What is the answer to this math problem? I can’t seem to figure it out.

The average number of hours of sleep for working college students is between 6.28 and 6.72 hours of sleep each night

According to the given data,

Sample size n = 101

Sample mean x = 6.5

Standard deviation s = 2.14

Level of confidence C = 96%

Using a 96% confidence level, the value of t* for 100 degrees of freedom is 2.081, as given in the question.

Now, the formula for the confidence interval is:x ± (t* × s/√n)Here, x = 6.5, s = 2.14, n = 101, and t* = 2.081

Substituting the values in the above formula, we get:

Lower limit = x - (t* × s/√n) = 6.5 - (2.081 × 2.14/√101) = 6.28

Upper limit = x + (t* × s/√n) = 6.5 + (2.081 × 2.14/√101) = 6.72

Therefore, the 96% confidence interval for the average number of hours of sleep for working college students is between 6.28 and 6.72 hours of sleep each night.

You can learn more about the average numbers at: brainly.com/question/16956746

#SPJ11

Answer:

If the GM between √2 and 2√2 is a find the value of a.​

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the geometric mean between two numbers, we simply take the square root of their product.

In this case, we want to find the geometric mean between √2 and 2√2.

Their product is:

√2 * 2√2 = 2√4 = 2*2 = 4

So, the geometric mean between √2 and 2√2 is the square root of 4, which is:

√4 = 2

Therefore, the value of a is 2.

Answer:

To find the point that partitions the line segment AB in a ratio of 1:3, we can use the following formula:

P = (3B + 1A) / 4

where P is the point that partitions the line segment in a ratio of 1:3, A and B are the endpoints of the line segment, and the coefficients 3 and 1 represent the ratio of the segment we are dividing.

Substituting the values, we get:

P = (3*(-1, -5) + 1*(-5, 3)) / 4

P = (-3, -7)

Therefore, the point that partitions the line segment AB in a ratio of 1:3 is (-3, -7).

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex] |x - 300| \leqslant 10[/tex]

Answer:

(-2,9)

Step-by-step explanation:

when moving it 5 units left on the x axis it would be 5-7

So in turn you would be given (-2,9)

Because the y stays the same you would still have (?,9)

Answer: 12.84

Step-by-step explanation:

if x = 3.2 and y = 6.1  and Z = 0.2

then plug in the numbers

(3.2)(0.2) + (6.1)(2)

0.64 + 12.2 = 12.84

Any variable next to a number means multiplication.

if I was wrong lmk

The result (recurrent value), A = sum j=1 to 89 ln(j), is true for every n. This is the desired result.

As in T(n) = T(n/2) + n, T(0) = T(1) = 1, a recurrence or recurrence relation specifies an infinite sequence by explaining how to calculate the nth element of the sequence given the values of smaller members.

We can start by proving the base case in order to demonstrate the first portion through recurrence. Let n = 1. Next, we have:

Being true, ln(a1) = ln(a1). If n = k, let's suppose the formula is accurate:

Sum j=1 to k ln = ln(prod j=1 to k aj) (aj)

Prod j=1 to k aj * ak+1 = ln(prod j=1 to k+1 aj)

(Using the logarithmic scale) = ln(prod j=1 to k aj) + ln(ak+1)

Using the inductive hypothesis, the property ln(ab) = ln(a) + ln(b)) = sum j=1 to k ln(aj) + ln(ak+1) = sum j=1 to k+1 ln (aj)

(b), we can use the just-proven formula:

A = ln(1, 2,...) + ln + ln (89)

= ln(j=1 to 89) prod

sum j=1 to 89 ln = ln(prod j=1 to 89 j) (j).

To know more about hypothesis visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ1

a block slides along a track that descends through distance h. The track is frictionless except for the lower section. There the block slides to a stop in a certain distance d because of friction. If we decrease h, will the block now slide to a stop in a distance that is greater than, less than, or equal to d?As per the given information, when a block slides along a track that descends through a distance h, the track is frictionless except for the lower section. There the block slides to a stop in a certain distance d because of friction. Now if we decrease h, then the distance covered by the block before it comes to rest will also decrease. So the block will slide to a stop in a distance that is less than d. Hence the answer is less than d.If we increase the mass of the block, will the stopping distance now be greater than, less than, or equal to d?

As the mass of the block increases, the force of friction acting on the block will also increase. Hence the stopping distance will also increase. So the stopping distance now will be greater than d. Hence the answer is greater than d.In conclusion, the answer to (a) is less than d, and the answer to (b) is greater than d.

for such more questions on conclusion

https://brainly.com/question/26093731

#SPJ11

Answer:

To use an area model to determine the quotient of 556 and 16, we can divide a rectangle of area 556 into 16 equal parts. Each part will have an area of 556/16.

We can start by dividing 556 into 16 groups of 10 (160), and then into 16 groups of 3 (48). That leaves us with a remainder of 4.

So we have:

556 = 16 x 34 + 48 + 4

This shows that 556 can be written as 16 times some whole number (34) plus a remainder of 48 + 4/16.

Simplifying the remainder, we have:

48 + 4/16 = 48 + 1/4 = 48.25

Therefore, the quotient of 556 and 16 is:

556/16 = 34 1/4

The quotient of 556 and 16 using an area model can be determined by producing a rectangle with the total area of 556 and one side of 16. The length of the other side will be the quotient. In this case, the quotient is 34 3/4.

When asked to determine the quotient of 556 and 16 using the area model, one way to think of this is making a rectangle. The total area is 556 and one side is 16. The length of the other side will be the quotient.

Start by first estimating how many times 16 could fit into 556. Let's take 30 as an estimate, because 30*16 = 480, which is relatively close to 556. Draw a rectangle with the width of 16 and the length of 30.

Find the difference between the rectangle's area and 556. So, 556 - 480 = 76. Now, 76 is our remaining area to fill. 16 goes into 76 four more times, adding up to 64.

There is still a leftover area, which is 76-64 = 12. This is smaller than our width of 16. So, your final answer is 34 12/16 or 34 3/4 in simplest form.

https://brainly.com/question/18472914

#SPJ2

Answer:

P = [tex]2y^{2}[/tex] + 4xy +4

Q = [tex]-3y^{2}[/tex] + 7 -3xy

R = -3xy +8

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of getting tails in the three coins would be 0.125 or 12.5%.

To calculate the probability of an event happening, first, we need to identify the rate of the desired outcome versus the total possible outcomes. Moreover, to determine the total probability of two or more events happening we need to calculate the probability of each event and then multiply the results.

Probability of getting tails in any of the three coins:

1 / 2 = 0.5

Total probabilityy:

0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.125 or 12.5%

Learn more about probability in https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

Answer:

3x, 4x | 5, 3

Step-by-step explanation:

By using differentials to estimate the maximum error when measuring the volume of the sphere if the possible error in measuring the radius is 0.5. It will be 32,572.03 in³. Which is option (d).

The possible error in measuring the radius of the sphere is 0.5 in

The formula for the volume of a sphere is given by V(r) = 4/3πr³

The volume of the sphere when r=72 in is given by V(72) = 4/3π(72)³

When r= 72 + 0.5 in= 72.5 in, the volume of the sphere can be calculated using the formula:

V(72.5) = 4/3π(72.5)³

The difference between these two volumes, V(72) and V(72.5), gives us the maximum error while measuring the volume of a sphere. It can be calculated as follows:

V(72.5) - V(72) = 4/3π(72.5)³ - 4/3π(72)³= 4/3π [ (72.5)³ - (72)³ ]= 4/3π [ (72 + 0.5)³ - 72³ ]= (4/3)π [ 3(72²)(0.5) + 3(72)(0.5²) + 0.5³ ]≈ (4/3)π [ 777.5 ]= 3.28 × 10⁴ in³

Therefore, the maximum error while measuring the volume of a sphere with a radius of 72 in, where the possible error in measuring the radius is 0.5 in, is approximately 3.28 × 10⁴ in³ or 32,572.03 in³. Therefore coorect option is (D).

To know more about the maximum error: https://brainly.com/question/13370015

#SPJ11

Answer:

Multiplying the second equation by 5, we get:

15x + 20y = 180

Now, we can add this equation to the first equation:

26x = 208

x = 8

Substituting x = 8 in the second equation:

3(8) + 4y = 36

4y = 12

y = 3

Therefore, the solution to the system is (8, 3).

Answer: $22.50

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the cost per pound of the secret-formula coffee beans.

The total cost of the secret-formula beans is 12x dollars.

The total cost of the other beans is 15 × 18 = 270 dollars.

The total cost of the mix is (12 + 15) × 20 = 540 dollars.

Since the barista mixed 12 pounds of the secret-formula beans with 15 pounds of the other beans, the total weight of the mix is 12 + 15 = 27 pounds.

We can set up an equation based on the total cost of the mix:

12x + 270 = 540

Subtracting 270 from both sides:

12x = 270

Dividing both sides by 12:

x = 22.5

Therefore, the barista's secret-formula coffee beans cost $22.50 per pound.

An inequality representing the amount that the island of Martinique can received for hurricane relief efforts, where x is the number of days is y ≤ 32,000 + 4,500x.

Inequality is an algebraic statement that two or more mathematical expressions are unequal.

Inequalities can be represented as:

The total amount received by the island = $32,000

The daily receipt of donations = $4,500

Let the number of days = x

Let the funds raised for aid = y

y ≤ 32,000 + 4,500x

Thus, the inequality for the funds that the island can fundraise for hurricane relief aid by the end of the month is y ≤ 32,000 + 4,500x.

Learn more about inequalities at https://brainly.com/question/24372553.

#SPJ1

Answer:

The 2nd equation is false.

Step-by-step explanation:

You don't even have to solve. DE is not 58, it's 40.

The 2nd equation is false.

The reason why the terms a and m have to be relatively prime integers is that it is the only way to make sure that ax≡1 (mod m) is solvable for x within the integers modulo m.

Theorem:"If a and m are relatively prime integers and m > 1, then an inverse of a modulo m exists. Furthermore, this inverse is unique modulo m. (That is, there is a unique positive integer a less than m that is an inverse of a modulo m and every other inverse of a modulo m is congruent to a modulo m.)"If a and m are relatively prime integers and m > 1, then an inverse of a modulo m exists. Furthermore, this inverse is unique modulo m. (That is, there is a unique positive integer a less than m that is an inverse of a modulo m and every other inverse of a modulo m is congruent to a modulo m.)The inverse of a modulo m is another integer, x, such that ax≡1 (mod m).

This theorem has an interesting explanation: if a and m are not co-prime, then there is no guarantee that ax≡1 (mod m) has a solution in Zm. The reason for this is that if a and m have a common factor, then m “absorbs” some of the factors of a. When this happens, we lose information about the congruence class of a, and so it becomes harder (if not impossible) to undo the multiplication by .This is the reason why the terms a and m have to be relatively prime integers.

To know more about function click here :

https://brainly.com/question/12976257

#SPJ11

a. S = {(1, -1), (2, 1)}Let's begin by calculating the determinant of the matrix composed of the vectors of S, and checking if it is equal to 0. Because the two vectors are not colinear, they should span R2.|1 -1||2 1| determinant is not 0, therefore S spans R2. No geometric description is required for this example.

b. S = {(1, 1)} The set S contains one vector. A set containing only one vector cannot span a plane because it only spans a line. Therefore, S does not span R2. Geometric description: S spans a line that passes through the origin (0, 0) and the point (1, 1).c. S = {(0, 2), (1, 4)} Let's again begin by calculating the determinant of the matrix composed of the vectors of S, and checking if it is equal to 0.|0 2||1 4| determinant is 0, thus S does not span R2. In this scenario, S only spans the line that contains both vectors, which is the line with the equation y = 2x.

Geometric description: S spans a line that passes through the origin (0, 0) and the point (1, 2).

Learn more about geometric description:

https://brainly.com/question/28159445

#SPJ11

The Trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule are two methods used to approximate the value of a definite integral. The Trapezoidal rule approximates the integral by dividing the region between the lower and upper limits of the integral into n trapezoids, each with a width h. The approximate value of the integral is then calculated as the sum of the areas of the trapezoids. The Simpson's rule is similar, except the region is divided into n/2 trapezoids and then the integral is approximated using the weighted sum of the area of the trapezoids.

For the given integral 4 x x2 1 0 dx, with n = 200, the Trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule approximate the integral to be 7.4528 and 7.4485 respectively, rounded to four decimal places. The exact value of the integral is 7.4527. The difference between the exact and approximate values is very small, thus indicating that both the Trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule are accurate approximations.

for such more questions on approximate value

https://brainly.com/question/201331

#SPJ11

The parabolic trajectory of the falling prey can be described by the equation y = 228 – x2/57, where y is the height above the ground and x is the horizontal distance traveled in meters. In this case, the prey was dropped at a height of 228 m and flying at 19 m/s. To calculate the total distance traveled by the prey, we can use the equation for the parabola to solve for x.

We can rearrange the equation y = 228 – x2/57 to solve for x, which gives us[tex]x = √(57*(228 – y))[/tex]. When the prey hits the ground, the height (y) is 0. Plugging this into the equation for x, we can calculate that the total distance traveled by the prey is[tex]x = √(57*(228 - 0)) = √(57*228) = 84.9 m.\\[/tex] Expressing this answer to the nearest tenth of a meter gives us the final answer of 84.9 m.

for such more questions on  parabolic trajectory

https://brainly.com/question/13244761

#SPJ11

Anna should use 10 mL of the 72% salt solution and 20 mL of the 54% salt solution to make 30 mL of a 60% salt solution

Let's assume that Anna will use x mL of the 72% salt solution, and therefore she will use (30 - x) mL of the 54% salt solution (since the total volume is 30 mL).

To find out how much of each solution Anna should use, we can set up an equation based on the amount of salt in each solution.

The amount of salt in x mL of 72% salt solution is

= 0.72x

The amount of salt in (30 - x) mL of 54% salt solution is

= 0.54(30 - x)

To make a 60% salt solution, the total amount of salt in the final solution should be

0.6(30) = 18

So we can set up an equation

0.72x + 0.54(30 - x) = 1

Simplifying the equation

0.72x + 16.2 - 0.54x = 18

0.18x = 1.8

x = 10 ml

Learn more about equation here

brainly.com/question/17156168

#SPJ4

Answer:

[tex]{ \rm{s = 12( v_{0} + v_{1} )t}} \\ \\{ \boxed { \rm{t = \frac{s}{12(v_{0} + v_{1})} \: \: }}}[/tex]

A bin can hold 28 pounds. each toy car weighs 7 ounces., so the bin can hold 64 toy cars.

To determine the number of toy cars the bin can hold, we must first convert the weight limit of the bin and the weight of the toy cars to a uniform unit of measure.

We'll then divide the weight limit of the bin by the weight of one toy car. After that, we'll multiply the resulting value by the number of ounces in one pound (16).

Here's how to solve the problem:

1 pound = 16 ounces

Therefore, a bin that can hold 28 pounds can hold:28 × 16 = 448 Ounces

The weight of one toy car is 7 ounces.

Divide the weight limit of the bin (448 ounces) by the weight of one toy car (7 ounces):

448 ÷ 7 = 64

Therefore, the bin can hold 64 toy cars.

Learn more about weight limit at

https://brainly.com/question/14375094

#SPJ11

The volume of the solid whose base is the region inside the circle with radius 3 if the cross sections taken parallel to one of the diameters are equilateral triangles is 81/2*\sqrt3 by using the slicing method.

To find the volume of the solid whose base is the region inside the circle with radius 3, we need to integrate the area of the cross sections taken parallel to one of the diameters, which are equilateral triangles.

Let's consider a cross section of the solid taken at a distance x from the center of the circle.

Since the cross section is an equilateral triangle, all its sides have the same length.

Let  this length be y. Since the triangle is equilateral, its height can be found using the Pythagorean theorem as follows:

[tex]height = \sqrt{(y^2 - (y/2)^2)} = \sqrt{(3/4y^2)}= \sqrt{3/2y}[/tex]

Therefore, the area of the cross section at a distance x from the center of the circle is:

[tex]A(x) = (1/2)y\sqrt{3/2y} = \sqrt{3/4y^2}[/tex]

Now, we need to integrate this area over the range of x from -3 to 3 (since the circle has radius 3):

[tex]V = \int\ [-3,3]\sqrt{3/4*y^2} dx[/tex]

To find the limits of integration for y, we need to consider the equation of the circle:

[tex]x^2 + y^2= 3^2[/tex]

Solving for y, we get:

[tex]y =\pm\sqrt{(3^2 - x^2)}=\pm\sqrt{(9^2 - x^2)}[/tex]

Since we want the cross sections to be equilateral triangles, we know that y is equal to the height of an equilateral triangle with side length equal to the diameter of the circle, which is 2*3 = 6. Therefore, we can write:

[tex]y = 3*\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Substituting this into the integral, we get:

[tex]V = \int\ [-3,3] \sqrt{3/4*(3\sqrt3)^2} dx[/tex]

[tex]= \int\ [-3,3] 27/4*\sqrt{3} dx[/tex]

Integrating, we get:

[tex]V = [27/4\sqrt{3x}]*[-3,3][/tex]

[tex]= 81/2*\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Therefore, the volume of the solid is [tex]81/2*\sqrt3[/tex]cubic units

To practice more questions about 'volume of solid':

https://brainly.com/question/20284914

#SPJ11

The upper bound of a + b can be found by adding the upper bounds of a and b.

For a = 5cm, the nearest whole number is 5. The upper bound would be the midpoint between 5 and 6, which is 5.5.

For b = 3cm, the nearest whole number is 3. The upper bound would be the midpoint between 3 and 4, which is 3.5.

So the upper bound of a + b is:

5.5 + 3.5 = 9

Therefore, the upper bound of a + b is 9cm.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

i think its right

Solve the equation [tex]7/11=18/x+1[/tex] we find the solution is [tex]x = 27.2857[/tex]

Your example is an equation since an equation is any statement with an equals sign. Equations are frequently utilized for mathematical equations since mathematicians like equal signs. A set of instructions for achieving a certain result is called an equation.

A number, a constant, or a mix of numbers, variables, and operation symbols make up an expression. Two expressions joined by such an assignment operator form an equation.

we can cross-multiply,

[tex]7(x+1) = 11(18)[/tex]

Expanding the left side,

[tex]7x + 7 = 198[/tex]

Subtracting [tex]7[/tex] from both sides,

[tex]7x = 191[/tex]

Dividing both sides by [tex]7[/tex],

[tex]x = 191/7[/tex]

Therefore, the solution to the proportion is

[tex]x = 27.2857[/tex]

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

Answer: x=211/1296

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

- 1 and 7

Step-by-step explanation:

to find h(0) substitute x = 0 into h(x)

h(0) = 4(0) - 1 = 0 - 1 = - 1

to find h2) substitute x = 2 into h(x)

h(2) = 4(2) - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7