Answer:
Its that already the whole question?
I dont understand it srry :(
How Can We Get Khula in Pakistan?
http://www.advocateinlahore.com/khula-procedure-in-pakistan/
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish
Explanation:
jails never hold more than 1,000 prisoners
true or false
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. This is despite the national incarceration rate being at its lowest in 20 years. About 25% of the world’s total prison population is in the United States, which holds about 2.19 million prisoners as of 2019 (1.38 million in federal and state prisons, 745,200 in jails).
It false, i got the unit 8 for this question and it false
Explanation:
QUESTION 18
Indicate the correct statement:
(1) An ex parte application is the motion application used when there is no dispute of facts
(2) Action proceedings is another type of motion application and the procedure is started by a
notice of motion
(3) In criminal cases a procedure is started with action proceedings
(4) The parties in a criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant
Answer:
2 or 4 is correct
Explanation:
step by step explanation
The correct statement in the given question is (4) statement.
Statement (1) - Ex Parte Application
Ex parte application is used in civil procedure and is used to refer to motions for orders that can be granted without waiting for the response from the other side.
These orders are only in place until further hearing can be held such as temporary restraining order .
Under U.S.A law , court are hesitant to make ex parte motion because according to 5th amendment and 14th amendment, there is a guarantee of right to due process and ex parte leads to the violation of excluded party's right to due process.
Statement (2)- Action Proceedings
Action Proceedings refers to a judicial proceedings where a party brings a civil or criminal case against another party, an action has been brought against the other party.
It is not a type of motion application and is used in cases such as:
- presence of material disputes in facts
- it is instituted by summons
- evidence to be relied upon in supporting the claim and is not disclosed in the statement
- exchange of pleadings are involved
-evidence in the form of testimonies and documentary is given to prove the claims
- more expensive and time consuming
Statement (3)- Arrest
In criminal cases a procedure is started with Arrest.
An arrest is made with an arrest warrant and may be made with or without warrant if probable cause and exigent circumstances are presented at the time of Arrest.
The right to make warrantless arrests are commonly defined and limited by statutes subject to due process guaranteed by U.S.A Constitution.
Statement (4)- Prosecutor and Defendant
These both terms are related strictly to Criminal Law.
Prosecutor- Legal representative of the prosecution in the states with the criminal law system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against an individual accused of breaking the law.
A lawyer who initiates prosecution of criminal offences and present s the case for prosecution in a criminal proceedings
Defendant- Defendant is a person who is the party either accused of committing a crime or criminal prosecution
Thus the parties in criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant.
To learn more about Prosecution and Defendant here
https://brainly.com/question/11980088
#SPJ3
The way to the house ?
Answer:
what is the house in question
Explanation:
do yo have a screen shot
A plaintiff sues her employer for sexual harassment. During the trial, the plaintiff attempts to introduce into evidence company records that include written complaints from other employees alleging that they too were sexually harassed by the employer. The defense objects to the admission of the records on the basis of hearsay. Should the objection be sustained?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The evidence is most likely valid and can be useful so the judge shouldn't Sustain it.
No, Hearsay rule is the rule prohibiting hearsay (out of court statements offered as proof of that statement) from being admitted as evidence because of the inability of the other party to cross-examine the maker of the statement.
What is considered hearsay evidence?Hearsay evidence is evidence of a statement that was made other than by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated.
Why hearsay is admissible?The hearsay rule does not exclude the evidence if it is an operative fact. Language of commercial offer and acceptance is also admissible over a hearsay exception because the statements have independent legal significance. Double hearsay is a hearsay statement that contains another hearsay statement itself.
To learn more about Hearsay rule, refer
https://brainly.com/question/18407390
#SPJ2
What Is Actual Process of Divorce Certificate in Pakistan
Answer:
Divorce certificate Pakistan is issued when your divorce proceedings from the court of arbitration council get finalized
Ms. Y went to Alluta Hotel together with her friends for the celebration of her birthday. At the close of the event her friends could not find some of their items and some complained of stomach upset from the food and beverage served. Given their social media presence, Ms. Y and her friends posted their complaints online. Discuss the legal issues arising from this situation.
Answer:
may be that ms.y and her friend is just spreading rumor about that hotel .. maybe she already had some issues with the people there ..and they were just doing it as a revenge ... it doesn't makes sense when we think no one complain except both of them
In determining whether a witness is credible, an investigator should (check all that apply):
A. observe the witness's demeanor while speaking
B. refrain from reaching conclusions about a witness's veracity
C. consider the witness's bias and motive to testify
D. consider whether the individual has the ability to make an effective witness
Need help with drivers Ed question
Answer:
It is a two way road
Explanation:
Traffic circles are generally two lanes going in, two lanes coming around and two lanes exiting the circle
Answer:
it's a two-way road I'm pretty sure
Provision that authorizes payment to anyone fairly entitled to insurance proceeds only one to the insurance proceeds by reason of having incurred expenses
Provision that authorizes payment to anyone who is fairly entitled to the insurance proceeds because of having incurred expenses on behalf of the insured for medical treatment and/or burial
Answer:
Facility of Payment Clause
Explanation:
Facility of Payment Clause was formulated to prevent the need to nominate any of the administrator, executor, or guardian to obtain the insurance benefits, and then immediately fasten the settlement of disputes among rival claimants without the unnecessarily wasting time and going through litigation.
Hence, in this case, the right answer is Facility of Payment Clause
discuss three contributing factors that lead to human rights violation
Answer:
Poverty, Lack of education, Lack of law enforcement.
Explanation:
Human rights violations occur when actions by state (or non-state) actors abuse, ignore, or deny basic human rights (including civil, political, cultural, social, and economic rights).
Which of the following parties is permitted to view all entries in the Notary Signing Agent Notary journal?
A) Contracting Companies and Lenders
B) Borrowers and signing Parties
C) Police with a warrant for Journal
Answer:
C) Police with a warrant for Journal
Explanation:
If Kripto sues Attorney Porquine for breach of the Jones-Porquine contract to recover what he would have received under the will, could Attorney Porquine successfully defend himself due to Kripto not having standing to sue? Why or why not?
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
No, Sandy Porquine cannot defend himself successfully. This is because Kripto is the designated beneficiary in the contract between Emma Jones and Sandy Porcupine. Beneficiaries intended to seek a court resolution (have a duty to prosecute) if their contract rights are violated. Sandy Porquine also couldn't apply this theory effectively, Kripto had obtained a right.
Bài 1: Công ty Cổ phần Tấn Tài đăng kí doanh nghiệp ngày 10/10/2015 với 3 cổ đông sáng lập là A, B, C. Công ty có vốn điều lệ là 1 tỷ và phát hành 100.000 cổ phiếu (mỗi cổ phần trị giá 10.000 đồng) trong đó cổ phần phổ thông 800 triệu, 50 triệu CPUD biểu quyết và 150 triệu CPUD cổ tức. Hỏi: a, A, B, C phải đăng kí mua ít nhất bao nhiêu cổ phần phổ thông. b, Ông Đức nắm giữ 10% cổ phần của công ty và muốn mua thêm cổ phần ưu đãi biểu quyết của công ty Tấn Tài. Yêu cầu trên có được không. C, Tháng 10/2019 ông A do không hài lòng với các chính sách của công ty nên đã chuyển nhượng các cổ phần của mình cho người khác. - Ông A có được chuyển nhượng không? Vì sao? - Nếu A chuyển nhượng hết thì hậu quả pháp lý đối với công ty Cổ phần Tấn Tài là gì?
Explanation:
get Garbrumeyjjethztjarhatjztjafnatmstbatnatntn
How Can We Obtain Divorce Certificate in Pakistan?
Answer:
The Process to get the divorce certificate in Pakistan is very long and difficult. ...
1- Provide the legal documents.
2- Prepare the application for a divorce certificate.
3- File the Application in court for a divorce certificate.
4- After proceeding, you can easily get the divorce certificate.
Which of the following is not an instruction that would be given to witnesses to prepare them for trial?
If asked to give exact times or measurements, "approximate" your responses.
It is best to elaborate and give detailed answers to questions.
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand.
Always tell the truth and testify with confidence.
Answer:
Always control your emotions while on the witness stand
Explanation:
Judges are very smart and with your actions while on the witness stand tell them what you mean. so your explanation should. be of reasonable doubt.
Law Enforcement can issue a DUI for driving under the influence of prescription drugs just as they would for
someone who wad been drinking and driving.
A. True.
B. False.
The statement" Law Enforcement can issue a DUI for driving under the influence of prescription drugs just as they would for someone who wad been drinking and driving" is True.
What is Law Enforcement?Law enforcement is the practice of some members of the government acting in a planned manner to uphold the law by identifying, discouraging, treating or punishing those who disobey the laws and social standards that govern that society.
The phrase refers to the legal system, courts, and prisons. By using record sharing and interdependent collaboration, these three elements can function alone or jointly.
The idea of law enforcement has been around since the dawn of time, and police and law enforcement have taken many different forms in all human communities.
The term "peace officer," or "law enforcement officer," is used in modern state legal codes to refer to every person who the legislating state has invested with police power or authority. Traditionally, law enforcement refers to anyone who is sworn or badged and has the authority to detain anyone for violating the law.
Learn more about Law Enforcement, here
https://brainly.com/question/10253135
#SPJ2
Red is a union official. He is faced with a problem when a union member breaks a union bylaw. To address the union member’s fault, Red and union officials meet together and decide to kick the union member out of the union. Which of the following is true
Answer:
red is a union official
Explanation:
that one is true
How are members of house committees determined?
Explanation:
Each of the committee is determined at the beginning of the Congress
mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại tròn xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật đúng hay sai? Giải thích
Answer:
Sai lầm
Explanation:
Mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại trong xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật.
Sai. Các quan hệ xã hội của chúng ta được điều chỉnh bơi các quy phạm đao đức và các quy phạm pháp luật, mà các quy phạm đạo đức thì có thể đượec thể chế hóa và đưa lên thành các quy phạm pháp luật nhưng không phải quy phạm đạo đức nào cũng được dưa lên thành luật cả. Tồn tại xã hội quyết định ý thức xã hội cho nên các quy tắc ứng xử đựoc coi là các chuẩn mực đạo đứa đó đó không nhất thiết phải được xem là pháp luật mà nó song song tồn tại trong xã hội
Which of the following best explains how the need for eldercare impacts
estate planning?
A. Eldercare costs only impact estate planning and estate taxes
for individuals with assets of over $5 million.
B. If eldercare is needed, the individual's estate becomes the
property of the organization providing the care.
C. The high cost can have a significant impact on an estate's
assets and how those assets will eventually be distributed to
beneficiaries
D. Because eldercare is provided by government programs
without any cost to the individual receiving care, it does not
impact estate planning,
Answer:
A. Eldercare costs only impact estate planning and estate taxes
for individuals with assets of over $5 million.
Answer:
C. The high cost can have a significant impact on an estate's
assets and how those assets will eventually be distributed to
beneficiaries
Explanation:
I got it wrong.
relationship between legislation and case law
Explanation:
Common law or case law is law as declared by judges. Legislation is the primary source of law today and all cases start with interpreting the legislation as made by Commonwealth and the States. There are a few notable exceptions to this rule that are common law jurisdictions.
Answer:
Common law or case law is law as declared by judges. Legislation is the primary source of law today and all cases start with interpreting the legislation as made by Commonwealth and the States. There are a few notable exceptions to this rule that are common law jurisdictions
the law enacted by the military is called what
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
The ABC Company is going to be incorporated in the form of a private company. As a promoter, Minh signed a contract with an Equipment provider. Before incorporation, ABC Corporation paid half of the contract via bank account. After incorporation, the company ABC transferred a third of the contract to the Equipment provider’s bank account, then stopped paying. Does Minh have to pay the remaining of the contract?
Answer:
Minh doesn't have to continue paying for the contract.
The type of government in which eligible members of society make decisions by voting is known as what?
What is the first step when investigating an arson?
Photograph the scene of the fire.
Question witnesses who observed the fire burning.
Identify the "plant"—the material used to set the fire.
Identify the point of origin of the fire.
Answer:
identify the plant - the material that used to set the fire
Question 15
Which situation is an example of an observational study?
A. Measuring the weights of patients who come for a check-up in a
hospital
B. Asking voters about the candidate they prefer
C. Testing the effectiveness of a new reading program by allowing a
classroom to use it and comparing the results with another
classroom that doesn't use it
D. Having customers who bought a certain type of car answer
questions about their satisfaction with the car
SUBMIT
Answer:
A. Measuring the weights of patients who come for a check-up in a
hospital
The situation that is an example of an observational study is measuring the weights of patients who come for a check-up in a hospital. The correct option is a.
What is an observational study?The observational study draws inferences from a sample to a population where the independent variable is not under the control of the researcher because of ethical concerns or logistical constraints.
One common observational study is about the possible effect of a treatment on subjects, where the assignment of subjects into a treated group versus a control group is outside the control of the investigator. This is in contrast with experiments, such as randomized controlled trials, where each subject is randomly assigned to a treated group or a control group. Observational studies, for lacking an assignment mechanism, naturally present difficulties for inferential analysis.
A 2014 Cochrane review concluded that observational studies produce results similar to those conducted as randomized controlled trials.
Learn more about study, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30579242
#SPJ7
Chủ thể nào bắt buộc là cá nhân đủ điều kiện theo quy định pháp luật:
a. Cổ đông sáng lập công ty cổ phần c. Thành viên hợp danh
b. Thành viên của công ty hợp danh d. Thành viên công ty TNHH
Answer:
What's this bro
Explanation:
kichdi aaaaaaa
You must submit a report to the DMV within 15 days of a traffic accident on a Traffic accident report form. True or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Quizlet - Unit 6 Lesson 3: Procedures When Involved In An Accident
First question.
