In general, active voice is usually more direct and easier to read than passive voice. However, there are certain instances when passive voice would be more appropriate. These include:
When the agent is unknown.When the agent is less important than the action.When you want to vary your sentence structure.When the agent is unknown, passive voice can be used to avoid inserting an arbitrary subject into the sentence. For example, “The tree was blown over” is better than “The wind blew over the tree”, as the agent (the wind) is unknown in the first sentence. This also applies when the agent is irrelevant to the sentence.
When the agent is less important than the action, passive voice can be used to emphasize the action rather than the agent. An example of this could be “The cake was eaten” instead of “John ate the cake”. In this sentence, the agent (John) is less important than the action (the cake being eaten), so passive voice can be used to emphasize this.
Passive voice can also be used to vary sentence structure, in order to make the writing more interesting or to emphasize a particular point. For example, if a sentence has been written in active voice (“John drank the juice”) and the sentence immediately afterward is also in active voice (“John ate the cake”), then the passive voice can be used in the next sentence to add variety (“The cake was eaten”).
In conclusion, passive voice is not always an unacceptable sentence structure. In certain cases, such as when the agent is unknown or less important than the action, or when sentence structure needs to be varied, passive voice can be more appropriate than active voice.
Learn more about the passive voice here: https://brainly.com/question/26432700
#SPJ11