Answer: Because of PEMDAS, the way Morgan rewrote the expression would change the the order of the steps to simplify it.
Step-by-step explanation: PEMDAS is the order of operations and it stands for Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, Divide, Addition, and Subtraction. If we simplify Morgan's version of the expression, we would add 90+10 first, which makes 100, then add 4.8 which makes 104.8. We come to the same conclusion when simplifying the original expression, 104.8. The difference is that we add 10+4.8 first and then add it to 90. While in this situation, the outcome was not different, the order of operations was changed.
The expression (x-6)^2 is equivalent to
Answer:
2−12x+36
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
(x-6)² = (x-6)(x-6) = x² - 12x + 36
Step-by-step explanation:
A movie theater conducted a survey to see what customers preferred at the concession stand. The theater asked every fifth person who entered the movie theater every Friday for a month what his or her favorite movie snack was. Were the results of the survey valid? A. No, because the theater did not survey everyone in the theater. B. Yes, because the theater only surveyed children. C. Yes, because the theater surveyed a random sample. D. No, because the theater did not use a random sample.
Answer:
A) No because the theater did not survey everyone in the theater.
Answer:
Yes, because the theater surveyed a random sample.
Step-by-step explanation:
The survey is valid because there was a random sample. They surveyed every fifth person, so there was a variety of age groups, genders, and preferences included in the sample. Therefore, the correct answer is yes, because the theater surveyed a random sample.
I had $20.00 My Mom gave me $10.00. My Dad Gave me $50.00 My Aunt & Uncle gave me $100.00. I had another $5.00. How much did I have? I had $20.00 My Mom gave me $10.00. My Dad Gave me $50.00 My Aunt & Uncle gave me $100.00. I had another $5.00. How much did I have?
Answer:
you have $185 in total unless the aunt and uncle gave you 100 each, then your answer would be $285
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
0$
Step-by-step explanation:
simple
When factoring 6x2−7x−20 by grouping, how should the middle term be rewritten? It should be written as 8x−15x. It should be written as −2x−5x. It should be written as x−8x. It should be written as −x−7x. I think it should be B but im not quite sure Is the given equation a quadratic equation? x(x−6)=−5 The equation is not a quadratic equation because there is no x2-term. The equation is a quadratic equation because there is an x2-term. The equation is not a quadratic equation because the expression is not equal to zero. The equation is not a quadratic equation because there is a term with degree higher than 2. For this one i think its A but once again im not sure. Which of the following is an example of the difference of two squares? x2−9 x3−9 (x+9)2 (x−9)2 this one i have no clue i would appreciate it if anyone could explain this one.
Answer:
(3x+4)(2x-5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Factor by grouping.
What is the difference between {2,3} and {{2,3}}
[tex]\{2,3\}[/tex] is a set containing two elements - numbers 2 and 3
[tex]\{\{2,3\}\}[/tex] is a set containing one element - a set [tex]\{2,3\}[/tex]
fill in the table with whole numbers to make 2.8 in three different ways i do not get this qestion can you help me
Answer: what table? u need to add an attachment
Step-by-step explanation:
The table containing whole number express 2.8 as the sum or difference.
To express 2.8 as the sum or difference of whole numbers.
There are three different ways to do it:
1. As a sum of whole numbers:
2 + 0.8 = 2.8
2. As a difference of whole numbers:
4 - 1.2 = 2.8
3. Another way as a sum of whole numbers:
1 + 1.8 = 2.8
The table will be:
Representation Whole Number 1 Whole Number 2 Result
1 2 0.8 2.8
2 4 1.2 2.8
3 1 1.8 2.8
As each row represents a different way to represent the number 2.8 using whole numbers.
Learn more about Whole number here:
https://brainly.com/question/29766862
#SPJ3
A hiker starts walking due west from Sasquatch Point and gets to the Chupacabra Trailhead before she realizes that she hasn't reset her pedometer. From the Chupacabra Trailhead she hikes for 8 miles along a bearing of N27°W which brings her to the Muffin Ridge Observatory. From there, she knows a bearing of S38°E will take her straight back to Sasquatch Point. How far will she have to walk to get from the Muffin Ridge Observatory to Sasquach Point, to the nearest tenth of a mile?
Answer:
9.05 mile
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information given :
Let represent S for Sasquatch Point
Let C represent Chupacabra Trailhead
Let M represent Muffin Ridge Observatory
The diagram for the bearing of the information given can be seen in the attached file below.
At angel C = 90° -27° = 63°
The Alternate angles are shown in the second diagram below.
In order to determine the distance she will have to walk from the Muffin Ridge Observatory to Sasquatch Point, we use the sine formula:
[tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{sin \ C }{c} = \dfrac{sin \ S}{s}}[/tex]
[tex]\mathtt{\dfrac{sin \ 63 }{c} = \dfrac{sin \ 52}{8}}[/tex]
By cross multiply
8 × sIn 63 = c× sin 52
[tex]\mathtt{c = \dfrac{8 \times Sin 63}{Sin \ 52}}[/tex]
[tex]\mathtt{c = \dfrac{7.1281}{0.7880}}[/tex]
c = 9.0458 mile
c [tex]\simeq[/tex] 9.05 mile to the nearest tenth
Please help me Tramserran mam...
Answer: see proof below
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the following when solving the proof...
Double Angle Identity: cos2A = 1 - 2sin²B
Pythagorean Identity: cos²A + sin²A = 1
note that A can be replaced with B
Proof from LHS → RHS
Given: cos²A + sin²A · cos2B
Double Angle Identity: cos²A + sin²A(1 - 2sin²B)
Distribute: cos²A + sin²A - 2sin²A·sin²B
Pythagorean Identity: 1 - 2sin²A·sin²B
Pythagorean Identity: cos²B + sin²B - 2sin²A·sin²B
Factor: cos²A + sin²B(1 - 2sin²A)
Double Angle Identity: cos²B + sin²B · cos2A
cos²B + sin²B · cos2A = cos²B + sin²B · cos2A [tex]\checkmark[/tex]
Find the missing the side of the triangle A. 130−−−√ m B. 179−−−√ m C. 42–√ m D. 211−−−√ m
Answer:
The answer is option AStep-by-step explanation:
Since the triangle is a right angled triangle we can use the Pythagoras theorem to find the missing side
Using the Pythagoras theorem
That's
[tex] {a}^{2} = {b}^{2} + {c}^{2} [/tex]
From the question
x is the hypotenuse or the longest side of the triangle
Substituting the values into the above formula we have
[tex] {x}^{2} = {9}^{2} + {7}^{2} [/tex]
[tex] {x}^{2} = 81 + 49[/tex]
[tex] {x}^{2} = 130[/tex]
Find the square root of both sides
We have the final answer as
x = √130 mHope this helps you
Simplify the expression a-2b, when a=1.4 - 2x and b=-0.2x + 1.7 *
Answer:
a-2b= -1.6x-2.0
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex]a=1.4-2x\\b=-0.2x+1.7\\a-2b= (1.4-2x)-2(-0.2x+1.7)\\a-2b= 1.4-2x+0.4x-3.4\\a-2b=-1.6x-2.0\\[/tex]
{By, substituting the values of a and b in a-2b , we can find the value of a-2b}
If it takes B hours to walk a certain distance at the rate of 3 miles per hour, the number of hours it takes to return the same distance at 4 miles per hour is...? Will mark brainlist
Answer:
It will take 0.75B hours for the return leg
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, given that the first leg of the trip was for B hours at 3 miles per hour , we want to calculate the number of hours the return leg will take at 4 miles per hour given that it is the same distance.
Mathematically, we know that ;
Distance = speed * time
So the distance taken on the first leg of the trip would be;
Distance = 3 miles per hour * B hours = 3B miles
Now, this distance was traveled on the return leg also.
This means that the time taken here will be;
Time on return leg = distance/speed = 3B/4 = 0.75B hours
The marketing department at Quality Home Improvement Center (QHIC) uses simple linear regression analysis to predict home upkeep expenditure on the basis of home value. Predictions of home upkeep expenditures are used to help determine which homes should be sent advertising brochures promoting QHIC's products and services.
Full question :
The Tasty Sub Shop Case:
A business entrepreneur uses simple linear regression analysis to predict the yearly revenue for a potential restaurant site on the basis of the number of residents living near the site. The entrepreneur then uses the prediction to assess the profitability of the potential restaurant site.
And
The QHIC Case:
The marketing department at Quality Home Improvement Center (QHIC) uses simple linear regression analysis to predict home upkeep expenditure on the basis of home value. Predictions of home upkeep expenditures are used to help determine which homes should be sent advertising brochures promoting QHIC’s products and services.
Discuss the difference in the type of prediction in both cases and provide rational of the reasons that these predictions were used.
Answer and explanation:
In the first case, The Tasty Sub Shop Case, the entrepreneur aims to utlilize the predicted values from his regression analysis in ascertaining profit of his potential business. He does this using the values from number of residents in the area(independent variables) to predict the revenue for his business(dependent variables). His predictions using the number of residents in the area are largely because the residents in the area are his target consumers and are the ones to buy food from his restaurant and increase his revenue.
In the other case, the marketing department in QHIC utilizes the predicted values in determining their customers who need to be aware of their products. They get the predicted values(home upkeep expenditure and dependent variable) by plotting their relationship with home value(independent variable) and then use predicted values of home upkeep expenditures in determining their customers who they will market their products to. They do this because predicting home upkeep expenditures will enable them determine what homes can afford or will need their products and services.
one utilizes his predictions at ascertaining profit while the other uses his predictions in determining potential customer base to market products to. The first case is making a revenue/ profitability prediction while the other is making a market prediction
if the area of the rectangle is 120, what is the area of triangle cpd
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
area of rectangle=120
find area of CPD
area=1/2 (area of the rectangle)
area = 1/2×120=60
The area of triangle CPD IS 30 square units.
If the area of the rectangle is 120, then the area of triangle CPD is 30.
The area of a rectangle is given by the formula:
Area = length × width
In this case, the length of the rectangle is 120/width.
The area of a triangle is given by the formula:
Area = (1/2) × base × height
The base of triangle CPD is the width of the rectangle, and the height of triangle CPD is half the length of the rectangle.
Therefore, the area of triangle CPD is:
(1/2) × width × (120/width) = 30
So the answer is 30.
Learn more about triangle here: brainly.com/question/2773823
#SPJ2
Write an expression for two times the difference of eight and d.
Answer:
The answer is
2( 8 - d)Step-by-step explanation:
From the question difference in the statement means subtraction
So the statement
two times the difference of eight and d is written as
2( 8 - d)Hope this helps you
Answer:
the answer is 2( 8 - d) I got the same answer and got it right
Step-by-step explanation:
the lines on a 2 cup liquid measuring cup divide each cup into eighths. if you measure 1 3/4 cups of water between which two quantities can you be certain the exact measurement will be?
Answer:
1 3/4 cups is between the 13th and 15th lines from the bottom.
Step-by-step explanation:
The bottom of the cup has no line and corresponds to 0 eights.
1st line up: 1/8 cup
2nd line up: 2/8 cup this is also called 1/4 cup
3rd line up: 3/8 cup
4th line up: 4/8 cup this is also called 1/2 cup
5th line up: 5/8 cup
6th line up: 6/8 cup this is also called 3/4 cup
7th line up: 7/8 cup
8th line up: 8/8 cup this is also called 1 cup
9th line up: 9/8 cup
10th line up: 10/8 cup this is also called 1 1/4 cup
11th line up: 1 3/8 cup
12th line up: 1 4/8 cup this is also called 1 1/2 cup
13th line up: 1 5/8 cup
14th line up: 1 6/8 cup this is also called 1 3/4 cup
15th line up: 1 7/8 cup
16th line up: 1 8/8 cup this is also called 2 cups
1 3/4 cups is between the 13th and 15th lines from the bottom.
Beverly made a deposit of 375 into our checking account. Then she
withdraw $65. The next day, she wrote a check for $135. She had 475 before any of these transactions how much money is in her account now?
Answer:
650
Step-by-step explanation:
475+375-65-135=650
answer of a ²-10a+16-6b-b^2
[tex] \quad a^2-10a+16-6b-b^2[/tex]
$=(a^2-10a)-(b^2+6b) +16$
$=[(a^2-2(5)a+25)-25]-[(b^2+2(3)b+9)-9]+16$
$=(a-5)^2-25-(b+3)^2+9+16$
$=(a-5)^2-(b+3)^2$
Listed below are numbers of internet users per 100 people and numbers of scientific award winners per 10 million people for different countries. construct aâ scatterplot, find the value of the linear correlation coefficientâ r, and find theâ p-value of r. determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of linear correlation between the two variables. use a significance level of alpha α equals = 0.05 0.05. internet users 78.0 78.0 79.0 79.0 56.2 56.2 68.3 68.3 77.9 77.9 38.2 38.2 award winners 5.5 5.5 8.8 8.8 3.3 3.3 1.7 1.7 10.8 10.8 0.1 0.1
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support a claim of linear correlation between the two variables.
Step-by-step explanation:
The data provided is as follows:
X Y
78 5.5
79 8.8
56.2 3.3
68.3 1.7
77.9 10.8
38.2 0.1
(a)
The scatter plot is attached below.
(b)
Use the Excel function: =CORREL(array1, array2) to compute the correlation coefficient, r.
The correlation coefficient between the number of internet users and the award winners is,
r = 0.797.
(c)
The test statistic value is:
[tex]t=r\sqrt{\frac{n-2}{1-r^{2}}}[/tex]
[tex]=0.797\times\sqrt{\frac{6-2}{1-(0.797)^{2}}}\\\\=0.797\times 3.311372\\\\=2.639163484\\\\\approx 2.64[/tex]
The degrees of freedom is,
df = n - 2
= 6 - 2
= 4
Compute the p-value as follows:
[tex]p-value=P(t_{n-2}<2.64)=0.057[/tex]
*Use a t-table.
p-value = 0.057 > α = 0.05
The null hypothesis will not be rejected.
Thus, it can be concluded that there is not sufficient evidence to support a claim of linear correlation between the two variables.
The office building is 111ft high. About how tall is this in meters.?
Answer:
Hey there!
11 meters is about 36 feet tall.
Let me know if this helps :)
Answer:
you answer is :33.8328
Check whether 301 is a term of the list of numbers 5, 11, 17, 23, . . .
Answer:
not a term
Step-by-step explanation:
There is a common difference between consecutive terms in the sequence, that is
d = 11- 5 = 17 - 11 = 23 - 17 = 6
This indicate the sequence is arithmetic with n th term
[tex]a_{n}[/tex] = a₁ + (n - 1)d
where a₁ is the first term and d the common difference
Here a₁ = 5 and d = 6, thus
[tex]a_{n}[/tex] = 5 + 6(n - 1) = 5 + 6n - 6 = 6n - 1
Equate this to 301 and solve for n
6n - 1 = 301 ( add 1 to both sides )
6n = 302 ( divide both sides by 6 )
n = 50.333....
Since n is not an integer value then 301 is not a term in this sequence.
Please give me the correct answer
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
slant height = l = 15 mm
radius = r = 7 mm
Surface area of cone = πr (l + r) square units
= 3.14 * 7 *(15 + 7)
= 3.14 * 7 * 22
= 483.56 square mm
Thirteen people on a sports team show up for a game. a. How many ways are there to choose 10 players to play the game? b. How many ways are there to assign the 10 different positions by selecting players from the 13 who show up?
Answer:
a)286 ways
b)1,037,836,800 ways
Step-by-step explanation:
a. How many ways are there to choose 10 players to play the game?
We have to take note of a key word here which is CHOOSE. For question a, order does not matter.
Hence, we use the combination formula. This is given as:
C(n, r) = nCr = n!/r! (n - r)!
n = 13, r = 10
13C10 = 13!/10! (13 - 10)!
= 13!/ 10! × (3!)
= 13 × 12 × 11 × 10 × 9 × 8 × 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 / (10 × 9 × 8 × 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1) × (3 × 2 × 1)
= 1716/6
= 286 ways.
b. How many ways are there to assign the 10 different positions by selecting players from the 13 who show up?
For question b as well, we take note of a key word which is ASSIGN. For question b, order is very important.
Therefore, the formula we use is the permutation formula.
P(n, r) = nPr = n!/(n - r)!
n = 13, r = 10
13P10 = 13!/ (13 - 10)!
= 13!/ 3!
= 13 × 12 × 11 × 10 × 9 × 8 × 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 / (3 × 2 × 1)
= 1,037,836,800 ways
Desmond is 2 inches taller than Niki. If we let w represent Nikis height in inches, write an algebraic expression for Desmonds height. Enter your answer as an expression. Example: 3x^2+1
Answer:
w + 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Niki's height = w in
Desmond height = w + 2
Answer:
w+2
Step-by-step explanation:
Since Desmonds is 2 inches taller than Niki, w+2 would make the most sense.
Graphing Linear Equations
Answer:
Kyra=15 points
Liam=20 points
30 points=y=4/3x+5
Step-by-step explanation:
I graphed each equation and point on the graph given
HOPE THIS HELPS!!! :)
PLEASE CORRECT ME IF IM WRONG
A new brand of gym shoe claims to add up to 2 inches to an athlete’s vertical leaps. Design an experiment to test this claim.
Describe a sample procedure.
A) Find the average vertical leap of all the athletes in their regular shoes. Give the control group the new shoes and the experimental group a different pair of shoes. Find the average vertical leap of the athletes in both groups. Compare the increases in vertical leap for each group.
B) Find the average vertical leap of all the athletes in their regular shoes. Give the experimental group the new shoes and the control group a different pair of shoes. Find the average vertical leap of the athletes in both groups. Compare the increases in vertical leap for each group.
C) Find the average vertical leap of a group of athletes in their regular shoes. Then give them each the new shoes and find their average vertical leap. Compare the before and after results.
Answer:
The correct option is (B).
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case, we need to test whether the claim made by the new brand of gym shoe is correct or not.
Claim: A new brand of gym shoe claims to add up to 2 inches to an athlete’s vertical leaps.
So, we need to test whether the average vertical leap of all the athletes increased by 2 inches or not after using the new brand of gym shoe.
The sample procedure would be to compute the average vertical leap of a group of athletes in their regular shoes (or a different pair) and the average vertical leap of a group of athletes in their new shoes.
Compare the two averages to see whether the difference is 2 inches or not.
The experimental group would be the one with the new shoes and the control group would be the one with the different pair of shoes.
Thus, the correct option is (B).
Answer:
B) Find the average vertical leap of all the athletes in their regular shoes. Give the experimental group the new shoes and the control group a different pair of shoes. Find the average vertical leap of the athletes in both groups. Compare the increases in vertical leap for each group.
Step-by-step explanation:
Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points) (07.02 LC) Celine is playing a game at the school carnival. There is a box of marbles, and each box has a white, a green, a blue, and an orange marble. There is also a fair 12-sided die labeled with the numbers 1 through 12. How many outcomes are in the sample space for pulling a marble out of the box and rolling the die? 48 32 16 8
Answer: 48
Step-by-step explanation:
Given, A box has a white, a green, a blue, and an orange marble.
Total possible outcomes of pulling marbles = 4
There is also a fair 12-sided die labeled with the numbers 1 through 12.
Total possible outcomes of rolling the die = 12
By Fundamental counting principle , we have
Possible outcomes are in the sample space for pulling a marble out of the box and rolling the die = (Total possible outcomes of pulling marbles ) x (Total possible outcomes of rolling the die)
= 4 x 12
= 48
Hence, the correct answer is "48".
Solve for x : 2^(x-5) . 5^(x-4) = 5
Answer:
x = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Notice that there is also a base 5 on the right hand side of the equation, therefore, let's move [tex]5^{x-4}[/tex] to the right by dividing both sides by it. and then re-writing the right hand side as 5 to a power:
[tex]2^{x-5}\,*\,5^{x-4}=5\\2^{x-5}=5/5^{x-4}\\2^{x-5}=5\,*\,5^{4-x}\\2^{x-5}=5^{5-x}[/tex]
Now apply log to both sides in order to lower the exponents (where the unknown resides):
[tex](x-5)\,log(2)=(5-x)\,log(5)[/tex]
Notice that when x = 5, this equation is true because it makes it the identity: 0 = 0
So, let's now examine what would be the solution of x is different from 5, and we can divide by (x - 5) both sides of the equation:
[tex]log(2)=\frac{5-x}{x-5} \,log(5)\\log(2)=-1\,\,log(5)\\log(2)=-log(5)[/tex]
which is an absurd because log(2) is [tex]\neq[/tex] from log(5)
Therefore our only solution is x=5
Answer:
if decimal no solution
if multiply x =5
Step-by-step explanation:
If this is a decimal point
2^(x-5) . 5^(x-4) = 5
Rewriting .5 as 2 ^-1
2^(x-5) 2 ^ -1 ^(x-4) = 5
We know that a^ b^c = a^( b*c)
2^(x-5) 2 ^(-1*(x-4)) = 5
2^(x-5) 2 ^(-x+4) = 5
We know a^ b * a^ c = a^ ( b+c)
2^(x-5 +-x+4) = 5
2^(-1) = 5
This is not true so there is no solution
If it is multiply
2^(x-5) * 5 ^(x-4) = 5
Divide each side by 5
2^(x-5) * 5 ^(x-4) * 5^-1 = 5/5
We know that a^ b * a^c = a^ ( b+c)
2^(x-5) * 5 ^(x-4 -1) = 1
2^(x-5) * 5 ^(x-5) = 1
The exponents are the same, so we can multiply the bases
a^b * c*b = (ac) ^b
(2*5) ^ (x-5) = 1
10^ (x-5) = 1
We know that 1 = 10^0
10^ (x-5) = 10 ^0
The bases are the same so the exponents are the same
x-5 = 0
x=5
Two shaded identical rectangular decorative tiles are first placed (one each) at the top and at the base of a door frame for a hobbit's house, as shown in Figure 1. The distance from W to H is 45 inches. Then the same two tiles are rearranged at the top and at the base of the door frame, as shown in Figure 2. The distance from Y to Z is 37 inches. What is the height of the door frame, in inches?
Answer:
41 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the point at the top of the door on the left be x
Wx + xH = 45
Let the point at the top of the door on the right be c
Yc + cZ = 37
We know the door is
xH + plus the width of the tile
The width of the tile is Yc
xH + Yc
On the right door
cZ + the height of the tile
cZ + Wx
Add the two doors together
xH + Yc + cZ + Wx = 2 times the height of the door
Rewriting
xH + Wx + Yc + cZ = 2 times the height of the door
45+ 37 = 2 times the door height
82 = 2 times the door height
Divide by 2
41 = door height
At Horatio's machining company, it takes 2 minutes to manufacture each part and 10 minutes to pack all the parts for an order. Write an expression that shows how many minutes it will take to complete an order, assuming there are x parts in an order.
Answer:
f(x) = 2x + 10
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's call this function f(x), where f(x) is time to get the order ready and x is the number of parts:
f(x) = 2x + 10 Is the expression of this function.2x is the time to manufacture all parts of the order and 10 min is the time to pack them.
Answer:
2x + 10 is the correct answer :)
Please help! Question is given below in form of image!
Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
None of the choices are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex] 9x^3 + 9x^2 - 4x - 4 = 0 [/tex]
The polynomial has 4 terms and no common factors. We can try factoring by grouping.
[tex] 9x^2(x + 1) - 4(x + 1) = 0 [/tex]
[tex] (x + 1)(9x^2 - 4) = 0 [/tex]
Now we factor the difference of squares.
[tex] (x + 1)(3x + 2)(3x - 2) = 0 [/tex]
[tex] x + 1 = 0~~or~~3x + 2 = 0~~or~~3x - 2 = 0 [/tex]
[tex]x = -1~~or~~x = -\dfrac{2}{3}~~or~~x = \dfrac{2}{3}[/tex]
None of the choices are correct.
