Answer:
2,2-dimethylpropane
Explanation:
Draw the structure of the compound. You will get a carbon atom in center surrounded by 4 methyl groups. Now take one linear chain. It's propane derived because of 3 carbons. Now two methyl groups are attached to second carbon atom. So you will get 2,2-dimethylpropane
Answer:
2,2 Dimethyl propane is the IUPAC name
assume that some huys are knis, all jiks are suds, and some aws are huys therefore it makes sense that (a) some knis may also be aws. (b) all huys are knis (c) all jiks are aws (d) some suds are knis. (e) all jiks are huys.
Answer:
Therefore, it makes sense that:
(a) some knis may also be aws.
Explanation:
a) The argument is:
some huys are knis
all jiks are suds
some aws are huys
b) There is a logical connection between aws and knis because some huys are aws and some huys are knis. This verbal reasoning or logic can be inferred by reference to huys. With huys, some are aws and some are knis. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that "some knis may also be aws."
A federal statute prohibits discrimination based on age for all persons between the ages of 50 and 70 in matters relating to employment. A state constitutional provision requires that all state judges retire at the age of 65. A judge in the state trial court reached his 65th birthday, and the governor of the state named his replacement. The judge refused to retire and brought suit in federal court to enjoin the governor from replacing him on the bench. Who is likely to prevail in the lawsuit
Answer:
A Federal Statute and a State Constitutional Provision
The judge is likely to prevail in this case.
Explanation:
In any matter where the federal statute prohibiting age discrimination conflicts with a state constitutional provision, the U.S. Constitution or the federal statute will prevail. This means that based on this conflict, the state constitutional provision will be declared unconstitutional and unenforceable. The reason is that federal statutes or the U.S. Constitution takes priority over all other laws. Therefore, the judge will prevail in the lawsuit and prevent the state governor from replacing him.
Stealing goods from a retail store is called
forgery.
robbery.
burglary.
shoplifting.
The theft of currency over a long period of time that tends to be commissioned for a modest amount of money but may not be considered to be financially damaging is called
ATM burglaries.
embezzlement.
forgery.
credit card fraud.
Mr. Farhan has sent goods to Mr. Basit, good are held by Mr. Kashif a Carrier now Mr. Farhan wants to stop the goods plz advice on which grounds he can stops the goods
Answer:
go to mr.kashif to buy good
HELP ILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!
What would best illustrate how the national government uses taxation to regulate international
trade?
a. Truckers are required to stop a weigh stations to pay state fines on overweight goods they are transporting
on state highways.
b. Import taxes may not be charged for goods exchanged in any trade that occurs between states.
c. City governments pass laws that makes it illegal to sell certain goods at certain times of the day or week.
d. Tariffs are used to protect American businesses from unfair foreign competition.
Answer:
d is the correct answer or appropriate one
Có một "tàu lạ" của nước ngoài hoạt động khảo sát dầu khí trên biển, cách bờ biển Vũng Tàu của nước ta 160 hải lý. Vận dụng những kiến thức đã học về chủ quyền lãnh thổ, biên giới quốc gia; Anh, chị cho biết “tàu lạ” này có vi phạm chủ quyền lãnh thổ của Việt nam hay không?; nếu có, theo anh chị Đảng, Nhà nước ta nên giải quyết vấn đề này như thế nào?
Why do plaintiffs sometimes reach settlements before a civil trial begins?
A. To prevent a prosecutor from showing evidence against them
B. To give the judge a chance to reach a verdict in their favor
C. To avoid being found guilty of a crime by the jury
D. To make sure they get at least part of what they want
Answer: Choice D) To make sure they get at least part of what they want
=============================================================
Explanation:
Let's go through the answer choices to see which are true and which are false.
A) False. The plaintiff is the one doing the prosecution or bringing the case against the defendant. The plaintiff is not on trial.B) False. For many cases, a judge isn't involve in the settlement process. In those cases, the two parties directly negotiate together to settle the dispute. In cases where a judge is involved with a settlement, their powers aren't as strong as compared to a courtroom setting. C) False. Again, the plaintiff isn't the one being accused of the crime. That would be the defendant.D) True. Court cases take a very long time to reach their conclusion. Not only that, they're very costly as well (in terms of money, time and resources). Not to mention the stress they bring about also. All of these factors sometimes lead people to go for a settlement even if they know they have a 100% airtight case against their opponent. Settlements are often the easier route and they allow people to get something rather than nothing. Keep in mind that even if there is an airtight case, there might be some technicality that allows to defendant to be found not guilty.Patty is the Plaintiff in a trial and Daryl is the Defendant. Patty and Daryl each call their witnesses, offer their evidence, and presents their side of the case. The parties rest and give their closing statements. The jury finds for Patty. Daryl disagrees with the verdict. Name one option that Daryl can do at this point of the post-trial process and what that option will do for him.
Answer:
Take it to a higher jury
Explanation:
Detective Sanders knows the hole in the windshield was caused by a bullet being shot from inside the car. How is he MOST likely to make this
conclusion?
ОА
The bullet hole is wider on the outside of the windshield.
ОВ.
The bullet hole is wider on the inside of the windshield.
Ос.
The bullet hole made radial fractures and a few concentric fractures.
OD.
There is glass everywhere surrounding the car.
Answer:
The rounded shape of the bullet because as it goes through the glass it stops spinning and this make the hole wider
Explanation:
Answer:
The bullet is wider on the outside of the windshield.
Explanation:
Appellate courts Group of answer choices are made up of judges only. will, on occasion, seat juries, but only when dealing with cases and controversies dealing with federal questions. are courts exclusively of original jurisdiction and, hence, seat juries as a matter of court to make determinations of fact in reaching verdicts. often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts. seat a jury in criminal cases but never in civil matters.
Answer:
often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
There are different types of courts and these includes;
I. Trial court.
II. Circuit court.
III. Appeal court.
IV. Supreme court.
An appellate court is also known as court of appeals and can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).
This ultimately implies that, all appellate courts are empowered by law to review both questions of fact and questions of law. The appellate court can review questions of law as "De novo" or plenary review (legal error standard).
A criminal case can be defined as a lawsuit brought before a court of competent jurisdiction against someone who has been accused of committing a crime.
Typically, appellate courts (court of appeals) often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
A grand jury can be defined as a group of citizens that are legally saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the evidence in a criminal case. Thus, grand jury are legally empowered by law to carry out an investigation with respect to a potential criminal case, engage in legal proceedings and determine whether or not an evidence is quite sufficient to warrant trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Hence, if the grand jury serves an indictment in a criminal case, the suspect is formally accused of committing the crime. This simply means that, the grand jury has ascertained that there are enough evidence to indict an accused.
However, if in a criminal case, the grand jury offers no indictment, the case wouldn't go to trial at the time.
An office block of 14,000m2 gross area with 80% lettable area in Muscat, let
recently at OMR 350,000 p.a on internal repairing terms (The landlord is
responsible for 5% external repairs, 5% insurance and 3% management fees).
The block has been sold for OMR 2,800,000 with 5% cost for sale. A
development company wishes to purchase a nearby site to build an office block
with a gross floor area of 10,000 m2 (70% lettable area) that is to be let on fully
repairing and insuring terms (FRI). The development company need to avail a
loan from bank. Short-term finance of 50% of the total estimated building cost
Gm
the criminal justice does not include which of the following
Police
Courts
Corrections
Crime scholars
An acceleration clause is sometimes added to reverse mortgages. This means that the loan could become due and payable under certain circumstances, which may include all but which of the following?
A. A new owner is added to the title
B. The borrower adds MIP to the loan
C. New debt against the home is taken out
D. All or part of the home is rented out
Answer:
the borrower adds MIP to the loan
Which of the following documents is required for any type of search according to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
arrest order
arrest warrant
search warrant
seizure warrant
Dany is an international trader in computer. In June 2018 he wrote a proposal to his most frequent client, Alan, saying that he was offering to sell 100 motorbikes, XYZ brand, latest version for US$1000/a motorbike. The detail description of a motorbike was in the Exhibit A attached with the contract.Alan immediately responded that he accepted the proposal, but he was only willing to receive the good in a safe and sound condition. Decide what are the legal nature of Dany's proposal and Alan’s reply?
Answer to the following question is as follows;
⇒ The Legality of Danny's Proposal;
In this case, Danny's proposal is regarded an offer until it is approved by Alan in the market. As Danny's promised to sell 100 motorcycles for US$1000 each.The proposal from Danny's perspective is an offer since Alan did not acknowledge the agreement in the beginning. Once acknowledged by Allen, this exchanging of bikes becomes an offer.⇒ Allan's response;
Allan's response, on the other hand, was interpreted as offer and acceptance because no agreement was reached among them and Allan takes the bike only when it is in good shape. If the bikes are not in excellent condition, Allen has the right to decline the seller's contract at any moment.Learn more about "Legal proposal"
https://brainly.com/question/13460236?referrer=searchResults
Vehicle registration laws do not apply to:
•A tractor
•A three-wheeled motorcycle used for agricultural purposes.
•A trailers with no springs or pulled by a tongue.
•All of the above
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
Vehicle registration laws do not apply to:
•A tractor
•A three-wheeled motorcycle used for agricultural purposes.
•A trailers with no springs or pulled by a tongue.
Therefore, the correct answer is "all of the above."
This is because, they are used for transporting cargo or container as trailers hauling agricultural products that weigh less than 3,500 pounds are not registered.
15. The House of Representatives has the special power to
Which section of the outline is the introduction?
Section I
Section II
Section III
Section IV
Answer:
Section I
Explanation:
Section I is the introduction
Answer:
Section I
Explanation:
Just took the test on edge
A police officer stopped a driver who had run a red light. Upon approaching the car, the officer noticed a strong odor of alcohol and immediately asked whether the driver had been drinking. The driver admitted having had several alcoholic drinks that evening. The driver, charged with driving while intoxicated, moved to suppress the officer's testimony regarding the driver's statement about his drinking. The driver argued that the officer had elicited the statement without providing the requisite Miranda warnings. The prosecutor has responded that the statement should be allowed in the prosecution's case-in-chief or, at a minimum, should be allowed as impeachment in the event the driver testifies and denies drinking. How should the court rule regarding the driver's statement admitting his drinking
Answer:
Police Officer Stopping a Driver Who Had Run a Red Light
The driver's statement should be allowed, as pleaded by the prosecution, because the driver was not in custody for Miranda purposes when the free admission of drinking alcohol was made.
Explanation:
The driver freely disclosed his statement about having several alcoholic drinks that evening. At the time he made the statement, the driver was not under custody, he was not under arrest, and he was not suspected of driving under intoxication. The officer stopped him because he had run a red light (another traffic offense) and only noticed the strong odor of alcohol after the traffic offense was committed. Possibly, the alcohol odor could have emanated from another source altogether.
Discuss the difference between foriegn policy and domestic policy
Answer:
Domestic policies are those that affect or apply to people or institutions within a particular country and tend to be internal. Foreign policy has to do with policies between two or more nations and is external. It focuses on building networks with other countries.
In cities, about _____ of every _____ _______ killed by motor vehicle crashes are ___________; in rural areas, the rate is about ______ of every ____.
Many New Orleans officers responding to crime in the wake of Hurricane Katrina wore easily recognizable blue uniforms with distinctive gold badges. Which nineteenth-century organization was among the first to adopt the practice of wearing formal police uniforms with its three-quarter-length royal blue coats, white trousers, and top hats?
Answer:
The first London Metropolitan Police
Explanation:
On the 29th of August, 2005, New Orleans was hit with a fatal natural disaster, which was called Hurricane Katrina and it resulted in the widespread destruction of properties through flooding and storm.
During the Hurricane Katrina, many police officers serving in New Orleans wore easily recognizable blue uniforms with distinctive gold badges while responding to criminal activities.
The first London Metropolitan Police was established by Robert Peel in 1829, under the Metropolitan Police Act of 1829.
The first London Metropolitan Police is a nineteenth-century organization and it is considered to be among the first paramilitary unit to adopt the practice of wearing formal police uniforms.
Additionally, the first London Metropolitan Police wore royal blue coats of three-quarter-length, white trousers, and top hats to match.
If I am riding a motorcycle in a state that has a helmet law, however, I am riding on a road that is owned and maintained by the Federal Government, such as a road in a Federal park that is governed by the Department of Interior. Am I required to wear a helmet?
Answer:
yes you are required to wear helmet because it is for your safety not for others.
if you are charged with zero tolerance offense this mean that your driving privilege will be suspended for 1 year for aa second or subsequent Offense true or false
1. Vehicles driving in the opposite direction on a multi-lane highway with opposite lanes separated by a raised barrier do not have to stop for school buses.
what is special crime investigation
Answer:
a investigación de delitos es el proceso por el cual se descubre al autor de un delito, cometido o planeado.
Explanation:e spero que te ayude xd
Ways to avoid emotional stress when
driving include:
a Always have the radio off
b Obey the rules-of-the-road
c Never change lanes
d Always go
with the flow
Answer:
I will go with D always go with the flow
Question 1: Does this new law violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? If it does, what section(s) and why?
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, I provided explanations about the Charter of Rights and Freedoms law.
Explanation:
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms law is a law applied in Canada, which was first signed as law dating back to the year 1982. It basically consists of laws meant to safeguard the rights and freedoms of citizens, such as their:
freedom of expression,right to equality, andright to privacy, etc.Civilians and military personnel enjoy the same constitutional guarantees when charged with a serious felony.
True
False
