Answer:
In response to the first prompt, three questions you should ask Mrs. Samples's doctor are:
What is the extent of Mrs. Samples's injuries?
What is the prognosis for her recovery?
What treatment is she currently receiving?
In response to the second prompt, three questions you should ask the family members are:
Did either Peter or Emily have any medical conditions that could have contributed to the accident?
Did either Peter or Emily mention anything about the cause of the accident before the crash?
Did either Peter or Emily have any conflicts or issues with anyone that could have led to foul play?
Regarding the third prompt, the reason for conducting a search on both occupants’ criminal histories is to see if any previous criminal activity or patterns could have played a role in the accident. It could also potentially uncover any motive for the accident.
Regarding the fourth prompt, it is necessary to corroborate the report and the 911 logs to ensure that the timeline provided by Mr. Minus is accurate and consistent with other evidence. It also helps to confirm that there was no foul play involved in the accident.
In response to the fifth prompt, the measurements of the indentation damage could correlate to the speed of the car by using physics principles to estimate the impact force and energy. Other evidence that could give an indication of the speed of the car includes skid marks, debris, and eyewitness accounts.
In response to the sixth prompt, the toxicology report revealed that cocaine and marijuana were present in Mr. Samples's body that could cause impairment. In the state where the accident occurred, the legal limit of alcohol allowed is 0.08% BAC. Since there was no mention of alcohol in the prompt, it cannot be determined if Mr. Samples was above or below the legal limit.
Based on the new evidence, it is possible that the cause of the accident was due to Mr. Samples's impairment from the drugs found in his system. However, without further investigation and evidence, it is difficult to make a conclusive determination of the cause of the accident.
Regarding the Blood Alcohol Level (BAC) calculator:
Monday: Assuming a standard drink size of 5 oz, the BAC for the 200 lb man and 120 lb woman would be approximately 0.039% at midnight, which is below the legal limit.
Tuesday: Assuming a standard drink size of 5 oz, the BAC for both the man and woman would be approximately 0.05% at midnight, which is above the legal limit.
Saturday: Assuming a standard drink size of 12 oz for the stout beers and 4 oz for the cosmopolitans, the BAC for the man would be approximately 0.106% and for the woman would be approximately 0.093% at midnight, which is above the legal limit.
Based on the BAC calculator results, the couple should have taken a taxi home on Tuesday and Saturday nights.
The statement "If you drink, drink responsibly" means that individuals should be aware of the potential consequences of consuming alcohol and should make responsible choices regarding their alcohol intake to avoid harm to themselves or others.
Explanation:
Scenario 1
In the Case Study- Vokes v. Arthur Murray (pg. 84); how would you build a case for the plaintiff? Consider what information you would need to build a case against Arthur Murray. Discuss what information you would use and how it would be presented in court.
Scenario 2
In the Case Study- Vokes v. Arthur Murray (pg. 84); how would you build a case if you were the defendant's lawyer? Consider what kind of information you would need to build in defense of the dance school. Discuss what information you would use and how it would be presented in court.
The defendant is Aruthur Murray. The plaintiff is Vokes.
Scenario 1- If the case has to be build for Plaintiff which is Vokes in this case, we need a strong evidence and well written documentation to support it.
For Vokes, the evidence would be her bill for 14 classes which amounted to 31,000$ and the remarks of the organization that she was turning into a 'beautiful dancer' , even though she had no aptitude for dance.
The case will be filed for lie and fraud from the organization and compensation would be demanded.
Scenario 2- If the case has to be build for the defendant, which in this case is Arthur, we also need a strong evidence and well written documentation since its a civil case.
For Arthur, the evidence will be the contract signed by Vokes and her regular coming to courses which would justify her bill.
The case will be defended on these points.
Terms best describe law?Canon, ordinance, precept, rule, regulation, and statute. All of these terms say to "a principle guiding conduct or process," but the word "law" implies imposition by a sovereign power and the requirement of submission on the part of all those who are subject to that authority.
How are laws different from rules?The government enacts laws that hold everyone to the same standards. In contrast to regulations, most laws have some things that do not change depending on the situation.
To know more about Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ1
This Supreme Court case illustrates Amendment
in action.
The supreme court has illustrated the amendments in constitution on many occasions. One such case where 1st amendment was put in action was Edwards v. South Carolina case (1963).
In Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students’ First Amendment rights of peaceable assembly, speech, and petition.
It was when the police dispersed a peaceful protest against segregation. The case illustrates one of the roles played by the First Amendment in the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
The First Amendment imply in plain English?The freedoms of religion, expression, assembly, and petitioning are all given by the First Amendment. It bans Congress from showing one religion above another and from limiting a person's ability to follow their religion.
What does the second amendment say?The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated because a well-regulated militia is good to the security of a free State.
To know more about First Amendment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29894002
#SPJ1
State FOUR benefits of the Democratic government.