Answer: [tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a multiplication problem. You are multiplying [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] by 4. This also means 4 divided by 3. They are both the same.
Solve for x: 3(x + 1)= -2(x - 1) + 6.
Answer:
x=1
Step-by-step explanation:
3(x + 1)= -2(x - 1) + 6.
Distribute
3x+3 = -2x+2+6
Combine like terms
3x+3 = -2x+8
Add 2x to each side
3x+3+2x = 8
5x+3 = 8
Subtract 3 from each side
5x =5
Divide by 5
x =1
A Markov chain has 3 possible states: A, B, and C. Every hour, it makes a transition to a different state. From state A, transitions to states B and C are equally likely. From state B, transitions to states A and C are equally likely. From state C, it always makes a transition to state A.
(a) If the initial distribution for states A, B, and C is P0 = ( 1/3 , 1/3 , 1/3 ), find the distribution of X2
(b) Find the steady state distribution by solving πP = π.
Answer:
A) distribution of x2 = ( 0.4167 0.25 0.3333 )
B) steady state distribution = [tex]\pi a \frac{4}{9} , \pi b \frac{2}{9} , \pi c \frac{3}{9}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello attached is the detailed solution for problems A and B
A) distribution states for A ,B, C:
Po = ( 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 ) we have to find the distribution of x2 as attached below
after solving the distribution
x 2 = ( 0.4167, 0.25, 0.3333 )
B ) finding the steady state distribution solving
[tex]\pi p = \pi[/tex]
below is the detailed solution and answers
Suppose the following data show the prices of 4 cars with similar characteristics that sold at a recent auction (in thousands of dollars): 6.6, 5, 10.7, 7.3. Calculate the standard deviation of the sample of selling prices. (please express your answer using 2 decimal places)
Answer: 2.40
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: The prices of 4 cars with similar characteristics that sold at a recent auction (in thousands of dollars): 6.6, 5, 10.7, 7.3.
Let x: 6.6, 5, 10.7, 7.3.
n= 4
Mean : [tex]\overline{x}=\dfrac{\sum x}{n}[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow\ \overline{x}=\dfrac{6.6+5+10.7+7.3}{4}\\\\=\dfrac{29.6}{4}\\\\=7.4[/tex]
Now , standard deviation = [tex]\sqrt{\dfrac{\sum(x-\overline{x})^2}{n-1}}[/tex]
[tex]=\sqrt{\dfrac{(6.6-7.4)^2+( 5-7.4)^2+( 10.7-7.4)^2+( 7.3-7.4)^2}{4-1}}\\\\=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.64+5.76+10.89+0.01}{3}}\\\\=\sqrt{\dfrac{17.3}{3}}\approx2.40[/tex]
Hence, the standard deviation of the sample of selling prices = 2.40
If AD=2/3AB, the ratio of the length of BC to the length of DE is A. 1/6 B. 1/4 C. 3/2 D. 3/4
Answer:
The correct answer is c
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
C.) 3/2
Explanation:
PLATO
A random sample of 11 students produced the following data, where x is the hours spent per month playing games, and y is the final exam score (out of a maximum of 50 points). The data are presented below in the table of values.
x y
14 46
15 49
16 37
17 42
18 37
19 31
20 25
21 23
22 20
23 15
24 12
What is the value of the intercept of the regression line, b, rounded to one decimal place?
Answer:
b = - 3.7
Step-by-step explanation:
here are the data values:
x y XY X²
14 46 644 196
15 49 735 225
16 37 592 256
17 42 714 289
18 37 666 324
19 31 589 361
20 25 500 400
21 23 483 441
22 20 440 484
23 15 345 529
24 12 288 576
now we are required to find the summation (total) of all values of X, Y, XY and X².
∑X = 209
∑Y = 337
∑XY = 5996
∑X² = 4081
The formular for finding b is given as:
b = n∑XY - (X)(Y) / n∑X² - (∑X)²
= 11(5996) - (209)(337) / 11(4081) - (209)²
= 65956 - 70433 / 44891 - 43681
= -4477/ 1210
= -3.7
The question asked us to find the value of b but we can go further to find the equation of the regression line:
a = ∑Y - b∑X / n
= 337 - (-3.7)(209)/ 11
=1110.3/11
= 100.94
the equation is:
Y = 100.94 - 3.7X
I hope you find my solution useful!
=
The size of a television is the length of the diagonal of its screen in inches. The aspect ratio of the screens of older televisions is 4:3, while the aspect ratio of newer wide-screen televisions is 16:9. Find the width and height of an newer 75-inch television whose screen has an aspect ratio of 16:9
Answer:
The Width = 65.44 inches
The Height = 36.81 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
We are told in the question that:
The width and height of an newer 75-inch television whose screen has an aspect ratio of 16:9
Using Pythagoras Theorem we known that:
Width² + Height² = Diagonal²
Since we known that the size of a television is the length of the diagonal of its screen in inches.
Hence, for this new TV
Width² + Height² = 75²
We are given ratio: 16:9 as aspect ratio
Width = 16x
Height = 9x
(16x)² +(9x)² = 75²
= 256x² + 81x² = 75²
337x² = 5625
x² = 5625/337
x² = 16.691394659
x = √16.691394659
x = 4.0855103303
Approximately x = 4.09
For the newer 75 inch tv set
The Height = 9x
= 9 × 4.09
= 36.81 inches
The Width = 16x
= 16 × 4.09
= 65.44 inches.
In a recent year, the scores for the reading portion of a test were normally distributed, with a mean of and a standard deviation of . Complete parts (a) through (d) below. (a) Find the probability that a randomly selected high school student who took the reading portion of the test has a score that is less than . The probability of a student scoring less than is nothing. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) (b) Find the probability that a randomly selected high school student who took the reading portion of the test has a score that is between and . The probability of a student scoring between and is nothing. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) (c) Find the probability that a randomly selected high school student who took the reading portion of the test has a score that is more than . The probability of a student scoring more than is nothing. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) (d) Identify any unusual events. Explain your reasoning. Choose the correct answer below. A. than 0.05. B. than 0.05. C. The event in part is unusual because its probability is less than 0.05. D. The events in parts are unusual because its probabilities are less than 0.05.
The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question.
In a recent year, the socres for the reading portion of a test were normally distributed, with a mean of 23.3 and a standard deviation of 6.4. Complete parts (a) through (d) below.
(a) Find the probability that a randomly selected high school student who took the reading portion of the test has a score that is less than 18. (Round to 4 decimal places as needed.)
(b) Find a probability that a random selected high school student who took the reading portion of the test has a score that is between 19.9 and 26.7.
(c) Find a probability that a random selected high school student who took the reading portion of the test ahs a score that is more than 36.4.
(d) Identify any unusual events. Explain your reasoning.
Answer: (a) P(X<18) = 0.2033
(b) P(19.9<X<26.7) = 0.4505
(c) P(X>36.4) = 0.0202
(d) Unusual event: P(X>36.4)
Step-by-step explanation: First, determine the z-score by calculating:
[tex]z = \frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
Then, use z-score table to determine the values.
(a) x = 18
[tex]z = \frac{18-23.3}{6.4}[/tex]
z = -0.83
P(X<18) = P(z< -0.83)
P(X<18) = 0.2033
(b) x=19.9 and x=26.7
[tex]z = \frac{19.9-23.3}{6.4}[/tex]
z = -0.67
[tex]z = \frac{26.7-23.3}{6.4}[/tex]
z = 0.53
P(19.9<X<26.7) = P(z<0.53) - P(z< -0.67)
P(19.9<X<26.7) = 0.7019 - 0.2514
P(19.9<X<26.7) = 0.4505
(c) x=36.4
[tex]z = \frac{36.4-23.3}{6.4}[/tex]
z = 2.05
P(X>36.4) = P(z>2.05) = 1 - P(z<2.05)
P(X>36.4) = 1 - 0.9798
P(X>36.4) = 0.0202
(d) Events are unusual if probability is less than 5% or 0.05. So, part (c) has an unusual event.
The probability will be:
(a) 0.2038
(b) 0.4046
(c) 0.0203
(d) Event in part (c) is unusual.
According to the question,
[tex]\mu = 23.2[/tex][tex]\sigma = 6.4[/tex]Let,
"X" shows the test scores.(a)
The z-score for X=18 will be:
→ [tex]z = \frac{X- \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{18-23.3}{6.4}[/tex]
[tex]= -0.828[/tex]
So,
The probability will be:
→ [tex]P(X<18) = P(z < -0.828)[/tex]
[tex]= 0.2038[/tex]
(b)
The z-score for X=19.9 will be:
→ [tex]z = \frac{X -\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{19.9-23.3}{6.4}[/tex]
[tex]= -0.531[/tex]
The z-score for X=26.7 will be:
→ [tex]z = \frac{X -\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{26.7-23.3}{6.4}[/tex]
[tex]= 0.531[/tex]
So,
The probability will be:
→ [tex]P(19.9 < X< 23.3) = P(-0.531 < z< 0.531)[/tex]
[tex]= 0.4046[/tex]
(c)
The z-score for X=36.4 will be:
→ [tex]z = \frac{X -\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{36.4-23.3}{6.4}[/tex]
[tex]= 2.047[/tex]
So,
The probability will be:
→ [tex]P(X > 36.4 )= P(z > 2.047)[/tex]
[tex]= 0.0203[/tex]
(d)
Just because it's probability value is less than 0.05, so that the events is "part c" is unusual.
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/23044118
State the correct polar coordinate for the graph shown:
Answer:
Solution : ( - 5, 5π / 4 )
Step-by-step explanation:
There are four cases to consider here, the first two with respect to r > 0, the second two with respect to r < 0. r is the directed distance from the pole, and theta is the directed angle from the positive x - axis. Let's start by listing coordinates when r is positive. r here is 5 units from the positive x - axis.
( 5, θ ) theta here is between 30 and 60 degrees, so we can say it's about 45 degrees.
( 5, θ ) theta here is the remaining negative side of 360 - 45 = 315. That would make it - 315.
And when r is negative ( r < 0 ),
( - 5, θ ) now the point is going to lie on the ray pointing in the opposite direction of the terminal side of theta. This will be 45 degrees more than 180, or 180 + 45 = 225 degrees.
Right away we know that ( - 5, 225° ) is our solution, we don't have to consider the second case. Converting 225 to radians in terms of π will be 5π / 4 radians, giving us a solution of ( - 5, 5π / 4 ) or option b.
Kelvin wants to know whether he skied without falling more than twice as long as anyone else in his family. His dad tells him that he can check by using the inequality 2f < 223, where f is the time skied in seconds for each person. Plug the values for the time skied by each person into the inequality to find the answer.
Lori 55
Vanessa 265
Devon 172
Celia 112
Arnold 356
Answer:
Kelvin did not skied without falling more than twice as long as anyone else in his family.
Step-by-step explanation:
The inequality representing the event where Kelvin skied without falling more than twice as long as anyone else in his family is:
[tex]2f<223[/tex]
Here 223 is the time for Kelvin.
Check for Lori as follows:[tex]2f<223[/tex]
[tex]2\times 55=110<223[/tex]
Kelvin skied without falling more than twice as long as Lori.
Check for Vanessa as follows:[tex]2f<223[/tex]
[tex]2\times 265=530>223[/tex]
Kelvin skied without falling less than twice as long as Vanessa.
Check for Devon as follows:[tex]2f<223[/tex]
[tex]2\times 172=344>223[/tex]
Kelvin skied without falling less than twice as long as Devon.
Check for Celia as follows:[tex]2f<223[/tex]
[tex]2\times 112=224>223[/tex]
Kelvin skied without falling less than twice as long as Celia.
Check for Arnold as follows:[tex]2f<223[/tex]
[tex]2\times 356=712>223[/tex]
Kelvin skied without falling less than twice as long as Arnold.
Thus, Kelvin did not skied without falling more than twice as long as anyone else in his family.
Answer:
Yes, Kevin skied 2x as long as Lori.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kevin's time was 223 seconds; Lori's time was 110 seconds.
110^2 = 220 or 110 multiplied by 2 equals 220 or 110 x 2 = 220 or
110 * 2 = 220
Thus, Kevin indeed, skied twice as long as Lori.
find the domain of the graphed function.
Find the product of the roots of the equation
xl-5x - 36 = 0
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello, I assume that you mean
[tex]x^2-5x-36[/tex]
The product is -36.
[tex]x_1 \text{ and } x_2 \text{ are the two roots, we can write}\\\\(x-x_1)(x-x_2)=x^2-(x_1+x_2)x+x_1\cdot x_2[/tex]
So in this example, it means that the sum is 5 and the product is -36.
Thank you
Consider a bag of jelly beans that has 30 red, 30 blue, and 30 green jelly beans. a) How many color combinations of 15 beans have at least 6 green beans
Answer:
680
Step-by-step explanation:
Number of red beans = 30
Number of Blue beans = 30
Number of green beans = 30
How many color combinations of 15 beans have at least 6 green beans?
Since at least 6 of the beans must be green,
Then (15 - 6) = 9
Then, the remaining 9 could be either red, blue or green.
Therefore, C(9 + (9 - 1), 3)
C(17, 3) = 17C3
nCr = n! ÷ (n-r)! r!
17C3 = 17! ÷ (17 - 3)! 3!
17C3 = 17! ÷ 14!3!
17C3 = (17 * 16 * 15) / (3 * 2)
17C3 = 4080 / 6
17C3 = 680 ways
Using the combination formula, it is found that there are 17,157,323,000,000,000 color combinations of 15 beans have at least 6 green beans.
The order in which the beans are chosen is not important, hence, the combination formula is used to solve this question.
Combination formula:
[tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by:
[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]
Th total number of combinations of 15 beans from a set of 30 + 30 + 30 = 90 is:
[tex]C_{90,15} = \frac{90!}{15!75!} = 45795674000000000[/tex]
With less than 6 green, we have:
0 green:
[tex]C_{30,0}C_{60,15} = \frac{60!}{15!45!} = 53194089000000[/tex]
1 green:
[tex]C_{30,1}C_{60,14} = \frac{30!}{1!29!} \times \frac{60!}{14!46!} = 520376960000000[/tex]
2 green:
[tex]C_{30,2}C_{60,13} = \frac{30!}{2!28!} \times \frac{60!}{13!47!} = 2247585600000000[/tex]
3 green:
[tex]C_{30,3}C_{60,12} = \frac{30!}{3!27!} \times \frac{60!}{12!48!} = 5681396900000000[/tex]
4 green:
[tex]C_{30,4}C_{60,11} = \frac{30!}{4!26!} \times \frac{60!}{11!49!} = 9391696900000000[/tex]
5 green:
[tex]C_{30,5}C_{60,10} = \frac{30!}{5!25!} \times \frac{60!}{10!50!} = 10744101000000000[/tex]
Hence, the total for the number of combinations with less than 5 green is:
[tex]53194089000000 + 520376960000000 + 2247585600000000 + 5681396900000000 + 9391696900000000 + 10744101000000000 = 28638351000000000[/tex]
Subtracting the total amount of combinations from the number with less than 5 green, the number of combinations with at least 6 green is:
[tex]T = 45795674000000000 - 28638351000000000 = 17157323000000000[/tex]
There are 17,157,323,000,000,000 color combinations of 15 beans have at least 6 green beans.
A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24437717
Decide if the situation involves permutations, combinations, or neither. Explain your reasoning. Does the situation involve permutations, combinations, or neither? Choose the correct answer below. A. B. C. Neither. A line of people is neither an ordered arrangement of objects, nor a selection of objects from a group of objects.
Answer:
C. Neither
Step-by-step explanation:
The permutation is a selection of objects from a given sample in an ordered manner .
The combination is a selection of objects from a given sample irrespective of an order of arrangement.
The given line of people is neither an ordered arrangement of objects, nor a selection of objects from a group of objects So it fits neither of the combinations or permutations.
So the best answer is neither.
If f(x)=4x-6 and g(x) vx+2 what is (f*g)(7)
Answer: The value of (f*g)(7) is 66.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given functions: [tex]f(x)= 4x-6\text{ and } g(x)=\sqrt{x+2}[/tex]
Since, product of two functions: [tex](u*v)(x)=u(x)\times v(x)[/tex]
[tex](f*g)(x)=f(x)\times g(x)\\\\=4x-6\times \sqrt{x+2}\\\\\Rightarrow\ (f*g)(x)=(4x-6) \sqrt{x+2}[/tex]
[tex](f*g)(7)=(4(7)-6)\sqrt{7+2}\\\\=(28-6)\sqrt{9}\\\\=22\times 3=66[/tex]
Hence, the value of (f*g)(7) is 66.
An article contained the following observations on degree of polymerization for paper specimens for which viscosity times concentration fell in a certain middle range:
418 421 421 422 425 428 431 435 437
438 445 447 448 453 458 462 465
(c) Calculate a two-sided 95% confidence interval for true average degree of polymerization. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) Note that it is plausible that the given sample observations were selected from a normal distribution and there are no outliers.
(___ , ___)
Does the interval suggest that 441 is a plausible value for true average degree of polymerization?
Yes or No
Does the interval suggest that 451 is a plausible value?
Yes or No
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Form a set of values we get
n = 17
And with the help of a calculator
μ₀ = 438,47
σ = 14,79
Normal Distribution is : N ( 438,47 ; 14,79 )
c)
CI = 95 % means α = 5 % α/2 = 2,5 % α/2 = 0,025
and as n < 30 we should use t-student distribution with n -1 degree of freedom df = 16. t score for 0,025 and 16 s from t-table 2,120
By definition:
CI = [ μ₀ ± t α/2 ; n-1 * σ/√n ]
CI = [ μ₀ ± 2,120* 14,79/√17 ]
CI = [ μ₀ ± 7,60 ]
CI = [ 438,47 ± 7,60 ]
CI = [ 430,87 ; 446,07 ]
95% confidence interval for true average degree of polymerization is [430.87 ; 446.07] and this interval suggest that 441 is a plausible value for true average degree of polymerization and also this interval does not suggest that 451 is a plausible value.
Given :
Sample = [ 418, 421, 421, 422, 425, 428, 431, 435, 437, 438, 445, 447, 448, 453, 458, 462, 465 ]95% confidence interval.The total number of values given is, n = 17
Mean, [tex]\mu_0=438.47[/tex]
Standard Deviation, [tex]\sigma = 14.79[/tex]
The normal distribution is given by: N (438.47 ; 14.79)
If Cl is 95% then [tex]\alpha[/tex] is 5% and [tex]\alpha /2[/tex] is 2.5%
[tex]\alpha /2 = 0.025[/tex]
Now, use t-statistics distribution with (n-1) degree of freedom df = 16
So, the t score for 0.025 and 16 s from t-table 2.120.
[tex]\rm Cl = [\mu_0 \pm t_{\alpha /2};(n-1)\times \dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} }][/tex]
[tex]\rm Cl = [\mu_0 \pm 2.120\times \dfrac{14.79}{\sqrt{17} }][/tex]
[tex]\rm Cl = [\mu_0 \pm 7.60][/tex]
Cl = [430.87 ; 446.07]
Yes, the interval suggests that 441 is a plausible value for true average degree of polymerization.
No, the interval does not suggest that 451 is a plausible value.
For more information, refer to the link given below;
https://brainly.com/question/2561151
4 solid cubes were made out of the same material. All four have different side lengths: 6cm, 8cm, 10cm, and 12cm. How to distribute the cubes onto two plates of a scale so the scale is balanced? Answer: A= the cube with side length 6 cm, B= the cube with side length 8 cm, C= the cube with side length 10 cm, D= the cube with side length 12 cm. On one side of the scale : , on the other side of the scale
Answer: The cube with side length of 12cm is alone in one plate, the other 3 cubes are in the other plate.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have 4 cubes with side lengths of:
6cm, 8cm, 10cm and 12cm.
Now, some things you need to know:
If we want a scale to be balanced, then the mass in both plates must be the same.
The volume of a cube of side length L is:
V = L^3
And the mass of an object of density D, and volume V is:
M = D*V.
As all the cubes are of the same material, all of them have the same density, so the fact that we do not know the value of D actually does not matter here.
Then we want to forms two groups of cubes in such a way that the total volume in each plate is the same (or about the same), the volumes of the cubes are:
Cube of 6cm:
V = (6cm)^3 = 216cm^3
Cube of 8cm:
V = (8cm)^3 = 512cm^3
Cube of 10cm:
V = (10cm)^3 = 1000cm^3
cube of 12cm
V = (12cm)^3 = 1728cm^3
First, if we add the volumes of the first two cubes, we have:
V1 = 216cm^3 + 512cm^3 = 728cm^3
Now we can see that we add 1000cm^3 the volume will be equal to the volume of the larger cube, so here we can also add the cube with side length of 10cm
Then the volume of the 3 smaller cubes together is:
V1 = 216cm^3 + 512cm^3 + 1000cm^3 = 1728cm^3.
Then, if we want to have the same volume in each plate, then we need to have the 3 smaller cubes in one plate, and the larger cube in the other plate.
What is the rise over run for the slope -11/9
Answer: 11 down and 9 right
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope IS rise over run where the top number of the fraction (numerator) determines the vertical distance --> positive is up, negative is down
and the bottom number of the fraction (denominator) determines the horizontal distance --> positive is right, negative is left.
Given slope = -11/9
the numerator is -11 so the "rise" is DOWN 11 units
the denominator is 9 so the "run" is RIGHT 9 units
A researcher measures daily driving distance from college and weekly cost of gas for a group of commuting college students. What kind of correlation is likely to be obtained for these two variables?
Answer:
There is a positive correlation between these two variables.
Step-by-step explanation:
Positive correlation is an association amid two variables in which both variables change in the same direction.
A positive correlation occurs when one variable declines as the other variable declines, or one variable escalates while the other escalates.
As the distance covered by the vehicle increases the amount of gas consumed also increases. Thus, the weekly cost of gas will also increase.
Thus, there is a positive correlation between these two variables.
HELP PLEASE PLEASE :(
Answer:
16
Step-by-step explanation:
It’s a ratio.
x/12=21/28
21x=12*28
21x=336
x=336/21
x=16
Twelve apples cost $2.00. How much will 50 apples cost?
Answer:
$8.33
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]Solve \:using \: proportion\\\\12\:apples = \$ 2\\50\:apples = \$ x\\Cross \: Multiply\\\\12x = 100\\\\\\\frac{12x}{12} = \frac{100}{12} \\\\x = \$ 8.333[/tex]
Answer:
About $8.33.
Step-by-step explanation:
Write a proportion. Make sure the values line up horizontally:
[tex]\frac{12\text{ apples}}{\$2} =\frac{50\text{ apples}}{\$x}[/tex]
Cross multiply:
[tex]100=12x\\x=25/3\approx\$8.33[/tex]
Question
Consider this expression.
4/2² - 6²
Type the correct answer in the box. Use numerals instead of words. For help, see this worked example e.
When a =
-5 and b = 3, the value of the expression is
Submit
Answer:
16
Step-by-step explanation:
4 * sqrt( a^2 - b^2)
Let a = -5 and b =3
4 * sqrt( (-5)^2 - 3^2)
Do the squaring first
4 * sqrt( 25 - 9)
Subtract inside the square root
4 * sqrt( 16)
Take the square root
4 * 4
Multiply 16
Answer:
[tex]\Large \boxed{16}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]4\sqrt{a^2-b^2 }[/tex]
[tex]\sf Plug \ in \ the \ values \ for \ a \ and \ b.[/tex]
[tex]4\sqrt{-5^2-3^2 }[/tex]
[tex]4\sqrt{25-9 }[/tex]
[tex]4\sqrt{16}[/tex]
[tex]4 \times 4=16[/tex]
Find the distance between the points. Give an exact answer and an approximation to three decimal places.
(3.1,0.3) and (2.7. - 4.9)
The exact distance is
(Simplify your answer. Type an exact ans
Answer: sqrt(27.2) =approx 5.215
Step-by-step explanation:
The distance between 2 points can be calculated using Phitagor theorem
L= sqrt( (x1-x2)²+(y1-y2)²)
Where x1, y1 are the coordinates of the first point and x2, y2 are the coordinates of the 2-nd point.
L=sqrt((3.1-2.7)²+(0.3-(-4.9))²)= sqrt(0.4²+5.2²)=sqrt(27.2) - this is exact answer.
sqrt(27.2)=5.21536...=approx 5.215
if P(x)=1+6x-5x^2 represents the profit in selling x thousand Boombotix speakers, how many speakers should be sold to maximize profit?
Answer:
600
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]p(x) = 1 + 6x - 5x^2[/tex]
x max = [tex]-b/2a[/tex]
a = -5
b = 6
-6/2(-5) = 6/10 = 3/5 = .6
.6 thousand = 600
600 speakers should be sold.
Alternatively, you can check the vertex of the parabola formed.
Suppose we want to choose 6 colors, without replacement, from 14 distinct colors. (a) How many ways can this be done, if the order of the choices matters? (b) How many ways can this be done, if the order of the choices does not matter?
Answer:
(a) 2,162,160
(b) 3,003
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) order matters
You can choose from 14 for the first pick. Then you have 13 left for the second pick. Then you have 12 left for the third pick. Keep going until you have 9 left for the 6th pick. The number when order matters is:
total = 14 * 13 * 12 * 11 * 10 * 9 = 2,162,160
(b) Order does not matter
Start with the same number as above for picking 6 out of 14. Since order does not matter, we divide by the number of ways you can arrange 6 items.
Since there are 6! ways of arranging 6 items,
total = 2,162,160/6! = 3,003
The number of ways when the order matters are 121080960.
The number of ways when order does not matters are 3003.
Given,
Choose 6 colors, without replacement, from 14 distinct colors.
We have to find:
- How many ways can this be done, if the order of the choices matters.
- How many ways can this be done if the order of the choices does not matter.
What are permutation and combination?We use permutation when the order of the arrangements matters.
It is given by:
[tex]^ nP_r[/tex] = n! / r!
We use combination when order does not matter.
It is given by:
[tex]^nC_{r}[/tex] = n! / r! (n-r)!
Find the number of ways when order matters.
We have,
n = 14 and r = 6
[tex]^{14}P_{6}[/tex]
= 14! / 6!
= (14 x 13 x 12 x 11 x 10 x 9 x 8 x 7 x 6!) / 6!
= 4 x 13 x 12 x 11 x 10 x 9 x 8 x 7
= 121080960
Find the number of ways when order does not matter.
We have,
n = 14 and r = 6
[tex]^{14}C_{6}[/tex]
= 14! / 6! 8!
= 14 x 13 x 12 x 11 x 10 x 9 / 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2
= 7 x 13 x 11 x 3
= 3003
Thus,
The number of ways when the order matters are 121080960.
The number of ways when order does not matters are 3003.
Learn more about combination here:
https://brainly.com/question/28134115
#SPJ2
Open the graphing tool. Move the slider for the equation y = kx3 to a position of your choice, where k ≠ 1. Next, move the slider of y = (kx)3 so the two graphs lie on top of one another. How do the values of k compare with one another in this situation? Why do you think that is?
Answer:
For the functions to coincide, the value of k in y = (kx)3 must be smaller than in y = kx3. This is because the value of y changes more rapidly when k is cubed inside the parentheses. The behavior of the functions is similar since a vertical stretch is similar to a horizontal compression.
Step-by-step explanation:
PLATO
a sheet metal worker earns $26.80 per hour after receiving a 4.5% raise. what was the sheet metal worker's hourly pay before raise? Round your answer to the nearest cent
Answer
$25.59
Step-by-step explanation:
subtract by percentage or you can also do:
100% - 4.5% = 95.5%
95.5% x $26.80 = $25.594
IF ROUNDED: $25.59
Answer:
$25.65
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the original hourly rate be r.
Then 1.045r + $26.80/hr.
Dividing both sides by 1.045, we get:
$26.80/hr
r = ------------------ = $25.65 This was the before-raise pay rate.
1.045
(math and social studies) The two lines are messing me up and I'm not sure
Answer:
2009
Step-by-step explanation:
A deficit would be the least amount coming in (Revenues). and the most going out (Expenditures). So you look for the biggest gap. It appears the gap is largest in 2009.
which expression is equivalent to(x²y)³?
Answer:
x^6 y^3
Step-by-step explanation:
(x²y)³
We know that (ab) ^c = a^c * b^c
(x²y)³ = x^2 ^3 * y^3
We know that a^b^c = a^(b*c)
(x²y)³ = x^2 ^3 * y^3 = x^( 2*3) y^3 = x^6 y^3
This person did something wrong and I do not know what it is :( Please help this is for points!
Answer:
0.4 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
The magnifying glass basically zooms into smaller objects. If the insect appears to be 2cm, then it is actually smaller than this. It cannot be 10 cm.
If the scale factor is 5, then this means that the insect is zoomed in 5 times through the magnifying glass. Use the following ratio:
[tex]\frac{2}{5}[/tex]
This fraction can also be seen as division, so:
[tex]2[/tex]÷[tex]5=0.4[/tex]
The insect is actually 0.4 cm long.
(or 4 millimeters)
:Done
The cost in dollars y of producing x computer
desks is given by y = 40x + 4000
X
100
200
300
a. Complete the table
y
b. Find the number of computer desks that can be produced for $6200. (Hint: Find x when y = 6200.)
a. Complete the table.
х
100
200
300
y
b. For $6200,_ computer desks can be produced
Answer:
a.
y= 40x +4000
x= 100 --> y= 40(100)+4000= 4000+4000=8000
x=200 --> y= 40(200)+4000= 6000+4000= 10000
x=300 --> y= 40(300)+4000= 12000+4000= 16000
(in $)
b.
y= 40x+4000
6200= 40x+4000
6200-4000= 40x
2200= 40x
2200/40= x
55= x
(in unit)
Step-by-step explanation:
I hope this helps
if u have question let me know in comments ^_^