The tires on Mavis’ car will have to be replaced when they each have 160 000 km of wear on them. If new tires cost $140.00 each, what is the total cost of the wear on Mavis’ tires for a year in which she drives 25 000 km?

Therefore, the smallest positive integer with at least 8 odd factors and at least 16 even factors is N = 1800.

In mathematics, combination is a way to count the number of possible selections of k objects from a set of n distinct objects, without regard to the order in which they are selected.

The number of combinations of k objects from a set of n objects is denoted by [tex]nCk[/tex] or [tex]C(n,k),[/tex] and is given by the formula:

[tex]nCk = n! / (k! *(n-k)!)[/tex]

where n! denotes the factorial of n, i.e., the product of all positive integers up to n.

by the question.

Now, let's consider the parity (evenness or oddness) of the factors of N. A factor of N is odd if and only if it has an odd number of factors of each odd prime factor of N. Similarly, a factor of N is even if and only if it has an even number of factors of each odd prime factor of N. Therefore, the condition that N has at least 8 odd factors and at least 16 even factors can be expressed as:

[tex](a_{1} +1) * (a_{2} +1) * ... * (an+1) = 8 * 2^{16}[/tex]

Let's consider the factor 2 separately. Since N has at least 16 even factors, it must have at least 16 factors of 2. Therefore, we have a_i >= 4 for at least one prime factor p_i=2. Let's assume without loss of generality that p[tex]1=2[/tex] and [tex]a1 > =4.[/tex]

Now, let's consider the remaining prime factors of N. Since N has at least 8 odd factors, it must have at least 8 factors that are not divisible by 2. Therefore, the product (a2+1) * ... * (an+1) must be at least 8. Let's assume without loss of generality that n>=2 (i.e., N has at least three distinct prime factors).

Since a_i >= 4 for i=1, we have:

[tex]N > = 2^4 * p2 * p3 > = 2^4 * 3 * 5 = 240[/tex]

Let's now try to find the smallest such N. To minimize N, we want to make the product (a2+1) * ... * (an+1) as small as possible. Since 8 = 2 * 2 * 2, we can try to distribute the factors 2, 2, 2 among the factors (a2+1), (a3+1), (a4+1) in such a way that their product is minimized. The only possibility is:

[tex](a2+1) = 2^2, (a3+1) = 2^1, (a4+1) = 2^1[/tex]

This gives us:

[tex]N = 2^4 * 3^2 * 5^2 = 1800[/tex]

To learn more about distribute:

https://brainly.com/question/29062095

#SPJ

Answer:

112°

Step-by-step explanation:

Finding the unknown angle in a quadrilateral:

        Sum of all angles of a quadrilateral = 360

                                      a + 49 + 72 + 127 = 360

                                                     a + 248  = 360

                                                                a = 360 - 248

                                                                a = 112°

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Alternative interior angles means these angles are equal in magnitude and sign

[tex]{ \tt{(20x + 10) = (10x + 50)}} \\ \\ { \tt{20x - 10x = 50 - 10}} \\ \\ { \tt{10x = 40}} \\ \\ { \tt{x = 4}}[/tex]

Answer:

Y=x^2+7x-3

complete the square to re-write the quadratic function in vertex form.

pls help

Step-by-step explanation:

To complete the square, we need to add and subtract a constant term inside the parentheses, which when combined with the quadratic term will give us a perfect square trinomial.

y = x^2 + 7x - 3

y = (x^2 + 7x + ?) - ? - 3 (adding and subtracting the same constant)

y = (x^2 + 7x + (7/2)^2) - (7/2)^2 - 3 (the constant we need to add is half of the coefficient of the x-term squared)

y = (x + 7/2)^2 - 49/4 - 3

y = (x + 7/2)^2 - 61/4

So the quadratic function in vertex form is y = (x + 7/2)^2 - 61/4, which has a vertex at (-7/2, -61/4).

Answer:

3x, 4x | 5, 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-12 is the y intercept while your slope is -4

Step-by-step explanation:

In the following question, among the given options, the statement is said to be, The pooled estimate of the standard deviation for the data given is √(54.14^2/10 + 24.26^2/10) = 22.74.

According to the rule for examining standard deviations in ANOVA from Chapter 12 (page 560), the within-group standard deviation should be no more than twice the size of the between-group standard deviation. In this case, the between-group standard deviation is 44.85 and the within-group standard deviation (22.74) is less than twice the size of the between-group standard deviation, so it is reasonable to use a pooled standard deviation for the analysis of these data.

For more such questions on deviation

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11