I need help solving this problem. Thanks

Answer:

The standard error of your estimate of the average height in the city is 0.5 inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

You begin by collecting the heights of a random sample of 196 people from the city.

This means that [tex]n = 196[/tex]

The standard deviation of the heights in your sample is 7 inches.

This means that [tex]\sigma = 7[/tex]

The standard error of your estimate of the average height in the city is

[tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} = \frac{7}{\sqrt{196}} = 0.5[/tex]

The standard error of your estimate of the average height in the city is 0.5 inches.

Answer:

0.9984

Step-by-step explanation:

we have shape parameter for the first component as 2.1

characteristics life = 100000

for this component

we have

exp(-2000/100000)².¹

= e^-0.0002705

= 0.9997

for the second component

shape parameter = 1.8

characteristic life = 80000

= exp(-2000/80000)¹.⁸

= e^-0.001307

= 0.9987

the reliability oif the system after 2000  events

= 0.9987 * 0.9997

= 0.9984

Recall that variation of parameters is used to solve second-order ODEs of the form

y''(t) + p(t) y'(t) + q(t) y(t) = f(t)

so the first thing you need to do is divide both sides of your equation by t :

y'' + (2t - 1)/t y' - 2/t y = 7t

You're looking for a solution of the form

[tex]y=y_1u_1+y_2u_2[/tex]

where

[tex]u_1(t)=\displaystyle-\int\frac{y_2(t)f(t)}{W(y_1,y_2)}\,\mathrm dt[/tex]

[tex]u_2(t)=\displaystyle\int\frac{y_1(t)f(t)}{W(y_1,y_2)}\,\mathrm dt[/tex]

and W denotes the Wronskian determinant.

Compute the Wronskian:

[tex]W(y_1,y_2) = W\left(2t-1,e^{-2t}\right) = \begin{vmatrix}2t-1&e^{-2t}\\2&-2e^{-2t}\end{vmatrix} = -4te^{-2t}[/tex]

Then

[tex]u_1=\displaystyle-\int\frac{7te^{-2t}}{-4te^{-2t}}\,\mathrm dt=\frac74\int\mathrm dt = \frac74t[/tex]

[tex]u_2=\displaystyle\int\frac{7t(2t-1)}{-4te^{-2t}}\,\mathrm dt=-\frac74\int(2t-1)e^{2t}\,\mathrm dt=-\frac74(t-1)e^{2t}[/tex]

The general solution to the ODE is

[tex]y = C_1(2t-1) + C_2e^{-2t} + \dfrac74t(2t-1) - \dfrac74(t-1)e^{2t}e^{-2t}[/tex]

which simplifies somewhat to

[tex]\boxed{y = C_1(2t-1) + C_2e^{-2t} + \dfrac74(2t^2-2t+1)}[/tex]

True

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]P(t) = I^2(t)R[/tex]

Taking the derivative of P(t) with respect to time,

[tex]\dfrac{dP(t)}{dt} = 2I(t)\dfrac{dI(t)}{dt}R[/tex]

[tex]\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:= 2(1)(-0.5)(500) = -500[/tex]

Answer:

0.0002

Step-by-step explanation:

4 decimal places means tenths, hundredths, thousandths, and ten thousandths places. If we count 4 decimal places, we come to 0.0002. The number next to it, 3, rounds down, so the answer should be 0.0002.

Answer:

There are no solution/no roots for f(q) = 92 - 125

Answer:

See explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]M \to[/tex] randomly selecting a male

[tex]B \to[/tex] randomly selecting someone with blue eyes

Solving (a): Interpret P(M|B)

The above implies conditional probability

The interpretation is: the probability of selecting a male provided that a person with blue eyes has been selected

Solving (b): is (a) the same as P(B|M)

No, they are not the same.

The interpretation of P(B|M) is: the probability of selecting a person with blue eyes provided that a male has been selected

Answer:

(in the image)

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not sure I understood your question completely but I hope this helps.

Answer:

Slope is undefined. Line parallel to y-axis.

Step-by-step explanation:

By Analytic Geometry, we can determine the slope of a line by knowing two distinct lines and using the definition of secant line:

[tex]m = \frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}[/tex] (1)

Where:

[tex](x_{1}, y_{1})[/tex] - Coordinates of the initial point.

[tex](x_{2}, y_{2})[/tex] - Coordinates of the final point.

[tex]m[/tex] - Slope.

If we know that [tex](x_{1}, y_{1}) = (17, -13)[/tex] and [tex](x_{2}, y_{2}) = (17, 8)[/tex], then the slope of the line is:

[tex]m = \frac{8-(-13)}{17-17}[/tex]

[tex]m = \frac{21}{0}[/tex]

The slope is undefined, which means that line is parallel to y-axis.

Answer:

hello there here is your answer

51 is your next term.

Step-by-step explanation:

you are subtracting 9 from each number

95-9= 86

86-9=78

78-9=65

65-9=60

60-9=51

so on and so on

Hope this help

have a good day

bye

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]here \: is \: your \: solution: - \\ \\ given \: number \: = 95.86.78.71.65.60 \\ \\ = > 95 - 9 = 86 \\ \\ = > 86 - 8 = 78 \\ \\ = > 78 - 7 = 71 \\ \\ = > 71 - 6 = 65 \\ \\ = > 65 - 5 = 60 \\ \\ \: now \: follow \: the \: sequence \: \\ \\ subtract \: 4 \: from \: 60 \\ \\ = > 60 - 4 = 56 \\ \\ = > \: \: 56 \: \:( ANSWER✓✓✓)[/tex]

Answer:

36 introverts

Step-by-step explanation:

Total number of adults in the survey = 120

Ratio of introverts to extroverts = 3:7

Number of introverts = ratio number of introverts / ratio total × 120

Ratio number of introverts = 3

Ratio total = 3 + 7 = 10

Number of introverts = 3/10 × 120

= 36

Answer:

0.015 = 1.5% probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 83.8 months in a sample of 71 monitors

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

Mean life of 82 months with a standard deviation of 7 months.

This means that [tex]\mu = 82, \sigma = 7[/tex]

Sample of 71

This means that [tex]n = 71, s = \frac{7}{\sqrt{71}}[/tex]

What is the probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 83.8 months?

1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 83.8. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{83.8 - 82}{\frac{7}{\sqrt{71}}}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.17[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.17[/tex] has a p-value of 0.985.

1 - 0.985 = 0.015

0.015 = 1.5% probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 83.8 months in a sample of 71 monitors

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Number of suitcases on a plane is discrete because you can only have an integer amount. You can't have a fraction of a suitcase on a plane.

Answer:

90 maybe is a correct answer

Answer:

Y=40°

Step-by-step explanation:

VUW~YXZ

VWU~YZX

YXZ+XYZ+YZX=180°

70°+XYX+70°=180°

140°+XYZ=180°

XYZ=180°-140°

XYZ=40°

Answer:

A. -400

Step-by-step explanation:

We solve for the swap rate

R = (1-p3)/(p1+p2+p3)

R = 1-0.88/0.97+0.93+0.88

= 0.12/2.78

= 0.04317

Remember 4.45% is the one year spot rate for the second option

Net swap

= 300000*0.04317-300000*0.0445

= 12951-13350

= -399

This is approximately -400

So the net swap payment at the end of the second year is option a, -400

===========================================================

Explanation:

We have these two functions

which represent the amounts for his friend and William in that order. Strangely your teacher mentions William first, but then swaps the order when listing the exponential function as the first. This might be slightly confusing.

The table of values is shown below. We have t represent the number of years and t starts at 0.5. It increments by 0.1

The f(t) and g(t) columns represent the outputs for those mentioned values of t. For example, if t = 0.5 years (aka 6 months) then f(t) = 12.48 and that indicates his friend has 12,480 dollars in the account.

I've added a fourth column labeled |f - g| which represents the absolute value of the difference of the f and g columns. If f = g, then f-g = 0. The goal is to see if we get 0 in this column or try to get as close as possible. This occurs when we get 0.09 when t = 1.0

So we don't exactly get f(t) and g(t) perfectly equal, but they get very close when t = 1.0

It turns out that the more accurate solution is roughly t = 0.9925 which is close enough. I used a graphing calculator to find this approximate solution.

It takes about a year for the two accounts to have the same approximate amount of money.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-6z²-10z-3=0

multiply by -1

6z²+10z+3=0

disc .=b²-4ac=10²-4×6×3=100-72=28≥0

also it is not a perfect square.

so roots are real,irrational and different.

[tex]z=\frac{-6 \pm\sqrt{28} }{2 \times 6} \\=\frac{-6 \pm 2 \sqrt{7}}{12} \\=\frac{-3 \pm\sqrt{7} }{6}[/tex]

Answer:

The postage per ounce would be of $2.02.

Step-by-step explanation:

Exponential model:

The postage, in t years after 1963, follows the following format:

[tex]P(t) = P(0)(1+r)^t[/tex]

In which P(0) is the initial value and r is the growth rate, as a decimal.

In 1963, postage was 5 cents per ounce.

This means that [tex]P(0) = 5[/tex]

So

[tex]P(t) = P(0)(1+r)^t[/tex]

[tex]P(t) = 5(1+r)^t[/tex]

In 1981, postage was 18 cents per ounce.

This means that [tex]P(1981 - 1963) = P(18) = 18[/tex]. We use this to find r. So

[tex]P(t) = 5(1+r)^t[/tex]

[tex]18 = 5(1+r)^{18}[/tex]

[tex](1+r)^{18} = \frac{18}{5}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt[18]{(1+r)^{18}} = \sqrt[18]{3.6}[/tex]

[tex]1 + r = (3.6)^{\frac{1}{18}}[/tex]

[tex]1 + r = 1.0738[/tex]

So

[tex]P(t) = 5(1.0738)^t[/tex]

If the trend had continued through to 2015, what would the postage per ounce be?

2015 - 1963 = 52, so this is P(52).

[tex]P(52) = 5(1.0738)^{52} = 202[/tex]

202 cents, so $2.02.

Pls the answer is

D

Thank you

You are welcome

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

im smart

Answer:

[tex] { - 3}^{2} + (4 + 7)(2) \\ = - 9 + 22 \\ = 13[/tex]

Answer:

96 eggs

Step-by-step explanation:

A dozen is equal to 12 eggs, so 15 dozen is equal to 180 eggs

(Because 15*12 = 180)

We already know how many eggs are required for the 1st cake: 12 eggs.

Then it says "each successive cake needs twice as many eggs as the previos cake".

(Successive means the cake directly after the previous cake)

Here's how we find the number of eggs needed for the 2nd cake:

The 1st cake needed 12 eggs, and because the 2nd cake is directly after the 1st cake, we are going to need two times the amount of 12 eggs.

This equation represents the above scenario:

12*2 = 24

So we need 24 eggs for the 2nd cake.

Now we repeat this process for the 3rd cake, finding twice the amount of eggs from the 2nd cake to find the amount of eggs needed for the 3rd cake:

24*2 = 48

And we repeat it once more for the 4th cake, using the eggs from the 3rd cake:

48*2 = 96

So here's the list of how many eggs are required for each of the cakes:

1st cake: 12

2nd cake: 24

3rd cake: 48

4th cake: 96

If you add all the eggs from each of the cakes, you will get 180, which is the number of eggs needed for all four cakes. So our answer is correct.

Hope this helps (●'◡'●)

Options :

A.The graph will be a dashed line with a y-intercept of negative eight and a slope of three. The graph will be shaded below the line

B.The graph will be a solid line with a y-intercept of three and a slope of negative eight. The graph will be shaded above the line.

C. The graph will be a solid line with a y-intercept of three and a slope of negative eight. The graph will be shaded below the line.

D.The graph will be a dashed line with a y-intercept of negative eight and a slope of three. The graph will be shaded above the line

Answer:

D.The graph will be a dashed line with a y-intercept of negative eight and a slope of three. The graph will be shaded above the line

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation y > 3x – 8

Interpreting as a linear relation :

y > ax + b

Where, a = slope ; b = intercept

a = 3 ; that is a slope value of 3

b = -8 ; that is an intercept value of - 8

Since the inequality is >, a dashed line is used (dashed like is used for > and <) ; since we a have a greater than sign, the graph will be shaded above the dashed line.

Answer: The answer is D on edu 2021

Step-by-step explanation:

D.The graph will be a dashed line with a y-intercept of negative eight and a slope of three. The graph will be shaded above the line

Answer:

13/17

Step-by-step explanation:

I believe your answer is D.) $900

204 + 96 = 300

300 x 3 = 900

I hope this is correct and helps!

Answer:

Jon Applebe withdrew 37.15% of the amount he initially deposited.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that Jon Applebee deposited $ 619 in his savings account, and I have later withdrew $ 230, to determine the integer that represents the amount Jon Applebee deposited the following calculation must be performed:

619 = 100

230 = X

230 x 100/619 = X

23,000 / 619 = X

37.15 = X

Therefore, Jon Applebe withdrew 37.15% of the amount he initially deposited.

Answer:

Infinitely many solutions.

They must satisfy [tex]y = \frac{1}{5}(x - 5)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]x - 5y = 5[/tex]

[tex]-x + 5y = -5[/tex]

Required

The best description

Add both equations

[tex]x - x - 5y + 5y = 5 - 5[/tex]

[tex]0+0 =0[/tex]

[tex]0 = 0[/tex] ---- this means that the system has infinitely many solutions.

Make y the subject in: [tex]-x + 5y = -5[/tex]

Add x to both sides

[tex]5y = x - 5[/tex]

Divide through by 5

[tex]y = \frac{1}{5}(x - 5)[/tex]

Hence, they must satisfy: [tex]y = \frac{1}{5}(x - 5)[/tex]

Answer:

eh width = 103.5 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

x = width

Length = (x/2 - 5 )*6

so 384=x+3x-30

414=4x

x=414/4=103.5 inches