Find the indicated complement. A certain group of women has a 0.12​% rate of​ red/green color blindness. If a woman is randomly​ selected, what is the probability that she does not have​ red/green color​ blindness?

Answer:

4/7

Step-by-step explanation:

divide both by two for its simplest form

Answer:4/7

Step-by-step explanation

Divide both the numerator and denominator by 2

The result for the numerator is 8/2=4

that of the denominator is 14/2=7

Therefore the resultant answer is 4/7

Answer:

[tex]( - \sqrt{3} \: an d \: 1)[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]x = 7[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We can solve the equation [tex]5x+3+8x-4=90[/tex] by isolating the variable x on one side. To do this, we must simplify the equation.

[tex]5x+3+8x-4=90[/tex]

Combine like terms:

[tex]13x - 1 = 90[/tex]

Add 1 to both sides:

[tex]13x = 91[/tex]

Divide both sides by 13:

[tex]x = 7[/tex]

Hope this helped!

Answer:

x = 7

Step-by-step exxplanation:

5x + 3 + 8x - 4 = 90

5x + 8x = 90 - 3 + 4

13x = 91

x = 91/13

x = 7

probe:

5*7 + 3 + 8*7 - 4 = 90

35 + 3 + 56 - 4 = 90

Answer: A. According to the line of best fit, the object would have hit the ground 0.6 seconds later than the actual time the object hit the ground.

The statement first "According to the line of best fit, the object would have hit the ground 0.6 seconds later than the actual time the object hit the ground" is correct.

A mathematical notion called the line of the best fit connects points spread throughout a graph. It's a type of linear regression that uses scatter data to figure out the best way to define the dots' relationship.

We have a line of best fit:

h = –21.962x + 114.655

As per the data given and line of best fit, we can say the object would have impacted the ground 0.6 seconds later than it did according to the line of best fit.

Thus, the statement first "According to the line of best fit, the object would have hit the ground 0.6 seconds later than the actual time the object hit the ground" is correct.

Learn more about the line of best fit here:

brainly.com/question/14279419

#SPJ2

Answer:

3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

3/8 ÷ 1/4

Copy dot flip

3/8 * 4/1

12/8

Divide top and bottom by 4

3/2

Answer:

A. they are parallel because their slopes are equal.

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2020

Answer:

its A in egde

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7.5 cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Dimensions of the large ∆:

[tex] base (b) = 3cm, height (h) = 9cm [/tex]

[tex] Area = 0.5*b*h = 0.5*3*9 = 13.5 cm^2 [/tex]

Dimensions of the small ∆:

[tex] base (b) = 2cm, height (h) = 6cm [/tex]

[tex] Area = 0.5*b*h = 0.5*2*6 = 6 cm^2 [/tex]

Difference between the area of the large and the small ∆ = 13.5 - 6 = 7.5 cm²

Answer: -10

Step-by-step explanation: All you have to do is plug the values into the equation. -4+2(-3). Then you solve the equation using PEDMAS.

1. -4+2(-3)

2. -4+(-6)

3.-4-6

4.-10

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

-b + 2y

if

b = 4

and

y = 3

then:

-b + 2y = -4 + 2*6 = -4 + 12

= 8

Answer:

  x^2 +y^2 = 4y

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the usual translation relations, we have ...

  r^2 = x^2+y^2

  x = r·cos(θ)

  y = r·sin(θ)

Substituting for sin(θ) the equation becomes ...

  r = 4sin(θ)

  r = 4(y/r)

  r^2 = 4y

Then, substituting for r^2 we get ...

  x^2 +y^2 = 4y . . . . . matches the first choice

Answer:

3 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

6 quarts = 12 pints

12 divided by 3 = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

1 quart = 2 pints

6 quarts = 2 x 6 = 12 pints

12 ÷ 4 = 3

He can have 3 weeks

Hi there! :)

Answer:

Gina rented 3 dramas, 5 comedies, and 3 documentaries.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve, we will need to set up a system of equations:

Let x = # of dramas, y = # of comedies, and z = # of documentaries:

Write equations to represent each person:

Gina:

x + y + z = 11

Sam:

2x + 3y + 2z = 27

Robby:

x + 2y + 2z = 19

Write the system:

x + y + z = 11

2x + 3y + 2z = 27

x + 2y + 2z = 19

Begin by subtracting the third equation from the second:

2x + 3y + 2z = 27

x + 2y + 2z = 19

-----------------------

x + y = 8

If x + y = 8, plug this into the first equation:

(8) + z = 11

z = 11 - 8

z = 3

We found the # of documentaries Gina rented, now we must solve for the other variables:

Subtract the top equation from the third. Substitute in the value of z we solved for:

x + 2y + 2(3) = 19

x + y + (3) = 11

-------------------------

y + 3 = 8

y = 5

Substitute in the values for y and z to solve for x:

x + 5 + 3 = 11

x + 8 = 11

x = 11 - 8

x = 3.

Therefore, Gina rented 3 dramas, 5 comedies, and 3 documentaries.

Answer:

B- x + y + z = 11

2x + 3y + 2z = 27

x + 2y + 2z = 19

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the quiz

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

First, recall the meanings of the domain and range.

The domain is the span of x-values covered by the graph.

And the range is the span of y-values covered by the graph.

1)

So, we have here an absolute value function.

As we can see, the domain of the function is all real numbers because the graph stretches left and right infinitely. Therefore, the domain of the function is:

[tex]\{x|x\in\textbb{R}\}[/tex]

(You are correct!)

For the range, notice how the function stops at y=7. The highest point of the function is (-2,7). There graph doesn't and won't ever reach above y=7. Therefore, the range of the graph is all values less than or equal to 7. In set notation, this is:

[tex]\{y|y\leq 7\}[/tex]

2)

We have here an ellipse.

First, for the domain. We can see the the span of x-values covered by the ellipse is from x=-4 to x=6. In other words, the domain is all values in between these two numbers and including them. Therefore, we can write it as such:

[tex]-4\leq x\leq 6[/tex]

So x is all numbers greater than or equal to -4 but less than or equal to 6. This describes the span of x-values. In set notation, this is:

[tex]\{x|-4\leq x\leq 6\}[/tex]

For the range, we can see that the span of x values covered by the ellipse is from y=-5 to y=1. Just like the domain, we can write it like this:

[tex]-5\leq y\leq 1[/tex]

This represents all the y-values between -5 and 1, including -5 and 1.

In set notation, thi is:

[tex]\{y|-5\leq y\leq 1\}[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, by definition a perfect square can be written as [tex]a^2[/tex] where a in a positive integer.

So, to answer the first question, [tex]6^2[/tex] is a perfect square.

(a,b,c) is a Pythagorean triple means the following

[tex]a^2+b^2=c^2[/tex]

Here, it means that

[tex]x^2=20^2+21^2=841=29^2 \ \ \ so\\\\x=29[/tex]

Thank you.

Answer:

Its B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{y = 8}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

-4x + 3y = 12

Given that x = 3

-4 (3) + 3y = 12

-12 + 3y = 12

Adding 12 to both sides

3y = 12+12

3y = 24

Dividing both sides by 3

y = 8

Answer:

y =8

Step-by-step explanation:

-4x + 3y = 12

Let x = 3

-4(3) +3y = 12

-12+3y = 12

Add 12 to each side

-12+12+3y =12+12

3y =24

Divide each side by 3

3y/3 = 24/3

y =8

Answer:

C. -8, -6, -4, -2, ...

Step-by-step explanation:

An arithmetic sequence increases by the same amount every time through addition or subtraction. There is a common difference.

A: -2, 4, -6, 8, ... If there were a common difference, the numbers would not switch between being positive and back to negative. The numbers would either keep going positive or keep going negative.

B: 2, 4, 8, 16, ... The common difference between 16 and 8 is 16 - 8 = 8. The difference between 8 and 4 is 8 - 4 = 4. Since the difference changes between the numbers, this is not an arithmetic sequence.

C. -8, -6, -4, -2, ... The common difference between -2 and -4 is -2 - (-4) = -2 + 4 = 2. The difference between -4 and -6 is -4 - (-6) = -4 + 6 = 2. The difference between -6 and -8 is -6 - (-8) = -6 + 8 = 2. Since the common difference is always two, this is an arithmetic sequence.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

d. 30

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation of the 35th percentile of this data set is shown below:

Before that first we have to series the number in ascending number

S. No          Numbers

1                       26

2                      29

3                      30

4                      30

5                      31

6                      32

7                      34

8                      35

9                       36

Now use the formula

Here n = 9

Percentile = 100

[tex]= \frac{35(9 + 1)}{100} \\\\[/tex]

= 3.5th

= 3th + 0.5 (4th - 3th)

= 3th + 0.5 (30 - 30)

= 3th + 0

= 30

Answer:

We conclude that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a maker of microwave ovens advertises that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first 5 years of use.

In a random sample of 50 microwaves that are 5 years old, 12% needed repairs.

Let p = population proportion of microwaves who need repair during the first five years of use.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : p [tex]\leq[/tex] 10%      {means that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : p > 10%     {means that more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample z-test for proportions;

                        T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } }[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\hat p[/tex] = sample proportion of microwaves who need repair during the first 5 years of use = 12%

           n = sample of microwaves = 50

So, the test statistics =  [tex]\frac{0.12-0.10}{\sqrt{\frac{0.10(1-0.10)}{50} } }[/tex]

                                    =  0.471

The value of z-test statistics is 0.471.

Now, at a 0.04 level of significance, the z table gives a critical value of 1.751 for the right-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics is less than the critical value of z as 0.471 < 1.751, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as the test statistics will not fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use.

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=3x-3

g(x)=-x^2+4,

f(2) = 3(2) -3 = 6-3 =3

g(-2) = -(-2)^2+4 = -4+4 = 0

f(2)-g(-2)= = 3-0 = 3

Answer:

The​ z-score for 1880 is 1.34.

The​ z-score for 1190 is -0.88.

The​ z-score for 2130 is 2.15.

The​ z-score for 1350 is -0.37.

And the z-score of 2130 is considered to be unusual.

Step-by-step explanation:

The complete question is: A standardized​ exam's scores are normally distributed. In recent​ years, the mean test score was 1464 and the standard deviation was 310. The test scores of four students selected at random are ​1880, 1190​, 2130​, and 1350. Find the​ z-scores that correspond to each value and determine whether any of the values are unusual. The​ z-score for 1880 is nothing. ​(Round to two decimal places as​ needed.) The​ z-score for 1190 is nothing. ​(Round to two decimal places as​ needed.) The​ z-score for 2130 is nothing. ​(Round to two decimal places as​ needed.) The​ z-score for 1350 is nothing. ​(Round to two decimal places as​ needed.) Which​ values, if​ any, are​ unusual? Select the correct choice below​ and, if​ necessary, fill in the answer box within your choice. A. The unusual​ value(s) is/are nothing. ​(Use a comma to separate answers as​ needed.) B. None of the values are unusual.

We are given that the mean test score was 1464 and the standard deviation was 310.

Let X = standardized​ exam's scores

The z-score probability distribution for the normal distribution is given by;

                          Z  =  [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean test score = 1464

           [tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation = 310

S, X ~ Normal([tex]\mu=1464, \sigma^{2} = 310^{2}[/tex])

Now, the test scores of four students selected at random are ​1880, 1190​, 2130​, and 1350.

So, the z-score of 1880 =  [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

                                      =  [tex]\frac{1880-1464}{310}[/tex]  = 1.34

The z-score of 1190 =  [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

                                =  [tex]\frac{1190-1464}{310}[/tex]  = -0.88

The z-score of 2130 =  [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

                                =  [tex]\frac{2130-1464}{310}[/tex]  = 2.15

The z-score of 1350 =  [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

                                =  [tex]\frac{1350-1464}{310}[/tex]  = -0.37

Now, the values whose z-score is less than -1.96 or higher than 1.96 are considered to be unusual.

According to our z-scores, only the z-score of 2130 is considered to be unusual as all other z-scores lie within the range of -1.96 and 1.96.

Answer:

x = -10

Step-by-step explanation:

(x - 3) - 2(x + 6) = -5

Distribute

x-3 -2x-12 = -5

Combine like terms

-x -15 = -5

Add 15 to each side

-x-15+15 = -5+15

-x=10

Multiply each side by -1

x= -10

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

area of Arc subtending [tex]360^{\circ}[/tex] (i.e. the whole circle) is $\pi r^2$

so area of Arc subtending $\theta^{\circ}$ is, $\frac{ \pi r^2}{360^{\circ}}\times \theta^{\circ}$

$\theta =72^{\circ}$ so the area enclosed by one such arc is $\frac{\pi (10)^272}{360}$

abd there are 2 such arcs, so double the area.

[tex] \LARGE{ \underline{ \boxed{ \rm{ \purple{Solution}}}}}[/tex]

For solving this question, Let's know how to find the area of a sector in a circle?

[tex] \large{ \boxed{ \rm{area \: of \: sector = \frac{\theta}{360} \times \pi {r}^{2} }}}[/tex]

Here, Θ is the angle of sector and r is the radius of the circle. So, let's solve this question.

We have,

By using formula,

⇛ Area of shaded region = 2 × Area of each sector

⇛ Area of shaded region = 2 × Θ/360° × πr²

⇛ Area of shaded region = 2 × 72°/360° × 22/7 × 10²

⇛ Area of shaded region = 2/5 × 100 × 22/7

⇛ Area of shaded region = 40 × 22/7

⇛ Area of shaded region = 880/7 inch. sq.

⇛ Area of shaded region = 125.71 inch. sq.

☄ Your Required answer is 125.71 inch. sq(approx.)

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Answer:

  17 by 21 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter is twice the sum of the dimensions, and the area is their product, so you have ...

  L + W = 38

  LW = 357

__

Solution:

  W(38 -W) = 357 . . . . . substitute for L

  -(W^2 -76W) = 357 . . expand on the left

  -(W^2 -38 +19^2) = 357 -19^2 . . . . complete the square

  (W -19)^2 = 4 . . . . . . . write as a square

  W -19 = ±√4 = ±2 . . . take the square root; next, add 19

  W = 19 ±2 = {17, 21} . . . . if width is one of these, length is the other

The dimensions are 17 by 21 inches.

Answer:

D question,somewhat confusing, itsit's like simultaneous equation,but values are different

Answer:

x = 4 + 2y/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

length: 9cm

width: 9cm

Step-by-step explanation:

9×9=81

[tex]_9C_7=\dfrac{9!}{7!2!}=\dfrac{8\cdot9}{2}=36[/tex]

Answer: g = w + 8    g=w-2

Step-by-step explanation:

We could represent the word phrases by the equations.

g = w + 8  

g = w - 2  

Answer:

g = w + 8

g = w - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming that g and w exists, then we can show the relation as described:

"Variable g is 8 more than variable w."

g = w + 8

"Variable g is also 2 less than w."

g = w - 2

These are the two equations of the described relationship between g and w.

Note that g could not actually exist in the real number system:

g = w + 8

g = w - 2

w + 8 = w - 2

w - w = -2 - 8

0 != -10

This is impossible within the real number system.

Cheers.

Answer:

Use the student t distribution

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is the formula

t = (x - u) ÷(s/√N)

From the information we have in the question:

n = 150

s = 550

x = 3400

u = mean = 2400

= 3400 - 2400÷ 500/√150

= 1000/44.9

= 22.27

At 0.05 significance level, df = 149 so t tabulated will be 1.65.

Answer:

-7.

Step-by-step explanation:

g(x) = x^2 - 6x - 7

g(2) = 2^2 - 6(2) - 7

= 4 - 12 - 7

= -8 - 7

= -15

f(x) = x + 8

f(-15) = (-15) + 8

= 8 - 15

= -7

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A probability density function (pdf) is used for continuous random variables. That is why p is between 0 and 1 (the two extremes - 0 and 1 - exclusive).

X = 100pth percentile of W

Y = 100(1-p)th percentile of W

Expressing Y as a function of X;

Y = 100(1-p)th = 100th - 100pth

Recall that 100pth is same as X, so substitute;

Y = 100th - X

where 100th = hundredth percentile of W and X = 100pth percentile of W