The given statement "One of the main reasons why many economists remain critical of the infant industry argument is its reliance on the assumption that: firms are unable to make efficient long-term investments by borrowing money from the domestic or international capital markets." is true as firms are unable to make efficient long-term investments by borrowing money from the domestic or international capital markets.
According to the infant-industry theory, until new industries in developing nations mature, they must be shielded from competitive pressures. This theory, which was created in the early 19th century by Friedrich List and Alexander Hamilton, is frequently used to support protectionist trade policies.
There are several criticisms of the infant industry argument: Protectionism for emerging industries may promote inefficiency in those industries. Protected emerging industries might not have the incentives they need to be productive and competitive. Protectionism in the early stages of an industry could lead to retaliation from other nations.
(i) To enable the economy to become self-sufficient. To promote domestic production (ii). To promote buying locally produced goods (iii). (iv) To preserve limited foreign currency.
Learn more about infant-industry theory at:
brainly.com/question/28233554
#SPJ4
Which of these have been ruled by the Courts as constitutional and which have been ruled by the Courts as unconstitutional?
Unconstitutional -moment of silence for prayer at a school event
-requiring employers to provide female employees with birth control coverage
-prayer in public schools
Constitutional
-the display of religious symbols, like the Ten Commandments, on public grounds
Unconstitutional - moment of silence for prayer at a school event, requiring employers to provide female employees with birth control coverage, prayer in public schools.
The moment of silence for prayer at a school event was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Wallace v. Jaffree (1985) as it was seen as an endorsement of religion and violated the Establishment Clause.
In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014), the Supreme Court ruled that the requirement for employers to provide female employees with birth control coverage was unconstitutional as it violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Prayer in public schools was also ruled unconstitutional in Engel v. Vitale (1962) as it was seen as a government endorsement of religion and violated the Establishment Clause.
Constitutional - the display of religious symbols, like the Ten Commandments, on public grounds was ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court in Van Orden v. Perry (2005) as long as it has a secular purpose and does not promote a particular religion.
Learn more about Supreme Court :
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ1
____: the process by which one party supplants another as the dominant party in a two-party political system.
A political realignment is the process by which one party supplants another as the dominant party in a two-party political system.
In American politics, the term "realignment" refers to the process in which a party's electoral support base undergoes a fundamental shift, resulting in long-term changes in the balance of power between the two major political parties. The electoral realignment can be attributed to a variety of factors, including demographic shifts, significant events or policy decisions, changes in political culture, and changes in party organizations' strategies.
A realignment occurs when a political party undergoes a major shift ins its political ideology and agenda, resulting in significant changes in its base of support. This shift may result in the creation of a new electoral majority, or it may result in a significant weakening or even the complete collapse of a party's former electoral coalition. As a result, the opposing party may rise to power, and a new era of political dominance may emerge.
For more such questions on realignment
https://brainly.com/question/29668776
#SPJ11
QUESTION 2 "So, the Advocate Dali Mpofu is correct, we can afford free education for all South African children. But where I come from, I do not jubilate at free education, I want to revisit the curriculum; I want to know which publishing companies benefit from the education of our children, where they come from and what their philosophy of education is". Moss Mashamaite (2014). (a) Discuss the above extract with reference to Freire's views on education. (6)
According to the above extract Freire's views on education can be summed up as-
For Freire, education is never neutral. All education is political – either educating to support and maintain the status quo or helping to critique and change reality. Problem-posing education does not and cannot serve the interests of the oppressor.
Education mean today?Education is defined as a cycle of learning that helps a person acquire and understand more complex stuff. According to the training they have received, the knowledge that has been had about a person provides an example of thought and behavior.
The renowned definition of education?Education is an intentional process with certain goals in mind, such as information transmission or the development of abilities and moral character. The growth of comprehension, reason, compassion, and honesty are only a few examples of these objectives.
To know more about Education visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18023991
#SPJ1
Paul buys a bottle of Great Wine. He drinks it and becomes very ill. Doctors find the wine contained anti-freeze.Paul may not sue Great Wine because he assumed the risk of drinking alcohol, an inherently dangerous product. a. True
b. False
"Paul buys a bottle of Great Wine. He drinks it and becomes very ill. Doctors find the wine contained anti-freeze. Paul may not sue Great Wine because he assumed the risk of drinking alcohol, an inherently dangerous product" the statement is true.
In this case, it is true that Paul may not sue Great Wine because he assumed the risk of drinking alcohol, an inherently dangerous product. Although the bottle of Great Wine contained anti-freeze, which was the cause of Paul's illness, he still drank the wine voluntarily and as such assumed the risk that comes with drinking alcohol. The consumption of alcohol is considered an inherently dangerous product, as it is widely known to have risks associated with it such as addiction, health issues, and many others. Therefore, Paul can not sue Great Wine for his illness as he assumed the risk of drinking alcohol.Learn more about anti-freeze: https://brainly.com/question/1382943
#SPJ11
true/false. prosecuting attorneys exercise discretion when determining whether or not to bring charges against the arrestee.
True. Prosecuting attorneys are responsible for deciding whether to bring criminal charges against an individual who has been arrested.
This decision is made based on various factors, such as the strength of the evidence, the seriousness of the offense, and the interests of justice. Prosecutors have discretion in determining whether or not to bring charges, and their decision can have significant consequences for the individual facing the charges. In some cases, prosecutors may decide not to bring charges if they feel that the evidence is weak or if the offense is minor. However, in other cases, they may pursue charges aggressively, seeking the maximum possible penalty for the alleged offense.
To learn more about Prosecuting attorneys visit;
https://brainly.com/question/11394617
#SPJ4
true/false. small claims courts, for the most part, resolve relatively minor disputes with maximum recoveries usually limited to a few hundred dollars at most.
The given statement "small claims courts, for the most part, resolve relatively minor disputes with maximum recoveries usually limited to a few hundred dollars at most." is false as have limited jurisdiction to hear civil cases between private litigants.
Small-claims courts only have limited authority to hear civil disputes involving private parties. Small claims courts may also perform other judicial duties and may go by different names in different jurisdictions. The maximum amount of money that a small-claims court can award in judgments is typically in the tens of thousands of dollars or pounds. The plaintiff typically forfeits any right to seek an amount greater than the court can grant by filing a lawsuit in small claims court. Reducing a claim to meet the requirements of this venue may or may not be permitted by the plaintiff.
Small-claims courts typically have jurisdiction over private disputes involving small sums of money. The routine collection of small debts forms a large portion of the cases brought to small-claims courts, as well as evictions and other disputes between landlords and tenants, unless the jurisdiction is already covered by a tenancy board.
Learn more about small claims courts at:
brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ4
According to Rule 217.12(1), Unprofessional Conduct, one example of an unsafe practice includes failing toA. provide a two-week notice when leaving employment.B. attend a scheduled staff meeting.C. arrive at work on time twice during the last month.D. manage client records properly.
To remain professionally accountable, it is important to provide a two-week notice when leaving employment. (A)
According to Rule 217.12(1), Unprofessional Conduct, failing to provide a two-week notice when leaving employment is an example of an unsafe practice. (A)
In other words, it is a breach of professional standards to not give a two-week notice prior to leaving a job.
By providing such a notice, the employee is respecting the employer’s time and allowing them to properly plan for a replacement. Not doing so can be disruptive to the organization and create a disorganized workflow.
To know more about workflow click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/11939249#
#SPJ11
true or false. testosterone administration induces a red shift in democrats
Answer:
True, testosterone administration induces a red shift in democrats
in the civil trial process,______ are the documents by which each party sets his or her initial case before the court. voir dires demurrers discoveries pleadings
In a civil trial, pleadings are the documents by which each party sets his or her initial case before the court. Thus option d is correct.
A civil trial is a type of court proceeding in which one party tries to hold another party responsible for some harm or wrongdoing that has been done, typically through monetary compensation or other forms of relief.
The defendant, or the person being sued, has the chance to present their case in court as well. A civil trial may be heard before a judge or a jury depending on the circumstances.
Pleadings are the documents by which each party sets their initial case before the court. Pleadings generally include a complaint, an answer, and a counterclaim.
Thus, Pleadings are very important in the civil trial process because they set the stage for the rest of the trial.
Learn more about the civil trials here:
https://brainly.com/question/28151628
#SPJ11
fill in the blank. expansionary fiscal policy will cause gross domestic product to and the interest rate to .
Expansionary fiscal policy will cause gross domestic product to increase and the interest rate to rise.
Expansionary fiscal policy involves increasing government spending and/or reducing taxes, which increases aggregate demand in the economy. This increased demand can lead to higher economic growth and an increase in gross domestic product (GDP).
However, an increase in demand can also lead to higher inflation, which can cause the central bank to raise interest rates in order to cool down the economy and control inflation. As interest rates rise, this can reduce investment and consumption, which can partially offset the positive effects of expansionary fiscal policy on GDP growth.
To know more about fiscal policy click here:
brainly.com/question/27250647
#SPJ4
Please answer What are some advantages and disadvantages of having so many levels of government below the federal government? Please explain:
Advantages, such as shielding us from tyranny, dispersing power, expanding citizen participation, and increasing effectiveness, as well as disadvantages, such as claiming to protect slavery and segregation.
How is federal government better than?The provincial or local governments can be given orders by the central government. Compared to unitary governments, the federal government is superior because It helps to avoid conflict; Governments share power rather than having it centralized. Under unitary government, either there is only one level of government or the sub-units are subordinate to the central government. The central government can issue directives to the provincial or local governments.
To learn more about Government visit :
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ1
What are the guiding principles for first responders' to take when arriving at a potential crime scene?
which amendment preserves the right to a trial by jury in civil cases?
Answer:
The Seventh Amendment
Explanation:
The Supreme Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment protected freedom of speech from state
infringement in the _________ case.
a. Schenk v. United States
b. McCulloch v. Maryland
c. Gibbons v. Ogden
d. Gitlow v. New York
The Supreme Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment protected freedom of speech from state infringement in the d. Gitlow v. New York case.
What is Gitlow v. New York case?Gitlow v. New York is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, decided on June 8, 1925, which upheld the constitutionality of the Espionage Act of 1917, which made it illegal to advocate the overthrow of the United States government by force or violence.
The majority of the justices ruled that the First Amendment didn't prohibit states from suppressing or punishing speech that posed a serious danger to national security, even if it didn't immediately incite an illegal act.
What is the Fourteenth Amendment?The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed by Congress on June 13, 1866, and ratified by the states on July 9, 1868. It granted citizenship to all individuals born or naturalized in the United States and prohibited states from denying any person "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
The correct option is option d.
To know more about Fourteenth Amendment refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/29371683#
#SPJ11
Which is an example of intermediate punishment? state prison sentence electronic monitoring federal prison sentence long-term incarceration
Answer: Electronic monitoring is an example of intermediate punishment.
Explanation:
Intermediate punishment is a type of criminal sentencing that is between traditional probation and incarceration in a correctional facility. It involves the use of alternative sanctions that allow offenders to serve their sentence in the community, while still being supervised and held accountable for their actions. Electronic monitoring, also known as house arrest, involves the use of technology to track an offender's movements and ensure compliance with the conditions of their sentence.
Answer:
Electronic monitoring is an example of intermediate punishment.
When talking to his investment clients, broker Adam often refers to tax shelters. This term typically means?
Explanation:
The term "tax shelter" typically refers to a legal method of reducing taxable income and, therefore, the amount of tax owed. Tax shelters can take many different forms, including investment opportunities such as individual retirement accounts (IRAs), 401(k) plans, and annuities, as well as certain types of business expenses or deductions.
Question 1
Blood type AB is the rarest blood type, occurring in only 4% of the population in the United States. In Australia, only 1.5% of the population has blood type AB. Suppose a random sample of 50 U.S. residents and 40 Australians is obtained. Consider the random variables described below:
X: the number of US residents (out of 50) with blood type AB.
Y: the number of Australians (out of 40) with blood type AB.
Z: the total number of individuals (out of 90) with blood type AB.
Which of the following is true about the random variables X, Y, and Z? Check all that apply.
X is a binomial random variable with n = 50 and p = 0.04
Y is a binomial random variable with n = 30 and p = 0.015
Z is a binomial random variable with n = 90 and p = 0.055
Question 2
In Texas, 30% of parolees from prison return to prison within 3 years. Suppose 15 prisoners are released from a Texas prison on parole. Assume that whether or not one prisoner returns to prison is independent of whether any of the others return to prison. Let the random variable X be the number of parolees out of 15 that return to prison within 3 years. What are the values of the parameters for the binomial random variable X?
n =
p =
X is a binomial random variable with n = 50 and p = 0.04, Y is a binomial random variable with n = 40 and p = 0.015.
The value of n is 15 and p is 0.30 of the parameters for the binomial random variable X
1. X is a binomial random variable with n = 50 and p = 0.04
Y is a binomial random variable with n = 40 and p = 0.015
Z is not a binomial random variable, as it represents the total number of individuals with blood type AB, which is not a fixed number of trials with a constant probability of success.
2. The binomial distribution models the number of successes in a fixed number of independent trials, where each trial has the same probability of success. In this case, X represents the number of parolees out of 15 that return to prison within 3 years, where each parolee is either a success (returns to prison) or a failure (does not return to prison). Since each prisoner's return to prison is independent of the other prisoners' returns, we can model X as a binomial random variable with n = 15 (the number of trials) and p = 0.3 (the probability of success, or the proportion of parolees who return to prison within 3 years).
Therefore, final answer for question 1 is n = 40 and p =0.015 and for question 2 is n = 15 and p = 0.30.
Learn more about binomial random variables: https://brainly.com/question/14446233
#SPJ11
fill in the blank. the risk of a car bomb in a bank is about 1% whereas there is a 60% chance of an attack
The risk of a car bomb in a bank is about 1% whereas there is a 60% chance of an attack with a firearm.
The risk of a car bomb attack is very low, but it is still possible. It is important to be aware of the potential threat and take appropriate safety measures, such as installing protective barriers and surveillance systems.
Additionally, bank staff should be trained to be aware of suspicious activity and report it to the authorities. Finally, individuals should also take safety precautions such as parking in well-lit areas, avoiding leaving valuables in plain sight, and being aware of their surroundings.
To learn more about firearm link is here
brainly.com/question/2590785
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Fill in the blank.
The risk of a car bomb in a bank is about 1% whereas there is a 60% chance of an attack with a ________.
At one point, U.S. presidents accumulated so much power that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. warned of which of the following?
an imperial presidency
a dynamic presidency
a dual presidency
an amorphous presidency
U.S. presidents once grew to have so much authority that Arthur Schlesinger Jr. foresaw an imperial administration.
Imperial administration refers to a type of government that exercises authority over a vast and diverse territory or empire, often involving the rule of one individual or a small group of individuals. In this type of administration, there is a central government that exercises control over various regions, territories, and subject peoples.
The concept of imperial administration has been present throughout history, from ancient empires such as the Roman Empire to modern empires like the British Empire. Imperial administration often involves a hierarchical system of government, with the central government delegating authority to local officials and administrators.
Imperial administration can be both efficient and effective, as it allows for centralized decision-making and coordination of resources. However, it can also be criticized for being overly bureaucratic, oppressive, and authoritarian, as it often relies on force and coercion to maintain control over subject populations.
Overall, imperial administration remains a topic of study and debate, with scholars and policymakers grappling with the advantages and disadvantages of this type of government.
Learn more about Imperial administration here:
https://brainly.com/question/28021557
#SPJ1
the supreme court determined that enslaved people were property and therefore had no legal rights in .
The Supreme Court determined that enslaved people were property and therefore had no legal rights in Dred Scott v. Sandford case.
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case was heard by the United States Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, and ruled on March 6, 1857. This ruling was delivered by the United States Supreme Court’s Chief Justice Roger B. Taney. The case was between a slave named Dred Scott and his master’s widow, who was then residing in Missouri. Scott’s master had moved to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory, both of which were free territories. Dred Scott argued that he and his family should be freed since they had lived in free territory. Taney dismissed this argument and stated that enslaved people were property and therefore had no legal rights.Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford case: https://brainly.com/question/28042544
#SPJ11
in which of the following ways does the british democracy differ from most other parliamentary democracies in europe?
The British democracy differs from the majority of other parliamentary democracies in Europe in that the ruling party may adopt policies with essentially no checks from other levels of government.
The Westminster Parliament represents the idea of full power to legislate on all topics, free from any restrictions from underlying principles of international law or human rights, and now also from EU legislation.
The UK is a parliamentary democracy in europe. After the passage of the First Reform Act in 1832, which gave the vote to 7% of males and reallocated house seats for fairer representation, the UK became a democracy. This was the initial reform in a series that aimed to increase the electorate.
Learn more about parliamentary democracies Visit: brainly.com/question/305301
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
In what ways does the british democracy differ from most other parliamentary democracies in europe?
Which of the following areas of intellectual property law is the least impacted by state statutory or common law? a.) patents b.) copyrights c.) trademarks d.) trade secrets
Trade secrets are the area of intellectual property law that is least impacted by state statutory or common law.
Unlike patents, copyrights, and trademarks, which are governed by federal statutes, trade secret law is primarily based on common law principles that vary from state to state. While there are some federal laws that protect trade secrets, such as the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, the majority of trade secret law is governed by state law. This is because trade secret law is based on the legal principle of confidentiality, which is enforced through contracts and state tort law. As a result, trade secret law varies significantly depending on the jurisdiction in which it is applied.
To know more about Trade secrets click here:
brainly.com/question/31115497
#SPJ4
Under common law, which of the following was true in regard to arson?a. Negligence was sufficient to establish arsonb. Criminal intent was not necessaryc. The requirement of burning did not require that the dwelling be burned completelyd. You could commit arson
Under common law, criminal intent was not necessary in regard to arson. Arson is the criminal act of intentionally and requirement of burning did not require that the dwelling be burned completely under common law. Arson was established if the damage or destruction of the property was caused by fire.
Additionally, common law arson was a crime that required actual, malicious intent to set fire to a structure or property. A person could not be convicted of unlawfully setting fire to buildings or other property. Criminal intent was not necessary under the common law of arson. Criminal intent was the foundation for the most serious charges in most criminal cases under the common law, but arson was an exception.
Negligence was insufficient to establish arson under the common law of arson. The arson if they didn't intend to start a fire or cause harm. Common law is a body of law that has been established through legal decisions made by judges over the centuries. The doctrine of precedent is used in common law. The doctrine of precedent, also known as stare decisis, requires that lower courts must follow the decisions of higher courts that have dealt with similar cases in the past.
To know more about common law refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13522924#
#SPJ11
. The ______ test is used if the classification involves either a suspect class or a fundamental constitutional right.
A. minimum rationality
B. quasi-strict scrutiny
C. rational basis
D. prior restraints
E. strict scrutiny
______: When people use illegitimate means to gain success, in particular professional and organized criminality, including drug trafficking.
Innovation : When people use illegitimate means to gain success, in particular professional and organized criminality, including drug trafficking.
Those who pursue illegal activity while holding onto their dream of success, such as those who engage in illegal drug dealing to make money, are pursuing the "American Dream" in this way. Dr. Melton also made the argument that some people leave society and end up as drug addicts or drifters after realizing they cannot achieve the "American Dream," which can result in abnormal behavior.
Innovation: The acceptance of cultural goals by an individual or group but rejection of the accepted, established methods for achieving those goals. Families involved in organized crime are one example. They adhere to the "American Dream," but they go beyond the law to achieve their objectives.
Learn more about organized crime at:
brainly.com/question/9997722
#SPJ4
Under the ______, courts may be called upon to decide if a state law is invalid because it conflicts with a federal law.
A. minimum rationality approach
B. exclusion clause
C. strict scrutiny approach
D. supremacy clause
E. contract clause
Under the Supremacy Clause, courts may be called upon to decide if a state law is invalid because it conflicts with a federal law.
The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the United States Constitution that establishes the authority of federal law over state law. It essentially states that if there is a conflict between federal law and state law, federal law prevails. This means that state laws that are inconsistent with federal laws can be invalidated by federal courts. The Supremacy Clause is important in maintaining a consistent legal framework across the country, and ensuring that federal laws are not undermined by conflicting state laws.
You can learn more about Supremacy Clause at
https://brainly.com/question/29797201
#SPJ11
Compare and contrast the Uniform Crime Report, the National Crime Victimization Survey, and the Self Report. What are
the differences in the way data are collected for the three primary crime data sources? What are the limitations/weaknesses
of each of the three primary crime data sources (b) Explain the impact of COVID-19 on patterns of crime in (i) your
metropolitan area, county, or state.
A. We can see here that the Uniform Crime Report (UCR), National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), and Self-Report are three primary sources of crime data in the United States.
While each source provides insight into criminal behavior, they differ in the way data is collected and the information they provide.
What is crime?Crime refers to any behavior or action that is prohibited by law and punishable by the government or state. Crimes can range from minor offenses, such as traffic violations or petty theft, to serious offenses. The definition of what constitutes a crime varies by jurisdiction and can change over time as laws are updated and revised.
The UCR is compiled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and provides data on crimes reported to law enforcement agencies across the country. The UCR collects data on eight specific crimes referred to as Part I offenses, including mu'der, ra-pe, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson.
The NCVS is a survey conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) that collects data on victimization experiences of individuals, including both reported and unreported crimes. The survey includes questions on personal and property victimization, reporting to law enforcement, and the perceived effectiveness of the criminal justice system.
Self-report surveys are typically administered to individuals and ask about their involvement in criminal behavior. These surveys are often anonymous and may include questions about drug use, theft, and violent behavior.
Self-report surveys are useful in providing insight into criminal behavior that may not be reported to law enforcement, but are limited by potential social desirability bias and inaccuracies in reporting.
B. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on patterns of crime in many areas. In some regions, crime rates have decreased due to stay-at-home orders and decreased opportunities for criminal activity.
In conclusion, while the UCR, NCVS, and Self-Report provide important insights into criminal behavior, each has limitations and weaknesses. Researchers and policymakers should be aware of these limitations when using crime data to inform policies and decisions.
Learn more about crime reports on https://brainly.com/question/30856039
#SPJ1
the law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 from using any type of wireless device while driving, except in an emergency situation.True or false
In the United States, the answer is partially true. In most states, there are laws restricting the use of wireless devices while driving, especially for young and inexperienced drivers. However, these laws can vary from state to state, and not all states specifically prohibit the use of wireless devices by drivers under the age of 18.
It is important to note that these laws are intended to improve road safety, as the use of wireless devices while driving can significantly increase the risk of accidents. Driver distraction is one of the leading causes of traffic accidents, and the use of wireless devices can increase distraction and the likelihood of accidents.
In summary, in the United States, many laws restrict the use of wireless devices while driving, especially for young and inexperienced drivers. While not all states specifically prohibit the use of wireless devices by drivers under the age of 18, many laws are designed to improve traffic safety and reduce the risk of accidents caused by driver distraction.
Lear More About Laws for less than 18 years
https://brainly.com/question/13321659
#SPJ11
It is true that the law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 from using any type of wireless device while driving, except in an emergency situation.
According to the law it is illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to use any type of wireless device while driving. This also includes talking on the phone, texting, or surfing the internet. Some states have laws that specifically prohibit texting while driving regardless of age. It would be an only exception in case it is an emergency situation, such as calling 911. If anyone use any type of wireless device while driving, sometimes it may lead to dangerous situations like accidents where they put themselves and others also in danger.
To learn more about law click here https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ1
true/false. When at the zero bound, one of the policy alternatives that we discussed would be for the Fed to lower or eliminate the reserve requirement ratio
One of the policy options we explored was for the Fed to reduce or remove the reserve requirement ratio when it reached the zero bound. True.
The notion that interest rates cannot be decreased farther than zero is known as the "Zero Lower Limit." Historically, central banks have utilised monetary policy to influence the economy's interest rate in order to achieve its budgetary goal (s).
In fact, the Fed used a variety of other tactics to overcome the ZLB restriction after the crisis, including large-scale asset purchases (quantitative easing) and providing market participants with advance information on the direction of interest rates. The ZLB issue was not entirely solved by these policy improvements.
Learn more about zero bound Visit: brainly.com/question/29566776
#SPJ4
valley mart told its employees that they would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort. valley mart has committed an unfair labor practice T/F
The statement "valley mart told its employees that they would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort, valley mart has committed an unfair labor practice" is true because it is considered an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
The correct answer is true.
The NLRA is a federal law that protects employees' rights to organize and engage in concerted activity to improve their wages, benefits, and working conditions. This includes the right to form or join a union, bargain collectively with their employer, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid and protection.
Valley Mart's statement that employees would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort is considered an unfair labor practice under the NLRA because it is a form of interference, restraint, or coercion that can intimidate employees and chill the exercise of their protected rights.
To know more about National Labor Relations Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8726856
#SPJ4
