochitl describes herself as a "poetess" and a "maker of songs." She wrote songs and poetry for various religious ceremonies, and her work was highly respected among the Aztec nobility. She also describes herself as a "daughter of lords," indicating her noble status.
Macuilxochitl's description of the Tenochtitlan (Aztec) conquest of Tlacotepec as "forays for flowers [and] butterflies" suggests that the Aztecs saw the conquest as a way to acquire tribute in the form of valuable goods rather than as a military conquest. Flowers and butterflies were highly prized by the Aztecs, and the tribute system was a way for them to acquire these goods without engaging in warfare.
Macuilxochitl's account of Axayacatl sparing the Otomi warrior partly because he brought a piece of wood and deerskin to the ruler reveals the importance of tribute in the Aztec Empire. Tribute was an essential part of the Aztec economy, and rulers valued the tribute they received from subject peoples. The fact that Axayacatl spared the warrior suggests that tribute was seen as a way to maintain peace and avoid conflict.
The artist uses art and design to emphasize and demonstrate the importance of tribute by depicting the various goods that were given as tribute, such as precious metals, textiles, and exotic animals. These artworks served as a visual record of the tribute system and highlighted the wealth and power of the Aztec Empire.
Overall, Macuilxochitl's biography supports what we know about the state and economy in Mesoamerica during this period. The tribute system was a crucial aspect of the Aztec economy, and Macuilxochitl's account provides valuable insights into how tribute was collected and distributed within the empire. Additionally, her writings demonstrate the importance of poetry and literature in Aztec society, which was a reflection of the empire's cultural and intellectual achievements.
learn more about Aztec economy: https://brainly.com/question/28780778
#SPJ1
During the Meiji Restoration, fought to
as fast as possible and as a result changed its significantly.
Answer: During the Meiji Restoration, Japan fought to modernize as fast as possible and as a result changed its society and economy significantly.
Explanation:
The Meiji Restoration was a period in Japanese history that began in 1868 and lasted until 1912. It marked the end of the Tokugawa shogunate and the restoration of imperial rule under Emperor Meiji. During this time, Japan underwent a series of rapid reforms and modernization efforts, including the adoption of Western-style institutions, education, technology, and industry. These changes allowed Japan to transform itself into a modern nation and emerge as a major player on the world stage.
In the 1920s how many U.S. workers were annually replaced by machines?
During Industrialization, 200,000 American employees were displaced by machines as the speed of technical advancement advanced drastically in the 1920s.
Mass manufacturing methods, including the assembly line, were used, enabling producers to make things more swiftly and effectively than ever before. Several skilled individuals who were no longer required for the industrial process were displaced as a result.
Almost 5 million American employees lost their employment between 1923 and 1930, according to one estimate, as a result of technical developments. Due to the fact that many employees were compelled to retrain for new occupations or risk long-term unemployment, this had a significant effect on the economy and society.
Learn more about 1920 industrialization at
https://brainly.com/question/1732620
#SPJ4
in one of your assigned documents, this member of the supreme court expressed strong opposition to the decision rendered in the plessy v. ferguson case of 1896.
One of the members of the Supreme Court who expressed strong opposition to the decision rendered in the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 was Justice John Marshall Harlan.
Justice Harlan was the sole dissenter in the Plessy v. Ferguson case, in which the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of segregation laws. The case arose when Homer Plessy, a Louisiana man who was one-eighth black, refused to leave a whites-only train car and was arrested.
Plessy argued that Louisiana's segregation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but the Supreme Court ruled against him, saying that "separate but equal" facilities were constitutional. Justice Harlan wrote a powerful dissenting opinion in which he argued that segregation laws were inherently unequal and violated the principle of equal protection.
He wrote: "Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law."Despite the Supreme Court's ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson, Justice Harlan's dissenting opinion was important because it laid the groundwork for future challenges to segregation laws and helped to inspire the Civil Rights Movement.
To know more about Plessy v. Ferguson case, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12846797#
#SPJ11
