What was the Treaty of Wangxia?

A.) A treaty that the United States signed with China
B.) A treaty that the United States signed with Japan
C.) A treaty that the United States signed with Cuba
D.) A treaty that the United States signed with the Philippines​

Answer:

Shrinking industrial landings

Answer:Two hundred years ago this month, the United States abolished the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Eric Foner, a historian at Columbia University, takes listeners inside the historical moment tied to one of America's darkest eras.

The struggle to end the transatlantic slave trade and slavery was achieved by African resistance and economic factors as well as through humanitarian campaigns. The most prominent abolitionists in Britain, notably Thomas Clarkson and William Wilberforce, were great publicists.

Explanation:

It admitted Missouri as a slave state grants to derail its admittance to the union and the entire Missouri compromise.

The Missouri Compromise was a piece of federal legislation in the United States that struck a balance between northern states' aspirations to stop the spread of slavery in the nation and southern states' desires to do so.

In order to maintain the country's balance between slave and free states, this legislation accepted Maine as a non-slave state and Missouri as a slave state. In the remaining Louisiana Territory, above the 36° 30' latitude line, slavery was prohibited.

Although the Missouri Compromise succeeded in maintaining the peace for the time being, it was unable to address the crucial issue of slavery and its future in the country.

The Missouri Compromise was opposed by the South because it established a precedent for Congress to pass legislation pertaining to slavery, and by the North because it implied the spread of slavery into new areas.

To learn more about Missouri compromise

https://brainly.com/question/14020956

#SPJ2

Answer:

There have been many attempts at describing African Traditional Religion according to its main characteristics. Turaki (1999:69) lists the following main characteristics: belief in a Supreme Being • belief in spirits and divinities • the cult of ancestors • the use of magic, charms and spiritual forces.

Explanation:

Answer:

The populist party began to weaken during the early parts of the 20th century. One trait that continue for the party itself was the progressives, which started when they supported Jennings Bryan, but then moved to a more traditional role and started supporting more and more Democratic candidates. This was during the time of the first party shift, in which big corporations headed before his death in 1913, John D. Rockefeller, the Republican Party. The Irish feeling neglected came out in doves for Jennings Bryan in the 1898 election against McKinley, and parts of the 20th century.

During the first decades of the 20th century, the populist party started to lose strength. The progressives were one characteristic of the party that remained.

The operations involved in group decision-making or other types of inter-personnel power relationships, such as the allocation of funds or reputation, are collectively referred to as politics.

By making every attempt to comprehend the problems of the general public and communicate with the voters they claimed to represent, politicians of the twentieth century were influenced by populist party beliefs.

Defining the policies they thought would be best for various constituencies was another difficult task for them which creates challenges for them to survive.

The Populist Party influenced 20th-century politics by requiring politicians and established parties to always take the general public's demands into consideration.

Learn more about Populist Party, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8554109

#SPJ2

Answer:B is correct becuase many republicans split and made the progressive party in 1912.

Explanation:

Answer:

The conditions required for cultivating different cash crops largely shaped regional labor experiences and population demographics for enslaved Africans in the New World. European settlers experimented with a range of crops and export goods, often with significant influences from American Indians and Africans, but eventually market competition and environmental constraints determined which major cash crop different plantation regions primarily exported. The most lucrative cash crops to emerge from the Americas in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were sugar, tobacco, and rice. Cotton agriculture did not become a major feature of the U.S. southern economy until the early nineteenth century.

Explanation:

Answer:

With its natural borders - the Sahara Desert to the west, the mountainous Eastern Desert and the Red Sea to the east, the Mediterranean Sea edging the marshy Delta to the north and the Cataracts to the south, ancient Egyptians were reasonably free from invaders.

Explanation:

The historical significance of the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case repudiated the legal huddle posed by the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that legalized the "separate but equal" doctrine.

The case took to the cleaners the impossibility of offering "equal protection" according to the Fourteenth Amendment while maintaining "separate but equal" facilities for blacks and whites.

The Plessy v. Ferguson decision used the "equal protection" clause to entrench the Jim Crow laws.  On the other hand, the Brown v. Board of Education case used the "equal protection" clause to upturn the Jim Crow laws.  Thus, different interpretations of the same clause can birth different approaches to human relationships.

The Plessy v. Ferguson case killed all the efforts of racial harmony promoted by Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation. It showed the evil extent humans undertake to defend their whims and caprices. The Plessy decision killed minority rights by creating a misplaced "separate but equal" camouflage on human rights.

On the other hand, Brown v. Board of Education became the catalyst for minority rights movements, galvanizing people of color to redress centuries of racial discrimination.

The ruling in the Brown v. Board of Education case supports Thomas Jefferson's idea that while the majority should reasonably have their way, minorities must not lose their human rights on the altars of the majority. According to Thomas Jefferson, if the rights of minorities are denied or not protected, it becomes naked oppression.

The "checks and balances" that protect the rights of the minority are in the US Constitution, especially in the Amendments. Specifically, the Constitution underscored that all races are equal and possess inalienable rights.

Thus, to allow racial segregation through the creation of "separate but equal" facilities is injustice and a denial of liberty.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/19475596 and https://brainly.com/question/15806678

Answer:

I just took the test hope this helps:)

Explanation:

Answer:

Check out my pic attached. I hope this helps!

Explanation:

Answer:Well I need a picture of the answer it could be to help you, please.

Explanation:

Answer:

a. Four accounts of Jesus's life.

Explanation:

The four accounts are the 4 books, which include:

The Gospel of Matthew

The Gospel of Mark

The Gospel of Luke

The Gospel of John

~

Answer:

The Peloponnesian War ended in victory for Sparta and its allies and led directly to the rising naval power of Sparta.

Answer:

the origin of Chinese medicine emerged in the shamanistic era of the Shang dynasty period ( 1766 to 1122 BC). during this time the religious deity was called Shang Di who was believed to live in heaven in an imperial court accompanied by dead ancestors.

Answer:

With the French and Indian War over, many colonists saw no need for soldiers to be stationed in the colonies. Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens

Explanation:

They also just want someone to blame

Answer:

3

Explanation:

constitution is difficult

The question above is meant to assess your writing ability and for that reason, it is not right for me to write an essay for you, but I will show you how to write one.

First, you should search for articles and other essays that talk about the growth of executive power. These texts will serve as the basis for your essay, as well as be able to help you find the answers to the questions shown in your question.

After doing this research, you can write your essay as follows:

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/12640882?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

b. Children are used to working in unfair conditions.

Explanation: is correct!

Answer:

its b

Explanation:

Answer:

Nationwide is one of the largest insurance and financial services companies in the world, focusing on domestic property and casualty insurance, life insurance and retirement savings, asset management and strategic investments.

Explanation:

Answer: The Wampanoag

Based on the historical account, the statement that BEST summarizes a common argument against admitting California as a free state is "It would disrupt the existing balance of power between slave states and free states."

Before the admittance of California as a free state in 1850, the number of States in the United States was 30, with 15 each serving as slave states and free states, respectively.

However, as California was admitted as a free state, making it the 16th free state, many Southern states who were slave states felt that it would affect the power balance or decision structure in the Senate.

This made the US Congress to guaranteed the slave states that there would be no federal restrictions of slavery on Utah or New Mexico.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option B. "It would disrupt the existing balance of power between slave states and free states."

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/21773386

Answer:

1. The South resented the tariffs encouraged by the North because these tariffs

: increased the cost of imports the South relied on.

2. Which of the following BEST summarizes a common argument against admitting California as a free state?

: It would encourage other territories to enter the union as free states.

3. Which of the following BEST describes the outcome of the Compromise of 1850?

: It established an equal number of slave and free states.

4. The Fugitive Slave Act challenged the sovereignty of free states by

: making their officials complicit in preserving the institution of slavery.

Explanation:

!00% correct

The Failure of Compromise Quick Check

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

Pretty sure it's A (they live in similar climates)

Explanation:

Answer:

1

Explanation:

Answer: An early theory of democracy that holds that the best kind of government is one that promotes the "common good" and the welfare of an entire society.

Explanation: please add more detail to this question like add the answers that can chosen :)

Answer:1. What was the original intent of the Roman Republic? Why did the Romans decide to have that form of government? The Roman Republic began in 509 B.C. when the Romans expelled the Etruscan kings and set up their own government. Having witnessed the problems of the monarchy on their own land, and aristocracy and democracy among the Greeks, they opted for a mixed form of government, with three branches.

2. Why do you think eventually the Romans were not successful in their republic? Why is this important for all to know today? In other words, why do you think you were asked to do this specific project? Why are these ideas important? Economic problems, government corruption, crime and private armies, and the rise of Julius Caesar as emperor all led to its eventual fall in 27 BCE. Rome's continued expansion resulted in money and revenue for the Republic.

3. Find examples in our world today where governments are meant to be a democracy or a republic and are not following those ideals. Who and why? (at least 2 examples here). The United States and Nigeria are examples of presidential democracies. The executive branch includes the president and his cabinet. Along with the judicial and legislative branch, the three branches of government work to keep checks and balances, but the president has final say.

4. What is democracy and how is that different from a republic? (Please use your own words here – not just definitions.) Why is this difference important to know? The major difference between a democracy and a republic is that a republic is a form of government whereas a democracy is an ideology that helps shape how a government is run. Put another way: a republic is the system of government that allows a country to be democratic!

Explanation:

sorry if this dont help

Answer:

Paragraph in explanation

Explanation:

Yes, John Brown was "crazy". For one, he thought he could take down slavery by himself and a army he would slowly grow. He would start a "invasion" of the south and free slaves and use those slaves for his army. He also thought violence was the key to ending slavery. He would stop at nothing to end slavery including breaking the law and arguably committed treason.

Answer:

Reserve banks are REGIONAL BANKS that help the CENTRAL BANK carry out its duties.

Answers capitalized.

Answer:

1. regional banks 2. central bank

Explanation:

Answer:

The Sedition Act of 1918 curtailed the free speech rights of U.S. citizens during times of war.

Passed on May 16, 1918, as an amendment to Title I of the Espionage Act of 1917, the act provided for further and expanded limitations on speech. Ultimately, its passage came to be viewed as an instance of government overstepping the bounds of First Amendment freedoms.

President Woodrow Wilson, in conjunction with congressional leaders and the influential newspapers of the era, urged passage of the Sedition Act in the midst of U.S. involvement in World War I. Wilson was concerned about the country’s diminishing morale and looking for a way to clamp down on growing and widespread disapproval of the war and the military draft that had been instituted to fight it.

The provisions of the act prohibited certain types of speech as it related to the war or the military. Under the act, it was illegal to incite disloyalty within the military; use in speech or written form any language that was disloyal to the government, the Constitution, the military, or the flag; advocate strikes on labor production; promote principles that were in violation of the act or support countries at war with the United States.

The targets of prosecution under the Sedition Act were typically individuals who opposed the war effort, including pacifists, anarchists, and socialists. Violations of the Sedition Act could lead to as much as twenty years in prison and a fine of $10,000. More than two thousand cases were filed by the government under the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, and of these more than one thousand ended in convictions.

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of many of the individuals prosecuted. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. established the “clear and present danger” test in Schenck v. United States (1919). In upholding Socialist Charles Schenck’s conviction, Justice Holmes wrote that “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” The Court also unanimously upheld convictions in Debs v. United States (1919) and Frohwerk v. United States (1919).

In Abrams v. United States (1919), the Court reviewed the conviction under the act of Jacob Abrams, who, along with four other Russian defendants, was prosecuted for printing and distributing leaflets calling for workers to strike in an effort to end military involvement in the Soviet Union. The Court in late 1919 upheld the conviction.

However, in this instance Holmes, along with Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissented from the majority, arguing that the “clear and present danger” test was not met under the circumstances arising in the case. Specifically, Holmes felt that Abrams had not possessed the necessary intent to harm the U.S. war effort. In contrast to his majority opinion in Schenck, Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams urged that political speech be protected under the First Amendment.

The Sedition Act of 1918 was repealed in 1920, although many parts of the original Espionage Act remained in force.

Hope this helps, have a nice day/night! :D