Answer:
No
Explanation:
I don't think this it is good to depend on others
Assistance for every developmental activity.
Nations depend on Donor countries for development works, for donations and investments on developmental projects
That maybe a better idea in some cases but a nation should be independent. If a nation depends totally on other countries for development the nation may later face problems.
The sovereignty of the country maybe in danger
Because the donor countries may slowly start controlling the nations which totally depend on them. And losing sovereignty may hamper the development of the country.
I don't know if the answer is good or not
I am not that good in social studies:-{
What was George Washington's opinion about Foregien Policy? Explain what his vision for the future of the country was, is that what our country has chosen to do?
Answer:
Washington wraps up his foreign policy stance by advocating free trade with all nations, arguing that trade links should be established naturally and the role of the government should be limited to ensuring stable trade, defending the rights of American merchants, and any provisions necessary to ensure the conventional rules of trade. Hope This Helps In Any way!
Explanation:
4. Why does every decision involve trade-offs?
Select all answers that are correct. If people have never observed matter (mass) to be created or destroyed, then using inductive reasoning, it would be logical to conclude that: the known laws of science cannot account for the origin of mass the amount (quantity) of mass in the universe has never changed the mass of the universe must have created itself
Answer:
the known laws of science cannot account for the origin of mass
Explanation:
The known laws of science cannot account for the origin of mass Option(c) is correct.
What does Law of science denotes?Logical laws or laws of science are proclamations, in light of rehashed trials or perceptions, that portray or foresee a scope of regular peculiarities.
Scientific laws sum up the consequences of tests or perceptions, normally inside a specific scope of utilization. As a general rule, the exactness of a regulation doesn't change when another hypothesis of the significant peculiarity is worked out, yet rather the extent of the law's application, since the science or proclamation addressing the law doesn't change.
As with different sorts of scientific information, scientific laws don't communicate outright conviction, as numerical hypotheses or characters do. A scientific regulation might be gone against, confined, or stretched out by future perceptions. A regulation can often be planned as one or a few proclamations or conditions, with the goal that it can foresee the result of an investigation. Laws vary from speculations and hypothesizes, which are proposed during the scientific cycle previously and during approval by trial and perception. Speculations and proposes are not laws, since they have not been confirmed similarly, in spite of the fact that they might prompt the plan of laws. Laws are smaller in scope than scientific speculations, which might involve one or a few laws.
Therefore Option(c) is correct.
Learn more about Law of Science here:
brainly.com/question/14796314
#SPJ2
to study how violent conflicts between groups could be averted one would most likely consult as
Answer:
Social Psychologist
Explanation:
A social psychologist unlike medical psychologist studies the effect of social environment on an individual's behavior. He also examines that how the behavior and action of an individual is impacted by the actions, choices or thoughts of the society.
They play an important role in eliminating negative behavior of individuals and groups through counselling. They initiate programs to lessen the gaps between different social groups of a society.
Although social Psychologists perform diverse roles based on their job nature, but they have a special role in preventing the conflicts between groups. A social psychologist can lessen the intensity of conflict and even remove completely through:
-building the trust of groups for each other.
-Making the groups to negotiate with each other for mutual benefit.
-Arbitration and medication: by bringing the third parties.
-Agreeing one party to make small concessions for the other party.
-Subordinate goals- Making them to cooperate with each other to achieve same goals.
hope this helps ! :)
William Bradford was one of the elected governors for which group of colonies?
Answer:
i think it would be england
In the text you read this about the aftermath of the Boston Massacre: The soldiers were arrested and tried in court. John Adams agreed to defend them, saying that they deserved a fair trial. He wanted to show the world that the colonists believed in justice, even if the British government did not. At the trial, Adams argued that the crowd had provoked the soldiers. His arguments convinced the jury. In the end, the heaviest punishment any soldier received was a branding on the hand. Use the excerpt to answer the question. How could John Adams defend the British soldiers but still be seen as a Patriot? A. Adams knew that many Patriots wanted the British soldiers to be set free. B. Adams defended the soldiers because many Patriots asked him to. C. Adams defended the soldiers while defending the Patriots' belief in justice. D. Adams defended the soldiers because he thought it would make the British pity the Patriot cause.
Answer:
C. Adams defended the soldiers while defending the Patriots' belief in justice.
Explanation:
John Adams was a patriot because he defended a new idea of justice: that of a fair trial to everyone, which would later be codified in the Bill of Rights.
To do so, Adams showed that even the enemy deserved fair justice, meaning that the captured soldiers would have the right to a just trial.
Which of the following is a TRUE statement about the studies on obedience
conducted by Stanley Milgram, in 1963?
A) He found that Americans resist obeying authority figures, but Germans do not.
B) The purpose of his research was to further understand why Nazi soldiers obeyed
their orders to commit war crimes during the Holocaust
C) His studies did not involve the use of deception or confederates.
D) His studies were not ethically controversial.
( All of them are untrue to me)
Answer: B
Explanation:
That is the one I think is true, because he wanted to investigate whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures as this was a common explanation for the Nazi killings in World War II. and what I gather because of that is that the answer is b
The purpose of his research was to further understand why Nazi soldiers obeyed their orders to commit war crimes during the Holocaust is the statement true about the studies on obedience conducted by Stanley Milgram, in 1963.
What is Stanley Milgram?
Stanley Milgram was born on August 15, 1933, and passed away on December 20, 1984. He is a social psychologist who is mainly known for obeying authority. It investigates the willingness to obey authority. It is the creation of different theories on moral judgement. Stanley Milgram completed his education at Harvard University (1954–1960).
Stanley Milgram is a social psychologist from the United States whose controversial and ground-breaking studies on authority obedience are well-known. In order to carry out their orders to commit war crimes during the Holocaust, Nazi soldiers carried out study on their primary goal.
Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on Stanley Milgram, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10138784
#SPJ2
Germany has access to markets for its goods because of its _____. natural resources control of formerly Communist areas membership in the European Union early industrial development
What is the central idea of this article?
Answer:
A central idea is a main point that the author is making (also called a main idea or a key idea). In other words, a central idea is what the article is mostly about. You can think of a central idea as a thesis statement: one sentence that states what the article is about.
Explanation:
Central idea refers to the main idea or point that is consider as most important, idea in a paragraph or passage. It talks about the purpose of the passage.
What is the significance of the central idea in a passage?The main idea in the passage or a text is called a thesis statement. It refers to the central idea upon which the whole subject depends. The main idea is the chief point about which an author in the topic is talking about.
A central idea in the speech is also known as the main idea that represents the specific objective of the speech. It is usually one sentence statement that sums up the major ideas of a speech. It is the most important message that the author is trying to convey.
Basically, the central idea tells what a text is mainly about just in a one sentence. It also helps the reader to understand and analyze what they are reading.
Learn more about central idea of a text here:-
https://brainly.com/question/28309129
#SPJ2
failure to address the three questions of economics will have what kind of impact on an economy
Answer: It will have negative consequences.
I hope it helps. If it helps please mark me as the Brainliest. Have a great day :)
Answer:
It will have negative consequences.
Explanation:
See attachment just took the test.
Question 1 of 10
What was a similarity between the United States troops sent to the Spanish-
American War and the troops sent to fight in World War I?
A. They were mostly volunteers.
B. They were mostly recent immigrants.
C. They had little training.
D. They travelled overseas.
SUBMIT
Answer: D. They travelled overseas.
What is foreign aid ? Why do you like or dislike foreign aid? Present your critical analysis in eight points.
What are the values and philosophy adopted in the Constitution of India? Explain.(5 marks)
will mark u as brainliest if u answer correctly
Answer:
The Constitution of any country serves several purposes. It lays down certain ideals that form the basis of the kind of country that we as citizens aspire to live in.
A Constitution helps serve as a set of principles, rules, and procedures on which there is a consensus. These form the basis according to which the people want the country to be governed and the society to move on.
The Preamble to any Constitution is a brief introductory statement that conveys the guiding principles of the document. The Preamble to the Indian Constitution also does so. The values expressed in the Preamble are expressed as objectives of the Constitution.
These are sovereignty, socialism, secularism, democracy, republican character of Indian State, justice, liberty, equality, fraternity, human dignity, and the unity and integrity of the Nation.
Sovereignty: You may have read the Preamble. It declares India “a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic”. Being sovereign means having complete political freedom and being the supreme authority.
Socialism: You may be aware that social and economic inequalities have been inherent in Indian traditional society. This is why socialism has been made a constitutional value aimed at promoting social change and transformation to end all forms of inequalities.
Secularism: We all are pleased when anyone says that India is home to almost all major religions in the world. In the context of this plurality (means more than one or two; many), secularism is seen as a great constitutional value.
Democracy: The Preamble reflects democracy as a value. As a form of government, it derives its authority from the will of the people. The people elect the rulers of the country and the elected representatives remain accountable to the people.
Republic: India is not only a democratic nation but it is also a republic. The most important symbol of being a republic is the office of the Head of the State, i.e. the President who is elected and who is not selected on the basis of heredity, as is found in a system with the monarchy.
Justice: At times you may also realize that living in a democratic system alone does not ensure justice to citizens in all its totality. Even now we find a number of cases where not only social and economic justice but also political justice is denied.
Liberty: The Preamble prescribes liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship as one of the core values. These have to be assured to every member of all the communities.
Equality: Equality is a significant constitutional value as any other. The Constitution ensures equality of status and opportunity to every citizen for the development of the best in him/her.
Fraternity: There is also a commitment made in the Preamble to promote the value of fraternity that stands for the spirit of common brotherhood among all the people of India. In the absence of fraternity, a plural society like India stands divided.
The dignity of the individual: Promotion of fraternity is essential to realize the dignity of the individual. It is essential to secure the dignity of every individual without which democracy can not function.
Unity and integrity of the Nation: As we have seen above, the fraternity also promotes one of the critical values, i.e. unity and integrity of the nation. To maintain the independence of the country intact, the unity and integrity of the nation are very essential.
International peace and a just international order: The value of international peace and just international order, though not included in the Preamble is reflected in other provisions of the Constitution. The Indian Constitution directs the state
(a) to promote international peace and security,
(b) maintain just and honorable relations between nations,
(c) foster respect for international law and treaty obligations, and
(d) encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration.
To uphold and observe these values is in the interest of India. The peace and just international order will definitely contribute to the development of India.
Fundamental Duties: Our Constitution prescribes some duties be performed by the citizens. It is true that these duties are not enforceable in the court of law like the fundamental rights are, but these duties are to be performed by citizens.
Economic decisions involve doing what with resources to produce goods and
services for people to consume?
Answer: A
Explanation: It suits the definition
How Do We Participate in a World Community?
What factors led to the colonial resistance and resentment of Great Britain?
Answer:
There were many factors that led the American colonists to revolt against the British. One factor was that the British were passing laws the colonists didn't want or like. The Proclamation of 1763 prevented the colonists from moving west of the Appalachian Mountains. The colonists wanted to go there to acquire land.
Explanation:
Pls mark as brainliest
Which person most directly affected voting rights for women?
O A. Abraham Lincoln
O B. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
O C. Carrie Chapman Catt
D. Rosa Parks
Answer:
c?
Explanation:
