write 19.6 as a fraction

Answer:

29, 31, 33

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

S=(2,-2) ...............

Answer:

1/23

Step-by-step explanation:

5/23 - 4/23 would be 1/23. When the denominators of the fractions are the same, you can just subtract the numerators.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x +4y = -5

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the perpendicular line can be found by swapping the x- and y-coefficients and negating one of them. The new constant can be found by substituting the point values into the equation.

  3x +12y = 3(-5) +12(0)

  3x +12y = -15

We notice that all of the values include a factor of 3. We can divide that out to put the equation in standard form:

  x + 4y = -5

Answer:

n(number of tiles) x 3 - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

times mean multiplication and minus mean subtraction, I hope this helps.

An equation is formed of two equal expressions. An equation that fits Sarah's way of seeing the relationship is y = 3x - 2.

An equation is formed when two equal expressions are equated together with the help of an equal sign '='.

As stated by Sarah that "the number of tiles in each figure was always 3 times the step number minus 2", this can be written in the form of an equation as shown below.

Number of tiles = [3 × (Number of steps)] - 2

Assume that the number of tiles is represented by y, while the number of steps can be written as x. Therefore, we can write the equation as,

y = 3x - 2

Now, let's check the equation,

When the number of steps is 3, the number of tiles is 7.

y = 3(3) - 2

y = 9 - 2

y = 7

Since the number of tiles is the same, therefore, the equation is correct.

Hence, an equation that fits Sarah's way of seeing the relationship is y = 3x - 2.

Learn more about Equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/14686792

#SPJ2

We have that the total length of paper needed to cover all the tables is

[tex]X=288.5ft[/tex]

From the question we are told that:

Number of tables [tex]n=36[/tex]

Length of table[tex]l=8[/tex]

Extension [tex]e=3 inch =>0.25feet[/tex]

Generally, the equation for the Total length  tables is mathematically given by

[tex]l_t=n*l\\\\l_t=36*8[/tex]

[tex]l_t=288ft[/tex]

Therefore with an extension of 0.25ft at both end we have the Total length of  tablecloths to be

[tex]X=l_t+2(e)\\\\X=288ft+2(0.25)[/tex]

[tex]X=288.5ft[/tex]

In conclusion

The total length of paper needed to cover all the tables is

[tex]X=288.5ft[/tex]

For more information on this visit

https://brainly.com/question/12595620

Answer:

B) 74

Step-by-step explanation:

This is an icoseles triangle because of the 2 lines in each side. This makes <Y equal to <Z

Given:

<Y = <Z

All triangle angles add up to 180 so:

<W + <Y + <Z = 180

<W + 53 + 53 = 180

<W + 106 = 180

<W = 180 - 106

<W = 74

Answer:

1/5

Step-by-step explanation:

the prob that you will pick a blue marble would be 12/16, easy.

then the prob of picking a yellow marble after that would be 4/15 since one marble is already missing. multiply the numerator and denominator of each fraction. so 12 x 4 and 16 x 15 to get 48/240. then divide each by 48 to get 1/5.

the answer is 1/5

hope that solve your problem for whoever gets this question

Answer:

the last one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution is 8 in

Let´s call dimensions of the box

According to the problem statement

y = x + 3     and    h = 4 in

The volume of the box is:

V = x×y×h       V = 360 in³

Then  V = x × ( x + 3 ) × 4     ( by substitution of y as a function of x )

360 = x × ( x + 3 ) × 4

Simplifying by 4

90 =  x × ( x + 3 )

90 = x² + 3x

We got a second degree equation, solving for x

x² + 3×x - 90 = 0

x₁,₂ = ( -3 ± √ (3)² + 4×90 )/2   ⇒   x₁,₂ = ( - 3 ± 19,21 )/2

x₁   ⇒  is a negative value    x = - 11,1  so we dismiss such solution

x₂  = 16.21/2

x₂  =  8.1 in

rounding to the nearest integer number we get the value for the length f the box

x₂ = 8 in        ⇒ x = 8 in

Note: In Brainly.com in search bar ask for cube dimensions

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps you check it if there is a mistake sorry!! for that

Option A "4, 6, 8".

This is because when we multiply 2x2, we get 4, then we add +2 with 4, we get 6, then we add again +2 with 6, we get 8. So, a list of three square numbers is completed.

Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.

Thank You...

(Answered by Benjemin)

Answer:

Dan is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

First, I calculated the amount of hours that the graph shows in total, coming up with a total of 3,085 hours. I do this by multiplying the number of adults surveyed by the number of hours they spent. So for the first column, (80+70)*1, second column, (90+80)*2, third column, (135+130)*3, fourth column, (140+135)*4, and fifth column, (65+75)*5 if you get what I mean. Then I add up all values. Knowing that there were two sets of 500 American adults interviewed already, I came to the conclusion that 1,000 total adults were surveyed. Finally, I divided the total number of hours(3,085) by the total number of adults interviewed (1,000) to get a mean of 3.085 hours, rounding it to 3 hours and proving that Dan is correct.

Answer:

[tex]4\sqrt{6}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{sin\left(90\right)}{x}=\:\frac{sin\left(60\right)}{\left(\frac{\left(6\cdot \:sin\left(90\right)\right)}{sin\left(45\right)}\right)}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$137.33

Step-by-step explanation:

$115.78 + $15.00 = $130.78

$130.78 + $7.50 = $138.28

$138.28 - $35.90 = $102.33

$102.33 + $20.00 = $122.33

$122.33 + $15.00 = $137.33

Chow,...!

Answer:it's 844

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data, then conclusions are drawn from the data. ... Even if all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

g(x) = 0

0=-5x+5

5x=5

x=1

Answer:

x = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

given:

[tex]g(x) = -5x + 5[/tex]

solve for x, when:

[tex]g(x) = 0[/tex]

replace x with 0

~~~~~~~~~~~~

➡️ [tex] x = -5(0) + 5 [/tex]

➡️ [tex] x = 0 + 5[/tex]

➡️ [tex]x = 5 [/tex]

Answer: c

Step-by-step explanation:

correct answer would be b.

this is shown by just moving the individual points following the directions of the different answer choices.

Answer:

4th option

Step-by-step explanation:

The translation shifts Δ ABC → Δ A'B'C'

Consider the x- coordinates of A and A'

A has x- coordinate 1

A' has x- coordinate - 3

Then 1 to - 3 is a shift of 4 units left

Answer:

4 units lefts

Step-by-step explanation:

First you have to take 2 similar points, we will take A' and A and counts the squares between them. Since the dashed A is the new translation, we know the translation is left, all we do now is count the squares which is 4.

Answer:

4 + (-3-8)

4 + (-11)

4 (+ × -) 11

4 - 11

- 7

Therefore the answer is -7

Answer:

4 + (-3-8)

4 + (-11)

4 (+ × -) 11

4 - 11

- 7

Therefore the answer is -7

Answer:

8.8 grams

...................

The required 88 Decigrams equals 8.8 grams.

Given that,
To determine 88 Decigrams equals 8.8.

All over the world, most things are in use as of common quantity, so people all over the world agree that they have to follow a common system of measurement and that the common system of measurement is called standard measurement.

Fraction is defined as the number of compositions that constitutes the Whole.

here,
10 decigram = 1 gram
88 decigram = 8.8 gram

Thus, the required 88 Decigrams equals 8.8 grams.

Learn more about measurements here:

https://brainly.com/question/4725561

#SPJ2

Answer: Well 100g is 100 grams so 100 grams?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

the Andrew's going to be 12 because you have to

know all the sides of cube

Answer:

14

step by step explanation

-7×(-2)

14