State FOUR benefits of the Democratic government.
Scenario 1
In the Case Study- Vokes v. Arthur Murray (pg. 84); how would you build a case for the plaintiff? Consider what information you would need to build a case against Arthur Murray. Discuss what information you would use and how it would be presented in court.
Scenario 2
In the Case Study- Vokes v. Arthur Murray (pg. 84); how would you build a case if you were the defendant's lawyer? Consider what kind of information you would need to build in defense of the dance school. Discuss what information you would use and how it would be presented in court.
The defendant is Aruthur Murray. The plaintiff is Vokes.
Scenario 1- If the case has to be build for Plaintiff which is Vokes in this case, we need a strong evidence and well written documentation to support it.
For Vokes, the evidence would be her bill for 14 classes which amounted to 31,000$ and the remarks of the organization that she was turning into a 'beautiful dancer' , even though she had no aptitude for dance.
The case will be filed for lie and fraud from the organization and compensation would be demanded.
Scenario 2- If the case has to be build for the defendant, which in this case is Arthur, we also need a strong evidence and well written documentation since its a civil case.
For Arthur, the evidence will be the contract signed by Vokes and her regular coming to courses which would justify her bill.
The case will be defended on these points.
Terms best describe law?Canon, ordinance, precept, rule, regulation, and statute. All of these terms say to "a principle guiding conduct or process," but the word "law" implies imposition by a sovereign power and the requirement of submission on the part of all those who are subject to that authority.
How are laws different from rules?The government enacts laws that hold everyone to the same standards. In contrast to regulations, most laws have some things that do not change depending on the situation.
To know more about Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ1
This Supreme Court case illustrates Amendment
in action.
The supreme court has illustrated the amendments in constitution on many occasions. One such case where 1st amendment was put in action was Edwards v. South Carolina case (1963).
In Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students’ First Amendment rights of peaceable assembly, speech, and petition.
It was when the police dispersed a peaceful protest against segregation. The case illustrates one of the roles played by the First Amendment in the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
The First Amendment imply in plain English?The freedoms of religion, expression, assembly, and petitioning are all given by the First Amendment. It bans Congress from showing one religion above another and from limiting a person's ability to follow their religion.
What does the second amendment say?The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated because a well-regulated militia is good to the security of a free State.
To know more about First Amendment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29894002
#SPJ1
May 9, 2 p.m.
Both you and your partner go to the Limitville County Hospital to check on the passenger, who is the driver's wife, Emily Samples. You speak to the admitting doctor, Dr. Anthony Pallor, who indicates that Mrs. Samples is still in a coma, but in stable condition. You speak to the family members, offering sympathy. You also ask them a few questions.
In your crime scene notebook:
Determine three questions you should ask Mrs. Samples's doctor.
Determine three questions you should ask the family members.
May 10, 8 a.m.
At your office, you use a nationwide database to conduct a search on any charges or violations regarding Peter Samples and his wife, Emily Clairmont Samples.
In your crime scene notebook:
Why conduct a search on both occupants’ criminal histories?
May 10, 9:30 a.m.
You are able to obtain the officer’s report from the interview of the driver of the white SUV, Carl Minus. In the report, Mr. Minus indicates that he did not see the accident nor did he hear it. He came upon it around 9:50 p.m. on May 8, when his headlights showed the car smashed into the tree. He immediately pulled off to the side of the road and approached the vehicle, calling out to the victims in the car. He used the flashlight on his cellphone to look into the car and could not determine if either of them were alive. He then called 911 at approximately 9:52 p.m. to report the incident. After checking with the 911 logs, you confirm the time frame given by Mr. Minus.
In your crime scene notebook:
Clarify why it is necessary to corroborate the report and the 911 logs.
May 10, 12 p.m.
You call the hospital for an update on Mrs. Sample’s condition and are notified that she is still in a coma.
May 10, 2 p.m.
You and your partner go to the impound lot to look at the Samples' car and make sure you did not miss anything. You reexamine the point of impact on the car and take measurements of the indentation damage done to the car.
In your crime scene notebook:
Theorize how the measurements of the indentation damage would correlate to the speed of the car.
What other evidence could give an indication as to the speed of the car?
May 11, 8:30 a.m.
You receive the toxicology report from Temper Labs.
In your crime notebook:
What drug(s) were present in Mr. Samples's body that could cause impairment?
For your state, look up the legal limit of alcohol allowed. Is Mr. Samples below or above the legal limit?
Revise your hypothesis based on the new evidence.
Write a summary report as to the probable cause of the accident. Include evidence to support your findings. In your report, mention what may hinder you from making it conclusive.
Part 2: Accessthe Blood Alcohol Level (BAC) calculator.
Use the calculator to find these answers:
Monday: One couple at the bar drank red wine, and each had one glass between 9 and 10 p.m. What was the BAC for the 200 lb man and the 120 lb woman when they went home at midnight?
Tuesday: Another night, the same couple each drank one glass of wine every hour for four hours, beginning at 8 p.m. What was the BAC of each person at the end of that night? They went home at midnight.
Saturday: The same couple returned for drinks. On Saturday night, she drank two cosmopolitans and he drank four stout beers between 8 and 10 p.m. What was the BAC of each person at the end of the night? They went home at midnight.
What nights should they have taken a taxi to get home?
What does the statement "If you drink, drink responsibly" mean?
In your crime scene notebook:
Your responses to each bullet task must include one statement answering the question and justifying the answer with numerical evidence.
Answer:
In response to the first prompt, three questions you should ask Mrs. Samples's doctor are:
What is the extent of Mrs. Samples's injuries?
What is the prognosis for her recovery?
What treatment is she currently receiving?
In response to the second prompt, three questions you should ask the family members are:
Did either Peter or Emily have any medical conditions that could have contributed to the accident?
Did either Peter or Emily mention anything about the cause of the accident before the crash?
Did either Peter or Emily have any conflicts or issues with anyone that could have led to foul play?
Regarding the third prompt, the reason for conducting a search on both occupants’ criminal histories is to see if any previous criminal activity or patterns could have played a role in the accident. It could also potentially uncover any motive for the accident.
Regarding the fourth prompt, it is necessary to corroborate the report and the 911 logs to ensure that the timeline provided by Mr. Minus is accurate and consistent with other evidence. It also helps to confirm that there was no foul play involved in the accident.
In response to the fifth prompt, the measurements of the indentation damage could correlate to the speed of the car by using physics principles to estimate the impact force and energy. Other evidence that could give an indication of the speed of the car includes skid marks, debris, and eyewitness accounts.
In response to the sixth prompt, the toxicology report revealed that cocaine and marijuana were present in Mr. Samples's body that could cause impairment. In the state where the accident occurred, the legal limit of alcohol allowed is 0.08% BAC. Since there was no mention of alcohol in the prompt, it cannot be determined if Mr. Samples was above or below the legal limit.
Based on the new evidence, it is possible that the cause of the accident was due to Mr. Samples's impairment from the drugs found in his system. However, without further investigation and evidence, it is difficult to make a conclusive determination of the cause of the accident.
Regarding the Blood Alcohol Level (BAC) calculator:
Monday: Assuming a standard drink size of 5 oz, the BAC for the 200 lb man and 120 lb woman would be approximately 0.039% at midnight, which is below the legal limit.
Tuesday: Assuming a standard drink size of 5 oz, the BAC for both the man and woman would be approximately 0.05% at midnight, which is above the legal limit.
Saturday: Assuming a standard drink size of 12 oz for the stout beers and 4 oz for the cosmopolitans, the BAC for the man would be approximately 0.106% and for the woman would be approximately 0.093% at midnight, which is above the legal limit.
Based on the BAC calculator results, the couple should have taken a taxi home on Tuesday and Saturday nights.
The statement "If you drink, drink responsibly" means that individuals should be aware of the potential consequences of consuming alcohol and should make responsible choices regarding their alcohol intake to avoid harm to themselves or others.
Explanation:
