Ten cards numbered from 1 to 10 inclusive are placed in a hat Irene takes a card out of the hat without looking what is the probability that she takes out:
A] the number 10
B] an odd number
C] a number greater than 4
D] a prime number
E] a number between 5 and 9?

Answer: a makes the most sense

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

z =2.76

Step-by-step explanation:

z - 2.3 = 0.46

Add 2.3 to each side

z - 2.3+2.3 = 0.46+2.3

z =2.76

Answer:

200; 80% of 250 is 200

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

200

Answer:

173.15 yards is the distance from tee to hole.

Step-by-step explanation:

Please refer to the image attached.

Let A is the position of tee and where the golfer is standing.

C is the position of hole.

CB is the vertical distance between greens and tee.

Angle of elevation, [tex]\angle BAC = 12^\circ[/tex]

To find: side AC.

Using trigonometric functions, we know that value of sine is:

[tex]sin\theta = \dfrac{\text{Perpendicular}}{\text{Hypotenuse}}[/tex]

Here [tex]\theta = \angle BAC = 12^\circ[/tex]

Perpendicular is side CB.

Hypotenuse is side AC.

[tex]sin12^\circ = \dfrac{\text{CB}}{\text{AC}}\\\Rightarrow \text{CB} = \dfrac{36}{sin12^\circ}\\\Rightarrow \text{CB} = 173.15\ yards[/tex]

Hence, 173.15 yards is the distance from tee to hole.

Step-by-step explanation:

a. 81 ÷ 9 = 9

b. 40 ÷ 5 = 8

c. 21 ÷ 3 = 7

d. 54 ÷ 6 = 9

e. 42 ÷ 7 = 6

f. 63 ÷ 9 = 7

g. 36 ÷ 4 = 4

h. 45 ÷ 9 = 5

i. 39 ÷ 3 = 12

j. 24 ÷ 6 = 4

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

H0: µ2≤µ1 versus H1: µ2>µ1

(Upper tailed test)

WE will consider differences as (New – Old).

From given data, we have

Dbar = 0.70

SD = 0.70

n = 5

Degrees of freedom = df = n – 1 = 5 – 1 = 4

Test statistic = t = (Dbar - µd) /[SD/sqrt(n)]

t = (0.70 – 0)/[0.70/sqrt(5)]

t = 0.70/ 0.3130

t = 2.2361

Critical value = 2.1318

(by using t-table)

P-value = 0.0445

(by using t-table)

P-value < α = 0.05

So, we reject the null hypothesis

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the average monthly sales revenue increases after the advertising.

Kindly check the first attached image for the graphical table.

Part b

P-value = 0.0445

α = 0.01

P-value > α = 0.01

So, we do not reject the null hypothesis

There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the average monthly sales revenue increases after the advertising.

Kindly check the second attached image for the graphical table.

Answer:

9 times

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Mathematically, 9, although reality wise, you could flip the coin and get heads every time, or the opposite.

I think you mean mathematically though, so yes, it would be 9.

Answer:

  bisect each other.

Step-by-step explanation:

The midpoints are the same point, so the diagonals bisect each other.

__

More elaboration on a proof

The alternate interior angles formed by diagonals and the sides of the triangle are congruent, so the (point-to-point) triangles formed by the crossing diagonals are congruent ASA. Since the sides of those triangles are congruent, the diagonals meet at their midpoints. That is, the diagonals bisect each other.

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2 is also equal to 2/4 since 2 is half of 4 so 3/4 minus 2/4 will get you 1/4

Please give brainliest :3

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4 - 1/2

Get a common denominator

3/4 -1/2*2/2

3/4 - 2/4

1/4

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Kindly check the attached images below to see the step by step explanation to the question above.

Answer:

I would love to help you but all I see is dots

the answer is 8 because there is 4 sides on a square and 8 x 4 is 32.

Answer:

  7(5 +2)

Step-by-step explanation:

From our knowledge of times tables, we know that ...

  35 = 5·7

  14 = 2·7

so the greatest common factor of 35 and 14 is 7. Factoring that out, we have ...

  35 +14 = 7(5 +2)

The null and alternative hypothesis for the tests are:

H0: μ = 20

Ha: μ < 20

Given data:

In this situation, the null and alternative hypotheses can be formulated as follows:

Null Hypothesis (H0): The average weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill is equal to 20 pounds.

Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): The average weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill is less than 20 pounds.

In symbolic notation:

H0: μ = 20

Ha: μ < 20

where μ represents the population mean weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill.

The null hypothesis assumes that the claim made by the company is accurate and that the average weight loss is indeed 20 pounds. The alternative hypothesis challenges this claim and suggests that the actual average weight loss may be less than 20 pounds, implying that the "hype" around the pill's effectiveness might be exaggerated.

To learn more about null and alternative hypothesis, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30535681

#SPJ12

Domain (infinity,infinity)

Range (infinity,[tex]\sqrt{7}[/tex])

Answer: AC = 2.33

Step-by-step explanation:

use tangent to find the missing side

Tangent = opposite/adjacent

tan B = ?/5

tan 25 = ?/5

multiply each side by 5

? = 2.33153829.....

so

AC = 2.33

Answer:

B; {x|x<-8}

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4x - 5y = 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Any line parallel to 4x - 5y = 35 will have the same equation EXCEPT that the constant will be different.

Starting with 4x - 5y = 35, replace x with the given x-coordinate -5 and the given y-coordinate -6, and finally the given 35 with the constant C:

4(-5) - 5(-6) = C, or

-20 + 30 = C.  Thus, C = 10, and the equation of the new line is

4x - 5y = 10

The equation of line is 4x - 5y = 10

A straight line's general equation is y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. On the y-axis, this number c is referred to as the intercept. Key Point y = mx + c is the equation for a straight line with a gradient of m and an intercept of c on the y-axis.

Given the points (-5,-6)

and parallel to line 4x - 5y = 35...…..(1)

the equation of line is (y - y₁) = m( x - x₁)

for parallel line condition the value of m is equal to both equations

converting eq. 1 in the form of y = mx + c

4x - 5y = 35

we get y = 4/5x -7

here m = 4/5 and c = -7

substitute the value of m in  equation of line

where y₁ = -6; x₁ = -5

(y - (-6)) = 4/5(x - (-5))

y +6 = 4/5(x+5)

simplify above eq. we get

4x - 5y = 20

Hence the equation of  the line that passes through the point (- 5, - 6) is  4x - 5y = 20

Learn more about equation of line

https://brainly.com/question/29774095

#SPJ5

Answer:-53/12

Step-by-step explanation:

-7 2/3+(-5 1/2)+8 3/4

-7 2/3-5 1/2+8 3/4

-23/3 - 11/2 + 35/4

(4x-23 - 6x11 + 3x35)/12

(-92-66+105)/12=-53/12

Answer:

a. Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

If the absolute value of the z-score is 2 or larger, X is considered a surprising outcome.

In this question:

[tex]\mu = 7, \sigma = 3[/tex]

Would you be surprised if it took less than one minute to find a parking space?

We have to find the z-score when X = 1. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{1 - 7}{3}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2[/tex]

Since Z = -2, the correct answer is:

a. Yes

Answer: pi/3

Step-by-step explanation:

correct on edge 2020

The equivalent value of trigonometric relation sin⁻¹ ( √3/2 ) = π/3

Trigonometry is the study of the relationships between the angles and the lengths of the sides of triangles

The six trigonometric functions are sin , cos , tan , cosec , sec and cot

Let the angle be θ , such that

sin θ = opposite / hypotenuse

cos θ = adjacent / hypotenuse

tan θ = opposite / adjacent

tan θ = sin θ / cos θ

cosec θ = 1/sin θ

sec θ = 1/cos θ

cot θ = 1/tan θ

Given data ,

Let the trigonometric relation be represented as A

Now , the value of A is

sin⁻¹ ( √3/2 ) = θ

Now , the value of θ is calculated by

In a triangle , sin θ = opposite / hypotenuse

So , sin θ = √3/2

The value of θ = 60°

So , the measure of 60° in radians is θ = π/3

Hence , the value of θ from the trigonometric relation is π/3

To learn more about trigonometric relations click :

https://brainly.com/question/14746686

#SPJ7

Answer:

1/10

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 10 tiles and only 1 tile numbered 4 so 1 out of 10 tiles are numbered 4

Answer:

Y=x-3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

slope intercept form

(slope=x)(1x=x)

Answer:

The answer of life is 42 just look it up

Answer:

7/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Add up the amount of the marbles in total and read what color the marble they ask for the chances of. The color of marble should go first then the total of the marbles. (they could ask for more than one color so just add up both the colors given.)

Answer:

D. Vertx: (3,-16); Intercepts: x = -1, 7

Step-by-step explanation:

I graphed the equation on the graph below.

Answer:

height = 140.875m

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of first pyramid= base * height /3 = 230*147/3= 11270

if the base is 240, volume is remain -> height = volume *3 /base

                                                                            = 11270*3/240 =140.875m

Answer:

a. If the P-value is smaller than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

b. Pooled proportion = 0.8

c. z = 2.7

d. As the P-value (0.0072) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportions differ significantly.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

We will use the P-value approach, so the decision rule is that if the P-value is lower than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

The claim is that the proportions differ significantly.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1, of size n1=200 has a proportion of p1=0.85.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=170/200=0.85[/tex]

The sample 2, of size n2=150 has a proportion of p2=0.7333.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=110/150=0.7333[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.1167.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.85-0.7333=0.1167[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{170+110}{200+150}=\dfrac{280}{350}=0.8[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.8*0.2}{200}+\dfrac{0.8*0.2}{150}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.0008+0.00107}=\sqrt{0.00187}=0.0432[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.1167-0}{0.0432}=\dfrac{0.1167}{0.0432}=2.7[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=2\cdot P(z>2.7)=0.0072[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0072) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportions differ significantly.

Answer:

It will take 12 years using simple interest

Step-by-step explanation:

2,500 x 1.7% = 42.5

42.5 x 12 + 510

2500 +510 +3010

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Given the variables

X₁: Weight of a safety helmet for racers

X₂: Price of a safety helmet for racers

Note, there is n= 17 observed values for each variable so for all calculations I'll use this number and disregard the 18 mentioned in the text.

a) Scatterplot in attachment.

b) If you look at the diagram it seems that there is a negative linear regression between the price and the weight of the helmets, meaning, the higher the helmet weights, the less it costs.

c) The estimated regression equation is ^Yi= a + bXi

n= 17; ∑Y= 6466; ∑Y²= 3063392; ∑X= 1008; ∑X²= 60294; ∑XY= 367536

Y[bar]= 380.35; X[bar]= 59.29

[tex]b= \frac{sumXY-\frac{(sumX)(sumY)}{n} }{sumX^2-\frac{(sumX)^2}{n} } = \frac{367536-\frac{1008*6466}{17} }{60294-\frac{(1008)^2}{17} } = -30.18[/tex]

[tex]a= Y[bar]- bX[bar]= 380.35-(-30.18)*59.29= 2169.77[/tex]

The estimated regression equation for the price of the helmets as a function of their weight is:

^Yi= 2169.77 -30.18Xi

I hope it helps!