PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!!!

Expressions and answer options in picture

If you were asked to subtract in the following pair of expressions, what you use as the least common denominator?



any unrelated answers will be reported​

Answer:

7 square units

Step-by-step explanation:

We can break down this complex shape into smaller shapes.

I've broken it down into a rectangle, a square, and a triangle (See attached picture)

Let's first find the area of the triangle. To do this we use the formula [tex]\frac{bh}{2}[/tex]. The base is 1 (because the top is 2, and 1 is already used on the triangle - 2-1 = 1.) and the height is 2 (because 4 is already used on the left, and 2 was used on the right so 4-2=2).

[tex]\frac{2\cdot1}{2} = \frac{2}{2} = 1[/tex].

Now let's find the area of the top square - we can just square 2 which is 4.

To find the area of the bottom rectangle, we can multiply it's two side lengths of 2 and 1 = 2.

Adding these all together gets us 4+2+1 = 7.

Hope this helped!

Answer with  explanation:

A x% confidence interval interprets that a person can be x% confident thatthe true mean lies in it.

Here, Credit card companies is using the collection agency to justify the cost of , the agency must collect an average of at least $200 per customer.

i.e. [tex]H_0:\mu \geq200,\ \ \ H_a:\mu<200[/tex]

The 90% confidence interval on the mean collected amount was reported as ($190.25, $250.75) .

I recommend that we can be 90% sure that the true mean collected amount  lies in ($190.25, $250.75).

Also, $200 lies in it such that it is more far from $250.75 than $190.25, that means there are large chances of having an average is at least $200 per customer.

Answer:

5(x) +3(y)<26

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the number of cakes she will bake and let you know represent the nymber of quiche she will bake.

She will use less than 26 eggs while baking and 5 eggs for each cake and 3 eggs for each quiche.

The inequality representing the above statement iz given below.

5(x) +3(y)<26

Answer:

The probability is 0.31084

Step-by-step explanation:

We can calculate this probability using the z-score route.

Mathematically;

z = (x-mean)/SD/√n

Where the mean = 16, SD = 3 and n = 36

For 15.8, we have;

z = (15.8-16)/3/√36 = -0.2/3/6 = -0.2/0.5 = -0.4

For 16.2, we have

z = (16.2-16)/3/√36 = 0.2/3/6 = 0.2/0.5 = 0.4

So the probability we want to calculate is;

P(-0.4<z<0.4)

We can get this using the standard normal distribution table;

So we have;

P(-0.4 <z<0.4) = P(z<-0.4) - P(z<0.4)

= 0.31084

Answer:

22.57 x 28

Step-by-step explanation:

10.86 + 4x = 101.14

-10.86           -10.86

            4x = 90.28

             /4       /4

              x = 22.57

5.43 + 22.57 = 28

22.57

Answer:

1:3

2:4

3:6

Step-by-step explanation:

we can divide both sides by 6 and get 1:2

we can divide both sides by 3 and get 2:4

we can divide both sides by 2 and get 3:6

Answer:

12:24, 3:6, 2:4

Step-by-step explanation:

What we are looking for here is a ratio that, when you divide/multiply the same constant on both parts of the ratio, you get 6:12.

6:12 is the same thing as 1:2, so we can find ratios equivalent to 1:2 (the first value will be half the second).

Hope this helped!

Answer:

x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

● -3 (-4x+4) = 15 + 3x

Multiply -3 by (-4x+4) first

● (-3) × (-4x) + (-3)×(4) = 15 + 3x

● 12 x - 12 = 15 +3x

Add 12 to both sides

● 12x - 12 + 12 = 15 + 3x +12

● 12 x = 27 + 3x

Substract 3x from both sides

● 12x -3x = 27 + 3x - 3x

● 9x = 27

Dividr both sides by 9

● 9x/9 = 27/9

● x = 3

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

c. a descriptive technique

Answer: 2361.53

Step-by-step explanation:

Use long division and round.

(The 3 is repeated)

Answer:

Garden: 36 square feet

Path: 64 square feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's first find the total area. The total area will be 100 square feet since the side length is 10. Since the path is 2 feet wide and on all sides, that means that the inside square will have a side length of 6. That means that the vegetable garden is 36 square feet. The path will be 100 - (the garden), and the garden is 36 square feet, which means the outer path will be 64.

Answer: Please Give me Brainliest, Thank You!

21.6$/month

Step-by-step explanation:

4*150=600watts = 0.6kW

12cents = 0.12$

0.12$*0.6=0.72$

0.72$ * 30days = 21.6$/month

The amount of the electricity cost for 30 days will be 2.16 dollars per month.

The analysis of mathematical representations is algebra, and the handling of those symbols is logic.

Lee watches TV for 4 hours per day.

During that time, the TV consumes 150 watts per hour.

The amount of electricity used in a day will be

⇒ 4 × 150

⇒ 600 watts per day

⇒ 0.60 kilowatts per day

Electricity costs (12 cents)/(1 kilowatt-hour). Then the amount of electricity cost in a day will be

⇒ 0.60 × 12 cents

⇒ 0.60 × 0.12 dollars

⇒ 0.072 dollars per day

Then the amount of the electricity cost for 30 days will be

⇒ 0.072 × 30

⇒ 2.16 dollars per month

The amount of the electricity cost for 30 days will be 2.16 dollars per month.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ2

Answer:

The speed of the airplane in still air is 550 mph.

The speed of the wind is 50 mph.

Step-by-step explanation:

speed = distance / time

distance = speed * time

or simply

d = st

Let v be the speed of the airplane with no wind.

Let w = speed of wind

With the wind:

d = 1800; s = v + w; t = 3

1800 = 3(v + w)

Against the wind:

d = 1800; s = v - w; t = 3.6

1800 = 3.6(v - w)

We have a system of two equations:

3(v + w) = 1800

3.6(v - w) = 1800

Divide both sides of the first equation by 3. Divide both sides of the second equation by 3.6.

v + w = 600

v - w = 500

Add the equations.

2v = 1100

v = 550

The speed of the airplane in still air is 550 mph.

v + w = 600

550 + w = 600

w = 50

The speed of the wind is 50 mph.

Answer:

Those two are 0.25

4/16 = 1/4

5/20 = 1/4

Answer: Please Give Me Brainliest, Thank You!

4/16 = 5/20 = 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Because If you divide 4 and 16 by 4 you get 1/4 and if you divide 5 and 20 with 5 you get 1/4

Answer:

Circle Equation : x² + y² = 21

Step-by-step explanation:

So we know that this circle goes through the point ( - 4, √5 ), with a center being the origin. Therefore, this makes the circle equation a bit simpler.

The first step in determining the circle equation is the length of the radius. Applying the distance formula, the radius would be the length between the given points. Another approach would be creating a right triangle such that the radius is the hypotenuse. Knowing the length of the legs as √5 and 4, we can calculate the radius,

( √5 )² + ( 4 )² = r²,

5 + 16 = r²,

r = √21

In general, a circle equation is represented by the formula ( x - a )² + ( y - b )² = r², with radius r centered at point ( a, b ). Therefore our circle equation will be represented by the following -

( x - 0 )² + ( y - 0 )² = (√21 )²

Circle Equation : x² + y² = 21

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve for x, we set up our equation like this:

7x - 7 = 4x + 14

Next, we subtract 4x from the right side to cancel it out and then subtract 4x from the left side.

7x (-4x) - 7 = 4x (-4x) + 14

3x - 7 = 14

Then, we add 7 on both sides (to cancel the -7 out and place it on the right)

3x - 7 (+7) = 14 + 7

3x = 21

Finally, we divide both sides by 3 to isolate our variable, x.

3x ÷ 3 = x

21 ÷ 3 = 7

Our final answer: x = 7

Answer:

A

  [tex]t = 10.1[/tex]

B

  [tex]p-value = p(t > 10.1)= 0.000[/tex]

C

  [tex]0.4714 < p_1 - p_2 <0.6988[/tex]

D

  The  oxygen treatment  is effective because

1 the is no 0 in the interval telling us that the treatments are different

 2 the upper and the lower limit are positive tell us that the proportion of those treated by the oxygen treatment is greater

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The  first sample size is  [tex]n_1 = 140[/tex]

     The  number of patient which the oxygen cured is k = 113  

     The second sample size is  [tex]n_2 = 158[/tex]

     The number of patient that  placebo cured is  l =  35

The first sample proportion is

           [tex]\r p_1 = \frac{ 113}{140 }[/tex]

           [tex]\r p_1 = 0.8071[/tex]

The second sample proportion is  

           [tex]\r p_2 = \frac{ 35}{ 158 }[/tex]

          [tex]\r p_2 = 0.222[/tex]

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : p_1 = p_2[/tex]

 The  alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : p_1 > p_2[/tex]

Let assume the level of significance be[tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally the pooled proportion is mathematically evaluated as

    [tex]p = \frac{p1 * n1 + p2 * n2}{n1 + n2}[/tex]

substituting values

     [tex]p = \frac{0.8071 * 140 + 0.222 * 158}{140 + 158}[/tex]

      [tex]p = 0.4969[/tex]

Generally the standard error is mathematically represented

      [tex]SE = \sqrt{ p(1- p ) * [ \frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_1}] }[/tex]

      substituting values

     [tex]SE = \sqrt{ 0.4969(1- 0.4969 ) * [ \frac{1}{140} + \frac{1}{158}] }[/tex]

     [tex]SE = 0.0580[/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

       [tex]t = \frac{ \r p_1 - \r p_2}{ SE}[/tex]

       [tex]t = \frac{ 0.8071 -0.222}{ 0.0580}[/tex]

       [tex]t = 10.1[/tex]

The  p-value is from the normal distribution table as  

      [tex]p-value = p(t > 10.1)= 0.000[/tex]

given that [tex]t< \alpha[/tex] the null hypothesis is rejected

From the normal distribution table the critical value of  [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex]  is  

     [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } = 1.96[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically the represented as

         [tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } * SE[/tex]      

         [tex]E = 1.96 * 0.0580[/tex]      

          [tex]E = 0.1137[/tex]

The 95% confidence interval is mathematically  represented as

           [tex](\r p_1 - \r p_2) - E < p_1 - p_2 < (\r p_1 - \r p_2) + E[/tex]

substituting value

             [tex](0.8071 - 0.222) - 0.1137 < p_1 - p_2 < (0.8071 - 0.222) + 0.1137[/tex]

             [tex]0.4714 < p_1 - p_2 <0.6988[/tex]

The  oxygen treatment  is effective because

1 the is no 0 in the interval telling us that the treatments are different

 2 the upper and the lower limit are positive tell us that the proportion of those treated by the oxygen treatment is greater

Answer:

2:3

Step-by-step explanation:

It’s easy

Answer:

2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

i think

Answer:

[tex]m = 10[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Looking at the angles, we can see that this is a 30-60-90 triangle.

The side that is with the 30° angle and the 90° angle is represented by [tex]x\sqrt{3}[/tex].

So let's find x.

[tex]x\sqrt{3} = 5\sqrt{3}[/tex]

Divide both sides by [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]:

[tex]x = 5[/tex].

Now the hypotenuse is always [tex]2x[/tex] (the leg with the 90° and 60° is just x.) So,

[tex]2x = 2\cdot5 = 10[/tex].

Hope this helped!

Answer:

H0: μd=0 Ha: μd≠0

t= 0.07607

On the basis of this we conclude that the mean weight differs between the two balances.

Step-by-step explanation:

The null and alternative hypotheses as

H0: μd=0 Ha: μd≠0

Significance level is set at ∝= 0.05

The critical region is t ( base alpha by 2 with df=5) ≥ ± 2.571

The test statistic under H0 is

t = d/ sd/ √n

Which has t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom

Specimen        A               B           d = a - b         d²

1                     13.76        13.74         0.02           0.004

2                    12.47        12.45          0.02         0.004

3                    10.09        10.08           0.01        0.001

4                       8.91       8.92          -0.01          0.001

5                     13.57      13.54           0.03        0.009

6                     12.74      12.75          -0.01        0.001

∑                                                      0.06         0.0173

d`= ∑d/n= 0.006/6= 0.001

sd²= 1/6( 0.0173- 0.006²/6) = 1/6 ( 0.017294) = 0.002882

sd= 0.05368

t= 0.001/ 0.05368/ √6

t= 0.18629/2.449

t= 0.07607

Since the calculated value of t= 0.07607 does not falls in the rejection region we therefore accept the null hypothesis at 5 % significance level . On the basis of this we conclude that the mean weight differs between the two balances.

Answer:

b. 1

Step-by-step explanation:

All first coordinates are 1/2.

Answer: b. 1

186|2

93|3

31|31

1

310|2

155|5

31|31

1

434|2

217|7

31|31

1

[tex]186=2\cdot3\cdot31\\310=2\cdot5\cdot31\\434=2\cdot7\cdot31\\\\\text{hcf}(186,310,434)=2\cdot31=62[/tex]

Answer:

2.7 in²

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

∆BAC ~ ∆EDF

Area of BAC = 6 in²

EF = 2 in

BC = 3 in

Required:

Area of ∆EDF

SOLUTION:

Let x = area of ∆EDF

[tex] \frac{6 in^2}{x} = (\frac{3 in}{2 in})^2 [/tex] (theorem of area of similar triangles)

[tex] \frac{6 in^2}{x} = (\frac{3 in}{2 in})^2 [/tex]

[tex] \frac{6}{x} = \frac{9}{4} [/tex]

Cross multiply:

[tex] 6*4 = 9*x [/tex]

[tex] 24 = 9x [/tex]

Divide both sides by 9

[tex] \frac{24}{9} = x [/tex]

[tex] 2.67 = x [/tex]

Area of ∆EDF = 2.7 in²

Answer:  [tex]\dfrac{(x+9)^2}{225}-\dfrac{(y+7)^2}{49}=1[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation for a horizontal ellipse is: [tex]\dfrac{(x-h)^2}{a^2}-\dfrac{(y-k)^2}{b^2}=1[/tex]  where

Given: major axis (diameter on x) is 30 --> x-radius (a) = 15  -->  a² = 225

           minor axis (diameter on y) is 14 --> y-radius (b) = 7   --> b² = 49

           center (h, k) is (-9, -7)

Input those values into the equation for a horizontal ellipse and simplify:

  [tex]\dfrac{(x-(-9))^2}{15^2}-\dfrac{(y-(-7))^2}{7^2}=1\\\\\\\large\boxed{\dfrac{(x+9)^2}{225}-\dfrac{(y+7)^2}{49}=1}[/tex]  

Answer:

n = 9 is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given a Triangle [tex]\triangle KLM[/tex] with its perpendicular bisectors intersecting at a point A.

AK = 25 units and

AM = 3n -2

To find:

Value of n = ?

Solution:

First of all, let us learn about perpendicular bisectors and their intersection points.

Perpendicular bisector of a line PQ is the line which divides the line PQ into two equal halves and is makes an angle of [tex]\bold{90^\circ}[/tex] with the line PQ.

And in a triangle, the perpendicular bisectors of 3 sides meet at one point and that point is called Circumcenter of the triangle.

We can draw a circle from circumcenter so that the circle passes from the three vertices of the triangle.

i.e.

Circumcenter of a triangle is equidistant from all the three vertices of the triangle.

In the given statement, we are given that A is the circumcenter of the [tex]\triangle KLM[/tex].

Please refer to the attached image for the given triangle and sides.

The distance of A from all the three vertices will be same.

i.e. AK = AM

[tex]\Rightarrow 25 = 3n-2\\\Rightarrow 3n =25+2\\\Rightarrow 3n =27\\\Rightarrow \bold{n = 9}[/tex]

Therefore, n = 9 is the answer.

Answer:

36.143

Step-by-step explanation:

143/1000=0.143

36+0.143=36.143

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Mean = 3.34

sample size = 26

sample mean = 2.7

standard deviation = 1.17

level of significance = 0.10

The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as follows:

[tex]\mathtt{H_o: \mu \geq 3.34} \\ \\ \mathtt{H_1: \mu < 3.34}[/tex]

degree of freedom = n - 1

degree of freedom = 26 -1

degree of freedom =  25

level of significance = 0.10

Since the alternative hypothesis contains <, then the test is left tailed

[tex]\mathtt{t_{\alpha, df} = t_{0.10, 25}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathtt{t_{0.10, 25}}[/tex] = - 1.316

The rejection region therefore consist of all values smaller than - 1.316, therefore ; reject [tex]H_o[/tex] if t < -1.316

The test statistics can be computed as follows:

[tex]t = \dfrac{X - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \dfrac{2.7 - 3.34}{\dfrac{1.17}{\sqrt{26}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \dfrac{-0.64}{\dfrac{1.17}{5.099}}[/tex]

t = - 2.789

Decision Rule:  To reject the null hypothesis if the t test lies in the rejection region or less than the rejection region.

Conclusion: We  reject the null hypothesis since t = (- 2.789) < -1.316. Then we conclude that  the mean number of residents in the retirement community household is less than 3.34 persons.

Answer:

|b|= 4b+15

-b=4b+15

-b-4b= 15

-5b= 15

b= 15/-5

b= -3

the ans -3

If [tex]a<0[/tex] the [tex]|a|=-a[/tex]

So

[tex]|b|=4b+15\\-b=4b+15\\5b=-15\\b=-3[/tex]

Answer: Undefined

Step-by-step explanation:

slope is undefined

no y intercept

This line is vertical

Answer:

Daniel sold 54 and Jack sold 42

Step-by-step explanation:

D = number of tickets that Daniel sold

J = number of tickets that Jack sold

D + J = 96

D = 12+ J

Substitute the second equation into the first equation

12 + J + J = 96

Combine like terms

12 + 2J = 96

Subtract 12 from each side

2J = 84

Divide by 2

J = 42

D = J+12

D = 54

Daniel sold 54 and Jack sold 42

Answer:

Jack sold 42 & Daniel sold 54.

Step-by-step explanation:

96 - 12 = 84

84 / 2 = 42

Jack sold 42.

42 + 12 = 54

Daniel sold 54.

42 + 54 = 96