Is the function represented by the following table linear, quadratic or exponential? ​

If we total up the dots plot for 3, 4, and 5 pets, we find that 3 people have 2 pets at home, 10 individuals have at least 3 pets at home.

The fact that dogs are the most common pet in the world shouldn't be shocking. There is a reason why there are tens of millions of dogs living in the United States alone, which is why some people say that dogs are a man's greatest friend. Around the world, at least one dog is kept in one-third of all households.

A fully domesticated animal kept constitutes a "household pet." a pet kept by you for personal company, like a dog, cat, reptile, bird, or mouse. Any kind of horse, cow, pig, sheep, goat, chicken, turkey, other captive fur-bearing animal is not considered a household pet, nor is any animal that is typically kept for food or profit.

To know more about dots plot visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/22068145

#SPJ1

The total number of people with pets at home is 11, which is the sum of the heights of the columns.

What is equation?

A math equation is a method that links two claims and represents equivalence using the equals sign (=). An equation is a mathematical statement that establishes the equivalence of two mathematical expressions in algebra.

Based on the given dot plot, we can answer the following questions:

How many people have 2 pets at home?

Answer: Two people have 2 pets at home, as indicated by the two dots in the second column.

How many people have at least 3 pets at home?

Answer: Six people have at least 3 pets at home, as indicated by the dots in the third column and beyond.

How many more people have 2 pets than 5 pets?

Answer: There are no dots in the last column, which represents 5 pets. Therefore, the difference between the number of people with 2 pets and those with 5 pets is 2 - 0 = 2.

How many people have less than 3 pets at home?

Answer: Three people have less than 3 pets at home, as indicated by the dots in the first two columns.

Therefore, the total number of people with pets at home is 11, which is the sum of the heights of the columns.

To know more about equation fro the given link:

brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

Answer:Approximately

(0.58975,0.34781)

Step-by-step explanation:

If (x,y) is a point on the parabola, then the distance between (x,y) and (1,0) is:

√(x−1)2+(y−0)2=√x4+x2−2x+1

To minimize this, we want to minimize

f(x)=x4+x2−2x+1

The minimum will occur at a zero of:

f'(x)=4x3+2x−2=2(2x3+x−1)

graph{2x^3+x-1 [-10, 10, -5, 5]}

Using Cardano's method, find

x=3√14+√8736+3√14−√8736≅0.58975

y=x2≅0.34781

The probability of obtaining a reading less than 0.35° C is approximately 35%.

Accοrding tο the prοbability fοrmula, the likelihοοd οf an event οccurring is equal tο the ratiο οf the number οf favοurable οutcοmes tο the tοtal number οf οutcοmes. Prοbability οf an event οccurring P(E) = The number οf favοurable οutcοmes divided by the tοtal number οf οutcοmes.

The readings at freezing οn a set οf thermοmeters are nοrmally distributed, with a mean (x) οf 0°C and a standard deviatiοn (μ) οf 1.00°C. We want tο knοw hοw likely it is that we will get a reading that is less than 0.35°C.

To solve this problem, we must use the z-score formula to standardise the value:

[tex]$Z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

Z = standard score

x = observed value

[tex]\mu[/tex] = mean of the sample

[tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation of the sample

Here

x = 0.35° C

[tex]\mu[/tex] = 0° C

[tex]\sigma[/tex] = 1.00°C

Using the values on the formula:

[tex]$Z = \frac{0.35 - 0}{1}[/tex]

Z = 0.35

The probability of obtaining a reading less than 0.35° C is approximately 35%.

To know more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/30719832

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

Let length be x and breadth (x - 5).

Perimeter of rectangle is calculated by :

[tex] \: \: \boxed{ \pmb{ \sf{Perimeter_{(rectangle)} = 2(l + b)}}} \\ [/tex]

On substituting the values we get :

[tex]\dashrightarrow \: \: 130 = 2(x + x - 5) \\ [/tex]

[tex]\dashrightarrow \: \: 130 = 2(2x - 5) \\ [/tex]

[tex]\dashrightarrow \: \dfrac{130}{2} = (2x - 5) \\ [/tex]

[tex]\dashrightarrow \: \: 65 = 2x - 5 \\ [/tex]

[tex]\dashrightarrow \: \: 65 + 5 = 2x \\ [/tex]

[tex]\dashrightarrow \: \: 70 = 2x \\ [/tex]

[tex]\dashrightarrow \: \: \frac{70}{2} = x \\ [/tex]

[tex]\dashrightarrow \: \: 35 = x \\ [/tex]

Hence,

a. Histogram shows tip amounts ranging between $6 and $25, skewed to the right with a longer tail of higher tips.

b. Increasing the $8 tip to $18 would increase the mean since total tip amount increases by $10 spread out over 60 customers. Median won't be affected since changing one value does not alter the middle value.

a. The histogram shows that Elizabeth received a range of tip amounts, with the majority of tips falling between $6 and $25. The distribution is skewed to the right, with a longer tail of higher tip amounts.

b. i. The mean would increase because the total tip amount would increase by $10, and this increase would be spread out over the 60 customers.

ii. The median would not be affected because it is the middle value when the data is ordered, and changing one value does not change the middle value.

Learn more about histogram here: brainly.com/question/30354484

#SPJ4

Answer:

55 degrees angles on a rights angle triangle. 1 and 3 they are equal cause they are vertical opp angles 55 degrees

Answer:

5 as a percentage of 100 is 5/100 which is 5%

Answer:

To write an exponential decay function for this situation, we can use the formula:

P(t) = P₀e^(rt)

where:

P(t) = the population at time t

P₀ = the initial population

r = the annual rate of decrease (as a decimal)

t = time in years

We are given P₀ = 3,846 and r = -0.0027 (since the population is decreasing).

To approximate the population in 2022, we need to find t, the number of years from 1996 to 2022. That is:

t = 2022 - 1996 = 26 years

Now we can plug in the values we have:

P(t) = 3,846 e^(-0.0027t)

To find P(2022), we plug in t = 26:

P(26) = 3,846 e^(-0.0027(26))

≈ 3,200.62

Therefore, we can approximate the population of the city in 2022 to be about 3,201 people.

Answer:

3,101

Step-by-step explanation:

Please hit brainliest if this helped!

To write an exponential decay function for the population of the city, we can use the formula:

P(t) = P₀e^(-rt)

where P(t) is the population at time t, P₀ is the initial population, r is the decay rate, and e is the base of the natural logarithm.

In this problem, P₀ = 3,846 and r = 0.0027 (0.27% expressed as a decimal). We want to find the population in 2022, which is 26 years after 1996.To use the formula, we need to convert 26 years to the same time units as the decay rate. Since the decay rate is per year, we can use 26 years directly. Therefore, the exponential decay function for the population is:

P(t) = 3,846e^(-0.0027t)

To find the population in 2022 (t = 26), we substitute t = 26 into the function:

P(26) = 3,846e^(-0.0027*26) ≈ 3,101

Therefore, the population in 2022 is approximately 3,101.

Let me know if this helped by hitting brainliest! If you have any questions, comment below and I"ll get back to you ASAP.

In response to the stated question, we may state that As a result, the 66th derivative of f(x) = 4 sin(x) is 4 sin(x) (x).

In mathematics, the derivative of a function with real variables measures how sensitively the function's value varies in reaction to changes in its parameters. Derivatives are the fundamental tools of calculus. Differentiation (the rate of change of a function with respect to a variable in mathematics) (in mathematics, the rate of change of a function with respect to a variable). The use of derivatives is essential in the solution of calculus and differential equation problems. The definition of "derivative" or "taking a derivative" in calculus is finding the "slope" of a certain function. Because it is frequently the slope of a straight line, it should be enclosed in quotation marks. Derivatives are rate of change metrics that apply to almost any function.

Using the chain rule and the derivative of the sine function repeatedly yields the 66th derivative of the function [tex]f(x) = 4 sin (x).[/tex]

The derivative of sin(x) is cos(x), and the derivative of cos(x) is -sin(x), and this pattern repeats itself every two derivatives.

As a result, the first derivative of f(x) is:

[tex]f'(x) = 4 cos (x)[/tex]

The second derivative is as follows:

[tex]f"(x) = -4 sin (x)[/tex]

The third derivative is as follows:

[tex]f"'(x) = -4 cos (x)[/tex]

The fourth derivative is as follows:

[tex]f""(x) = 4 sin (x)[/tex]

And so forth.

[tex]f^{(66)(x)} = 4 sin (x)[/tex]

Because the pattern repeats every four derivatives, the 66th derivative is the same as the second, sixth, tenth, fourteenth, and so on.

As a result, the 66th derivative of f(x) = 4 sin(x) is 4 sin(x) (x).

To know more about derivatives visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ1

The Taylor's series for [tex]1 + 3e^x + x^2[/tex] at [tex]x=0[/tex] is :

[tex]1 + 3e^x+ x^2 = 5 + 3x + (3/2)x^2 + (1/3)x^3 + ...[/tex]

What do you mean by Taylor's series ?

The Taylor's series is a way to represent a function as a power series, which is a sum of terms involving the variable raised to increasing powers. The series is centered around a specific point, called the center of the series. The Taylor's series approximates the function within a certain interval around the center point.

The general formula for the Taylor's series of a function f(x) centered at [tex]x = a[/tex] is:

[tex]f(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + f''(a)(x-a)^2/2! + f'''(a)(x-a)^3/3! + ...[/tex]

where [tex]f'(a), f''(a), f'''(a),[/tex] etc. are the derivatives of f(x) evaluated at [tex]x = a[/tex].

Finding the Taylor's series for [tex]1 + 3e^x + x^2[/tex] at [tex]x=0[/tex] :

We need to find the derivatives of the function at [tex]x=0[/tex]. We have:

[tex]f(x) = 1 + 3e^x + x^2[/tex]

[tex]f(0) = 1 + 3e^0 + 0^2 = 4[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = 3e^x+ 2x[/tex]

[tex]f'(0) = 3e^0 + 2(0) = 3[/tex]

[tex]f''(x) = 3e^x + 2[/tex]

[tex]f''(0) = 3e^0 + 2 = 5[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x) = 3e^x[/tex]

[tex]f'''(0) = 3e^0 = 3[/tex]

Substituting these values into the general formula for the Taylor's series, we get:

[tex]f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + f''(0)x^2/2! + f'''(0)x^3/3! + ...[/tex]

[tex]f(x) = 4 + 3x + 5x^2/2 + 3x^3/6 + ...[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex]f(x) = 5 + 3x + (3/2)x^2 + (1/3)x^3 + ...[/tex]

Therefore, the Taylor's series for [tex]1 + 3e^x + x^2[/tex] at [tex]x=0[/tex] is :

[tex]1 + 3e^x+ x^2 = 5 + 3x + (3/2)x^2 + (1/3)x^3 + ...[/tex]

To know more about Taylor's series visit :

brainly.com/question/29733106

#SPJ1

Answer:

D I believe

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 6y + 6

Step-by-step explanation:

To simplify the expression 8(3/4y -2) + 6(-1/2+4) + 1, we can follow the order of operations (PEMDAS):

First, we simplify the expression within parentheses, working from the inside out:

6(-1/2+4) = 6(7/2) = 21

Next, we distribute the coefficient of 8 to the terms within the first set of parentheses:

8(3/4y -2) = 6y - 16

Finally, we combine the simplified terms:

8(3/4y -2) + 6(-1/2+4) + 1 = 6y - 16 + 21 + 1 = 6y + 6

Therefore, the expression 8(3/4y -2) + 6(-1/2+4) + 1 is equivalent to 6y + 6.