Can I have help with 43 and 44 I need to see how to do them thanks.

Answer:

42.7 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

To the nearest tenth of a mm, 42.67 mm would be 42.7 mm.

After estimate of this value rounded to the nearest tenth of a millimeter,

⇒ 42.67 ≈ 42.7

We have to given that,

According to the United States Golf Association, the diameter of a golf ball should not be less than 42.67 millimeters.

Hence, After estimate of this value rounded to the nearest tenth of a millimeter, we get;

⇒ 42.67

As, 7 is grater than 5, so we can add 1 to the tenth place.

⇒ 42.67 ≈ 42.7

Therefore, After estimate of this value rounded to the nearest tenth of a millimeter,

⇒ 42.67 ≈ 42.7

Learn more about the rounding number visit:

brainly.com/question/27207159

#SPJ2

Answer:

(x,y) -> (x+6, y-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

I followed c and it translated like the  last ans choice.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

● h(x) = 2-2x

The domain is {-3,-2,1,5}

● h(-3) = 2-2×(-3) = 2+6 = 8

● h(-2) = 2 -2×(-2) = 2+4 = 6

● h(1) = 2-2×1 = 2-2 = 0

● h(5) = 2-2×5 = 2-10 = -8

The range is {-8,0,6,8}

Answer:

x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

(segment piece) x (segment piece) =   (segment piece) x (segment piece)

3x(x+1) = 4x(x)

Divide each side by x

3x(x+1)/x = 4x(x)/x

3(x+1) = 4x

Distribute

3x+3 = 4x

Subtract 3x

3x+3-3x= 4x-3x

3 =x

Answer:

x = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

0 is a rediculas answer 9 and 12 are to big.

The lines are supposed to have a simular length:

3(3) + 4 = 13

4(3) + 3 = 15

These are the best answers that fit.

Answer:

The dimensions or Area of the rectangle is 1200cm².

Answer:

[tex]-1 \frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Using this number line, we can plot our original number - [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] (see picture attached)

Adding a negative is the same thing as subtracting - so we are subtracting [tex]2\frac{1}{2}[/tex] from  [tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex].

To subtract this, we can break up [tex]2\frac{1}{2}[/tex]  into 3 parts: 1, 1, and [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]. We can subtract each of these from the current number and see where we land up. (again see picture)

We land up at [tex]-1 \frac{3}{4}[/tex].

Hope this helped!

Answer:

5^3  y^5

125 y^5

Step-by-step explanation:

5y^3/(5y)^-2​

Distribute the exponent in the denominator

5y^3/(5 ^-2 y^-2)

A negative exponent in the denominator brings it to the numerator

5y^3 5 ^2 y^2​​

Combine like terms

5 * 5^2  * y^3 5^2

We know that a^b * a^c = a^(b+c)

5^(1+2) * y^( 3+2)

5^3  y^5

125 y^5

Answer:

27.73 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the Pythagorean theorem. It easiest to think of the distance between the two friends as a triangle in the rectangle. One side is 12ft and the other is 25ft.

12^2+25ft^2=769

The square root of 769 is 27.73

Answer:

27.73 Ft

Step-by-step explanation:I took the test

Answer:

252

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 7812 by 31 and we get the average daily answer... Hope this helps!!

Answer:

[tex]S = 3 h[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Let M represent Michaela hair tier and S represents Michaela  sister's

Given

M = h

S = Triple of M

Required

Determine an expression for S

From the given parameters, we have that;

S = Triple of M

Mathematically, this implies;

[tex]S = 3 * M[/tex]

Substitute h for M

[tex]S = 3 * h[/tex]

[tex]S = 3 h[/tex]

Hence, the expression for Michaela  sister' is [tex]S = 3 h[/tex]

Answer:

300 SF

Step-by-step explanation:

just took the test

Answer:

300

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find 12/37 of 444.

12/37 * 444 = 12/37 * 444/1 = (12 * 444)/(37 * 1) = 5328/37 = 144

She sat in the back seat 144 times out of 444.

444 - 144 = 300

She sat in the front seat 300 times.

Answer:

She must consider 3507 components to be 90% sure of knowing the mean will be within ± 0.1 mm.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that an engineer wishes to determine the width of a particular electronic component. If she knows that the standard deviation is 3.6 mm.

And she considers to be 90% sure of knowing the mean will be within ±0.1 mm.

As we know that the margin of error is given by the following formula;

The margin of error =  [tex]Z_(_\frac{\alpha}{2}_) \times \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]  

Here, [tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation = 3.6 mm

         n = sample size of components

         [tex]\alpha[/tex] = level of significance = 1 - 0.90 = 0.10 or 10%

         [tex]\frac{\alpha}{2} = \frac{0.10}{2}[/tex] = 0.05 or 5%

Now, the critical value of z at a 5% level of significance in the z table is given to us as 1.645.

So, the margin of error =  [tex]Z_(_\frac{\alpha}{2}_) \times \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]  

                  0.1 mm        =  [tex]1.645 \times \frac{3.6}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

                    [tex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{3.6\times 1.645}{0.1 }[/tex]

                    [tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex] = 59.22

                     n = [tex]59.22^{2}[/tex] = 3507.0084 ≈ 3507.

Hence, she must consider 3507 components to be 90% sure of knowing the mean will be within ± 0.1 mm.

Answer:

  log(1/10) = -1

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the law of exponents and the meaning of logarithm.

  1/10 = 10^-1

  log(10^x) = x

So, you have ...

  log(1/10) = log(10^-1)

  log(1/10) = -1

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

let the number be x

how Cindy worked it out :

(x -6) ÷ 3 = 25

x -6 = 75

x = 81

How she should have worked it out:

(x - 3) ÷ 6

(81 - 3) ÷ 6

78 ÷ 6 = 13

Answer:

d = s x t

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for distance.

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{(3,-1)}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there!

Well to find the solution the the given system,

3y - 2x = -9

y = -2x + 5

So to find x lets plug in -2x + 5 for y in 3y - 2x = -9.

3(-2x + 5) - 2x = -9

Distribute

-6x + 15 - 2x = -9

-8x + 15 = -9

-15 to both sides

-8x = -24

Divide -8 to both sides

x = 3

Now that we have x which is 3, we can plug in 3 for x in y = -2x + 5.

y = -2(3) + 5

y = -6 + 5

y = -1

So the solution is (3,-1).

Hope this helps :)

Step-by-step explanation:

When you have a ratio, you put one number as the numerator and than one number as the denominator.

so it would be (12/34)=(x/68)

In this example I made the ratio you are comparing it to have 68 dollars, so when you solve for the amount of quarters you need it should be 24, since all of the numbers in this example are just being doubled.

To solve for x, you multiply 68 on both sides of the equation, 68×(12/34)=x

24=x

So this proves that this is how ratios, are used. It also does not matter what number you place on the numerator or denominator.

Answer:

1,377/2 and 688 1/17

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Option (D) : (3.5, 8.75)

Answer:

Part a ) The degrees of freedom for the given two sample non-pooled t test is 24

Part b ) The degrees of freedom for the given two sample non-pooled t test is 30

Part c ) The degrees of freedom for the given two sample non-pooled t test is 30

Part d ) The degrees of freedom for the given two sample non-pooled t test is 25

Step-by-step explanation:

Degrees of freedom for a non-pooled two sample t-test is given by;

Δf = {[ s₁²/m + s₂²/n ]²} / {[( s₁²/m)²/m-1] + [(s₂²/n)²/n-1]}

Now given the information;

a) :- m = 12, n = 15, s₁ = 4.0, s₂ = 6.0

we substitute

Δf =  {[ 4²/12 + 6²/15 ]²} / {[( 4²/12)²/12-1] + [(6²/15)²/15-1]}

Δf  = 30184 / 1241

Δf  = 24.3223 ≈ 24 (down to the nearest whole number)

b) :- m = 12, n = 21, s₁ = 4.0, s₂ = 6.0

we substitute using same formula

Δf = {[ s₁²/m + s₂²/n ]²} / {[( s₁²/m)²/m-1] + [(s₂²/n)²/n-1]}

Δf = {[ 4²/12 + 6²/21 ]²} / {[( 4²/12)²/12-1] + [(6²/21)²/21-1]}

Δf = 56320 / 1871

Δf = 30.1015 ≈ 30 (down to the nearest whole number)

c) :- m = 12, n = 21, s₁ = 3.0, s₂ = 6.0

we substitute using same formula

Δf = {[ s₁²/m + s₂²/n ]²} / {[( s₁²/m)²/m-1] + [(s₂²/n)²/n-1]}

Δf = {[ 3²/12 + 6²/21 ]²} / {[( 3²/12)²/12-1] + [(6²/21)²/21-1]}

Δf = 29095 / 949

Δf = 30.6585 ≈ 30 (down to the nearest whole number)

d) :- m = 10, n = 24, s₁ = 4.0, s₂ = 6.0

we substitute using same formula

Δf = {[ s₁²/m + s₂²/n ]²} / {[( s₁²/m)²/m-1] + [(s₂²/n)²/n-1]}

Δf = {[ 4²/10 + 6²/24 ]²} / {[( 4²/10)²/10-1] + [(6²/24)²/24-1]}

Δf = 1044 / 41  

Δf = 25.4634 ≈ 25 (down to the nearest whole number).

Answer: A) (-2, 4), (6,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

When a point (x,y) is dilated by a scale factor of k , then the new points is given by (kx,ky).

Given: The line segment AB with endpoints A(-3, 6) and B(9, 12) is dilated with a scale factor [tex]\dfrac23[/tex] about the origin.

Let A' and B' b the endpoints of the dilated line segment.

Then, [tex]A'(\dfrac{2}{3}(-3), \dfrac23(6))=A'(-2,4)[/tex]

[tex]B'(\dfrac{2}{3}(9), \dfrac23(12))=B'(6,8)[/tex]

Hence, the correct option is A) (-2, 4), (6,8)

Answer:

The distribution is positively skewed.

Step-by-step explanation:

A measure of skewness is defined in such a way that the measure should always be zero when the distribution is symmetric and measure should be a pure number i.e independent of origin and units of measurement.

The shape of the distribution can be found by finding the coefficient of skewness.

The coefficient of skewness can be found by  

Sk= 3(Mean-Median)/ Standard Deviation

Sk= 3( 50-40)5= 30/5=6

The shape will be positively skewed.

In a positively skewed distribution the mean > median > mode. It has a long right tail.

Using the skewness formula, it is found that the distribution is right-skewed.

------------------

[tex]S = \frac{3(M - M_e)}{s}[/tex]

------------------

The coefficient is:

[tex]S = \frac{3(M - M_e)}{s} = \frac{3(50 - 40)}{5} = \frac{30}{5} = 6[/tex]

Thus, the distribution is right-skewed.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24415645

Step-by-step explanation:

The inequality shows by line is

i) 1<=x<=6

OR,

x is an positive integer.

Answer:

Cohen's d : 1.00

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that M₁ = 18, and M₂ = 14. Given that the pooled variance for the these two samples are 16, S²Pooled = 16, and therefore S - pooled = 4.

The formula to solve for the value of Cohen's d is as follows,

d = M₁ - M₂ / S - pooled,

d = 18 - 14 / 4 = 4 / 4 = 1

Therefore the value of Cohen's d = 1

[tex]f(f(3))=2\cdot3^2+1=19\\f(f(f(f(3))))=2\cdot19^2+1=723[/tex]

Answer:

In MATH:

Empowerment - Gaining the skills required in language and practices to fully understand math.

Radication - The process of extracting a number's root.

In ENGLISH:

Empowerment - The process of gaining more power over anything, including yourself, others, society, government, and corporations.

Ex - In the spirit of empowerment, the company has implemented a new system that asks employees to nominate one another for bonuses.

Radication - The process of establishing, fixing, or creating.

Ex - The high prestige of the premier is radicated in the hearts of the people.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

For b

To find side b we use the sine rule

a = 7

A = 23°

B = 32°

b = ?

Substitute the values into the above formula

That's

Divide both sides by sin 23°

b = 9.493573

To find side c we use sine rule

C = 125°

So we have

Divide both sides by sin 23°

c = 14.67521

Hope this helps you

Answer:

A, E

Step-by-step explanation:

There should be 2^8-1 proper subsets of A. Its every one besides { }

Answer:

Explained below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Enter the data in an Excel sheet.

(a)

Go to Insert → Chart → Scatter.

Select the first type of Scatter chart.

The scatter plot is attached below.

(b)

The scatter plot with the line of best fit is attached below.

The line of best fit is:

[tex]y=-0.8046x+103.56[/tex]

(c)

Compute the value of x for y = 30 as follows:

[tex]y=-0.8046x+103.56[/tex]

[tex]30=-0.8046x+103.56\\\\0.8046x=103.56-30\\\\x=\frac{73.56}{0.8046}\\\\x\approx 91.42[/tex]

Thus, the Advance Mathematics mark of a student who scores 30 out of 100 in English is 91.42.

(d)

The Pearson's Correlation Coefficient is:

[tex]r=\frac{n\cdot \sum XY-\sum X\cdot \sum Y}{\sqrt{[n\cdot \sum X^{2}-(\sum X)^{2}][n\cdot \sum Y^{2}-(\sum Y)^{2}]}}[/tex]

  [tex]=\frac{14\cdot 44010-835\cdot 778}{\sqrt{[14\cdot52775-(825)^{2}][14\cdot 47094-(778)^{2}]}}\\\\= -0.7062\\\\\approx -0.71[/tex]

Thus, the Pearson's Correlation Coefficient is -0.71.

(e)

A correlation coefficient between ± 0.50 and ±1.00 is considered as a strong correlation.

The correlation between Advanced Mathematics and English results is -0.71.

This implies that there is a strong negative correlation.