Answer:
B. Accounts Receivable 960
Sales Revenue 960
Cost of Goods Sold 620
Inventory 620
Explanation:
Under perpetual inventory system the sale is recorded separately by sale value and the cost of the sold inventory is deducted from the inventory and added in the cost of goods sold.
Ne benefit of $340 (960-620) is automatically recorded and it will be measure at end of the period by formatting the income statement. It does not need to be recorded separately.
Assume that at the end of 2019, Clampett, Inc. (an S corporation) distributes property (fair market value of $40,000, basis of $5,000) to each of its four equal shareholders (aggregate distribution of $160,000). At the time of the distribution, Clampett, Inc., has no corporate earnings and profits and J.D. has a basis of $50,000 in his Clampett, Inc., stock. What is J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution
Answer:
J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution is $85,000
Explanation:
In order to calculate the J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution we would have to use the following formula:
J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution=original basis +increase/decrease in basis from gain from property distribution
original basis=$50,000
basis from gain from property distribution=$40,000-$5,000
basis from gain from property distribution=$35,000
Therefore, J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution=$50,000+$35,000
J.D.'s stock basis after the distribution=$85,000
(Ignore income taxes in this problem.) Assume you can invest money at a 14 percent rate of return. How much money must be invested now to be able to withdraw $5,000 from this investment at the end of each year for eight years, the first withdrawal occurring one year from now
Answer:
the original amount invested = $285,714.29
Explanation:
Let original amount invested be x
Amount to be withdrawn per year = $5,000
Total number of years = 8
Total amount to be withdrawn = 5,000 × 8 = $40,000
Next, we are told that 14% return on x is realized,
∴ 14% return on x = $40,000
0.14 × x = 40,000
x = 40,000 ÷ 0.14 = $285,714.29
Therefore, the original amount invested = $285,714.29
The three service departments (indirect costs) are payroll, sales supervision and maintenance. The actual costs of these service departments are as follows:
Payroll Sales Supervision Maintenance
Salaries and wages $41,000 $80,000 $52,000
Office supplies $3,500 $1,600 $400
Supplies 0 $2,400 $7,500
The two operating departments and their statistics are as follows:
Square Footage Number of Employees Net Assets
Machining 14,500 78 $ 420,000
Assembly 46,000 42 280,000
If you allocate payroll department costs by number of employees then how much payroll cost is allocated to the Machining Department?
Answer:
$26,700
Explanation:
The solution of allocation of cost to machining department is provided below:-
First we need to find out the total payroll cost and total number of employees to reach the allocation of cost to machining department which is here below:-
Total Payroll costs = Payroll of salaries and wages + Payroll of office supplies
= $41,000 + $3,500
= $44,500
Total Number of employees = Machining number of employees + Assembly number of employees
= 78 + 52
= 130
Allocation of cost to Machining Department = Total Payroll costs ÷ Total Number of employees × Machining number of employees
= 44,500 ÷ 130 × 78
= $26,700
To reach allocation of cost to machining department we simply put the values into formula.
Problem 7-18 Variable and Absorption Costing Unit Product Costs and Income Statements [LO7-1, LO7-2]Haas Company manufactures and sells one product. The following information pertains to each of the company’s first three years of operations: Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing: Direct materials$20Direct labor$12Variable manufacturing overhead$7Variable selling and administrative$3Fixed costs per year: Fixed manufacturing overhead$110,000Fixed selling and administrative expenses$50,000 During its first year of operations, Haas produced 40,000 units and sold 40,000 units. During its second year of operations, it produced 55,000 units and sold 30,000 units. In its third year, Haas produced 20,000 units and sold 45,000 units. The selling price of the company’s product is $46 per unit. Required:1. Compute the company’s break-even point in unit sales.2. Assume the company uses variable costing:a. Compute the unit product cost for Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3.b. Prepare an income statement for Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3.3. Assume the company uses absorption costing:a. Compute the unit product cost for Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3.b. Prepare an income statement for Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3.
Answer and Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
a)
For computation of contribution margin per unit first we need to find out the contribution margin per unit and fixed expenses which is shown below:-
Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit
= $46 - ($20 + $12 + $7 + $3)
= $46 - $42
= $4
Fixed expenses = Fixed manufacturing overhead + Fixed selling and administrative expenses
= $110,000 + $50,000
= $160,000
Break-even units = Fixed expenses ÷ Contribution margin per unit
= $160,000 ÷ 4
= 40,000 units
2. a The Computation of unit product cost is shown below:-
Particulars Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Unit product cost :
Direct material $20 $20 $20
Direct labor $12 $12 $12
Variable manufacturing
overhead $7 $7 $7
Unit product cost $39 $39 $39
b. The preparation of Income statement is shown below:-
Income statement
Haas Company
Particulars Per unit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Sales unit 40,000 30,000 45,000
Sales $46 $1,840,000 $1,380,000 $2,070,000
Less:
Variable cost :
Variable manufacturing
cost $39 $1,560,000 $1,170,000 $1,755,000
Variable selling and
administrative cost $3 $120,000 $90,000 $135,000
Total variable cost $42 $1,680,000 $1,260,000 $1,890,000
Contribution margin $4 $160,000 $120,000 $180,000
Fixed expenses :
Fixed Manufacturing
overhead $110,000 $110,000 $110,000
Fixed selling and
administrative expense $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Net Operating Income $0 -$40,000 $20,000
3. a. The computation of unit product cost for Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 is shown below:-
Particulars Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Produced units 40,000 55,000 20,000
Unit Product Cost:
Direct material $20 $20 $20
Direct labor $12 $12 $12
Variable manufacturing
overhead $7 $7 $7
Fixed manufacturing
overhead $2.75 $2 $5.5
($110,000 ÷ Number of unit produced)
Total cost of produced unit $41.75 $41 $44.5
3. b The Preparation of income statement for Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 is attached in the spreadsheet.
Colil Computer Systems, Inc., manufactures printer circuit cards. All direct materials are added at the inception of the production process. During January, the accounting department noted that there was no beginning inventory. Direct materials of $ 300 comma 000 were used in production during the month. Workminusinminusprocess records revealed that 12 comma 500 card units were started in January, 6 comma 250 card units were complete, and 4 comma 000 card units were spoiled as expected. Ending workminusinminusprocess card units are complete in respect to direct materials costs. Spoilage is not detected until the process is complete. What is the direct material cost assigned to good units completed? A. $ 258 comma 621 B. $ 150 comma 000 C. $ 96 comma 000 D. $ 246 comma 000
Answer:
D. $246,000
Explanation:
As per the given question the solution of direct material cost assigned to good units completed is provided below:-
To reach Cost transferred out we need to follow some steps which is following below:-
Step 1. Cost per unit = cost of material used ÷ Units started
= $300,000 ÷ 12,500
= $24
Now,
Step 2. Goods units completed = Started units × Cost per unit
= 6,250 × $24
= $150,000
Step 3. Normal spoilage = Cards units × Cost per unit
= 4,000 × $24
= $96,000
and finally
Cost transferred out = Goods units completed + Normal spoilage
= $150,000 + $96,000
= $246,000
To reach allocation of Cost transferred out we simply put the values into formula.
Option A has an expected value of $2,000, a minimum payoff of -$4,000, and a maximum payoff of $18,000. Option B has an expected value of $2,200, a minimum payoff of -$1,000, and a maximum payoff of $6,000. Option C has an expected value of $1,900, a minimum payoff of $100, and a maximum payoff of $2,000. In this situation, a risk-averse decision maker would pay __________ for his risk aversion, and a risk-seeking decision maker would pay __________ for his risk seeking.
Answer:
Option A is the answer
Explanation:
A risk-averse decision maker will go for the option with the least chance of loss incurred (the highest minimum payoff of $100) and settle for an expected value of 1900. He'll pay for his risk avoidance in this way (2200-1900 = 300) while a risk-seeking decision maker will go for the option with the highest payoff chances ($18,000), regardless of the possibility of failure. This would make the risk-seeking decision maker go for option A.
Management in Life Annabelle and Bettina share a dorm room. They like each other, but they disagree about how often to clean. Eventually, Annabelle says to Bettina, "I'm afraid that if we clean the room only once a month, we're going to get bugs. Bettina replies, "Maybe, but this physics course is killing me, so I don't have time to clean more often than that." Annabelle and Bettina are engaged in conflict, based on Which of the following outcomes are likely in this situation?
A) Annabelle and Bettina will learn from each other.
B) The roommates will come up with a creative solution.
C) The roommates will stop speaking to each other.
D) Annabelle and Bettina will be angry at each other.
Answer:
A). Annabelle and Bettina will learn from each other .
B). The roommates will come up with a creative solution."
Explanation:
Anabelle and Bettina are involved in a 'cognitive' conflict as it occurs when they both experience a mental as well as emotional discomfort when they are confronted with the information that challenges their existing ideas or beliefs. The most likely outcomes of this situation would be that they 'both would learn from each other' by accepting each other's point of view and adapting with the new information that would help them 'reach a creative solution' to resolve their conflict over the cleaning of their room. Therefore, options A and B are the correct answers.
elb Company currently manufactures 50,000 units per year of a key component for its manufacturing process. Variable costs are $2.95 per unit, fixed costs related to making this component are $67,000 per year, and allocated fixed costs are $61,500 per year. The allocated fixed costs are unavoidable whether the company makes or buys this component. The company is considering buying this component from a supplier for $3.90 per unit. Calculate the total incremental cost of making 50,000 units and buying 50,000 units. Should it continue to manufacture the component, or should it buy this component from the outside supplier
Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
Incremental Cost of Making Product
Variable costs are $2.95 per unit and 50,000 units are to be made. Total Variable Cost is therefore,
= 2.95 * 50,000
= $147,500
Fixed costs associated with the production are$ 67,000 so added tl the variable costs is,
= 147,500 + 67,000
= $214,500
$214,500 is the cost making the product.
Cost of Buying Product
Component can be bought for $3.90 per unit. 50,000 units to be bought gives,
= 50,000 * 3.9
= $195,000
Cost of buying is $195,000
Decision
Company should buy the component as it spends less in buying it than I making it.
Note - Allocated fixed costs were not included in calculation because they will be there regardless of the decision. Hence the term, incremental costs.
Answer:
elb Company
a) Incremental Cost of making 50,000 units:
Variable costs = $2.95 x 50,000 = $147,500
Avoidable fixed costs = $67,000
Total = $214,500
b) Incremental Cost of buying 50,000
Buy-in costs =- $3.90 x 50,000 = $195,000
c) The company should buy this component from the outside supplier.
Explanation:
In make or buy decisions, only variable and avoidable costs are taken into consideration. Unavoidable fixed costs are sunk costs which must be incurred irrespective of the choice made.
Therefore, the unavoidable allocated fixed costs of $61,500 should not be taken into consideration. Afterall, no matter the decision, it would still be incurred and allocated.
Pharoah Corporation had the following activities in 2020. 1. Payment of accounts payable $843,000 4. Collection of note receivable $104,000 2. Issuance of common stock $256,000 5. Issuance of bonds payable $466,000 3. Payment of dividends $333,000 6. Purchase of treasury stock $45,000 Compute the amount Pharoah should report as net cash provided (used) by financing activities in its 2020 statement of cash flows. (Show amounts that decrease cash flow with either a - sign e.g. -15,000 or in parenthesis e.g. (15,000).)
Answer:
The amount Pharoah should report as net cash provided (used) by financing activities in its 2020 statement of cash flows is $344,000.
Explanation:
Pharoah Corporation
Statement of cash flows (extract)
Proceeds from common stock $256,000
Proceed from bond payable $466,000
Dividend paid ($333,000)
Purchase of treasury stock ($45,000)
Net cash flows from financing activities $344,000
Note that the payment of accounts payable and collection of notes receivable only affect the operating activities section of the cash flows.
The focused differentiation strategy differs from the differentiation strategy in that Group of answer choices a. the focused differentiators have a broader competitive scope b. the value-creating activities of focused differentiators are more constrained. c. focused differentiators target a narrower customer market d. there are fewer risks with the focused differentiation strategy.
Answer:
The answer is option C) The focused differentiation strategy differs from the differentiation strategy in that focused differentiators target a narrower customer market.
Explanation:
Product differentiation is a marketing strategy that creates competitive advantage with designing a product superior to that of rivals, priced higher and sometimes created for exclusive users.
However, the focused differentiation strategy takes it a step further by targeting a small group of customers with ostensible goods.
The bourgeoisie are the main target for focused differentiators. They have the economic power to foot the bill and they enjoy the exclusivity of being the few to consume such products. A good example of such products is the Bugatti and Ferrari.
While Mary Corens was a student at the University of Tennessee, she borrowed $9,000 in student loans at an annual interest rate of 9%. If Mary repays $1,700 per year, then how long (to the nearest year) will it take her to repay the loan? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to the nearest whole number.
Answer:
The time required to repay the loan is 8 years.
Explanation:
The loan amount that the student borrowed = $9000
Annual interest rate = 9%
Repayment amount per year or annuity amount = $1700 per year
Use the below formula to calculate the number of years to repay the loan amount.
A = annuity amount
r = interest rate
n = number of years
PVF = present value of annuity
[tex]\rm PVF = \frac{A\left [1-\left ( 1+r \right )^{-n} \right ]}{r} \\[/tex]
[tex]9000 = \frac{1700\left [1-\left ( 1+ 0.09 \right )^{-n} \right ]}{0.09} \\[/tex]
[tex]9000 = 18888.9(1-1.09^{-n}) \\[/tex]
[tex]n = 7.51 \ years \ or \ 8 \ years.[/tex]
So, the time taken to repay the loan amount is 8 years.
The following units of an item were available for sale during the year: Beginning inventory 8,100 units at $180 Sale 5,300 units at $300 First purchase 15,000 units at $185 Sale 13,000 units at $300 Second purchase 16,000 units at $192 Sale 14,000 units at $300 The firm uses the perpetual inventory system, and there are 6,800 units of the item on hand at the end of the year. a. What is the total cost of the ending inventory according to FIFO? $ b. What is the total cost of the ending inventory according to LIFO?
Answer:
a. $1,305,600
b. $1,258,000
Explanation:
FIFO - Assumes that the first goods received by the business will be first ones to be delivered to the final customer
FIFO Inventory = 6,800 units × $ 192 = $1,305,600
LIFO - Assumes that the last goods purchased are the first ones to be issued to the final customer
LIFO Inventory = 2,800 units × $180 = $ 504,000
2,000 units × $185 = $ 370,000
2,000 units × $ 192 = $ 384,000
Total = $1,258,000
Bass Accounting Services expects its accountants to work a total of 26 comma 000 direct labor hours per year. The company's estimated total indirect costs are $ 390 comma 000. The company uses direct labor hours as the allocation base for indirect costs. What is the indirect cost allocation rate? A. $ 18.00 per hour B. $ 30.00 per hour C. $ 15.00 per hour D. $ 150.00 per hour
Answer:
C) $ 15.00 per hour
Explanation:
total labor hours 26,000 per year
total indirect costs $390,000
if the company allocates indirect costs according to labor hours employed, the cost allocation rate should be:
$390,000 / 26,000 = $15 per direct labor hour
This means that for every labor hour employed, $15 will be allocated as indirect costs, e.g. a client requires 50 labor hours per year and $750 (= 50 x $15) in indirect costs.
Answer:
The correct answer is option (c) $15 per hour
Explanation:
Solution
Recall that:
Expected wok for accountants = 26,000
The company estimated total indirect costs - 390,000
The next step is to find the allocation base cost for indirect cost.
Now,
The indirect labor cost is calculated as follows:
indirect cost allocation rate:
= Total indirect costs/Labor hours
= $390,000/26,000
= $15 per hours
Hancock Medical Supply Co., earned $90,500 of revenue on account during Year 1, its first year of operation. During Year 1, Hancock collected $71,400 of cash from its receivables accounts. The company did not write-off any uncollectible accounts. It estimates that it will be unable to collect 1% of revenue on account. What is the net realizable value of receivables that will be reported on the balance sheet at December 31, Year 1
Answer:
$18,195
Explanation:
The computation of the net realizable value is shown below:
As we know that
Net Realizable Value of Receivables = Ending Accounts Receivable - Estimated Uncollectibles amount
where,
Ending balance of Accounts Receivable is
= Revenue on Account - Accounts collected
= $90,500 - $71,400
= $191,00
And,
Estimated Uncollectibles i.e Bad debt Expense is
= Revenue on Account × given percentage
= $90,500 × 1%
= $905
So, the net realizable value is
= $19,100 - $905
= $18,195
We simply applied the above formula
Pharoah Company has had 4 years of record earnings. Due to this success, the market price of its 500,000 shares of $4 par value common stock has increased from $15 per share to $55. During this period, paid-in capital remained the same at $6,000,000. Retained earnings increased from $4,500,000 to $30,000,000. CEO Don Ames is considering either (1) a 15% stock dividend or (2) a 2-for-1 stock split. He asks you to show the before-and-after effects of each option on (a) retained earnings, (b) total stockholders’ equity, and (c) par value per share.
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
1) 15% Stock Dividend-
Retained Earnings = Increase Value of Retained Earnings - (Total Shares × 15% Stock Dividend × Increase Value of Per Share)
= $30,000,000 - (500,000 × 15% × $55)
= $30,000,000 - $4,125,000
= $25,875,000
2) 2-for-1 stock split-
Retained earnings = $30,000,000
The 2-for-1 stock split will not impact retained earnings.
a and b) The before, after effects of each option are shown in the attachment below
c) Par value per share
Par value per share of stock dividend = $4
Par value per share of 2-for-1 stock split = $4 ÷ 2 = $2
According to the analysis, stock dividend will not make any impact.
Last year Kruse Corp had $380,000 of assets (which is equal to its total invested capital), $403,000 of sales, $28,250 of net income, and a debt-to-total-capital ratio of 39%. The new CFO believes the firm has excessive fixed assets and inventory that could be sold, enabling it to reduce its total assets and total invested capital to $252,500. The firm finances using only debt and common equity. Sales, costs, and net income would not be affected, and the firm would maintain the same capital structure (but with less total debt). By how much would the reduction in assets improve the ROE (percentage point change)
Answer:
=6.154%
Explanation:
Original New
Assets $380,000 $252,500
Sales $403,000 $403,000
Net income $28,250 $28,250
Debt ratio 39.00% 39.00%
Debt = Assets × debt % = $148,200 $98,475
Equity = Assets − Debt = $231,800 $154,025
ROE = NI/Equity = 12.187% 18.341%
Increase in ROE = 18.341%-12.187%
= 6.154%
Therefore, the reduction in assets improve the ROE (percentage point change) is 6.154%
he income statement of Sarasota Company is shown below. SARASOTA COMPANY INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 Sales revenue $6,890,000 Cost of goods sold Beginning inventory $1,910,000 Purchases 4,410,000 Goods available for sale 6,320,000 Ending inventory 1,620,000 Cost of goods sold 4,700,000 Gross profit 2,190,000 Operating expenses Selling expenses 460,000 Administrative expenses 700,000 1,160,000 Net income $1,030,000 Additional information: 1. Accounts receivable decreased $350,000 during the year. 2. Prepaid expenses increased $160,000 during the year. 3. Accounts payable to suppliers of merchandise decreased $300,000 during the year. 4. Accrued expenses payable decreased $90,000 during the year. 5. Administrative expenses include depreciation expense of $50,000. Prepare the operating activities section of the statement of cash flows using the direct method.
Answer:
Cash flow from operating activities
Cash Receipts from Customers $7,240,000
Cash Paid to Suppliers and Employees ($6,460,000)
Net Cash from Operating Activities $780,000
Explanation:
Prepare a statement of cash flows` operating activities section as follows :
Cash flow from operating activities
Cash Receipts from Customers $7,240,000
Cash Paid to Suppliers and Employees ($6,460,000)
Net Cash from Operating Activities $780,000
Cash Receipts from Customers Calculations
Sales revenue $6,890,000
Add Decrease in Accounts Receivables $350,000
Cash Receipts from Customers $7,240,000
Cash Paid to Suppliers and Employees Calculations
Cost of goods sold $4,700,000
Add
Selling expenses $460,000
Administrative expenses $700,000
Less depreciation expense of $50,000
Decrease in Accounts Payable $300,000
Decrease in Accrued Expenses $90,000
Increase in Prepaid expenses $160,000
Cash Paid to Suppliers and Employees $6,460,000
Please help ASAP giving BRAINLIEST , Did I get this correct?
Answer:
No, in my opinion I would choose:
A) the properties of free-market system that determine what the outcomes will be.
Explanation:
That would be my answer because the definition of market forces is "the economic factors affecting the price of, demand for, and availability of a commodity."(off the internet) and the answer which fits that definition the most in my opinion is A.
That would be my answer at least.
Hope this helps!
The Converting Department of Hopkinsville Company had 1,200 units in work in process at the beginning of the period, which were 75% complete. During the period, 25,200 units were completed and transferred to the Packing Department. There were 1,360 units in process at the end of the period, which were 25% complete. Direct materials are placed into the process at the beginning of production. Determine the number of equivalent units of production with respect to direct materials and conversion costs. If an amount is zero, enter in "0".
Answer:
Equivalent Units
Material cost = 26,560
Conversion Cost= 25,540
Explanation:
We would assume the company uses weighted average method of valuation.
Under the weighted average method of valuation, to account for completed units, it is assumed that the entire degree of work required is done in the period under consideration. So there is no separation of the completed units into opening inventory and fully worked.
Equivalent units = Degree of completion (%) × Number of units
Material cost
Item Unit Equivalent unit
Completed 25,200 100% ×25200 = 25,200
Closing WIP 1,360 100%× 1,360 1360
Total equivalent units 26,560
Conversion Cost
Item Unit Equivalent unit
Completed 25,200 100% ×25200 = 25,200
Closing WIP 1,360 25%× 1,360 340
Total equivalent units 25,540
Who has the comparative advantageLOADING... in producing oil? A. Norway has a comparative advantage producing oil because its opportunity cost of producing oil is lower. B. Neither country has a comparative advantage producing oil because their opportunity costs of producing oil are equal. C. The United Kingdom has a comparative advantage producing oil because its opportunity cost of producing oil is lower. D. Norway has a comparative advantage producing oil because it can produce more oil. E. The United Kingdom has a comparative advantage producing oil because it can produce more oil.
Answer:
The answer is option D) Norway has a comparative advantage producing oil because it can produce more oil.
Explanation:
Norway currently produces 1,398 thousand barrels of crude oil per day. At this capacity, it can produce more oil in comparison to United Kingdom that produces 1000 thousand barrels per day.
This statistics gives Norway a comparative advantage over United Kingdom.
Also comparing the consumption rate for both countries with Norway having a population of 5,421,241 which is far less than 66, 650,000 of the United Kingdom, shows that Norway will have enough to cater for her citizens as well as for exports.
It costs Cool Clothes Company $15 to produce one pair of jeans, but they needed to discontinue production of shirts to focus on jeans. For this company, the $15 is the _______, and discontinuation of shirt production is considered their __________. opportunity cost; production cost production cost; resource cost production cost; opportunity cost resource cost; production cost
Answer:
production cost; opportunity cost
Explanation:
The $15 is the production cost and the shirt is the opportunity cost
What is opportunity cost?Simply put, opportunity cost is the alternative forgone, it is the benefit forfeited for another.
In this case, the shirt was forfeited for the production of jeans, despite the possibility of still making a profit in shirt production.
Learn more about opportunity costs here:
https://brainly.com/question/481029
#SPJ2
A Company manufactures coffee tables. The Company has a policy of adding a 20% markup to full costs and currently has excess capacity. The following information pertains to the company's normal operations per month: Output units 30,000 tables Machine-hours 6000 hours Direct manufacturing labor-hours 10,000 hours Direct materials per unit $50 Direct manufacturing labor per hour $12.00 Variable manufacturing overhead costs $322,500 Fixed manufacturing overhead costs $1,200,000 Product and process design costs $600,000 Marketing and distribution costs $1,290,000 For long-run pricing of the coffee tables, what price will most likely be used by the Company
Answer:
$201.30
Explanation:
Direct materials = $50
Total Direct manufacturing labor = $12.00 * 10,000 = $120,000
Variable manufacturing overhead costs = $322,500
Fixed manufacturing overhead costs = $1,200,000
Product and process design costs = $600,000
Marketing and distribution costs = $1,290,000
Total cost apart from direct material = $120,000 + $322,500 + $1,200,000 + $600,000 + $1,290,000 = $3,532,500
Cost per unit apart from direct material = $3,532,500 / 30,000 = $117.75
Total cost per unit = $117.75 + $50 = $167.75
Mark up per unit = $167.75 * 20% = $33.55
Price per unit = $167.75 + $33.55 = $201.30
Answer: $201.30
Explanation:
To solve this all the expenses incurred per unit need to be included in the unit.
Direct Materials $50
Direct Manufacturing Labour Hours per unit
= (10,000/30,000 units) * 12 (direct Manufacturing Labour per hour)
= $4
Variable Manufacturing Overhead Cost
= 322,500/30,000
= $10.75
Fixed manufacturing overhead costs
= 1,200,000/30,000
= $40
Product and process design costs
= 600,000/30,000
= $20
Marketing and distribution costs
= 1,290,000/30,000
= $43
Adding everything up,
= 50 + 4 + 10.75 + 40 + 20 + 43
= $167.75
Company adds 20% to costs so,
= 167.75 * ( 1 + 20%)
= $201.30
Company will most likely sell at $201.30
The following costs are included in a recent summary of data for a company: advertising expense, $85,000; depreciation expense - factory building, $133,000; direct labor, $250,000; direct material used, $300,000; factory utilities, $105,000; and sales salaries expense, $150,000. Determine the dollar amount of conversion costs.
Answer:
Conversion costs= $488,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
depreciation expense - factory building, $133,000
direct labor, $250,000
factory utilities, $105,000
The conversion costs are the sum of direct labor and manufacturing overhead.
Manufacturing overhead= 133,000 + 105,000= 238,000
Direct labor= 250,000
Conversion costs= $488,000
The following cost data relate to the manufacturing activities of Chang Company during the just completed year: Manufacturing overhead costs incurred: Indirect materials $ 16,000 Indirect labor 140,000 Property taxes, factory 9,000 Utilities, factory 80,000 Depreciation, factory 251,500 Insurance, factory 11,000 Total actual manufacturing overhead costs incurred $ 507,500 Other costs incurred: Purchases of raw materials (both direct and indirect) $ 410,000 Direct labor cost $ 70,000 Inventories: Raw materials, beginning $ 21,000 Raw materials, ending $ 31,000 Work in process, beginning $ 41,000 Work in process, ending $ 71,000 The company uses a predetermined overhead rate of $25 per machine-hour to apply overhead cost to jobs. A total of 20,700 machine-hours were used during the year. Required: 1. Compute the amount of underapplied or overapplied overhead cost for the year. 2. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured for the year.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of given question is shown below:-
The difference between the actual accumulated manufacturing overhead and the applied overhead measured on the basis of actual activity carried out at standard cost is the overhead expense under or over applied.
When applied overheads, the overheads are considered underapplied less than the actual overhead.
When overheads are applied, the overheads are considered overapplied higher than the real overhead.
So, we need to compute the applied overhead to find out the under or over applied overhead.
Applied Manufacturing Overhead = Total Machine Hours actually recorded × Predetermined Overhead Rate
= 20,700 MHs × $25
= $517,500
As we can see that the applied overheads are greater than the actual incurred overhead, so, Overheads are overapplied.
Over-Applied Overhead Cost = Applied Overhead – Actual Overhead
= 517,500 – 507,500
= $10,000
2. The preparation of schedule of cost of goods manufactured for the year is shown below:-
Chang Company
Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured
Direct materials:
Raw material, beginning $21,000
Raw material, purchases
(excluding indirect material
($410,000 - $16,000) $394,000
Raw materials available
for use $415,000
Less: Raw materials, ending ($31,000)
Raw materials use
in production $799,000
Add: Direct labor cost $70,000
Add: Applied Manufacturing
Overhead
(20,700 MHs × $25) $517,500
Total manufacturing costs $1,386,500
Add: Work in process,
beginning $41,000
Less: Work in process, ending ($71,000)
Cost of goods manufactured $1,356,500
Opera Corp uses the periodic inventory system. For the current month, the beginning inventory consisted of 7,200 units that cost $10 each. During the month, the company made two purchases: 4,000 units at $13 each and 12,000 units at $13.50 each. Checkers also sold 12,900 units during the month. Using the average cost method, what is the amount of cost of goods sold for the month
Answer:
$159,057
Explanation:
The computation of cost of goods sold is shown below:-
Total cost of goods available for sale = (7,200 × $10) + (4,000 × $13) + (12,000 × $13.50)
= $72,000 + $52,000 + $162,000
= $286,000
Total units = 7,200 + 4,000 + 12,000
= 23,200
Average cost per unit = Total cost of goods available for sale ÷ Total units
= $286,000 ÷ 23,200
= $12.33
So,
Cost of Goods sold = Sold units during the month × Average cost per unit
= 12,900 × $12.33
= $159,057
Therefore for computing the cost of goods sold for the month we simply applied the above formula.
The capital accounts of Heidi and Moss have balances of $90,000 and $65,000, respectively, on January 1, the beginning of the current fiscal year. On April 10, Heidi invested an additional $8,000. During the year, Heidi and Moss withdrew $40,000 and $32,000, respectively. Revenues were $540,000 and expenses were $420,000 for the year. The articles of partnership make no reference to the division of net income. Required: 1. Prepare a statement of partners' equity for the partnership of Heidi and Moss. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank. Enter all amounts as positive numbers. Heidi and Moss Statement of Partners' Equity For the Year Ended December 31 Heidi Moss Total Capital, January 1 $ 90,000 $ 65,000 $ 155,000 Net income for the year 60,000 60,000 120,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ Withdrawals during the year Capital, December 31 $ 118,000 $ 93,000 $ 211,000 2. Journalize the entries to: Close the revenue and expenses account. Close the drawing accounts. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank. a. Revenues 540,000 Heidi, Capital 540,000 Moss, Capital 420,000 Heidi, Capital 40,000 Moss, Capital Moss, Drawing b. Heidi, Capital 40,000 Moss, Capital 32,000 Heidi, Drawing 40,000 Moss, Drawing 32,000
Answer:
The statement and journal are attached
Explanation:
HI Corporation is considering the purchase of a machine that promises to reduce operating costs by the same amount for every year of its 5-year useful life. The machine will cost $211,980 and has no salvage value. The machine has a 14% internal rate of return. (Ignore income taxes.) Click here to view Exhibit 13B-1 and Exhibit 13B-2 to determine the appropriate discount factor(s) using the tables provided. Required: What are the annual cost savings promised by the machine? (Round your intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
Answer:
Annual savings = 61,746.
Explanation:
The Net Present Value (NPV) is the difference between the present value (PV) of cash outflows and PV of cash inflow
At the internal rate of return the PC of annual cash savings will be equal to the investment cost
Initial cost = 211980
PV = annual cash savings = A× (1- (1+r)^(-n)/ r
A=? r-internal rate of return, 14%, n-number of years- 5
211980 = A (1- (1.14)^(-5)/ 0.14
211,980 = A× 3.433080969
A= 211,980/3.43308
A= 61746.28619
Annual savings = 61,746.
On January 1, 2021, Cobbler Corporation awarded restricted stock units (RSUs) representing 29.7 million of its $1 par common shares to key officers, subject to forfeiture if employment is terminated within three years. After the recipients of the RSUs satisfy the vesting requirement, the company will distribute the shares. On the grant date, the shares had a market price of $5.2 per share. Required: 1. Determine the total compensation cost pertaining to the RSUs. 2. to 6. Prepare the appropriate journal entries.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation and the journal entries are shown below:
1) Total compensation cost
= Common shares × market price per share
= 29,700,000 × $5.2
= $154,440,000
2)The journal entries are shown below:
On Jan 1 2021
No journal entry is required for awarded the restricted stock units
On Dec 12 2021
Compensation expense (154,440,000 ÷ 3 years) $5,1480,000
Paid-in capital- restricted stock $51,480,000
(Being the compensation expense is recorded)
For recording this we debited the compensation expense as it increased the expenses and credited the paid in capital as it increased the equity
On Dec 31 2022
Compensation expense (154,440,000 ÷ 3 years) $5,1480,000
Paid-in capital- restricted stock $51,480,000
(Being the compensation expense is recorded)
For recording this we debited the compensation expense as it increased the expenses and credited the paid in capital as it increased the equity
On Dec 31 2023
Compensation expense (154,440,000 ÷ 3 years) $5,1480,000
Paid-in capital- restricted stock $51,480,000
(Being the compensation expense is recorded)
For recording this we debited the compensation expense as it increased the expenses and credited the paid in capital as it increased the equity
On Dec 31 2023
Paid-in capital - restricted stock $154,440,000
Common stock (29.7 million × $1) $29,700,000
Paid-in capital- excess of par $124,740,000 (Balancing figure)
(Being the lifting of restrictions and issuance of the shares is recorded)
For recording this we debited the paid in capital as it decreased the equity and credited the paid in capital and common stock as it increased the equity
Irving Corporation makes a product with the following standards for direct labor and variable overhead: Standard Quantity or Hours Standard Price or Rate Standard Cost Per Unit Direct labor 0.20 hours $ 29.00 per hour $ 5.80 Variable overhead 0.20 hours $ 6.50 per hour $ 1.30 In November the company's budgeted production was 6,800 units, but the actual production was 6,600 units. The company used 1,510 direct labor-hours to produce this output. The actual variable overhead cost was $9,211. The company applies variable overhead on the basis of direct labor-hours. The variable overhead rate variance for November is:
Answer:
Manufacturing overhead rate variance= $604 favorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Variable overhead 0.20 hours $ 6.50 per hour
The company used 1,510 direct labor-hours to produce this output. The actual variable overhead cost was $9,211.
To calculate the variable overhead rate variance, we need to use the following formula:
Manufacturing overhead rate variance= (standard rate - actual rate)* actual quantity
Actual rate= 9,211/1,510= $6.1
Manufacturing overhead rate variance= (6.5 - 6.1)*1,510
Manufacturing overhead rate variance= $604 favorable
Present Value of Bonds Payable; Premium Moss Co. issued $100,000 of four-year, 12% bonds, with interest payable semiannually, at a market (effective) interest rate of 9%. Determine the present value of the bonds payable, using the present value tables in Exhibit 5 and Exhibit 7. Note: Round final answer to the nearest dollar. $ Feedback Remember, the selling price of a bond is the sum of the present values of: the face amount of the bonds due at the maturity date and the periodic interest to be paid on the bonds. The market rate of interest is used to compute the present value of both the face amount and the periodic interest.
Answer:
The present of value of the bonds payable is $ 109,893.83
Explanation:
The present value of the bonds payable is the present of semiannual coupon payments as well as the repayment of face value in year 4.
coupon payments =$100,000*12%*6/12=$6,000
Face value receivable in year 4 is $100,000
Find attached spreadsheet detailing the computation of present value
