Answer:
Explanation:
h
A jury convicted two defendants for crimes involving the transportit
aliens. After the trial was over, the federal judge in the case enforced a court rule
that prohibited anyone from interviewing any juror, relative, friend, or associate
of the juror regarding the deliberations or verdict of the jury unless the person
can show good cause. Two weeks after the verdict, a newspaper publisher and
reporter filed a motion to get permission to interview the jurors for a news story.
The court denied the motion.
The publisher and reporter filed a lawsuit, claiming that they have a right under
freedom of the press to gather news and that the denial of access to interview the
jurors violates that constitutional right.
The court defends its ruling and its order not to grant permission by stating that,
like other First Amendment rights, the right to gather news is not absolute. The
purpose of prohibiting interviews of the jury is to protect jurors from annoyance
and harassment. Additionally, freedom of debate and independence of thought
would be stifled if jurors were made to feel that their arguments and ballots were
to be freely published to the public.
The law requires that restrictions of the press's news-gathering rights must be
justified by a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored to serve
that interest.
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. Who is the defendant?
3. What does the plaintiff want?
4. What does the defendant want?
5. What is the issue in this case?
What arguments does the plaintiff make?
The answer responses are:
The plaintiff in this case is the newspaper publisher and reporter.The defendant in this case is the court.The plaintiff wants permission to interview the jurors for a news story.The defendant wants to maintain its ruling and order not to grant permission to interview the jurors.The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff's right to gather news under the First Amendment of the US Constitution is being violated by the defendant's prohibition on interviewing jurors.What arguments does the plaintiff make?The plaintiff argues that they have a right under the freedom of the press to gather news and that the prohibition on interviewing jurors violates this right.
They may also argue that the prohibition is not justified by a compelling governmental interest and is not narrowly tailored to serve that interest, as required by law.
Therefore, the plaintiff may also argue that the prohibition is overly broad and unnecessarily restricts their ability to gather news.
Learn more plaintiff from
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ1
A disagreement has erupted between Jarron and Will about who owns a book that is in the public domain. Jarron says the original writer remains the
owner while Will says that no one owns it. Who is right?
A. Jarron because books cannot be public domain.
B. Jarron because Creative Commons licenses protect author ownership in the public domain.
C. Neither Jarron nor Will because the original writer's family are the legal copyright owners.
D.
Will because items in the public domain belong to the public.
A disagreement has erupted between Jarron and Will about who owns a book that is in the public domain. Jarron because books cannot be public domain. Hence, option A is appropriate.
What is the public domain?All artistic creations for which no exclusive rights of intellectual property apply are considered to be in the public domain. Anyone may legally use or make references to those works without permission since these rights have expired.
Generally speaking, if a piece of work is no longer copyrightable or its copyrights have expired, it is in the public domain. Public domain compositions can be extensively quoted and can act as the basis for new creative works.
Hence, option A is correct.
Learn more about the Public Domain here:
https://brainly.com/question/8922427
#SPJ1
A physics student weighing 500 N stands on a scale in an
elevator and records the scale reading over time. The data is
shown in the graph above. At time t = 0, the elevator is at rest
on the ground floor. What is the acceleration of the student
from 10-15 s?
According to the question , net force is zero so the acceleration of student is zero.
By data, what do you imply?Data is data that has been transformed into a form that is useful for transfer or analysis in computers. Data is data that has been transformed into binary digital form for use with modern technology and communication mediums. The topic of data can be used in either as the single or the plural.
Briefing:Weight= 500mg
m = 500/9.8 = 51.02Kg
g=9.8ms^2
b) when scale elevator is at rest, acceleration is zero so net force is zero
N-mg = 0
N = mg = 500N
c) During 5-10 second , N = 500N , from graph
N-mg = ma
500-500 = 51.02a
a = 300/51.02
= 5.85m/s^2 upward
d) 10-15 second , reading is 500N
so, N-mg = 500-500
= 0N
Net force is zero acceleration is zero so moving with a constant velocity or at rest.
e) During 15-20 scale reading is 300
300-500 = m2a
-200 = 51.02a
a = -3.92m/s2 downward
Net force is zero , so it moves with constant velocity.
To know more about data visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28162338
#SPJ4
Because Indigenous communities often lack the money to buy or sell goods and services, tribal governments: A. work with the state government to open businesses and casinos. B. formed their own banks to give loans to Indigenous people. C. run casinos, gas stations, hotels, and online businesses. D. rely on the federal government to provide subsidies and grants.
Because Indigenous communities often lack the money to buy or sell goods and services, tribal governments is option C. run casinos, gas stations, hotels, and online businesses.
What is the Indigenous communities about?It is important to note that Indigenous communities have a diverse range of economic activities, and different communities may have different approaches to economic development.
Some Indigenous communities have established businesses, such as casinos, gas stations, hotels, and online businesses, as a way to generate income and support their communities. Other Indigenous communities may work with state or federal governments to access subsidies or grants to support economic development.
Still, others may have formed their own banks or credit unions to provide loans to Indigenous people. It is not uncommon for Indigenous communities to use a combination of these approaches to support economic development and improve the well-being of their communities.
Learn more about Indigenous communities from
https://brainly.com/question/367033
#SPJ1
In England in the 18th century, when men on prison hulks had done all of the local project repairs that were needed, what happened to them?
O They were released because that paid their debt.
O They were shipped to Australia and America to work on projects there.
O They were allowed to spend time at home with their families.
O They were sent to penitentiaries, locked up to think about what they'd done.
For nearly a century, these ships were used as "temporary" prisons. There is no denying the harshness of life in the prison hulks. Inmates were chained in irons and had to get up every day at 5 a.m., work hard for ten hours in the summer, seven in the winter, and finish at 7 p.m.
In hulks, how were convicts treated?
This was done intentionally because the parliamentary act that allowed for the use of hulks stipulated that convicts would only be fed bread, "any coarse or inferior food," water, and small beers. Convicts frequently experienced malnutrition and hunger.
When were hulks used in prison?
In the 18th and 19th centuries, authorities used decommissioned ships as floating prisons. These were called "prison hulks." In England, they were used a lot.
To learn more about prison hulks here:
https://brainly.com/question/13103453
#SPJ1
Answer: B, they were shipped to Australia and America to work on projects there.
Explanation:
4. Could the United States Government implement a similar security model in the United States to monitor the
behavior of persons suspected of planning terrorist acts against the United States?
What is the correct definition of a constitution?
Answer: A constitution is a document that sets forth the fundamental principles and laws of a government, outlining the powers and duties of the government and establishing the rights, liberties, and duties of the people. It is typically the highest law of the land, and its provisions are typically more difficult to change than those of ordinary laws. A constitution provides the framework for the organization and operation of a government, and it sets the rules for the exercise of political power. It is often seen as a safeguard against arbitrary or oppressive rule, as it sets limits on the powers of government and protects the rights of individuals.
