the x and y for 2x-8y=10

Answer:

D. x+10

Step-by-step explanation:

-2x² - 16x +40 = -2(x²+8x -20) = -2(x+10)(x-2)

Answer:

Mean: 17

Median: 16

Mode: 10

Step-by-step explanation:

8, 10, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 41

Median: (the middle number in the number list/data set) 16

Mode: 10

Mean: 8 + 10 + 10 + 11 + 16 + 17 + 19 + 21 + 41 = 153/9 = 17

The mean is equal to 17. The value of the median is 16 and the value of the mode is 10.

The mean of the numbers is defined as the ratio of the sum of the total numbers to the total count of the numbers.

The given numbers are,

8, 10, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 41

Mean = ( 8 + 10 + 10 + 11 + 16 + 17 + 19 + 21 + 41 ) / 9

Mean = 153/9

Mean = 17

The median is calculated by arranging the numbers in ascending order and the middle term of the data.

8, 10, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 41

The median is 16.

The mode is calculated as the highest repetition in the data,

8, 10, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 41

Mode: 10

Therefore, the mean is equal to 17. The value of the median is 16 and the value of the mode is 10.

To know more about the mean, mode and median follow

https://brainly.com/question/14532771

#SPJ2

Answer

8,112 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

505 pounds converted into ounces= 8080 ounces which is not more than 8,112

Step-by-step explanation:

1 pound = 16 ounces

505 pound = 505 x 16 = 8080 ounces

So 8112 ounces weighs more

Answer:

-2p +13

Step-by-step explanation:

(7p + 6) - (9p - 7)

Distribute the minus sign

(7p + 6) - 9p + 7

Combine like terms

7p -9p   +6 +7

-2p +13

Answer:

-2p + 13

Step-by-step explanation:

Distribute the -1 to (9p - 7):

7p + 6 - 9p + 7

Add like terms (7p and -9p, 6 and 7):

-2p + 13

Answer:

 |Z| = |-52.5|  = 52.5 > 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

 Null  hypothesis is rejected

We rejected the researcher's claim

A researcher do not claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has been  a good investment.

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given data A researcher claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has  been a good investment.

Population proportion 'P' = 0.96

                                       Q = 1-P = 1- 0.96 = 0.04

In a random sample of 2000 graduates, 1500 say their college degree has

been a good investment.

Sample proportion

                       [tex]p^{-} = \frac{x}{n} = \frac{1500}{2000} = 0.75[/tex]

Level of significance  ∝ = 0.05

[tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } = Z_{\frac{0.05}{2} } = Z_{0.025} = 1.96[/tex]

Test statistic

                        [tex]Z = \frac{p^{-} - P }{\sqrt{\frac{PQ}{n} } }[/tex]

                        [tex]Z = \frac{0.75 - 0.96 }{\sqrt{\frac{0.96 X 0.04}{2000} } }[/tex]

                        [tex]Z = \frac{-0.21}{0.00435} = -52.5[/tex]

    |Z| = |-52.5|  = 52.5 > 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

  Null  hypothesis is rejected

  We rejected the researcher's claim

Conclusion:-

A researcher do not claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has been  a good investment.

Answer:

  The graph of the function is negative on (3, ∞)

Step-by-step explanation:

The function starts negative at the left side of the graph, crosses the x-axis at x = -5, touches the x-axis at x = 1, again crosses into negative values at x = 3.

The function is positive on the open intervals (-5, 1) and (1, 3). It is negative on the open intervals (-∞, -5) and (3, ∞). The latter description matches the last answer choice:

  the graph of the function is negative on (3, ∞).

Answer:

The answer is "0.2"

Step-by-step explanation:

Given value:

factor = 10

The amount of two divided by the number of options. When both fours and eight gaps are available, that probability can be defined as follows:

[tex]\Rightarrow \frac{2}{10}\\\\\Rightarrow \frac{1}{5}\\\\\Rightarrow 0.2\\[/tex]

Answer:

In Geometry, we have several undefined terms: point, line and plane. From these three undefined terms, all other terms in Geometry can be defined. In Geometry, we define a point as a location and no size. ... And the third undefined term is the line.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

198

Step-by-step explanation:

If you add 11,18, 19, 81, 88, 89, 91, 98, 99 then the sum would be 594 then dividing by 3 would be 198.

PLZ MARK BRAINLIEST!!!

Answer:

129.3

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to find the number in the middle of all of the heights and multiply them by the all of the frequency (122x7 etc). When you have those answers, add them together and divide the answer by 40.

Answer:

juice wrld

Step-by-step explanation:

fast

Answer:

yuh

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

( 2, 4 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Look at the attachment

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

The total surface area of a cubical lunch box having each edge as 10 cm is 600 square centimeter. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

The surface area of the cube all six faces of the cube are made up of squares of the same dimensions then the total surface area of the cube will be the surface area of one face added six times to itself. The formula to find the surface area of a cube is 6a², where a is edge.

Given that, the cubical lunch box having each edge as 10 cm.

Here, surface area = 6×10²

= 600 square centimeter

Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

Learn more about the surface area of a cube here:

brainly.com/question/23273671.

#SPJ2

Answer:

a) We want to test the claim that 35​% of adults have heard of the new electronic reader, then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.35[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p \neq 0.35[/tex]  

And is a two tailed test

b) [tex]z=\frac{0.334 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{1562}}}=-1.326[/tex]  

c) [tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.326)=0.184[/tex]  

d) Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.35[/tex]  

e) Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=1562 represent the random sample selected

X=522 represent the people who have heard of a new electronic reader

[tex]\hat p=\frac{522}{1562}=0.334[/tex] estimated proportion of people who have heard of a new electronic reader

[tex]p_o=0.35[/tex] is the value to verify

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Part a

We want to test the claim that 35​% of adults have heard of the new electronic reader, then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.35[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p \neq 0.35[/tex]  

And is a two tailed test

Part b

The statistic for this case is given :

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.334 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{1562}}}=-1.326[/tex]  

Part c

We can calculate the p value using the laternative hypothesis with the following probability:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.326)=0.184[/tex]  

Part d

The null hypothesis for this case would be:

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.35[/tex]  

Part e

The best conclusion for this case would be:

Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.

Answer:

DUEDY A. 32 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

PATROLLING WEE WOOO

Xd

Answer:

55  125

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the smaller angle = x

Let the larger angle = x + 70

They are supplementary so the total of the two angles, by definition must be 180 degrees. Note that you should understand that any number of angles can but supplementary as long as they all add up to 180 degrees.

x + x + 70 = 180

2x + 70 = 180

2x + 70 - 70 = 180 - 70

2x = 110

2x/2 = 110/2

x = 55

the smaller angle = 55 degrees

The larger angle = 55 + 70 = 125

Answer: 3x^4+7x^3+7x^2+11x+4

Step-by-step explanation:

(x^2+3x+4)(3x^2-2x+1)

3x^4-2x^3+x^2+9x^3-6x^2+3x+12x^2-8x+4

Collect like terms

3x^4-2x^3+9x^3+x^2-6x^2+12x^2+3x+8x+4

3x^4+7x^3+7x^2+11x+4

Answer:

To multiply (x^2 + 3x + 4) and (3x^2 - 2x + 1), we need to distribute each term of the first polynomial to every term in the second polynomial:

(x^2 + 3x + 4)(3x^2 - 2x + 1)

= x^2 * (3x^2 - 2x + 1) + 3x * (3x^2 - 2x + 1) + 4 * (3x^2 - 2x + 1)

Now, let's simplify each term:

= 3x^4 - 2x^3 + x^2 + 9x^3 - 6x^2 + 3x + 12x^2 - 8x + 4

Combining like terms:

= 3x^4 + (-2x^3 + 9x^3) + (x^2 - 6x^2 + 12x^2) + (3x - 8x) + 4

= 3x^4 + 7x^3 + 7x^2 - 5x + 4

So, the product of (x^2 + 3x + 4) and (3x^2 - 2x + 1) is 3x^4 + 7x^3 + 7x^2 - 5x + 4.

Therefore, the correct answer is option C: 3x^4 + 7x^3 + 7x^2 - 5x + 4.

Answer:

4.3 + (-1.07)+(-2.971)

Step-by-step explanation:

4.3 + (-1.07)+(-2.971)

4.3 -1.07-2.971

4.3 - 4.041= 0.259

Answer:

a) The range of scores that includes the middle 95% of these test scores is between 470 and 674.

b) The range of scores that includes the middle 90% of these test scores is between 488.1 and 655.9.

Step-by-step explanation:

68-95-99.7 rule:

The Empirical Rule states that, for a normally distributed random variable:

68% of the measures are within 1 standard deviation of the mean.

95% of the measures are within 2 standard deviation of the mean.

99.7% of the measures are within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

In this problem, we have that:

Z-score:

Problems of normally distributed samples are solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question:

Mean [tex]\mu = 572[/tex], standard deviation [tex]\sigma = 51[/tex]

a. Use the 68-95-99.7 rule to estimate the range of scores that includes the middle 95% of these test scores.

By the 68-95-99.7 rule, within 2 standard deviations of the mean.

572 - 2*51 = 470

572 + 2*51 = 674

The range of scores that includes the middle 95% of these test scores is between 470 and 674.

b. Use technology to estimate the range of scores that includes the middle 90% of these test scores.

Using the z-score formula.

Between these following percentiles:

50 - (90/2) = 5th percentile

50 + (90/2) = 95th percentile.

5th percentile.

X when Z has a pvalue of 0.05. So when X when Z = -1.645.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]-1.645 = \frac{X - 572}{51}[/tex]

[tex]X - 572 = -1.645*51[/tex]

[tex]X = 488.1[/tex]

95th percentile.

X when Z has a pvalue of 0.95. So when X when Z = 1.645.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]1.645 = \frac{X - 572}{51}[/tex]

[tex]X - 572 = 1.645*51[/tex]

[tex]X = 655.9[/tex]

The range of scores that includes the middle 90% of these test scores is between 488.1 and 655.9.

Answer:

121 km

Step-by-step explanation:

i added all the number together

Answer:

1/4 x 19=4.75 rounded to 4.8 or 5

Step-by-step explanation:

please mark brainliest if this helped

Answer:

4.75

Step-by-step explanation:

simple math you would find a number that both 4 and 19 have in common make that tha dominator and mutiple the number that equaled the dominator by the numerator to make them like fractions. mutiply across and make a simple fraction

Answer:

(B) [tex]f(x)=-3(x+1)(x-5)[/tex]

x=5

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the three equivalent forms of f(x):

[tex]f(x)=-3(x-2)^2+27\\f(x)=-3(x+1)(x-5)\\f(x)=-3x^2+12x+15[/tex]

The form which most quickly reveals the zeros (or "roots") of f(x) is

(B) [tex]f(x)=-3(x+1)(x-5)[/tex]

This is as a result of the fact that on equating to zero, the roots becomes immediately  evident.

[tex]f(x)=-3(x+1)(x-5)=0\\-3\neq 0\\Therefore:\\x+1=0$ or x-5=0\\The zeros are x=-1 or x=5[/tex]

Therefore, one of the zeros, x=5

Answer:

i dont think the one above is correct. here is the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The probability that it came from A, given that is defective is 0.362.

Step-by-step explanation:

Define the events:

A: The element comes from A.

B: The element comes from B.

C: The element comes from C.

D: The elemens is defective.

We are given that P(A) = 0.25, P(B) = 0.35, P(C) = 0.4. Recall that since the element comes from only one of the machines, if an element is defective, it comes either from A, B or C. Using the probability axioms, we can calculate that

[tex]P(D) = P(A\cap D) + P(B\cap D) + P(C\cap D)[/tex]

Recall that given events E,F the conditional probability of E given F is defined as

[tex]P(E|F) = \frac{P(E\cap F)}{P(F)}[/tex], from where we deduce that

[tex]P(E\cap F) = P(E|F)P(F)[/tex].

We are given that given that the element is from A, the probability of being defective is 5%. That is P(D|A) =0.05. Using the previous analysis we get that

[tex] P(D) = P(A)P(D|A)+P(B) P(D|B) + P(C)P(D|C) = 0.05\cdot 0.25+0.04\cdot 0.35+0.02\cdot 0.4 = 0.0345[/tex]

We are told to calculate P(A|D), then using the formulas we have

[tex] P(A|D) = \frac{P(A\cap D)}{P(D)}= \frac{P(D|A)P(A)}{P(D)}= \frac{0.05\cdot 0.25}{0.0345}= 0.36231884[/tex]

Answer:

  (1 3/4, 2 1/2)

Step-by-step explanation:

The point of intersection is an "ordered pair." That means the order of the two numbers is important. The first number means something different than the second number.

So, if you want a reasonable estimate for (1.8, 2.6), you need to have the first number in the estimate be close to 1.8. The offered choices are ...

  1 3/4 = 1.75

  2 1/2 = 2.5

  1 1/3 ≈ 1.33

The closest of these to 1.8 is 1.75, so the first choice is the best choice so far.

__

The second number of the estimate needs to be close to 2.6. The offered choices are ...

  2 1/2 = 2.5

  1 3/4 = 1.75

  1 1/3 = 1.33

The closest of these to 2.6 is 2.5, so the first choice is still the best choice.

  A reasonable estimate is (1 3/4, 2 1/2).

Answer:

A: (1 3/4, 2 1/2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

555 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

w = (-3/2)u + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we don't know the value of u, we can only solve -12u+13=8w-3 for w in terms of u.

Adding 3 to both sides, we get -12u+13=8w-3 => -12u+16=8w, or

8w = -12u + 16

Reduce this by dividing all three terms by 8:

w = (-12/8)u + 2

... and then reduce the fraction:      w = (-3/2)u + 2

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

they are on the bed

The total legs on the floor excluding chicken is 50 legs

From the given question, the following animals have 4 legs

dogs, cats, girraffe and cows

Duck and chickens both have 2 legs

The total number of legs on the floor = 4(2) + 4(4) + 1(4) + 5(4) + 1(2)

Total number. = 8 + 20 + 22
Total number = 50legs

Hence the total legs on the floor excluding chicken is 50 legs

Learn more on word problems here:

https://brainly.com/question/13818690

#SPJ5

Answer: 109 years old

Step-by-step explanation:

2009-1900=109

Answer:

109years old

Step-by-step explanation:

1900

1900 to 2000 is 100 years old

2000 to 2009 is 9 years old

100+9=109

Answer:

(1): -4.7 - 2.3x + 0.5 - 4x

(2):-5.3x-4.2-x

(3):-3.4-6.3x-0.8

Step-by-step explanation:

By Collecting like terms and adding the answer I get -6.3x - 4.2

(1):-4.7-2.3x+0.5-4x

Collect like terms

-2.3x-4x-4.7+0.5

-6.3x-4.2

(2):-5.3x-4.2-x

Collect like terms

-5.3x-x-4.2

-6.3x-4.2

(3): -3.4-6.3x-0.8

Collect like terms

-6.3x-3.4-0.8

-6.3x-4.2

Answer:

The first 3 are equivalent the last 3 aren't.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the 2nd one

i am pretty sure

Step-by-step explanation: