What piece of information is needed to prove the triangles are congruent through AAS?

Step-by-step explanation:

hope u like it.......

Answer:

y=¼x-6

Step-by-step explanation:

y=mx+c

y=¼x+-6

y=¼x-6

Answer:

First term=1

Second term=-x

Third term=[tex]2x^2[/tex]

Fourth term =[tex]-\frac{28}{3!}x^3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that function

[tex]f(x)=(1+3x)^{-1/3}[/tex]

We have to find the  first four non zero terms of the Maclaurin series for the binomial.

Maclaurin series of function f(x) is given by

[tex]f(x)=f(0)+f'(0)x+\frac{1}{2!}f''(0)x^2+\frac{1}{3!}f'''(0)x^3+....[/tex]

[tex]f(0)=(1+3x)^{\frac{-1}{3}}=1[/tex]

[tex]f'(x)=-\frac{1}{3}(1+3x)^{-\frac{4}{3}}(3)=-(1+3x)^{-\frac{4}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]f'(0)=-1[/tex]

[tex]f''(x)=\frac{4}{3}\times 3 (1+3x)^{-\frac{7}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]f''(0)=4[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x)=-4\times \frac{7}{3}\times 3(1+3x)^{-\frac{10}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(0)=-28[/tex]

Substitute the values we get

[tex](1+3x)^{-\frac{1}{3}}=1-x+\frac{4}{2!}x^2+\frac{-28}{3!}x^3+...[/tex]

[tex](1+3x)^{-\frac{1}{3}}=1-x+2x^2+\frac{-28}{3!}x^3+...[/tex]

First term=1

Second term=-x

Third term=[tex]2x^2[/tex]

Fourth term =[tex]-\frac{28}{3!}x^3[/tex]

Answer:

#########

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

25

Step-by-step explanation:

divide 48 by 4 which is 25%

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

One way to write the relationship between time, speed, and distance is ...

  time = distance/speed

For the first part of the trip, the time is ...

  t1 = 240/r

For the second part of the trip, the time is ...

  t2 = 72/(r+10)

The total time is 6 hours, so we have ...

  t1 +t2 = 6

  240/r +72/(r+10) = 6

We can simplify this a bit by multiplying by (r)(r+10)/6 to get ...

   40(r+10) +12(r) = r(r+10)

  r² -42r -400 = 0 . . . . . . . . subtract the left side and collect terms

  (r -50)(r +8) = 0 . . . . . . . . factor

  r = 50 . . . . . the positive solution of interest.

The two average speeds were 50 mph and 60 mph.

Answer:

m = 4

n = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]m + 8 = 3m\\\\m - 3m = - 8\\\\-2m = - 8\\\\m = 4[/tex]

[tex]2n - 1 = 9 \\\\2n = 9 + 1\\\\2n = 10\\\\n = 5[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\frac{y^{6} }{ x^{2} }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]y^{6} x^{-2}[/tex]

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

When there is a set of values within parenthesis, and an exponents on the values and on the parenthesis, you multiply the outer exponent with the inner exponent.

When a value has a negative exponent, the value that has the negative exponent will become a fraction and go to the denominator of the fraction (or go immediately to the denominator), or if it is already a fraction, goes to the denominator. If the value that has the negative exponent is in the denominator, the value will go to the numerator. In both instances, the negative exponent will then change to positive.

First, we need to simplify the expression inside the parenthesis.

[tex]y^{\frac{3}{2} } x^{-\frac{1}{2} } --> \frac{y^{\frac{3}{2} } }{x^{\frac{1}{2}} }[/tex]

Now we multiply the 4 to the exponents.

[tex]\frac{y^{\frac{3}{2} *\frac{x4}{1} } }{x^{\frac{1}{2}}*\frac{4}{1} } = \frac{y^{\frac{12}{2}} }{x^{\frac{4}{2}}} = \frac{y^6}{x^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{y^6}{x^2}[/tex] is the answer.

#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)

Answer: D. 38x + 1,450 > 4,000

Step-by-step explanation:

It has to be greater than 4,000 so A makes no sense

The parentheses are in the wrong place completely changing the meaning for B

C disregards the info we have about how she's already typed 1,450 words

The answer has to be D

Answer:

A. A prediction based on Model 1 is better than a prediction based on Model 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

Model 1 :

R² = 0.92

s = 1.65

Model 2 :

R² = 0.85

s = 1.91

The Coefficient of determination of the first model is 0.92 which is greater than the coefficient of determination of the Second model, the coefficient of determination gives the proportion of variation in the dependent variable which is caused by the regression line. Hence, we can say a prediction based on Model 1 is better than a prediction based on Model 2 because a larger proportion of the variation in the dependent variable is predictable from the independent variable.

Answer:

[tex] {3}^{2} \div 48 - 6 \\ 9 \div 48 - 6 \\ = - 5.8125[/tex]

Answer:

74 base 10.

Step-by-step explanation:

134 base 7 = 7^2 + 3*7 + 4

= 49 + 21 + 4

= 74 base 10

Answer:

0.1636 = 16.36% probability that Kobe makes his 10th free throw on his 14th shot

Step-by-step explanation:

For each free throw, there are only two possible outcomes. Either he makes it, or he misses. The probability of making a free throw is independent of any other free throw, which means that the binomial probability distribution is used to solve this question.

Binomial probability distribution

The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, and X can only have two outcomes.

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

In which [tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

And p is the probability of X happening.

He is able to make a free throw 70% of the time.

This means that [tex]p = 0.7[/tex]

What is the probability that Kobe makes his 10th free throw on his 14th shot?

9 of his first 13(P(X = 9) when n = 13), and then the 10th with 0.7 probability.

Thus

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 9) = C_{13,9}.(0.7)^{9}.(0.3)^{3} = 0.2337[/tex]

0.7*0.2337 = 0.1636

0.1636 = 16.36% probability that Kobe makes his 10th free throw on his 14th shot

Answer:

7 hundred thousands, 5 ten thousands, 2 thousands, 8 hundreds, 6 tens, 3 ones

Step-by-step explanation:

to write a number in expanded notation all you need to do is write out the number in words.

Answer:

25

Step-by-step explanation:

im pretty sure i think only ok i think no saying bad things in the comment

Answer:

O 4x+2y=8.

Hope this helps you

Answer:

The degree is the highest number exponent....

that is hard to see in your question...

it does appear to be a 2?

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

 10x +9y = 60

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation for the tangent line at a point is ...

  y -f(a) = f'(a)(x -a)

For the given function,

  f(x) = 10/x

The derivative is ...

  f'(x) = -10/x^2

Then the equation of the tangent line is ...

  y -10/3 = -10/9(x -3) . . . . equation of the tangent line (point-slope form)

Clearing fractions, we have ...

  9y -30 = -10(x -3) = -10x +30

  10x +9y = 60 . . . . . equation in standard form

Answer:

[tex]1)\:2\frac{2}{3} ft[/tex]

[tex]2)\:4[/tex]

[tex]3)\:\frac{20}{3} ft^{2}[/tex]

[tex]4)\:10\frac{2}{3} ft^{2}[/tex]

------------------------

hope it helps...

have a great day!!

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.7994 = 79.94% probability that the proportion of persons with myopia will differ from the population proportion by less than 3%.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

Suppose 42% of the population has myopia.

This means that [tex]p = 0.42[/tex]

Random sample of size 442 is selected

This means that [tex]n = 442[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = p = 0.42[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.42*0.58}{442}} = 0.0235[/tex]

What is the probability that the proportion of persons with myopia will differ from the population proportion by less than 3%?

Proportion between 0.42 + 0.03 = 0.45 and 0.42 - 0.03 = 0.39, which is the p-value of Z when X = 0.45 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 0.39.

X = 0.45

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.45 - 0.42}{0.0235}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.28[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.28[/tex] has a p-value of 0.8997

X = 0.39

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.39 - 0.42}{0.0235}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.28[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.28[/tex] has a p-value of 0.1003

0.8997 - 0.1003 = 0.7994

0.7994 = 79.94% probability that the proportion of persons with myopia will differ from the population proportion by less than 3%.

Answer:

The total distance Allie traveled was 0.81 miles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since Allie rode her bike up a hill at an average speed of 12 feet / second, and she then rode back down the hill at an average speed of 60 feet / second, and the entire trip took her 2 minutes, to determine what is the total distance she traveled, the following calculation must be performed:

12 + 60 = 72

72 x 60 = 4320

1000 feet = 0.189394 miles

4320 feet = 0.8181818 miles

Therefore, the total distance Allie traveled was 0.81 miles.

Answer:

Take the picture you uploaded.

Click the rotate 'button' once.

Change the x to y and y to x on the graph. (axis labels)

Done

J (0, -1)

K(-4,-3)

I ( -4,-1)

Answer:

NO

Step-by-step explanation:

NO

Answer:

I got u, it is litearly 16540/83.8 = $19737.5

Step-by-step explanation:

its very simple sincen 100-16.2=83.8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given;

first leg of the right triangle, a = 15.21 cm

second leg of the right triangle, b = 17.34 cm

Angle C = 90 ⁰

The missing parameters;

Use Pythagoras theorem to calculate the missing side "c", which is the hypotenuse

c² = a² + b²

c² = (15.21)²  +  (17.34)²

c² = 532.02

c = √532.02

c = 23.1 cm

The missing angle A is calculated as;

[tex]tan(A) = \frac{a}{b} \\\\tan(A) = \frac{15.21}{17.34} \\\\tan(A) = 0.8772 \\\\A = tan^{-1} (0.8772)\\\\A = 41.26^0[/tex]

The missing angle is calculated as;

B = 90⁰ - A

B = 90⁰ - 41.26⁰

B = 48.74⁰

==========================================================

Explanation:

The phrasing "no less than" means the same as "at least".

Saying "at least 37" means 37 is the lowest we can go.

If x is the number of disconnected calls, then [tex]x \ge 37[/tex] and we want to find the probability of this happening (the max being 295).

We could use the binomial distribution to find the answer, but that would require adding 295-37+1 = 259 different values which could get tedious. So we could use the normal approximation to make things relatively straight forward.

Assuming this binomial meets the requirements of the normal approximation, then we'd look under the normal curve for the area to the right of 36.5; which is why the answer is choice A.

Why 36.5 and not 37? This has to do with the continuity correction factor when translating from a discrete distribution (binomial) to a continuous one (normal).

If we used 37, then we'd be missing out on the edge case. So we go a bit beyond 37 to capture 36.5 instead. It's like a fail safe to ensure we do account for that endpoint of 37. It's like adding a buffer or padding.

------------

Side notes:

Answer:

true ...

believe it or not there is an exponential sequence that can make that

result

f(x) = [tex]2^{(2(x+2) -1)}[/tex]

x   /// 2(x+2) -1

-1  /// 1

0 /// 3

1 /// 5

2 /// 7

[tex]2^{1} = 2\\2^{3} = 8\\\\2^{5} = 32\\\\2^{7 = 128\\\\[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation: