Answer:
Sometimes parents and grandparents like to recount how difficult life was when they were kids, such as having to walk 10+ miles to school (in the snow, uphill both ways). A random sample of 180 teenagers were selected and 40% had heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids. Do these data provide convincing evidence at an α = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50? State: Plan: Do: Conclude:
Explanation:
We want to test if the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.
The significance level is α = 0.05.
The sample size is n = 180 and the proportion of the sample who have heard stories is p = 0.40.
Plan:
We will use a one-sample proportion test.
The null hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is equal to 0.50.
The alternative hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is not equal to 0.50.
We will use a significance level of α = 0.05.
Do:
The test statistic is z = (p - P) / sqrt(P * (1 - P) / n), where P is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis.
The observed test statistic is z = (0.40 - 0.50) / sqrt(0.50 * (1 - 0.50) / 180) = -2.47 (rounded to two decimal places).
The p-value is P(Z ≤ -2.47) + P(Z ≥ 2.47) = 2 * P(Z ≤ -2.47) = 0.013 (rounded to three decimal places), where Z is the standard normal distribution.
Since the p-value is less than the significance level of α = 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclude:
There is convincing evidence at an α = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.
Specifically, the sample proportion of 0.40 suggests that the proportion may be lower than 0.50.
We want to test if the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50. The significance level is a 0.05.
What is the further explanation?The sample size is n 180 and the proportion of the sample who have heard stories is p=0.40. Plan: We will use a one-sample proportion test. The null hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is equal to 0.50. The alternative hypothesis is that the true proportion, p. is not equal to 0.50 We will use a significance level of a=0.05.
Do: The test statistic is z=(p-P)/sqrt(P(1-P)/n), where P is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis. The observed test statistic is z = (0.40-0.50)/sqrt(0.50 (1-0.50)/180) = -2.47 (rounded to two decimal places). The p-value is P(Z<-247) + P(Z ≥2.47)-2 PZ ≤ 2.47) 0.013 (rounded to three decimal places), where Z is the standard normal distribution. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of a=0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. Conclude: There is convincing evidence at an a = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.
Specifically, the sample proportion of 0.40 suggests that the proportion may be lower than 0.50.
Learn more about level, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13947717
#SPJ2
Congress struck a blow against organized labor with the passage of the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act. Which of the following were features of this legislation?
feature of the Taft-Hartley Act
-granted the president the ability to suspend strikes
-forced union officials to swear that they were not communists
-prohibited mandatory union membership in unionized workplaces
Last option . The features of the Taft-Hartley Act: prohibited mandatory union membership in unionized workplaces
What did the Taft-Hartley Act do?The Taft-Hartley Act, also known as the Labor Management Relations Act, was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1947. The legislation was designed to restrict the power of labor unions and strengthen the position of employers in labor disputes. Some of the key features of the Taft-Hartley Act included:
Prohibition of mandatory union membership in unionized workplaces: This meant that workers could not be forced to join a union in order to work in a unionized workplace.
Granting the president the ability to suspend strikes: The act allowed the president to order a cooling-off period of up to 80 days in cases where a strike threatened national security or the public welfare.
Forcing union officials to swear that they were not communists: The act required union officials to sign an affidavit stating that they were not members of the Communist Party or any other organization that advocated the overthrow of the U.S. government.
The Taft-Hartley Act was controversial at the time it was passed and remains a contentious issue today. Supporters of the act argue that it helped to balance the power between employers and unions, while opponents argue that it unfairly restricted the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively.
Read more on Taft-Hartley Act.
https://brainly.com/question/10748899
#SPJ1
In the 1920s how many U.S. workers were annually replaced by machines?
During Industrialization, 200,000 American employees were displaced by machines as the speed of technical advancement advanced drastically in the 1920s.
Mass manufacturing methods, including the assembly line, were used, enabling producers to make things more swiftly and effectively than ever before. Several skilled individuals who were no longer required for the industrial process were displaced as a result.
Almost 5 million American employees lost their employment between 1923 and 1930, according to one estimate, as a result of technical developments. Due to the fact that many employees were compelled to retrain for new occupations or risk long-term unemployment, this had a significant effect on the economy and society.
Learn more about 1920 industrialization at
https://brainly.com/question/1732620
#SPJ4
Who plays Lincoln in history of the world 2?
Michael Jai White plays Lincoln in the second installment of the History of the World series. Michael Jai White is an American actor and martial artist known for his roles in the Tyler Perry films and the Spawn movie.
He has also made appearances in popular television shows like The Dark Knight, ER, and The Game. Michael Jai White has won several awards for his martial arts and acting prowess and is one of the few actors to play a major role in both the martial arts and acting fields.The film is a comedy that parodies several historical periods and events, but it does not have a plot that revolves around Abraham Lincoln or any other American president.Instead, the movie has several unrelated skits and segments that spoof different historical periods, such as the Stone Age, the Roman Empire, and the French Revolution.
The movie was directed and co-written by Mel Brooks, a well-known comedian and filmmaker, who also appears in several roles throughout the film.As such, if you were expecting to see Abraham Lincoln portrayed in a comedic fashion, you will be disappointed, as the movie does not feature this character. However, if you enjoy absurdist humor and parodies of different historical eras, you might still find the movie entertaining.
For such more questions on Michael J:
brainly.com/question/14767013
#SPJ11
During the Meiji Restoration, fought to
as fast as possible and as a result changed its significantly.
Answer: During the Meiji Restoration, Japan fought to modernize as fast as possible and as a result changed its society and economy significantly.
Explanation:
The Meiji Restoration was a period in Japanese history that began in 1868 and lasted until 1912. It marked the end of the Tokugawa shogunate and the restoration of imperial rule under Emperor Meiji. During this time, Japan underwent a series of rapid reforms and modernization efforts, including the adoption of Western-style institutions, education, technology, and industry. These changes allowed Japan to transform itself into a modern nation and emerge as a major player on the world stage.