I don't know why we are re-learning this in the 8th grade but I don't remember the answer:
here's the choices ..
-mutiny
-resign
-quit

Answer:

in 1980s there was a very dirty was there

The Dirty War, from 1976 to 1983, changed into a seven-year campaign via way of means of the Argentine authorities in opposition to suspected dissidents and subversives.

The actions of the Argentine Anti-Communist Alliance since 1973 and the "annihilation decrees" of Isabel Martínez de Perón in opposition to left-wing guerrillas at some point of Operation Independence in 1975 have additionally been counseled as dates for the start of the Dirty War, here we are referring to Argentina's Dirty War.

Many people, each fighter of the authorities in addition to harmless people, were "disappeared" withinside the center of the night.

Thus, these are points discussed about Argentina's Dirty War.

Learn more about Argentina's Dirty War here:

https://brainly.com/question/16724552

#SPJ2

Answer:

I think it's a bit of both

Explanation:

Taking Britain as an example, its overseas colonial expansion went through three stages. They are the stages of adhering to mercantilism, carrying out "license" system, "pillaging ship" model and establishing commercial capitalism centered on the North American colonies. After the Industrial Revolution, it gained the position of commodity competition, and under the guidance of free trade thought, it seized the key places of trade network, raw material producing areas and markets by means of maritime hegemony and gun diplomacy, and constructed the free capitalism stage of invisible trade empire. As well as the industrial capital (imperialism) stage in which the British empire was built with India as the core, the British empire returned to the colonial road after suffering fierce competition from other European countries.

Answer:

It was some mixture of both Trade and Conquest.

Explanation:

Answer:

make the nation's laws

Explanation:

While all of the options are powers of Congress, the most important one is their ability to make laws as it influences all of the nation.

Answer:

make the nation’s laws

Explanation:

Verwoerd was an authoritarian, socially conservative leader and an Afrikaner nationalist. He was a member of the Afrikaner Broederbond, an exclusively white and Christian Calvinist secret organization dedicated to advancing the Afrikaner "volk" interests, and like many members of the organization had verbally supported Germany during World War II. Broederbond members like Verwoerd would assume high positions in government upon the Nationalist electoral victory in 1948 and come to wield a profound influence on public and civil society throughout the apartheid era in South Africa.

Verwoerd's desire to ensure white, and especially Afrikaner dominance in South Africa, to the exclusion of the country's nonwhite majority, was a major aspect of his support for a republic (though removing the British monarchy was long a nationalist aspiration anyway). To that same end, Verwoerd greatly expanded apartheid.[citation needed] He branded the system as a policy of "good-neighborliness", stating that different races and cultures could only reach their full potential if they lived and developed apart from each other, avoiding potential cultural clashes,[neutrality is disputed] and that the white minority had to be protected from the majority non-white in South Africa by pursuing a "policy of separate development" namely apartheid and keeping power firmly in the hands of whites.[citation needed] Given Verwoerd's background as a social science academic, he attempted to justify apartheid on ethical and philosophical grounds. This system however saw the complete disfranchisement of the nonwhite population.[2]

Verwoerd heavily repressed opposition to apartheid during his premiership. He ordered the detention and imprisonment of tens of thousands of people and the exile of further thousands, while at the same time greatly empowering, modernizing, and enlarging the white apartheid state's security forces (police and military). He banned black organizations such as the African National Congress and the Pan Africanist Congress, and it was under him that future president Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for life for sabotage.[3][4] Verwoerd's South Africa had one of the highest prison populations in the world and saw a large number of executions and floggings. By the mid-1960s Verwoerd's government to a large degree had put down internal civil resistance to apartheid by employing extraordinary legislative power, draconian laws, psychological intimidation, and the relentless efforts of the white state's security forces.

Apartheid as a program began in 1948 with D. F. Malan's premiership, but it was Verwoerd's large role in its formulation and his efforts to place it on a firmer legal and theoretical footing, including his opposition to even the limited form of integration known as baasskap, that have led him to be dubbed the "Architect of Apartheid". His actions prompted the passing of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761, condemning apartheid, and ultimately leading to South Africa's international isolation and economic sanctions. On 6 September 1966, Verwoerd was stabbed several times by parliamentary aide Dimitri Tsafendas. He died shortly after, and Tsafendas was jailed until his death in 1999.

The prime minister of the Africa gave the speech regarding the education of black Africans, in his speech he told that there should be the equal education between the black Africans and whites.

Hendrik Verwoerd, the Minister of Native Affairs, claimed that the goal was to solve South Africa's “ethnic problems” by creating complementary economic and political units.

It is frequently claimed that the Bantu (African) education policy was intended to direct black or non-white youth to the unskilled labor market.

The African Prime Minister delivered a speech on black African education, in which he stated that black and white Africans should have equal education.

Therefore, there was the starting of equal education among the Americans, black and white man's.

Learn more about the education, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/22517654

#SPJ2

En territorios espero te sirva

Answer:

A. Whig

Explanation:

The Whig Party was formally organized in 1834, bringing together a loose coalition of groups united in their opposition to what party members viewed as the executive tyranny of “King Andrew” Jackson. They borrowed the name Whig from the British party as opposed to royal prerogatives.

Answer:

an is the right answer maybe

Explanation:

j is not an vouvel

Answer:

England, France, Rome

Explanation:

I'm not for sure but I'm pretty sure this is it. Between those times these were the biggest empires there were.

Answer:

the biggest empires between the 11th, and 16th century without a doubt would be England, France and Rome

Explanation:

Answer:

For the answer to the question above, li thinks it means that a republic is a government of laws, that have been going over and printed out and you cannot argue with it. but men can argue and fight and not makeup such a great republic. In many countries as politically polarized as our own, the resignation of its leader amid scandal after winning re-election by an electoral landslide might have triggered insurrection if not civil war, but the wise leaders whose collective genius framed our Constitution had anticipated even this unthinkable event. Nixon accepted the consequences of his actions with such grace as he could salvage, his vice-president took over the reins of government as provided for by law, and even those who might have been less than completely satisfied with this result accepted it and got on with the nation's business pretty much as they had done before.

La ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación han cobrando creciente relevancia en los últimos años y se han transformado en un determinante fundamental de las posibilidades para crecer y competir en el mercado mundial.Como sociedad siempre estamos buscando nuevas tendencias, buscando y dirigiéndonos hacia la evolución y la búsqueda de la solución de las cosas tanto en sectores primarios como secundarios, muchas veces los cambios no son positivos e incluso pueden llegar a hacer a la gente mediocre mediante cosas muy innecesarias que son llamativas pero muchas veces llegan a entorpecer a la mente humana y llevarla hasta los límites, nosotros como nuevas generaciones debemos aprender cómo saber aprovechar de una buena manera las cosas que tenemos puesto que al mal derroche que se le viene dando de generación a generación se va perdiendo.

Answer: D. Gather information about the potential career.

Explanation: You should gather info first because if you get a degree and you didn't find information first, it may not be the job you want, and 3 months may not be enough because it depends on what job you think you want.

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

In the 20th century, both chemotherapy and radiotherapy were developed as treatments for cancer. Before the development of these treatments, the vast majority of people who developed cancer died of the disease without any hope of being cured.

Answer:

Trade and Globalization

Essay:

Comparative advantage

In economic theory, the ‘economic cost’ – or the ‘opportunity cost’ – of producing a good is the value of everything you need to give up in order to produce that good.  

Economic costs include physical inputs (the value of the stuff you use to produce the good), plus forgone opportunities (when you allocate scarce resources to a task, you give up alternative uses of those resources).

The freely available economics textbook The Economy: Economics for a Changing World! explains this as follows: “A person or country has a comparative advantage in the production of a particular good if the cost of producing an additional unit of that good relative to the cost of producing another good is lower than another person or country’s cost to produce the same two goods.”

so the Evidence is...:

Is there empirical support for comparative-advantage theories of trade?

The empirical evidence suggests that the principle of comparative advantage does help explain trade patterns. Bernhofen and Brown (2004)25, for instance, provide evidence using the experience of Japan. Specifically, they exploit Japan’s dramatic nineteenth-century move from a state of near-complete isolation to wide trade openness.

Net exports and price changes for 1869, Japan – Figure 4 in Bernhofen and Brown (2014)26

so thats how did economics and trade change through out the years.

Answer:

The answer is describes the legislative branch of the government :)

Answer:

2

Explanation:

Answer:

The Israeli–Palestinian conflict is one of the world's most enduring hostilities, with the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip reaching 53 years. Various attempts have been made to resolve the conflict as part of the Israeli–Palestinian peace process.

Explanation:

Definition                                                                       Terms

The man for who the New world named                Vespucci

ruler of the Aztecs                                                    Montezuma

discovered the pacific ocean                                    Magellan

first to sail around the world                                      Ferdindand

conquered the Aztecs of Mexico                               Cortes                  

conquered the Incas of Peru                                       Pizzaro

king of Spain                                                                  Balboa

attempted to free Jerusalem                                     crusaders

home town of Chris Columbus                                     Genoa

I might be wrong! If you notice it, please comment it!

Under federalism, power is divided between national and state governments. Both levels have their own agencies and officials, and pass laws that directly affect citizens. This was devised because the people were afraid to give all the power to a central government, federalism offered a middle ground on the subject. Montesquieu believed in a separation of powers consisting of three branches, the federal government consisting of a legislative, executive and judicial branch. Each philosophy further separated the power of the federal government, making it so that each branch keeps the other in check, as with each citizen keeping the government under check. Montesquieu balanced the branches, the separation of power balance the government

The events related to westward expansion that affected African Americans are Missouri Compromise, Dred Scott v. Sandford, Fugitive Slave Act, Kansas-Nebraska Act and Bleeding Kansas.

Missouri Compromise became the first compromise in America between the states favouring slavery and non-slavery. Missouri entered as a slave state.

Dred Scott court case for freedom raised hostility between the South and the North related to slavery.

Fugitive Slave Act forced runaway slaves to return from the North to their masters in the South.

Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed Kansas to decide on slavery themselves.

Abolitionists attempt to destroy slavery led to Bleeding Kansas.

The given event Missouri Compromise had the strongest impact because it divided states based on slavery and free states.

Therefore we can conclude that option A, C, D, E and G are the correct answer.

Answer:d

Explanation:

Answer:

Anne Hutchinson (née Marbury; July 1591 – August 1643) was a Puritan spiritual advisor, religious reformer, and an important participant in the Antinomian Controversy which shook the infant Massachusetts Bay Colony from 1636 to 1638.

Explanation:

brainliest

Answer:

Columbus sighted land in the Western Hemisphere.

Hope that helps you

please mark brainliest

please follow

iron

The Economist has referred to iron ore as the most important commodity after oil and stated that the development of processes to turn raw earth into steel one of “mankind's most ingenious achievements.” ... However, as the world became more globalized, locally sourced materials for steel making were no longer needed.

Answer:

Pope Urban II called for people to recover Jerusalem from the Muslims. - 1st crusade.

Crusaders sacked Constantinople. - 4th crusade.

The Holy Roman Emperor wanted to regain control of the Byzantine Empire. - 1st crusade.

Crusaders massacred Jews in the Rhineland. - 1st crusade.

Crusaders recaptured Jerusalem but killed Jews, Muslims, and Christians in the process. - 1st crusade.

Pope Innocent III hoped to return to Jerusalem to free the city from the Muslims. - 4th crusade.