Answer:
240 candidates
Step-by-step explanation:
40% candidates failed, i. e. out of every 100 candidates 40 failed.
40 failed ----------------------------- 100 total students
1 failed --------------------------------100/40 total students, given 160 failed therefore
160 failed ----------------------------(100/40) x 160 total students
Total students = (100/40) x 160 = 400
Number of candidates passed = (total candidates) - (total candidates failed)
= 400 - 160 = 240 candidates
Can your help me please?
Answer:
(-5, 0) and (0,4)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given equation: -4x + 5y = 20
Sub. in the values
When x = -5 and y = 0 (-5,0),
[tex] - 4( - 5) + 5(0) = 20 [/tex]
When x = 0 and y = 4 (0,4),
[tex] - 4(0) + 5(4) = 20[/tex]
That's how I would do it, not sure if your school has another method. Hope this helps :)
Answer: x = -5 and y = 4
Step-by-step explanation: its the first option do you need me to exlain how cuz its multiple choice
I need help badly best answer gets BRAINLIEST:)
Answer:
a = 55°, b = 65°, c = 65°, d = 60°, e = 120°, f = 60°
Step-by-step explanation:
Vertical angles are congruent. Since a and 55° are vertical angles, we know that a = 55°. Since b and 65° are vertical angles, we know that b = 65°. Alternate interior angles are congruent. Since b and c are alternate interior angles and b = 65°, we know that c = 65° as well. Since 60° and d are alternate interior angles, we know that d = 60°. Supplementary angles add up to 180°. Since d and e are supplementary and d = 60°, we know that e = 180 - 60 = 120°. Since vertical angles are congruent, we see that d and f are vertical angles and we know d = 60°, we also know that f = 60°.
Avi's pet hamster Chubby loves to run in his hamster wheel. During one "race", Avi counts 100100100 rotations of the wheel. She wants to know how far Chubby ran, so she measures the diameter of the wheel and finds that it is 20 \text{ cm}20 cm20, start text, space, c, m, end text. How far did Chubby run? Round your answer to the nearest \text{cm}cmstart text, c, m, end text.
Answer:
63 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
If Chubby ran his wheel, which has a diameter of 20cm, we want to find its circumference - this will tell us how far Chubby has ran one one full rotation of the wheel.
The formula for the circumference of a circle is [tex]2\pi r[/tex], where r is the radius. We know the diameter is 20, which is double the radius, so the radius is [tex]20\div2=10[/tex] cm.
We can know substitute inside the formula:
[tex]2\cdot \pi \cdot10\\\\2\cdot 3.14 \cdot10\\\\ 6.28\cdot10\\\\62.8[/tex]
62.8 rounded to the nearest cm is 63.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
6280
Step-by-step explanation:
The average age of a part-time seasonal employee at a Vail Resorts ski mountain has historically been 37 years. A random sample of 50 part-time seasonal employees in 2010 had a mean of 38.5 years with a standard deviation of 16 years. Required:a. At the 5 percent level of significance, does this sample show that the average age was different in 2010? b. Which is the right hypotheses to test the statement?c. What are the test statistic and critical value?
Answer:
No the sample does not show that the average age was different in 2010
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 50
The sample mean is [tex]\= x = 38.5[/tex]
The population mean is [tex]\mu = 37[/tex]
The standard deviation is [tex]\sigma = 16[/tex]
The level of significance is [tex]\alpha = 5 \% = 0.05[/tex]
The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : \mu = 37[/tex]
The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a : \mu \ne 37[/tex]
The critical value of the level of significance obtained from the normal distribution table is ([tex]Z_{\alpha } = 1.645[/tex] )
Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as
[tex]t = \frac{ \= x - \mu }{ \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]
substituting values
[tex]t = \frac{ 38.5 - 37}{ \frac{16}{\sqrt{50} } }[/tex]
[tex]t = 0.663[/tex]
Now looking at the value t and [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex] we see that [tex]t < Z_{\alpha }[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
This mean that there is no sufficient evidence to state that the sample shows that the average age was different in 2010
Find a8 of the sequence 10,9.75,9.5,9.25,….
Answer:
10,9.75,9.5,9.25,9, 8.75 , 8.5, 8.25, 8...
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract 0.25 from each to find the next number
Answer:
8.25
Step-by-step explanation:
If you substract .25 from each number until you get to a8 you will get 8.25
URGENT, PLEASE HELP! (3/5) -50 POINTS- !please no wrong answers for the points.! A) [tex]y = \frac{9}{2} x + \frac{1}{2}[/tex] B) [tex]y = - \frac{1}{2} x + \frac{7}{2}[/tex] C) [tex]y = -4x + 9[/tex] D) [tex]y = 4x + 15[/tex]
Answer:
B y = -1/2x + 7/2
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that it has a negative slope since the points go from the top left to the bottom right
We can eliminate A and D
The y intercept is where it crosses the y axis
It should cross somewhere between 2 and 4
C has a y intercept of 9 which is too big
Lets verify with a point
x = -4
y = -4(-4)+9 = 16+9 = 25 (-4,25) not even close to being near the points on the graph
checking B
y = -1/2 (-4) +7/2
= 2 + 7/2 = 11/2 = 5.5 it seems reasonable
Answer:
[tex]\Large \boxed{y=-\frac{1}{2} x+\frac{7}{2} }[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Using a graph,
we can see that the line y = -1/2x + 7/2 best fits for the data.
The average of 4 numbers is 15 , the sum of 3 numbers is 14 what is the fourth number
Answer:
46
Step-by-step explanation:
(14+x)/4 = 15
14 + x = 60
x = 46
Answer:
46
Step-by-step explanation:
Let a to d be number 1 to 4 respectively.
15 = (a + b + c + d) / 4
(a + b + c + d) = 60 ------> total sum of the 4 numbers
Since the sum of 3 numbers (assuming a to c) is 14,
Fourth number (d) = 60 - 14
= 46
That's how I would do it, hope this helps :)
If x =y, then x-a=y-a represents the blank property of equality. A-addition B-symmetric C-subtraction D.transitive
Answer:
Subtraction property
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Subtraction
Step-by-step explanation:I took the test
A study was conducted to assess the effects that occur when children are exposed to cocaine before birth. Children were tested at age 4 for object assembly skill, which was described as a task requiring visual spatial skills related to mathematical competence. The 190 children born to cocaine users had a mean of 7.3 and a standard deviation of 3.0 The 186 children not exposed to cocaine had a mean score of 8.2 with a standard deviation of 3.0 Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four year old children on the test of object assembly.
What are null and alternative hypothesis? What is test statistics?
Answer:
We conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that the 190 children born to cocaine users had a mean of 7.3 and a standard deviation of 3.0 The 186 children not exposed to cocaine had a mean score of 8.2 with a standard deviation of 3.0.
Let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] = population mean score for children born to cocaine users.
[tex]\mu_2[/tex] = population mean score for children not exposed to cocaine.
So, Null Hypothesis, : = 490 {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is not associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}
Alternate Hypothesis, : 490 {means that the prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly}
The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviations;
T.S. = [tex]\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }[/tex] ~ [tex]t__n_1_+_n_2_-_2[/tex]
where, [tex]\bar X_1[/tex] = sample mean score of children born to cocaine users = 7.3
[tex]\bar X_2[/tex] = sample mean score of children not exposed to cocaine = 8.2
[tex]s_1[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children born to cocaine users = 3
[tex]s_2[/tex] = sample standard deviation for children not exposed to cocaine = 3
[tex]n_1[/tex] = sample of children born to cocaine users = 190
[tex]n_2[/tex] = sample of children not exposed to cocaine = 186
Also, [tex]s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)\times s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)\times s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{(190-1)\times 3^{2}+(186-1)\times 3^{2} }{190+186-2} }[/tex] = 3
So, the test statistics = ~
= -2.908
The value of t-test statistics is -2.908.
Now, at a 0.05 level of significance, the t table gives a critical value of -1.645 at 374 degrees of freedom for the left-tailed test.
Since the value of our test statistics is less than the critical value of t as -2.908 < -1.645, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as the test statistics will fall in the rejection region.
Therefore, we conclude that prenatal cocaine exposure is associated with lower scores of four-year-old children on the test of object assembly.
In the null hypothesis, a test always forecasts no effect, while the alternate theory states the research expectation impact, and calculation as follows:
Null and alternative hypothesis:Calculating the pooled estimator of [tex]\sigma^2[/tex], denoted by [tex]S^2_p[/tex], is defined by
[tex]\to \bold{S^2_p= \frac{(n_1 - 1) S^2_1+ (n_2 - 1)S^2_2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}}[/tex]
Null hypothesis:
[tex]\to H_0 : \mu_1 - \mu_2 = \Delta_0\\[/tex]
Test statistic:
[tex]\to T_0=\frac{\bar{X_1}- \bar{X_2} -\Delta_0}{S_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}} \\\\[/tex]
Alternative Hypothesis:
[tex]H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 \neq \Delta_0\\\\ H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 > \Delta_0\\\\H_1 : \mu_1 -\mu_2 < \Delta_0\\\\[/tex]
Rejection Criterion
[tex]t_0 > t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2}\ \ \ or\ \ \ t_0 < - t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2} \\\\t_o > -t_{\alpha , n_1+n_2 -2}[/tex]
Given value:
[tex]\to S_p=9\\\\\to \Delta_0=0\\\\\to t_0=-\frac{0.9}{3(\sqrt{(\frac{1}{190}+\frac{1}{186})})}=-2.9\\\\\to t_{0.05,374}=1.645\\\\[/tex]
here
[tex]\to t_0 < -t_{0.05,374}[/tex]
hence rejecting the [tex]H_0[/tex]
Since there should be enough evidence that prenatal cocaine exposure is linked to inferior item assembly scores in 4-year-olds.
Find out more about the alternative hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/18831983
find the product 538 x 100=
Answer:
Answer=53,800
Step-by-step explanation:
just add the two zero behind the number
Let s1 = k and define sn+1 = √4sn − 1 for n ≥ 1. Determine for what values of k the sequence (sn) will be monotone increasing and for what values of k it will be monotone decreasing.
Answer:
The answer is "[tex]\bold{\frac{1}{4}<k\leq 2+\sqrt{3}}[/tex]"
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
[tex]\ S_1 = k \\\\ S_{n+1} = \sqrt{4S_n -1}[/tex] [tex]_{where} \ \ n \geq 1[/tex]
In the above-given value, [tex]S_n[/tex] is required for the monotone decreasing so, [tex]S_2 :[/tex]
[tex]\to \sqrt{4k-1} \leq \ k=S_1\\\\[/tex]
square the above value:
[tex]\to k^2-4k+1 \leq 0\\\\\to k \leq 2+\sqrt{3} \ \ \ \ \ and \ \ 4k+1 >0\\\\[/tex]
[tex]\bold{\boxed{\frac{1}{4}<k\leq 2+\sqrt{3}}}[/tex]
Solve the following equations
x-1=6/x
[tex]x-1=\dfrac{6}{x}\qquad(x\not=0)\\\\x^2-x=6\\x^2-x-6=0\\x^2+2x-3x-6=0\\x(x+2)-3(x+2)=0\\(x-3)(x+2)=0\\x=3 \vee x=-2[/tex]
a sample of 25 workers with employer provided health insurance paid an average premium of $6600 eith a sample standard deviation of $800. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the mean premium amount paid by all workers who have employer provided health insurance g
Answer:
$6284.4≤μ≤$6313.6
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the formula for calculating confidence interval as shown:
CI = xbar ± Z×S/√n
xbar is the average premium
Z is the z-score at 95% confidence
S is the standard deviation
n is the sample size
Given parameters
xbar = $6600
Z score at 95% CI = 1.96
S = $800
n = 25
Substituting this parameters in the formula we have;
CI = 6600±1.96×800/√25
CI = 6600±(1.96×800/5)
CI = 6600±(1.96×160)
CI = 6600±313.6
CI = (6600-313.6, 6600+313.6)
CI = (6284.4, 6913.6)
Hence the 95% confidence interval for the mean premium amount paid by all workers who have employer provided health insurance is $6284.4≤μ≤$6313.6
Kim is earning money for a trip. She has saved and she earns per hour babysitting. The total amount of money earned (y) after (x) number of hours worked is given by the equation . How many hours will she need to work in order to earn for her trip?
Answer:
what is the amount of money Kim earn per hour of babysitting? Also I need to know how much trip cost to find out how many hours she need to work.
Step-by-step explanation:
What is the scale factor of this dilation?
Answer:
5/3
Step-by-step explanation:
on both sides we can see that the orginal length of 3 increased to five
therfore if we multiply 3 by 3/5 we get five which means the scale factor is 5/3
Subtract 5p + 8q from the sum of 5p + 4q and – 9p + 69.
Answer:
-9p -4q + 69
Step-by-step explanation:
5p +4q + (-9p +69)
=> 5p + 4q -9p +69
=> -4p +4q +69
Now, we need to subtract 5p +8q from -4p + 4q +69
=> -4p +4q +69 - (5p +8q)
=> -4p + 4q +69 - 5p -8q
=> -9p -4q + 69
X-6 greater then equal to 15 + 8x
Answer:x ≤ 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x ≥ -3
Step-by-step explanation:
x - 6 ≥ 15 + 8x
x - 8x ≥ 15 + 6
-7x ≥ 21
x ≥ 21/-7
x ≥ -3
x greater than equal to -3
check:
-3 - 6 ≥ 15 + 8*-3
-9 ≥ 15 - 24
Given the following three points, find by the hand the quadratic function they represent (0,6, (2,16, (3,33)
Answer:
[tex] f(x) = 4x^2 - 3x + 6 [/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Quadratic function is given as [tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]
Let's find a, b and c:
Substituting (0, 6):
[tex] 6 = a(0)^2 + b(0) + c [/tex]
[tex] 6 = 0 + 0 + c [/tex]
[tex] c = 6 [/tex]
Now that we know the value of c, let's derive 2 system of equations we would use to solve for a and b simultaneously as follows.
Substituting (2, 16), and c = 6
[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]
[tex] 16 = a(2)^2 + b(2) + 6 [/tex]
[tex] 16 = 4a + 2b + 6 [/tex]
[tex] 16 - 6 = 4a + 2b + 6 - 6 [/tex]
[tex] 10 = 4a + 2b [/tex]
[tex] 10 = 2(2a + b) [/tex]
[tex] \frac{10}{2} = \frac{2(2a + b)}{2} [/tex]
[tex] 5 = 2a + b [/tex]
[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex] => (Equation 1)
Substituting (3, 33), and c = 6
[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + x [/tex]
[tex] 33 = a(3)^2 + b(3) + 6 [/tex]
[tex] 33 = 9a + 3b + 6 [/tex]
[tex] 33 - 6 = 9a + 3b + 6 - 6 [/tex]
[tex] 27 = 9a + 3b [/tex]
[tex] 27 = 3(3a + b) [/tex]
[tex] \frac{27}{3} = \frac{3(3a + b)}{3} [/tex]
[tex] 9 = 3a + b [/tex]
[tex] 3a + b = 9 [/tex] => (Equation 2)
Subtract equation 1 from equation 2 to solve simultaneously for a and b.
[tex] 3a + b = 9 [/tex]
[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex]
[tex] a = 4 [/tex]
Replace a with 4 in equation 2.
[tex] 2a + b = 5 [/tex]
[tex] 2(4) + b = 5 [/tex]
[tex] 8 + b = 5 [/tex]
[tex] 8 + b - 8 = 5 - 8 [/tex]
[tex] b = -3 [/tex]
The quadratic function that represents the given 3 points would be as follows:
[tex] f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c [/tex]
[tex] f(x) = (4)x^2 + (-3)x + 6 [/tex]
[tex] f(x) = 4x^2 - 3x + 6 [/tex]
Lila is camping with her family. She wants to hike to the lake, go fishing, and hike back before 6:05 P.M. It will take 1 hour and 10 minutes to hike to the lake and 1 hour and 50 minutes to hike back. Lila wants to fish for 3 hours and 10 minutes. What is the latest time Lila can start the hike to the lake?
Lila will need to start the hike at 11: 55 a.m. to be back at exactly 6: 05 p.m. or at 11: 54 a.m. to be before 6: 05 p.m (6: 04 p.m.)
Explanation:
To solve this question, the first step is to calculate how much time does hiking to the lake, go fishing, and go back takes in total. This can be calculated by adding the time of the three activities. This means 1 hour 10 minutes + 3 hours 10 minutes + 1 hour 50 minutes which is equal to 6 hours 10 minutes. The detailed process is shown below.
Add the hours: 1 + 3 + 1 = 5
Add the minutes: 10+50 +10 = 70
Also, because the total of minutes is above 60 (each hour has 60 minutes) it is necessary to subtract 60 minutes and add 1 hour.
5 hours + 1 hour and 70 minutes - 60 minutes = 6 hours and 10 minutes
Now, to solve the question subtract the time of the activities to the time Lila needs to complete all the activities.
6: 05 p.m. - 6 hours and 10 minutes = 11: 55 a.m
You can get this result by substracting first the hours and then the minutes
6: 05 p.m. - 6 hours = 12: 05 p.m.
12: 05 - 10 minutes = 11: 55 a.m.
According to this, Lila will need to start the hike at 11: 55 a.m. to be back at exactly 6: 05 p.m. or at 11: 54 a.m. to be before 6: 05 a.m because if she starts at 11: 54 a.m. she will be back at 6:04, which is a minute before 6:05 p.m.
|3(x–2)|=12 pls help i need assistance
Answer:
x1 = -4
x2 = 6
Step-by-step explanation:
The 2 vertical lines are "absolute values" meaning whatever they contain has to be positive
For Example
|-3| = 3
So we can ignore if the answer we get is positive or negative because it will forced to be a positive
|3 x 4| = 12
|x - 2| = 4
x1 = 6
x2 = -2
The time between consecutive uses of a vending machine is exponential with an average of 15 minutes. a)Given that the machine has not been used in the previous 5 minutes, what is the probability that the machine will not be used during the next 10 minutes
Answer5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer this will give 10 points
Answer:
maximum --> 62
median --> 46.5
upper quartile --> 60
lower quartile --> 37
minimum --> 32
Step-by-step explanation:
Forgive me on the explanation as I'm a bit rusty on these types of problems.
First, we need to put the set of numbers in order -->
from: 34, 37, 39, 32, 48, 45, 53, 62, 58, 61, 60, 41 -->
to: 32, 34, 37, 39, 41, 45, 48, 53, 58, 60, 61, 62
maximum = biggest number => thus, 62
median = middle number in a sense => (45+48)/2 => thus, 46.5
upper quartile = median over the median => thus, 60
lower quartile = median under the median => thus, 37
minimum = lowest number => thus, 32
And there we have our 5 answers.
Hope this helps!
What is the circumference of the following circle?
Answer:
The answer is 157 inStep-by-step explanation:
Circumference of a circle = 2πr
where
r is the radius
From the above question
radius = 25 in.
Substitute this value into the above formula
That's
Circumference = 2(25)π
= 50π
= 157.079
We have the final answer as
Circumference = 157 inHope this helps you
C-Spec, Inc., is attempting to determine whether an existing machine is capable of milling an engine part that has a key specification of 4 ± .003 inches. After a trial run on this machine, C-Spec has determined that the machine has a sample mean of 4.001 inches with a standard deviation of .002 inch. Calculate the Cpk for this machine.
Answer:
0.3333
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the following :
Sample mean(m) = 4.001 inch
Standard deviation(sd) = 0.002 inch
Key specification : = 4 ± .003 inches
Upper specification LIMIT ( USL) : (4 + 0.003) = 4.003 inches
Lower specification limit (LSL) : (4 - 0.003) = 3.997 inches
Cpk is found using the relation:
min[(USL - mean) / (3 * sd), (mean-LSL) / (3*sd)]
min[(4.003 - 4.001)/(3*0.002), (4.001 - 3.997)/(3*0.002)]
min[(0.002 / 0.006), (0.004 / 0.006)]
min[(0.33333, 0.66667)
Therefore Cpk = 0.3333
Because 0.33333<0.66667
will rate you brainliest need help
Answer:
x = 0.09
Step-by-step explanation:
[tex] {3}^{x + 2} = {2}^{3} [/tex]
Taking Logarith both sides, we get :
Using the properties of Logarithms:
[tex](x + 2) log(3) = 3 log(2) [/tex]
[tex](x + 2) = 1.91[/tex]
(taking log2= 0.3 and log3= 0.47)
x = 0.09
Which of the following is equivalent to –2i(6 – 7i)?
Answer:
[tex]\boxed{\sf \bf \ \ -2i(6-7i)=-14-12i \ \ }[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello, please consider the following.
[tex]-2i(6-7i)=-12i+14i^2=-14-12i[/tex]
Hope this helps.
Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.
Thank you
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer = A
2. (1 pt) The following statement is true or false;
When we know the population standard deviation, o, we use a standard normal
distribution (z-score) to calculate the error bound EBM and construct the
confidence interval and when the population standard deviation, o, is unknown,
we use a Student's t distribution (t-score) to calculate the error bound EBM and
construct the confidence interval.
a. true
b. false
If you know the population standard deviation (sigma), then you use the Z distribution. If sigma is not known, then you use the T distribution.
Side note: Even if sigma is not known, you could use the Z distribution if the sample size n is greater than 30. If n > 30, then the T distribution is approximately about the same as the Z distribution.
A television screen has a length to width ratio of 8 to 5 and a perimeter of 117 inches. What is the diagonal measure of the screen (to the nearest tenth of an inch)?
Answer:
[tex]D = 42.5\ inch[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
[tex]L = Length[/tex] and [tex]W = Width[/tex]
[tex]L:W = 8: 5[/tex]
[tex]Perimeter = 117[/tex]
Required
Determine the Diagonal
First, the dimension of the screen has to be calculated;
Recall that; [tex]L:W = 8: 5[/tex]
Convert to division
[tex]\frac{L}{W} = \frac{8}{5}[/tex]
Multiply both sides by W
[tex]W * \frac{L}{W} = \frac{8}{5} * W[/tex]
[tex]L = \frac{8W}{5}[/tex]
The perimeter of a rectangle:
[tex]Perimeter = 2(L+W)[/tex]
Substitute [tex]L = \frac{8W}{5}[/tex]
[tex]Perimeter = 2(\frac{8W}{5}+W)[/tex]
Take LCM
[tex]Perimeter = 2(\frac{8W + 5W}{5})[/tex]
[tex]Perimeter = 2(\frac{13W}{5})[/tex]
Substitute 117 for Perimeter
[tex]117 = 2(\frac{13W}{5})[/tex]
[tex]117 = \frac{26W}{5}[/tex]
Multiply both sides by [tex]\frac{5}{26}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{5}{26} * 117 = \frac{26W}{5} * \frac{5}{26}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{5 * 117}{26} = W[/tex]
[tex]\frac{585}{26} = W[/tex]
[tex]22.5 = W[/tex]
[tex]W = 22.5[/tex]
Recall that
[tex]L = \frac{8W}{5}[/tex]
[tex]L = \frac{8 * 22.5}{5}[/tex]
[tex]L = \frac{180}{5}[/tex]
[tex]L = 36[/tex]
The diagonal of a rectangle is calculated using Pythagoras theorem as thus;
[tex]D = \sqrt{L^2 + W^2}[/tex]
Substitute values for L and W
[tex]D = \sqrt{36^2 + 22.5^2}[/tex]
[tex]D = \sqrt{1296 + 506.25}[/tex]
[tex]D = \sqrt{1802.25}[/tex]
[tex]D = \sqrt{1802.25}[/tex]
[tex]D = 42.4529150943[/tex]
[tex]D = 42.5\ inch[/tex] (Approximated)
5. When looking at a map, a student realizes that Birmingham is nearly due west of Atlanta, and Nashville is nearly due north of Birmingham. If the distance from Atlanta to Birmingham is roughly 150 mi, and the distance from Birmingham to Nashville is roughly 200 mi, what is the estimated distance from Atlanta to Nashville?
Answer: 250 mi
Step-by-step explanation:
Here we can think in a triangle rectangle:
The distance from Birmingham to Atlanta is roughly 150 mi, and this is one of the cathetus.
And the distance from Birmingham to Nashville is roughly 200 mi, this is the other cathetus of the triangle.
Now, the distance from Atlanta to Nashville will be the hypotenuse of this triangle rectangle.
Now we can apply the Pythagorean's theorem:
A^2 + B^2 = H^2
Where A and B are the cathetus, and H is the hypotenuse:
Then:
H = √(A^2 + B^2)
H = √(150^2 + 200^2) mi = √(62,500) mi = 250 mi
Then the estimated distance from Atlanta to Nashville is 250 mi
Find the length of FT¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ A. 77.71 B. 72.47 C. 56.84 D. 49.42
Answer:
D, 49.42
Step-by-step explanation:
ΔVFT=180-90-43=47
formula
a/sin A = b/sin B/ = c/sin C
So,
FV/sin90=53/sin47
FV=72.4684
FT=√(72.4684)^2-(53)^2
FT=49.4234
Ans:D
The length FT in the given right-angle triangle is 49.42.
So option D is the correct answer.
We are given a right-angle triangle and to find the length of any side we can use Pythagoras theorem or trigonometric identities.
In the triangle, we see that TV = 53 and ∠ FVT = 43°
We will find the length FT by using Pythagoras theorem or trigonometric identities.
What are trigonometric functions?
There are some commonly used trigonometric identities:
SinФ = Perpendicular / hypotenuse
Cos Ф = Base / hypotenuse
Tan Ф = Perpendicular / Base
We will use Tan Ф = Perpendicular / Base to find the length FT.
Because we need to use trigonometric identities that have TV and FT.
Tan Ф = FT / TV
Tan 43° = FT / 53
FT = Tan 43° x 53
FT = 0.932515 X 53
FT = 49.42
Thus we got FT = 49.42 using the tan function.
Learn more about trigonometric functions here:
https://brainly.com/question/14746686
$SPJ2