Please helpppp me i

Using the formula for the margin of error, it is found that a smaller confidence interval would be obtained as follow:

D. Increase the sample size to 64.

It is given by the following formula:

[tex]M = z\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In which:

For a smaller interval, we need to decrease the margin of error, which is possible increasing the sample size, hence option D is correct.

More can be learned about margin of error at https://brainly.com/question/25779324

#SPJ1

Answer:

A is the right answer

Step-by-step explanation:

the y axis can start at 0 and the y axis isn't broken. and the increments aren't to large so most reasonable will be A

Answer:

different widths of the bars

Step-by-step explanation:

the y-axis does begin at 0, the increments are reasonable, and the y-axis is not broken

the widths of the bars are visibly different, so that answer makes the most sense.

Answer:

a) Brain sweep out 4 radians

b) Brian is -0.3922 km to the right of the center of the ski trail

c) Brian is -0.4541 km above of the center of the ski trail

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

circular ski trail radius = 0.6 km

Derek starts at the 3-o'clock position and travels 2.4 km in the counter-clockwise direction.

a) How many radians does Brian sweep out?

arc length = 2.4 km

from the diagram;

arc length = rθ

θ = arc length / r

θ = 2.4 / 0.6

θ = 4 radians

Therefore, Brain sweep out 4 radians

b) When Brian stops skiing, how many km is Brian to the right of the center of the ski trail?

from the diagram;

x = rcosθ

we substitute

x = 0.6 × cos(4)

x = 0.6 × -0.65364

x = -0.3922 km

Therefore Brian is -0.3922 km to the right of the center of the ski trail

c) When Brian stops skiing, how many km is Brian above of the center of the ski trail?

from the diagram;

m = rsinθ

m = 0.6 × -0.7568

m = -0.4541 km

Therefore, Brian is -0.4541 km above of the center of the ski trail

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  2. The x-intercept is 4, and the y-intercept is -3

Step-by-step explanation:

The given equation is in general form. I find it easier to see the intercepts when the equation is written in standard form:

  3x -4y = 12

Setting y=0 and solving for x, we have the x-intercept:

  3x = 12   ⇒   x = 12/3 = 4

Setting x=0 and solving for y, we have the y-intercept:

  -4y = 12   ⇒   y = 12/-4 = -3

The x-intercept is 4; the y-intercept is -3.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2, 6, 10, 14

Entonces, como puede ver, el patrón en la secuencia se suma por 4 como (+4)

(So, as you see that the pattern in the sequence is added by 4 )

2

2+4=6

6+4=10

10+4=14

Entonces, los próximos tres términos serán (Then, the next three terms will be)

14+4=18

18+4=22

22+4=26

Answer:

unbounded region

A feasible region that cannot be enclosed in a closed figure is known as an unbounded region. A feasible region is a set of all possible points of an optimization problem that satisfy the problem's constraints; feasible sets may be bounded or unbounded.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(-2) is the index of y make value 1/y².

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find what index of y makes value 1/y².

Here, the numerator is 1 and the denominator is y².

We know that,

[tex]\dfrac{1}{a^x}=a^{-x}[/tex]

So, the given expression is :

[tex]\dfrac{1}{y^2}=y^{-2}[/tex]

Hence, (-2) is the index of y make value 1/y².

Answer:

hi please upload the photo so we can help :)

Answer:

A:12p^3r and D:54p^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 31

Step-by-step explanation: just took the test

Answer:

Last one (x + 4, y - 1).

Step-by-step explanation:

From the point, you go right 4 (going right on a graph is positive).

From there, you go down 1 (going down on a graph is negative).

Answer:

(10 , -1)

Step-by-step explanation:

(10)+6(-1)=4

10-6=4

Answer:

82% of what number is 369

82% of 450 is 369

Answer:

number is 450

Step-by-step explanation:

let the number be x

82% of x=369

[tex]\frac{82}{100}[/tex]x = 369

82x=369*100

x=36900/82

x=450

Answer:

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the formula :

Pn = 25.8(1.0219)^h to predict the population of Ghana ;

The equation given is in the form of an exponential function:

The general form of an exponential distribution :

y = ab^x

a = Initial value ; b = constant multiplier or growth or Decay factor

Comparing :

The number in parenthesis = 1.0219 = b

b = Decay or growth factor :

Since b > 1 ; then We have a growth factor;

b = 1 + rate

1.0219 = 1 + rate

Rate = 1.0219 - 1

Rate = 0.0219

Hence, the population is growing at a rate of about (0.0219)*100% = 2.19%

There is a formula for the total interior angles of a polygon:

180(sides−2)=total interior angles

One of the angles is 100 and all the others are 110.

We can rewrite the equation.

Assume there is x number of sides.

There are x−1 number of angles, 110 degrees

180(x−2)=100+110(x−1)

180x−360=100+110x−110

70x−360=100−110

70x−360=−10

70x=3507x=35

x=5

There are 5 sides to the polygon.

We can check our answer:

180(sides−2)=total interior angles

Therefore it is true:

The polygon has 5 sides

I HOPE IT HELPS

HAVE A GREAT DAY

#Liliflim

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

17

Answer: The missing angle is 32 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation: All the degrees in a triangle sum up to 180 degrees. Add the two known angles and subtract the sum from 180

Hope this helps! :)

serian 144 apretones de manos en total

Answer:

66

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps :)

Answer:

m =7.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the constant number = k.

g(m) = k/m,

3.5 = k/10,

k = 35.

Thus, when g(m) = 5 = 35/m, m = 7.

Answer:

53degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the diagram attached

<PQR = 75degrees

From the diagram'

<SQR + <PQS = <PQR

<SQR + 22 = 75

<SQR = 75-22

<SQR= 53degrees

Hence the measure of <SQR is 53degrees

Answer:

2.5 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 12 inches in a foot, so divide the number of inches by 12

30 ÷ 12 = 2.5

2.5 feet (ft)

hope this helped!

Answer:

If Khalfan is 30 inches, he is 2.5 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

1 foot is 12 inches, so to get closest to 30, you double 12 to 24, and then you add another 6 inches, which is half of 1 foot, and there you go! You're welcome!

Answer:

2.2916

Step-by-step explanation:

Imagine bannanas flying into your room? I mean I couldn't imagine that either but im just saying

Answer:

[tex]y = -\frac{1}{3}m + 41[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Linear equation:

A linear function has the following format:

[tex]y = mn + b[/tex]

In which m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

When she plants 30 stalks, each plant yields 31 oz of beans. When she plants 36 stalks, each plant produces 29 oz of beans.

This means that these two points belong to the line: (30,31), (36,29).

Finding the slope:

When we have two points, the slope is given by the change in the output divided by the change in the input.

Change in the output: 29 - 31 = -2

Change in the input: 36 - 30 = 6

Slope:

[tex]m = \frac{-2}{6} = -\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Thus

[tex]y = -\frac{1}{3}m + b[/tex]

Finding b:

We take one of the points and replace on the equation.

(30,31) means that [tex]m = 30, y = 31[/tex]. Thus

[tex]y = -\frac{1}{3}m + b[/tex]

[tex]31 = -\frac{1}{3}(30) + b[/tex]

[tex]31 = -10 + b[/tex]

[tex]b = 41[/tex]

Thus

[tex]y = -\frac{1}{3}m + 41[/tex]

Answer:

108

Step-by-step explanation: When you want to find out how much a fraction fits into a number, you have to multiply it by how much it takes to make 1 whole number using the fraction. 1/3 requires 3 of them to make 1 whole number. This means that 36 can be multiplied by 3, which gives us the answer of 108

Answer:

108 of 1/3 servings are in 36 servings.

Step-by-step explanation:

3/1 multiples 3 become 1.

1 multiple 36 and equal 36,

so,3 multiple 36.

3×36=108

Answer:

C. 1 and 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9.3 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]y = 2.89\sin(0.0145x-1.40) + 10.99.[/tex]

Required

Hours of sunlight on Feb 21, 2013

First, calculate the number of days from Jan 1, 2013 to Feb 21, 2013

[tex]days = 52[/tex]

So:

[tex]x = 52[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]y = 2.89\sin(0.0145x-1.40) + 10.99.[/tex]

[tex]y = 2.89\sin(0.0145*52-1.40) + 10.99.[/tex]

[tex]y = 2.89\sin(0.754-1.40) + 10.99.[/tex]

[tex]y = 2.89\sin(-0.646) + 10.99.[/tex]

[tex]y = 2.89*-0.6020 + 10.99.[/tex]

[tex]y = -1.740 + 10.99.[/tex]

[tex]y = 9.25[/tex]

[tex]y = 9.3[/tex] --- approximated

Answer:

The growth rate of the exponential function exceeds the growth rate of the linear function for 1 > x > 3

Step-by-step explanation:

edg2020 thank me latter

The growth rate of the exponential function exceeds the growth rate of the linear function for 1 ≤ x ≤ 3.

We have,

The graph of the linear function y = 7x is a straight line with a constant slope of 7, while the graph of the exponential function y = 7% is an increasing curve that starts at y = 1 and approaches y = infinity as x increases.

To compare the growth rates of the two functions, we can look at their derivatives.

The derivative of y = 7x is 7, which is a constant, while the derivative of

y = 7% is y' = 0.07y, which is proportional to y.

Now,

For x < 0, the growth rate of the linear function y = 7x exceeds the growth rate of the exponential function y = 7%.

This eliminates options 1 and 3.

For x > 0, the growth rate of the exponential function y = 7% exceeds the growth rate of the linear function y = 7x, since the derivative of the exponential function is proportional to the function itself.

This eliminates option 2.

Thus,

The growth rate of the exponential function exceeds the growth rate of the linear function for 1 ≤ x ≤ 3.

Learn more about functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/28533782

#SPJ7