Angle of rotation :(((

Answer:

AAA

Stp-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

base is 6 in

height is 4 in

to get the area of a triangle is 1/2base×height

being 1/2(6)(4)=12

to get the area of a rectangle is length×width being 9×8=72

By observing the given figure,

The base(b) of a triangle is 6 inches

The height(h)  of  a triangle is 4 inches

The area of the triangle is 12 square inches

The area of the rectangle is 72 square centimeter

A triangle is a polygon with three edges and three vertices

A rectangle is a quadrilateral with four right angles

Area is the quantity that expresses the extent of a region on the plane or on a curved surface

From the given figure

The base(b) of a triangle is 6 inches

The height(h)  of  a triangle is 4 inches

The area of a triangle = [tex]\frac{1}{2}bh[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{2}(6)(4)[/tex]

=12 square inches

Length of the rectangle = 8 centimeter

Width of the rectangle = 9 centimeter

Area of the rectangle = l × w = 9×8=72 square centimeter

Hence,

The base(b) of a triangle is 6 inches

The height(h)  of  a triangle is 4 inches

The area of the triangle is 12 square inches

The area of the rectangle is 72 square centimeter

Learn more about Triangle, Rectangle and Area here

https://brainly.com/question/27701864

#SPJ2

The null and alternative hypothesis for the tests are:

H0: μ = 20

Ha: μ < 20

Given data:

In this situation, the null and alternative hypotheses can be formulated as follows:

Null Hypothesis (H0): The average weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill is equal to 20 pounds.

Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): The average weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill is less than 20 pounds.

In symbolic notation:

H0: μ = 20

Ha: μ < 20

where μ represents the population mean weight loss of consumers who take the "fat-burner" pill.

The null hypothesis assumes that the claim made by the company is accurate and that the average weight loss is indeed 20 pounds. The alternative hypothesis challenges this claim and suggests that the actual average weight loss may be less than 20 pounds, implying that the "hype" around the pill's effectiveness might be exaggerated.

To learn more about null and alternative hypothesis, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30535681

#SPJ12

Answer:

It will take 12 years using simple interest

Step-by-step explanation:

2,500 x 1.7% = 42.5

42.5 x 12 + 510

2500 +510 +3010

Answer:

4x - 5y = 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Any line parallel to 4x - 5y = 35 will have the same equation EXCEPT that the constant will be different.

Starting with 4x - 5y = 35, replace x with the given x-coordinate -5 and the given y-coordinate -6, and finally the given 35 with the constant C:

4(-5) - 5(-6) = C, or

-20 + 30 = C.  Thus, C = 10, and the equation of the new line is

4x - 5y = 10

The equation of line is 4x - 5y = 10

A straight line's general equation is y = mx + c, where m is the gradient. On the y-axis, this number c is referred to as the intercept. Key Point y = mx + c is the equation for a straight line with a gradient of m and an intercept of c on the y-axis.

Given the points (-5,-6)

and parallel to line 4x - 5y = 35...…..(1)

the equation of line is (y - y₁) = m( x - x₁)

for parallel line condition the value of m is equal to both equations

converting eq. 1 in the form of y = mx + c

4x - 5y = 35

we get y = 4/5x -7

here m = 4/5 and c = -7

substitute the value of m in  equation of line

where y₁ = -6; x₁ = -5

(y - (-6)) = 4/5(x - (-5))

y +6 = 4/5(x+5)

simplify above eq. we get

4x - 5y = 20

Hence the equation of  the line that passes through the point (- 5, - 6) is  4x - 5y = 20

Learn more about equation of line

https://brainly.com/question/29774095

#SPJ5

Answer:

The new rule has a higher salary level for exemption from overtime, at $684 a week. This means that lower-pay exempt employees may qualify for overtime.

Step-by-step explanation: this is your answer plz rate e the most brainlest

Answer:

The point (2, -1 ) is not on the graph of the line.

Step-by-step explanation:

3x–4y–12=0

3*2 - 4*(-1) - 12= 0

6 + 4 - 12 =0

10 - 12 = 0

- 2 = 0 , false, so the point (2, -1 ) is not on the graph of the line.

Domain (infinity,infinity)

Range (infinity,[tex]\sqrt{7}[/tex])

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  216 = 2³·3³ = 8·3³ = 27·2³

Step-by-step explanation:

6³ = 2·2·2·3·3·3

The string of factors can be grouped however you like, and any repeated factors in the group can be expressed using an exponent.

  = 2·2²·3³

  = 8·3³

  = 6·2²·3²

  = 6·6²

  = 27·2³

Answer:

B; {x|x<-8}

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The common factors of 45 and 72 are 9, 3, 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The GCF of these two numbers is nine.

Step-by-step explanation:

They share three common factors: 1, 3 and 9. The greatest out of all of those is 9. Hope this helps!

Answer:

  7(5 +2)

Step-by-step explanation:

From our knowledge of times tables, we know that ...

  35 = 5·7

  14 = 2·7

so the greatest common factor of 35 and 14 is 7. Factoring that out, we have ...

  35 +14 = 7(5 +2)

Answer:

should be 20

Step-by-step explanation:

yes

Answer: She had added the Denominator, instead of finding the LCM.

Explanation: She should've multiplied them by a common number to equal a common Product, and replace the Denominator with the Product. (The correct denominator is 20, because 4 x 5 = 20, and 5 x 4= 20)

Step-by-step explanation:

a. 81 ÷ 9 = 9

b. 40 ÷ 5 = 8

c. 21 ÷ 3 = 7

d. 54 ÷ 6 = 9

e. 42 ÷ 7 = 6

f. 63 ÷ 9 = 7

g. 36 ÷ 4 = 4

h. 45 ÷ 9 = 5

i. 39 ÷ 3 = 12

j. 24 ÷ 6 = 4

Question:

Data were collected over a 10-year timespan from a sample of 100 penguins that were randomly given either metal or electronic tags. One variable examined is the length of foraging trips. Longer foraging trips can jeopardize both breeding success and survival of chicks waiting for food. Mean length of 344 foraging trips was 12.70 days for metal-tagged penguins. Mean length of 512 foraging trips was 11.60 days for electronic-tagged penguins. An estimate of the standard error for this difference of means is SE=0.283.

a) We will address the question of whether foraging trips are longer on average among metal-tagged penguins than among electronic-tagged penguins. State hypotheses in terms of two means.

b. Calculate the sample statistic xM - xE

c. Calculate a t-test statistic, using the given estimate of SE.

d. What are the correct (conservative) degrees of freedom for a t-distribution for this test?

e. Use t-distribution methods to find the p-value and draw a rough curve with appropriate shaded region. You may give either a precise p-value from software or bounds on a p-value from Table A.

f. State the conclusion of the test in context, using nontechnical language.

Answer:

See explanation below

Step-by-step explanation:

a)  The null and alternative hypotheses are:

H0 : uM - uE = 0

H1 : uM - uE > 0

b) Calculating the sample statistic,

xM-xE, we have:

Given xM = 12.70 days

xE = 11.60 days

xM - xE = 12.70 - 11.60 = 1.10 days

Therefore sample statistic = 1.10

c) Calculating the test statistic, using the given estimate of SE, we have:

Given standard error, SE = 0.283

[tex] \frac{xM - xE}{SE} = \frac{12.70 - 11.60}{0.283} = 3.89 [/tex]

Therefore, t test = 3.89

d) The correct degrees of freedom.

We have:

[tex]Min(n_M-1, n_E-1 ) = Min(344-1, 512-1) = Min(343, 511)[/tex]

df = 343

e) p-value:

Pvalue = P(Z > 3.89) = 0.00000602

Since p value is less than significance level of 0.05, we reject null hypothesis H0.

f) Conclusion:

There is enough evidence to conclude that foraging trips are longer on average among metal-tagged penguins than among electronic-tagged penguins.

Answer:

9 times

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Mathematically, 9, although reality wise, you could flip the coin and get heads every time, or the opposite.

I think you mean mathematically though, so yes, it would be 9.

Answer:

173.15 yards is the distance from tee to hole.

Step-by-step explanation:

Please refer to the image attached.

Let A is the position of tee and where the golfer is standing.

C is the position of hole.

CB is the vertical distance between greens and tee.

Angle of elevation, [tex]\angle BAC = 12^\circ[/tex]

To find: side AC.

Using trigonometric functions, we know that value of sine is:

[tex]sin\theta = \dfrac{\text{Perpendicular}}{\text{Hypotenuse}}[/tex]

Here [tex]\theta = \angle BAC = 12^\circ[/tex]

Perpendicular is side CB.

Hypotenuse is side AC.

[tex]sin12^\circ = \dfrac{\text{CB}}{\text{AC}}\\\Rightarrow \text{CB} = \dfrac{36}{sin12^\circ}\\\Rightarrow \text{CB} = 173.15\ yards[/tex]

Hence, 173.15 yards is the distance from tee to hole.

Answer:

  bisect each other.

Step-by-step explanation:

The midpoints are the same point, so the diagonals bisect each other.

__

More elaboration on a proof

The alternate interior angles formed by diagonals and the sides of the triangle are congruent, so the (point-to-point) triangles formed by the crossing diagonals are congruent ASA. Since the sides of those triangles are congruent, the diagonals meet at their midpoints. That is, the diagonals bisect each other.

Answer: pi/3

Step-by-step explanation:

correct on edge 2020

The equivalent value of trigonometric relation sin⁻¹ ( √3/2 ) = π/3

Trigonometry is the study of the relationships between the angles and the lengths of the sides of triangles

The six trigonometric functions are sin , cos , tan , cosec , sec and cot

Let the angle be θ , such that

sin θ = opposite / hypotenuse

cos θ = adjacent / hypotenuse

tan θ = opposite / adjacent

tan θ = sin θ / cos θ

cosec θ = 1/sin θ

sec θ = 1/cos θ

cot θ = 1/tan θ

Given data ,

Let the trigonometric relation be represented as A

Now , the value of A is

sin⁻¹ ( √3/2 ) = θ

Now , the value of θ is calculated by

In a triangle , sin θ = opposite / hypotenuse

So , sin θ = √3/2

The value of θ = 60°

So , the measure of 60° in radians is θ = π/3

Hence , the value of θ from the trigonometric relation is π/3

To learn more about trigonometric relations click :

https://brainly.com/question/14746686

#SPJ7

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Kindly check the attached images below to see the step by step explanation to the question above.

Answer:

7/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Add up the amount of the marbles in total and read what color the marble they ask for the chances of. The color of marble should go first then the total of the marbles. (they could ask for more than one color so just add up both the colors given.)

Answer:

I would love to help you but all I see is dots

Answer:

  see below for a graph

Step-by-step explanation:

To draw a graph on a grid, locate the point (4, -2) and use the slope to find another point. One such point will be 1 to the left and up 3*, at (3, 1). With two points, you can draw the line through them to complete the graph.

__

For a graphing tool that requires an equation, the point-slope form of the equation can be used:

  y -k = m(x -h) . . . . . a line of slope m through point (h, k)

For the given slope and point, the equation of the line is ...

  y +2 = -3(x -4)

  y = -3x +10

_____

* The slope is "rise" over "run". The slope of -3 means that a run of +1 will result in a rise of -3. The given point is already below the x-axis, so we don't really want to find more points farther down. In order to go up on a line with negative slope, we must choose a point to the left of the given one.

Answer:

a. If the P-value is smaller than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

b. Pooled proportion = 0.8

c. z = 2.7

d. As the P-value (0.0072) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportions differ significantly.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

We will use the P-value approach, so the decision rule is that if the P-value is lower than the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

The claim is that the proportions differ significantly.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1, of size n1=200 has a proportion of p1=0.85.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=170/200=0.85[/tex]

The sample 2, of size n2=150 has a proportion of p2=0.7333.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=110/150=0.7333[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.1167.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.85-0.7333=0.1167[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{170+110}{200+150}=\dfrac{280}{350}=0.8[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.8*0.2}{200}+\dfrac{0.8*0.2}{150}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.0008+0.00107}=\sqrt{0.00187}=0.0432[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.1167-0}{0.0432}=\dfrac{0.1167}{0.0432}=2.7[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=2\cdot P(z>2.7)=0.0072[/tex]

As the P-value (0.0072) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportions differ significantly.

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Kindly check the attached image below to see the step by step explanation to the question above.

Answer:

height = 140.875m

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of first pyramid= base * height /3 = 230*147/3= 11270

if the base is 240, volume is remain -> height = volume *3 /base

                                                                            = 11270*3/240 =140.875m

Answer:

1/10

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 10 tiles and only 1 tile numbered 4 so 1 out of 10 tiles are numbered 4

Answer:

200; 80% of 250 is 200

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

200

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Given the variables

X₁: Weight of a safety helmet for racers

X₂: Price of a safety helmet for racers

Note, there is n= 17 observed values for each variable so for all calculations I'll use this number and disregard the 18 mentioned in the text.

a) Scatterplot in attachment.

b) If you look at the diagram it seems that there is a negative linear regression between the price and the weight of the helmets, meaning, the higher the helmet weights, the less it costs.

c) The estimated regression equation is ^Yi= a + bXi

n= 17; ∑Y= 6466; ∑Y²= 3063392; ∑X= 1008; ∑X²= 60294; ∑XY= 367536

Y[bar]= 380.35; X[bar]= 59.29

[tex]b= \frac{sumXY-\frac{(sumX)(sumY)}{n} }{sumX^2-\frac{(sumX)^2}{n} } = \frac{367536-\frac{1008*6466}{17} }{60294-\frac{(1008)^2}{17} } = -30.18[/tex]

[tex]a= Y[bar]- bX[bar]= 380.35-(-30.18)*59.29= 2169.77[/tex]

The estimated regression equation for the price of the helmets as a function of their weight is:

^Yi= 2169.77 -30.18Xi

I hope it helps!

Answer:

Y=x-3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

slope intercept form

(slope=x)(1x=x)