Look at photo and answer.

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.0301 > 0.02, which means that there is not sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

The company's promotional literature claimed that under 64% fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of at least 64%, that is:

[tex]H_0: p \geq 0.64[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of less than 64%, that is:

[tex]H_1: p < 0.64[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

64% is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.64, \sigma = \sqrt{0.64*0.36}[/tex]

A sample of 900 computer chips revealed that 61% of the chips fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

This means that [tex]n = 900, X = 0.61[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.61 - 0.64}{\frac{\sqrt{0.64*0.36}}{\sqrt{900}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -1.88[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion below 0.61, which is the p-value of z = -1.88.

Looking at the z-table, z = -1.88 has a p-value of 0.0301.

The p-value of the test is 0.0301 > 0.02, which means that there is not sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim.

Answers:

First bottle's unit cost = 27 cents per oz

Second bottle's unit cost = 27 cents per oz

Both have the same unit cost.

----------------------------------------

Work Shown:

unit cost = price/(number of ounces)

1st bottle unit cost = (1.35)/(5) = 0.27 dollars per oz = 27 cents per oz

2nd bottle unit cost = (2.16)/(8) = 0.27 dollars per oz = 27 cents per oz

Both lead to the same unit cost. Therefore, you can pick either option and it doesn't matter.

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

x- coordinate = cos45° = [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} }[/tex] = [tex]\frac{\sqrt{2} }{2}[/tex]

y- coordinate = sin45° = [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} }[/tex] = [tex]\frac{\sqrt{2} }{2}[/tex]

That is ( [tex]\frac{\sqrt{2} }{2}[/tex] , [tex]\frac{\sqrt{2} }{2}[/tex] ) → D

Answer:

After a 75% increase, it would become

x + 75%x = x + 0.75x = x(1 + 0.75) = 1.75x

After a 50% decrease, it would become

1.75x - 50%(1.75x) = 1.75x - 0.5(1.75x) = 1.75x - 0.875x = 0.875x = [tex]\frac{7}{8} x[/tex]

Because [tex]\frac{7}{8} x[/tex] is less than x, the new amount would be less than the original.

Answer:

The numbers 3(pi)/2, 5(pi)/2 satisfy the conclusion of Rolle's Theorem

Step-by-step explanation:

1. The function must be continuous.  

Trigonometric functions are continuous.  

2.  It must be true that f(a) = f(b) = 0

For this case sin(pi) = sin(3pi) = 0

3. Therefore by Rolle's Theorem, there exist a point, x, such that f(x) = 0

For this case f(x) = cos(x)

And cos(x) = 0 at x = 3(pi)/2,5(pi)/2

Answer:

x+ 4

Step-by-step explanation:

      ____x__+4___

x+2 | [tex]x^2 + 6x + 8[/tex]

        [tex]x^2 + 2x[/tex]

        ------------

                [tex]4x + 8\\[/tex]

                 [tex]4x + 8\\[/tex]

                  --------

                     0

Answer:

x+4

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to find LCM

3 | 45,75,63

3 | 15,25,21

5 | 5,25,7

5 | 1,5,7

7 | 1,1,7

LCM=3×3×5×5×7=1575

The least common denominator for the group of denominators using the method of prime numbers is 1575.

LCM stands for Least Common Multiple. It is a method to find the smallest common multiple between any two or more numbers.  A factor is one of the numbers that multiplies by a whole number to get that number.

For the given situation,

The numbers are 45, 75, 63​

Prime factors of 45 = [tex]3,3,5[/tex]

Prime factors of 75 = [tex]3,5,5[/tex]

Prime factors of 63 = [tex]3,3,7[/tex]

Then the LCM can be found by, first take the common factors then multiple the remaining factors as,

⇒ [tex](3)(3)(5)(5)(7)[/tex]

⇒ [tex]1575[/tex]

Hence we can conclude that the least common denominator for the group of denominators using the method of prime numbers is 1575.

Learn more about least common multiple here

https://brainly.com/question/24859913

#SPJ2

Answer:

hshdkKnfbsjfjznd jzkz e zkkfkd

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it will help u

hope it will help u please mark me as brillient...

Answer:

939 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

plz Mark me as the brainlist

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope is given by

m = ( y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

   = (7-3)/(10-8)

    = 4/2

    = 2

Answer:

(0,0) is the x and y intercept of the function

Step-by-step explanation:

The parabola touches the x and y axis at 0

The x intercept is (0,0) and the y intercept is (0,0)

Answer:

(0, 0) is the x and y intercepts

Step-by-step explanation:

intercepts are where the curve of the equation contacts an axis

The equation is y = x²

Answer:

question is not proper

Step-by-step explanation:

question is

Answer:

0.8997 = 89.97% probability of a bulb lasting for at most 622 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Mean of 590 hours, standard deviation of 25 hours.

This means that [tex]\mu = 590, \sigma = 25[/tex]

Find the probability of a bulb lasting for at most 622 hours.

This is the p-value of Z when X = 622.

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{622 - 590}{25}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.28[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.28[/tex] has a p-value of 0.8997.

0.8997 = 89.97% probability of a bulb lasting for at most 622 hours.

Answer:

A. QT ≅ AZ

Step-by-step explanation:

When writing a congruence statement of two triangles, the order of arrangement of the letters used in naming the triangles are carefully considered. Corresponding sides and angles of both triangles are arranged accordingly in the order they appear.

Given that ∆QPT ≅ ∆ARZ, we have the following sides that correspond and are congruent to each other:

QP ≅ AR

PT ≅ RZ

QT ≅ AZ

The only correct one given in the options given above is QT ≅ AZ

Answer:

31/32

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 2^5, or 32 combinations.

There is only 1 combination which is all 5 children are boys.

So the probability that will have at least 1 girl is: 1 - 1/32 = 31/32

9514 1404 393

Explanation:

1. End behavior is the behavior of the function when the value of the independent variable gets large (or otherwise approaches the end of the domain). There are generally four kinds of end behavior:

Of these, behavior 2 will ultimately look like one of the others.

For polynomials, the function will always approach ±∞ as the independent variable approaches ±∞. Whether the signs of the infinities agree or not depends on the even/odd degree of the polynomial, and the sign of its leading coefficient.

For exponential functions, the end behavior is a horizontal asymptote in one direction and a tending toward ±∞ in the other direction.

For trig functions sine and cosine, the end behavior is the same as the "middle" behavior: the function oscillates between two extreme values.

For rational functions (ratios of polynomials), the end behavior will depend on the difference in degree between numerator and denominator. If the degree of the denominator is greater than or equal to that of the numerator, the function will have a horizontal asymptote. If the degree of the numerator is greater, then the end behavior will asymptotically approach the quotient of the two functions—often a "slant asymptote".

__

2. A polynomial inequality written in the form f(x) ≥ 0, or f(x) > 0, will be solved by first identifying the real zeros of the function f(x), including the multiplicity of each. For positive values of x greater than the largest zero, the sign of the function will match the sign of the leading coefficient. The sign will change at each zero that has odd multiplicity, so one can work right to left to identify the sign of the function in each interval between odd-multiplicity zeros.

The value of the function will be zero at each even-multiplicity zero, but will not change sign there. Obviously, the zero at that point will not be included in the solution interval if the inequality is f(x) > 0, but will be if it is f(x) ≥ 0. Once the sign of the function is identified in each interval, the solution to the inequality becomes evident.

As a check on your work, you will notice that the sign of the function for x > max(zeros) will be the same as the sign of the function for x < min(zeros) if the function is of even degree; otherwise, the signs will be different.

The solution to a polynomial inequality is a set of intervals on the real number line. The solution to a polynomial equation is a set of points, which may be in the complex plane.

__

3. A composite function is a function of a function, or a function of a composite function. For example f(g(x)) is a composite function. The composition can be written using either of the equivalent forms ...

  [tex](f\circ g)(x)\ \Leftrightarrow\ f(g(x))[/tex]

It can be easy to confuse an improperly written composition operator with a multiplication symbol, so the form f(g(x)) is preferred when the appropriate typography is not available.

When simplifying the form of a composition, the Order of Operations applies. That is, inner parenthetical expressions are evaluated (or simplified) first. As with any function, the argument of the function is substituted wherever the independent variable appears.

For example, in computing the value f(g(2)), first the value of g(2) is determined, then that value is used as the argument of the function f. The same is true of other arguments, whether a single variable, or some complicated expression, or even another composition.

Note that the expression f(g(x)) is written as the composition shown above. The expression g(f(x)) would be written using the composition operator with g on the left of it, and f on the right of it:

  [tex](g\circ f)(x)\ \Leftrightarrow\ g(f(x))[/tex]

That is, with respect to the argument of the composition, the functions in a composition expression are right-associative. For example, ...

  for h(x)=2x+3, g(x)=x^2, f(x)=x-2 we can evaluate f(g(h(x)) as follows:

  f(g(h(x)) = f(g(2x+3) = f((2x+3)^2) = (2x+3)^2 -2

It should be obvious that g(h(f(x)) will have a different result.

  g(h(f(x)) = g(h(x-2)) = g(2(x-2)+3) = (2(x-2)+3)^2

Answer:

There isn't sufficient evidence that support the claim that mean cost differs from $117.91

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Population Mean cost, μ = 117.91

Sample size, n = 36

Sample mean, xbar = 122.57

Sample standard deviation, s = 20

The hypothesis :

H0 : μ = 117.91

H0 : μ ≠ 117.91

Using the one sample t test :

Test statistic

(xbar - μ) ÷ s/sqrt(n)

T = (122.57 - 117.91) ÷ 20/sqrt(36)

T = 4.66 / 3.333

T = 1.398

Decision region :

Reject H0 ; If Pvalue < α

α = 0.10

Degree of freedom, df = n - 1 = 36 - 1 = 35

Pvalue(1.398, 35) = 0.1709

Since 0.1709 > 0.10 ; WE fail to reject H0 ; therefore there isn't sufficient evidence that support the claim that mean cost differs from $117.91

Answer:

9 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

12 people take 15 hours to complete one job. First let's ask how long it would take 18 people working at the same rate to complete the same job? We can use proportions to answer this

[tex]\frac{12 people}{15 hours} = \frac{18 people}{x hours}\\x = \frac{18\times15}{12} = 22.5[/tex]

Now we know that one job takes 18 people 22.5 hours, so 2/5 of the job would take

[tex]\frac{18\times15}{12} \times \frac{2}{5} = 9[/tex]

Answer:

To maximize the monthly rental profit, 90 units should be rented out.

The maximum monthly profit realizable is $38,200.

Step-by-step explanation:

Vertex of a quadratic function:

Suppose we have a quadratic function in the following format:

[tex]f(x) = ax^{2} + bx + c[/tex]

It's vertex is the point [tex](x_{v}, y_{v})[/tex]

In which

[tex]x_{v} = -\frac{b}{2a}[/tex]

[tex]y_{v} = -\frac{\Delta}{4a}[/tex]

Where

[tex]\Delta = b^2-4ac[/tex]

If a<0, the vertex is a maximum point, that is, the maximum value happens at [tex]x_{v}[/tex], and it's value is [tex]y_{v}[/tex].

In this question:

Quadratic equation with [tex]a = -12, b = 2160, c = -59000[/tex]

To maximize the monthly rental profit, how many units should be rented out?

This is the x-value of the vertex, so:

[tex]x_{v} = -\frac{b}{2a} = -\frac{2160}{2(-12)} = \frac{2160}{24} = 90[/tex]

To maximize the monthly rental profit, 90 units should be rented out.

What is the maximum monthly profit realizable?

This is p(90). So

[tex]p(90) = -12(90)^2 + 2160(90) - 59000 = 38200[/tex]

The maximum monthly profit realizable is $38,200.

Explanation:

Because we have a midsegment, this means that it is half as long as the side it's parallel to. You can think of "mid" as "middle" and that could lead to "halfway" to remember to take half.

So z = 14/2 = 7

Answer:

$80

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the largest price, assume that all 20 copies of the workbook will have 400 pages.

Since the company charges 1 cent per page, this means each workbook will cost 400 cents. This is equivalent to 4 dollars.

Find the total cost by multiplying this by 20:

20(4)

= 80

So, the largest price to print 20 copies is $80

Answer:

[tex](5^{0} -4^{-1} )(\frac{3}{4} )\\\\=(1-\frac{1}{4^{1}} )(\frac{3}{4} )\\\\=(\frac{4}{4} -\frac{1}{4} )(\frac{3}{4} )\\\\=(\frac{3}{4} )(\frac{3}{4} )\\\\=\frac{9}{16}[/tex]

The expected value of the distribution of the number of selected red balls is 0.795.

The expected value of the distribution is the mean or average of the possible outcomes.

There are 12 balls in an urn, five of which are crimson. The selection of a red ball is desired and hence considered a success.

In this case, the possible outcomes are 0, 1, 2, or 3 red balls.

To calculate the expected value, we need to find the probability of each outcome and multiply it by the value of the outcome.

The probability of selecting 0 red balls is :

[tex]$\frac{7}{12} \cdot \frac{6}{11} \cdot \frac{5}{10} = \frac{105}{660}$[/tex].

The probability of selecting 1 red ball is :

[tex]$3 \cdot \frac{5}{12} \cdot \frac{7}{11} \cdot \frac{6}{10} + 3 \cdot \frac{7}{12} \cdot \frac{5}{11} \cdot \frac{6}{10} + 3 \cdot \frac{7}{12} \cdot \frac{6}{11} \cdot \frac{5}{10} = \frac{315}{660}$[/tex].

The probability of selecting 2 red balls is

[tex]:$\dfrac{5}{12} \cdot \frac{7}{11} \cdot \frac{6}{10} + \frac{7}{12} \cdot \frac{5}{11} \cdot \frac{6}{10} + \frac{7}{12} \cdot \frac{6}{11} \cdot \frac{5}{10} = \frac{105}{660}$.[/tex]

The probability of selecting 3 red balls is

[tex]$\dfrac{5}{12} \cdot \frac{4}{11} \cdot \frac{3}{10} = \frac{15}{660}$[/tex]

The expected value is then :

[tex]$0 \cdot \frac{105}{660} + 1 \cdot \frac{315}{660} + 2 \cdot \frac{105}{660} + 3 \cdot \frac{15}{660} = \frac{525}{660} = \frac{175}{220} \approx \boxed{0.795}$[/tex]

To learn more about the expected value of the distribution click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29068283

#SPJ5

the trip to the airport was 6.25 miles.

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

(-12) + (-8) +30

-(12+8)+30

-20 + 30

10

Answer:

If the parent graph is h(x) = x, then h(x+9) would actually be shifting the graph 9 units to the LEFT.

Let me know if this helps!

Answer:

y=2/3x+1

Step-by-step explanation: