1
Drag and drop the
labels to the correct
sides using Angle A
as a reference.
A
boy
3
4
hypotenuse
adjacent
opposite
5
6

Answer:

The brothers would not sell any ton.

Step-by-step explanation:

Facts we are given;

-Fresno coounty is the largest agriculture procuring county.

-It has harvested more than 99000 acres

-Fresno sold at $4300 a ton of almonds

For the Sagardia Brothers;

-Grew 600 acres of almond

- Sold at $4500 a ton of almonds

Now, from the given data, we can see that the price being sold by the brothers is higher than that of fresno county despite the fact that fresno is the biggest county producer in the country and as well has way more products in the market than the brothers.

Thus, the Brothers will likely not sell any product because the industry is price controlled and in addition to that, their prices are higher than the existing benchmark from county.

Also, the brothers don't even have the kind of name or quantity available from Fresno County.

The brothers sold 600 tons at a price of $2,700,000

Let x represent the number of tons of almonds produced by Sagardia Brothers and y represent the amount of money made.

Since 600 acres of almonds were farmed and each acre produces about a ton of almonds. Hence:

Total ton produced = 600 acres * 1 ton per acre = 600 tons

Each ton is priced at $4500 a ton, hence:

y = 600 tons * $4500 per ton

y = $2,700,000

The brothers sold 600 tons at a price of $2,700,000

Find out more at: https://brainly.com/question/21105092

Answer:

204

Step-by-step explanation:

To simplify the shape, you can do multiple things. I've opted to shave down both prongs to take it from a 'T' shape to a rectangular prism.

For height of the prongs, take 4 from 6.

6 - 4 = 2

Divide by 2 as there are 2 prongs.

2 / 2 = 1

Remember L * W * H

6 * 3 * 1 = 18

Remember that there are two prongs!

3 + 4 = 7

6 * 7 * 4 = 168

168 + 2(18) = 204

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

n < 2^n

First let n=1

1 < 2^1

1 <2  This is true

Next, assume that

(k) < 2^(k)

as we attempt to prove that

(k+1) < 2^(k+1)

.

.

.

Therefore we can conclude that

k+1 < 2^(k+1)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, please consider the following.

First, assume that n equals [tex]\boxed{1}[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\boxed{1<2^1}[/tex] is [tex]\boxed{\text{True}}[/tex]

Next, assume that [tex]\boxed{k<2^k}[/tex], as we attempt to prove [tex]\boxed{k+1<2^{k+1}}[/tex]

Since .... Therefore, we can conclude that [tex]\boxed{k+1<2^{k+1}}[/tex]

The choice for the last box is confusing. Based on your feedback, we can assume that we are still in the step 2 though.

And the last step which is not included in your question is the conclusion where we can say that we prove that for any integer [tex]n\geq 1[/tex], we have [tex]n<2^n[/tex].

Hope this helps.

Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.

Thank you

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let REPEAT [tex]_{TM[/tex]= { | M is a TM, and for all s ∈ L(M), s = uv where u = v }

To prove that REPEAT [tex]_{TM[/tex]  is undecidable.

Let  REPEAT [tex]_{TM[/tex] {| M is a TM that does not accept M}

Then, we form a TM  u for L by applying TM v as a subroutine.

Assume Repeat   is decidable

Let M be the algorithm that  TM which decides the REPEATU = on input "s" simulate the M

Accept; if M ever enters the accept state

Reject; if M ever enters the reject state

U does not decide the REPEAT as it may loop over s

so REPEAT is undecidable

Answer:

52 units^2

Step-by-step explanation:

It's unclear what the leg lengths and the width are.  I must assume that the lengths are 12 units and 14 units and that the width of the trapezoid is 4 units.  You were given an illustration for this problem and should have shared it or described the trapezoid in words.  Please do this if the answer given below does not agree with any of your answer choices.

If the lengths are 12 units and 14 units and that the width of the trapezoid is 4 units, then the area is

      12 units + 14 units

A = ---------------------------- * 4 units = 52 units^2

                    2

Answer:

Divide the diameter by 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

The radius of any circle is always the end to the center.

The diameter is a point of the circle to the opposite side.

This means that the diameter is twice the size of the radius, so to find the radius from the diameter, divide the diameter by 2.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

Divide the diameter by 2. d/2=r

Step-by-step explanation:

If a diameter has been given instead of a radius, you can find the radius by dividing the diameter by 2, for example.

If the diameter was 10, the radius would 10/2=5.

Answer:

[tex]a = \frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's convert everything to sixths to make it easier to work with.

[tex]\frac{4}{6}a - \frac{1}{6} = \frac{2}{6}[/tex]

Add 1/6 to both sides:

[tex]\frac{4}{6}a = \frac{3}{6}[/tex].

Dividing both sides by 4/6:

[tex]a = \frac{3}{6} \div \frac{4}{6}\\\\a = \frac{3}{6} \cdot \frac{6}{4}\\\\a = \frac{18}{24}\\\\a = \frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Hope this helped!

Answer:

it should be 308,608. the comma is after every three in this scenario.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6 sandwiches to choose from because

3×2 = 6

Answer:

x ≥-10

Step-by-step explanation:

–2.5x ≤ 25

Divide each side by -2.5, remembering to flip the inequality

–2.5x/-2.5 ≥ 25 /-2.5

x ≥-10

Answer:

[tex]x\leq -10[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-2.5x\leq 25[/tex]-----> Multiply by -1:

[tex]2.5x\geq -25[/tex]-----> Divide by 2.5:

[tex]x\geq -10[/tex]

Hope this helps!

Answer:

.25 hour / dollar

Step-by-step explanation:

We want hours per dollar

9 hours/ 36 dollars

1/4 hour / dollar

Answer:

maybe it's 10.because c is 10,b is 10,and so as s.

hence s is 10 also.

Answer:

Mean = 108

Median = 45

The better measure of Lauren's "typical class size" is the Mean

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Calculating mean and median.

The mean is an important measure of central tendency, and it is the average of the measurement of a given set of data. It is calculated as follows:

[tex]Mean\ (\overline {X}) &= \frac{\sum X}{N}[/tex]

where X = individual data sets

N = total number of data

[tex]Mean= \frac{375\; +\ 35\ +\ 45\ +\ 25\ +\ 60}{5} \\=\frac{540}{5} \\= 108[/tex]

The Median divides the measurements into two equal parts, and in order to calculate the median, the distribution has to first be arranged in ascending or descending order. Arranging this series in descending order:

375, 60, 45, 35, 25

The formula for calculating median is given by:

[tex]M_{d} = \frac{N\ +\ 1}{2} th\ data\\\\=\frac{5\ +\ 1}{2}th\ data\\\\=\frac{6}{2} th\ data\\= 3rd\ data\\M_{d} = 45[/tex]

from the list or arranged data in descending order (375, 60, 45, 35, 25), the third data is 45.

Therefore, Median = 45

2. The better measure of typical class size is Mean because the mean depends on all the values of the data sets, whereas the median does not. When there are extreme values (outliers) the effect on the median is very small, whereas it is effectively captured by the mean.

Answer:

math is really a difficult subject for me. sometimes i feel confident when i get my answers correct, but sometimes i feel bored when i dnt get my answer. Sometimes i feel anxious , sometimes i feel excited to solve the problems.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/13061296

Answer:

hundredths place, 7,500.

Step-by-step explanation:

They would be the same when they are all rounded all of the numbers to the the hundredths place. And that number would be 7,500.

When rounding its 5 or higher round up, if its 4 or lower round down.

Answer:

(DNE,DNE)

Step-by-step explanation:

-24x-12y = -16. Equation one

6x +3y = 4. Equation two

Multiplying equation two with +4 gives

4(6x +3y = 4)

24x +12y = 16...result of equation two

-24x -12y= -16...

A careful observation to the following equation will help us notice that the both equation are same thing.

Multiplying minus to equation one gives

-(-24x-12y=-16)

24x+12y = 16.

Since the both equation are same, there is no solution to it.

Answer:

2√2

Step-by-step explanation:

hope you understand.

Answer:

-52

Step-by-step explanation:

Think of it this way.  Opposite means to take the negation.  So we are taking the negation of the negation of negative 52.  This means mathematically:

- ( - ( -52 ) ) == -52

Cheers.

Answer: approx 1196 students.

Step-by-step explanation:

As known for normal distribution 95.4% of all results are situating at +-2*s distance from the mean. (s is the standard deviation)

2s=16*2=32 . The mean +2s= 104+32=136 = approx 140.

95.4% from 52000 = 49608 students. The residual amont ( which is out of the border mean+-2s)= 52000-49608=2392

Because of the normal distribution simmetry the number of the students which has IQ 140 and more is twice less than 2392.

N=2392:2=1196

This is equivalent to x^2+8x+13

======================================================

Explanation:

The vertex of f is at (0,0). The vertex of g is at (-4, -3). The vertex has moved 4 units to the left and 3 units down.

To shift to the left, we replace x with x+4. So we have f(x) = x^2 turn into f(x+4) = (x+4)^2 so far.

Then we subtract off 3 to move everything 3 units down. We have

g(x) = (x+4)^2-3

---------------------

Optionally we can expand things out like so

g(x) = (x+4)^2-3

g(x) = (x+4)(x+4)-3

g(x) = x(x+4)+4(x+4)-3

g(x) = x^2+4x+4x+16-3

g(x) = x^2+8x+13

Showing that (x+4)^2-3 is equivalent to x^2+8x+13

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

because its right dummy

Answer:5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6344

Step-by-step explanation:

Find 26% of 24400

24400 * 26%

24400 * .26

6344

Answer:

a; H0: u= 140 Ha: u ≠ 140 two tailed test.

b. Therefore reject H0 as t= 3 ≠ t≤ t ( ∝/2) (n-1) =2.353 or

3 > t ( ∝/2) (n-1) =2.353    

c. If we check from the table the p- value is 0.6 which lies between 0.1 and 0.05  therefore reject H0.

d. Again reject H0 as 140 < 150.163

e. A type II error has not been committed as H0 is rejected.

Step-by-step explanation:

We formulate the null and alternative hypotheses as

a; H0: u= 140 Ha: u ≠ 140 two tailed test.

For a two tailed test the significance level ∝= 0.1 the critical region is given by

t ≤ t ( ∝/2) (n-1) and t > t ( ∝/2) (n-1)

So the critical region will be

t≤ t ( ∝/2) (n-1) =2.353

where

t= x` - u / s/ √n

Sr. No X X²

1 150 22500

2 150 22500

3 180 32400

4 170 28900

∑ 650 106,300

X`= ∑x/n = 650/4= 162.5

s²= 1/n-1 (x-x`)²= 1/n-1 [ ∑x² -(∑x)²/n ]

= 1/3[106,300 -650²/4] = 225

s= 15

Putting the values in the above equation

t= 162.5- 140/ 15/ √4

t= 3

So calculated value of t= 3

b. Therefore reject H0 as t= 3 ≠ t≤ t ( ∝/2) (n-1) =2.353 or

3 > t ( ∝/2) (n-1) =2.353    

c. If we check from the table the p- value is 0.6 which lies between 0.1 and 0.05  therefore reject H0.

d. a 90% confidence interval based on the calculated values will be

x`± 1.645 (s)/ √n

Putting the values

162.5 ±1.645 ( 15/2)

162.5 ±12.3375

174.84 , 150.163

d. Again reject H0 as 140 < 150.163

e. A type II error has not been committed as H0 is rejected.

Answer:

1) [tex]\boxed{p(x) = x^3-x^2+x-1}[/tex]

2) [tex]\boxed{p(x) = x^2+x-2}[/tex]

3) [tex]\boxed{p(x) =- 2x^2+2x+4}[/tex]

4) [tex]\boxed{p(x) = 2x^2+x-4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Part (1)

[tex]p(x) = x^3-x^2+x-1[/tex]

As we have to determine it by ourselves, this is the polynomial having a degree of 3. p(x) with a degree of 3 means that the highest degree/exponent of x should be 3.

Part (2)

[tex]p(x) = x^2+x-2[/tex]

This can be the polynomial having the factor x-1 because if we put:

x - 1 = 0 =>  x = 1 in the above polynomial, it gives us a result of zero which shows us that (x-1) "is" a factor of the polynomial.

Part (3)

[tex]p(x) = -2x^2+2x+4[/tex]

This can be the polynomial for which p(0) = 4 and p(-1) = 0

Let's check:

[tex]p(0) =- 2(0)^2+2(0)+4\\p(0) = 0 + 0+4\\p(0) = 4[/tex]

[tex]p(-1)= -2(-1)^2+2(-1)+4\\p(-1) = -2(1)-2+4\\p(-1) = -2-2+4\\p(-1) = 0[/tex]

So, this is the required polynomial determined by "myself".

Part (4):

[tex]p(x) = 2x^2+x-4[/tex]

This is the polynomial having a remainder 6 when divided by (x-2)

Let's check:

Let x - 2 = 0 => x = 2

Putting in the above polynomial

[tex]p(x) = 2(2)^2+(2)-4\\Given \ that \ Remainder = 6\\6 = 2(4) +2-4\\6 = 8+2-4\\6 = 10-4\\6 = 6[/tex]

So, Proved that it has a remainder of 6 when divided by (x-2)

Answer:

Hello the options to your question is missing below are the options

 A) if sample means were obtained for a long series of samples, approximately 95 percent of all sample means would be between 10 and 16 miles

B.the unknown population mean is definitely between 10 and 16 miles

C.if these intervals were constructed for a long series of samples, approximately 95 percent would include the unknown mean commute distance for all Californians

D.the unknown population mean is between 10 and 16 miles with probability .95

Answer : if these intervals were constructed for a long series of samples, approximately 95 percent would include the unknown mean commute distance for all Californians  ( c )

Step-by-step explanation:

95%  confidence

interval = 10 to 16 miles

To have 95% confidence signifies that if these intervals were constructed for a long series of samples, approximately 95 percent would include the unknown mean commute distance for all Californians

confidence interval covers a range of samples/values in the interval and the higher the % of the confidence interval the more precise the interval is,

Answer:

b = 10.5

Step-by-step explanation:

2(b-9) = 3

then:

2*b + 2*-9 = 3

2b - 18 = 3

2b = 3 + 18

2b = 21

b = 21/2

b = 10.5

check:

2(10.5 - 9) = 3

2*1.5 = 3

Answer: 3 pounds.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have two metals:

One that contains 20% nickel, let's call it metal A.

One that contains 80% nickel, let's call it metal B.

We have 6 pounds of metal B, in those 6 punds we have:

0.80*6lb = 4.8lb of nickel.

Now, if we add X pounds of metal A, then we will have:

X + 6lb in total weight.

4.8lb + 0.2*X of nickel.

And we want to have exactly 60% of nickel, so we must have that the quotient between the amount of nickel and the total weight is equal to 0.6

(4.8lb + 0.2*X)/(6lb + X) = 0.6

now we solve it for X:

(4.8lb + 0.2*X) = 0.6*(6lb + X) = 3.6lb + 0.6*X

4.8lb - 3.6lb = 0.6*X - 0.2*X

1.2lb = 0.4*X

1.2lb/0.4 = 3lb = X

We should use 3 pounds of the metal with 20% of nickel.