Probable cause is a set of facts and circumstances that would induce a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that a particular other person has committed a specific crime.
This is also reasonable ground to make or believe an accusation. Probable cause refers to the necessary level of belief that would allow for police seizures (arrests) of individuals and full searches of dwellings, vehicles, and possessions.
According to the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, any searches or seizures that are made by the police must be accompanied by probable cause.
This means that the police must have evidence that a crime has been committed and that the person they are searching or seizing is somehow involved in that crime.
If there is no probable cause, then any evidence that is obtained through the search or seizure will not be admissible in court.
The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the rights of individuals who are being searched or seized by the police.
If there is no probable cause, then the evidence that is obtained will be considered the "fruit of the poisonous tree" and cannot be used in court to support the prosecution's case.
To know more about Probable cause refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14787541#
#SPJ11
Which of the following could be argued by the defendant in a product liability case based on strict liability to limit the dollar amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff?
Answers:
a. The product was based on state of the art design
b. The manufacturer exercised all reasonable care in the manufacture of the product.
c. The user was careless or misused the product.
d. All of the above can be pled to reduce damages.
The defendant in a product liability case based on strict liability could argue that the user was careless or misused the product to limit the dollar amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff. Hence, Option c is the correct.
What is product liability?Product liability is a legal term used to describe the liability of manufacturers and sellers for injuries caused by a product's design, production, and marketing. There are three theories under which a plaintiff can bring a product liability lawsuit: negligence, breach of warranty, and strict liability.
In a product liability case based on strict liability, the defendant might claim that the plaintiff was careless or misused the product. This can be argued to reduce the amount of damages awarded to the plaintiff.
Strict liability is a legal doctrine that imposes liability on a party without requiring proof of fault. In product liability cases, it means that a manufacturer or seller is strictly liable for any injuries caused by a defective product, regardless of whether they were negligent or not.
Hence, Option c is the correct.
Learn more about Product liability here:
brainly.com/question/30830242
#SPJ11
TRUE/FALSE.Authority often provides both the permission to do something as well as providing guidance and limitations on how it should be done.
Authority often provides both permission to do something as well as providing guidance and limitations on how it should be done. - True
The power that is acknowledged as legitimate is called authority. The authority to issue and carry out commands. The faculty is in charge of making choices and carrying them out. Those who have earned the right to do so may exercise authority. Authority may give both approval and direction over what should be done.
Individuals or organizations frequently get permission to carry out certain duties or make specific choices, but they are also required to abide by specific rules or restrictions when doing so. Any principal who is a party to the transaction papers has the necessary power and authority to execute and deliver them, as well as to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby to be carried out by that principle.
Read more about Authority on:
https://brainly.com/question/28067297
#SPJ4
In 1873, the congressional law that officially discontinued silver coinage. became known to critics as the "Crime of '73."
In 1873, the congressional law that officially discontinued silver coinage became known to critics as the "Crime of '73." The act, also known as the Coinage Act of 1873, ended the circulation of silver dollars, half dollars, and quarter dollars.
It was a controversial law because it had long-lasting implications for the US monetary system and the country's economy. The Coinage Act of 1873 played a significant role in shaping the country's monetary system. It was instrumental in ending the bimetallism era, which allowed gold and silver to be used interchangeably as a currency. The law put the US on the gold standard, which meant that the country's currency was tied to gold.
The gold standard was a crucial factor in stabilizing the US economy in the late 19th century, but it had its drawbacks too, particularly during economic crises. The passage of the Coinage Act of 1873 created much controversy in the United States, and it is still considered a significant moment in US monetary history. Those who opposed the law saw it as a conspiracy to deprive people of their right to use silver as a currency. As a result, it became known as the "Crime of '73."
To learn more about Congressional law :
https://brainly.com/question/30837088
#SPJ11
Although every crime scene is unique, discuss the components of and things to be considered when conducting a scene assessment.
Answer:
When conducting a scene assessment, several important components and considerations should be taken into account, including safety, preservation of evidence, documentation, interviews, reconstruction, analysis, and collaboration. Thorough attention to detail, effective communication, and a commitment to preserving evidence and reconstructing the events that occurred are essential for a successful investigation.
Explanation:
When conducting a scene assessment, there are several components to consider in order to ensure a thorough and accurate investigation. Although every crime scene is unique, the following are some of the most important components and considerations:
Safety: The safety of all individuals involved in the investigation should be the top priority. This includes law enforcement officers, first responders, and any potential witnesses. The scene should be secured, and any potential hazards should be identified and addressed.
Preservation of evidence: All potential evidence should be identified and preserved. This includes physical evidence such as fingerprints, DNA, and trace evidence, as well as any potential digital evidence such as surveillance footage or electronic communication records.
Documentation: Detailed documentation of the scene is essential in order to accurately reconstruct the events that occurred. This includes taking photographs, sketching the layout of the scene, and taking detailed notes.
Interviews: Any potential witnesses or individuals with information related to the crime should be interviewed. This can help to provide additional information and context to the investigation.
Reconstruction: The scene should be reconstructed in order to determine how the crime occurred. This can involve examining the physical evidence and interviewing witnesses in order to develop a clear timeline of events.
Analysis: All evidence and information gathered at the scene should be analyzed in order to determine potential suspects and motives. This can involve reviewing surveillance footage, conducting background checks on potential suspects, and collaborating with other law enforcement agencies.
Collaboration: Effective collaboration between all parties involved in the investigation is essential in order to ensure a thorough and accurate investigation. This can involve working with other law enforcement agencies, forensic specialists, and prosecutors.
Overall, conducting a thorough scene assessment involves careful attention to detail, effective communication and collaboration, and a commitment to preserving evidence and reconstructing the events that occurred.
A successful scene assessment at a crime scene is fundamentally based on three components - preservation of the scene, documentation, and evidence collection. Other factors like type of crime, time, location, witnesses, and environmental conditions are also considered. Every crime scene is unique requiring a distinctive assessment approach, albeit the basic components stay consistent.
Explanation:Conducting a scene assessment at a crime scene is a meticulous and deliberate process that requires a systematic approach. The primary components considered when doing a scene assessment include the preservation of the crime scene, thorough documentation, and evidence collection.
Preservation of the crime scene is crucial to avoid contamination or loss of evidence. This may involve cordoning off the area and controlling who has access to the crime scene. Documentation plays a central role in a scene assessment. This can include photographs, sketches, and detailed notes about the condition of the scene and the positions of evidence. Evidence collection involves identifying, recording, marking, packaging, and transporting evidence to preserve its integrity for lab analysis and possibly, use in court proceedings.
Apart from these core components, a scene assessment also takes into account other factors such as the time of the crime, location, any witnesses, type of crime committed, and environmental conditions. Each crime scene is unique, and as such, requires a unique approach for its assessment, but the components remain fundamentally consistent across all investigations.
Learn more about Scene Assessment here:https://brainly.com/question/34194009
#SPJ2
What are the four sources of law in the US legal system
The four sources of law in the US legal system are constitutional law, statutory law, administrative law, and common law.
constitutional law- The term "constitutional law" describes the body of legislation derived from the US Constitution. It lays out fundamental rights establishes the governing structure and principles and serves as the foundation for additional legislation.
Statutory Law: At the federal, state and local levels legislative bodies enact statutes. These laws which deal with issues like criminal offenses, civil rights, taxation and regulations are passed through the legislative process.
Administrative Law: Administrative agencies enact administrative laws in order to carry out and uphold statutory laws. To regulate particular businesses, occupations or areas of public interest, these agencies have the power to issue rules, regulations and directives.
Common Law: The legal precepts and precedents established by judicial decisions are referred to as common law. It is used in situations where there is no specific statute or regulation and is based on judicial interpretations of statutory and constitutional law. The accumulation of legal precedents over time is how common law develops.
learn more about US legal system here
brainly.com/question/32872846
#SPJ2
paragraph 3 states that overcrow cities and urban spawn have put more peolple and wild animals close
The rapid growth of urban areas has resulted in many challenges, one of which is the increasing proximity between people and wild animals.
How would you support your answer ?As cities expand and new suburbs are built, they often encroach on the habitats of wild animals. As a result, animals such as deer, coyotes, and raccoons are often found living in close proximity to humans. This can be particularly problematic for both people and animals. Wild animals can be a threat to human safety, particularly if they become aggressive or attack humans. On the other hand, people can also be a threat to wild animals, either intentionally or unintentionally.
For example, they may kill animals that they perceive as pests or encroach on their habitats. Moreover, the increasing proximity between people and wild animals can also increase the spread of diseases. Overall, it is crucial for policymakers to find ways to balance the needs of humans and wild animals in urban areas to minimize potential conflicts and protect both groups.
To know more about urban areas , visit :
https://brainly.com/question/4028801
#SPJ1
People perceive vertical and horizontal orientations more easily than other orientations according to the:
a) principle of size constancy.
b) oblique effect.
c) law of pragnanz.
d) law of good continuation.
People perceive vertical and horizontal orientations more easily than other orientations according to the oblique effect. (B)
The oblique effect is the phenomena that humans have more trouble perceiving stimuli that aren't straight up and down or side to side. The oblique effect is a phenomenon in perception science in which vertical and horizontal orientations are more quickly and accurately detected than oblique orientations.(B)
he oblique effect has been shown to be sensitive to many factors, including task, age, and visual experience. However, the origin of the oblique effect remains unknown.
In neuroscience, the oblique effect is described as the over-representation of vertical and horizontal orientations and a decrease in response to oblique orientations in cortical neurons.
To know more about oblique effect click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29140804#
#SPJ11
a car crash woke john from his afternoon nap. when he looked out his apartment window, he saw several people milling around two smashed cars. he decided not to dial 911 because he assumed someone had already called. john's reaction is an example of the bystander effect pluralistic compliance obedience to authority conformity to social norms dispositional attribution
A: conformity to social norms
B: obedience to authority
C: pluralistic compliance
D: the bystander effect
Answer: the bystander effect
The bystander effect is John's response to the car accident. (D)
He did not feel compelled to dial 911 because he assumed someone else had already done so.
The bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon in which individuals are less inclined to offer assistance in an emergency situation when others are present. The assumption is that someone else would intervene or assume responsibility for the situation.
The effect has been proven in several studies, and it is thought to occur due to the following reasons: diffusion of responsibility, social influence, and evaluation apprehension.Social norms refer to the unwritten rules that govern the behavior of a group of people. (D)
Conformity to social norms is when an individual adjusts their behavior, attitudes, or beliefs to align with those of a group. People frequently conform to social norms to be accepted, to feel good about themselves, or to avoid conflict.
However, if a person's opinions or values differ significantly from those of the group, conformity to social norms may be challenging, and individuals may opt for individualism instead.
To know more about bystander effect click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29775854#
#SPJ11
William Sheldon's attempt to link physical appearance to delinquency; he focused on somatotype (body type)
Sheldon believed there would be differences between the somatotypes of delinquents and nondelinquents
He identified three somatotypes: Endomorph, Mesomorph, and Ectomorph
He did not believe anyone was a pure endomorph, mesomorph, or ectomorph; he developed a system where levels could be measured
According to Sheldon, individuals with mesomorphic body structures are more likely to be delinquent, because body structure influences an individual's temperament, and mesomorphs are more aggressive and assertive than other body types
William Sheldon's attempt to link physical appearance to delinquency was highly controversial and has been largely discredited by modern research.
Sheldon believed that there would be differences between the somatotypes (body types) of delinquents and non-delinquents, and he identified three somatotypes: Endomorph, Mesomorph, and Ectomorph. He claimed that individuals with mesomorphic body structures were more likely to be delinquent because he believed body structure influenced an individual's temperament, and mesomorphs were more aggressive and assertive than other body types. However, modern research has not found a significant link between body type and criminal behavior, and many researchers have criticized Sheldon's methods and conclusions as biased and unscientific.
To know more about delinquency click here:
brainly.com/question/15578702
#SPJ4
Virtually all parties seeking Supreme Court review must petition the Court for a(n) _____, which commands the lower court to forward the trial records to the Court.criminal trial court proceeding.writ of certiorariforum non conveniens.
A party seeking Supreme Court review must petition the Court for a writ of certiorari, which commands the lower court to forward the trial records to the Court for a criminal trial court proceeding.
Learn more about writ of certiorari: https://brainly.com/question/12106865
#SPJ11
describe a political ideology being appealed to by president johnson by the speech in the scenario. frq
The political ideology being appealed to by President Johnson in the Great Society speech is liberalism.
What does President Johnson call for ?President Johnson's speech promoting the "Great Society" is appealing to a political ideology of liberalism. Liberalism is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual freedom, equality, and social justice, and advocates for government intervention to promote these values.
In the context of the Great Society, Johnson's speech outlines a vision for a society in which all citizens have access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities, and where poverty and discrimination are eliminated.
Find out more on the Great Society speech at https://brainly.com/question/14943137
#SPJ1
The missing part of the question references the Great Society speech by President Johnson.
if ministers fail to answer parliamentary in time, does it mean that they have abdicated their responsibilities?
Yes, Ministers who fail to answer questions in Parliament will face a public reprimand in the House.
What is a sanction imposed on adjudicated delinquents in order to prevent them from continuing to commit delinquent acts in the future?
The sanction imposed on adjudicated delinquents in order to prevent them from continuing to commit delinquent acts in the future is probation.
What is Probation?Probation is defined as the court-ordered conditional release of a convicted offender who, by obeying specific conditions of behavior, can avoid imprisonment. The primary objective of probation is to assist in the rehabilitation of the delinquent while also safeguarding society by enforcing court orders.
Probation allows the offender to live and work in the community while adhering to certain conditions. The conditions of probation are typically tailored to the offender's circumstances and the severity of the offense.
A probationer who violates the conditions of probation, such as by committing a new offense or failing to report to the probation officer, may have his or her probation revoked and be incarcerated. The objective of probation is to keep delinquents out of jail and to encourage them to reintegrate into society as responsible members.
Learn more about Probation here:
brainly.com/question/9567331
#SPJ11
the federal court system has exclusive jurisdiction over all but which of the following types of cases?
The federal court system in the United States is responsible for interpreting and enforcing federal laws and the US Constitution.
It is composed of various levels of courts, including district courts, appellate courts, and the Supreme Court. The federal court system has exclusive jurisdiction over certain types of cases, meaning that only federal courts can hear and decide these cases. However, there are some types of cases that do not fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts.
One type of case that does not fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts is state law cases. State law cases involve legal disputes that arise under state law and are generally heard in state courts. Examples of state law cases include contract disputes, family law matters, and criminal cases involving violations of state law.
Another type of case that does not fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts is cases involving small claims. Small claims courts are state courts that handle disputes involving small amounts of money, usually under $5,000. These courts are designed to be accessible to individuals who cannot afford to hire an attorney and are generally less formal than other courts.
Cases involving violations of local ordinances and zoning laws also generally fall under the jurisdiction of state or local courts, rather than federal courts. These cases involve disputes over issues such as property use, building codes, and noise violations.
In summary, while the federal court system has exclusive jurisdiction over many types of cases, including cases involving federal law, constitutional issues, and disputes between states, there are certain types of cases that fall outside of its jurisdiction. State law cases, small claims cases, and cases involving violations of local ordinances and zoning laws are typically heard in state or local courts.
learn more about US Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/28862908
#SPJ4
State legislatures define offenses and set punishments for their states and authorize local governing bodies to enact ____________ defining minor offenses and setting penalties.Ordinancesimpliedstare decisis
State legislatures define offenses and set punishments for their states and authorize local governing bodies to enact ordinances defining minor offenses and setting penalties.
An ordinance is a local law, passed by a city, county, or other local government body.
Ordinances usually address minor issues such as noise control, zoning, street parking, and other issues of local concern. These ordinances define offenses and set punishments that are usually less severe than those set by state legislatures.
Furthermore, local governing bodies may also be authorized to pass ordinances that can be enforced within their jurisdiction. This allows them to define minor offenses and set penalties, allowing them to maintain order within their local area.
To know more about governing bodies click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/6771907#
#SPJ11
acts as leader of departments within the executive branch called by?
Acts as leader of departments within the executive branch called by Cabinet Secretaries.
The heads of departments within the executive branch are generally called as the cabinet secretaries or simply secretaries. These individuals are appointed by the President of the United States and are responsible for overseeing and managing their respective departments, which include agencies, bureaus, and other offices that are part of the federal government. There are currently 15 Cabinet-level departments in the United States government, each led by a Secretary who is responsible for implementing the policies and programs of the President and Congress within their specific area of responsibility.
Therefore, the cabinet secretaries or simply secretaries are the people who leads the departments within the executive branch.
Learn more about Cabinet Secretaries :
https://brainly.com/question/29545701
#SPJ4
later, cad has second thoughts and files a lawsuit against zed to recover his car. a court would likely:
Later, Cad has second thoughts and files a lawsuit against Zed to recover his car. A court would likely direct Cad to request equitable relief when the law is unable to provide a monetary judgment.
A lawsuit is a legal action in which a person sues another person or entity to resolve a dispute. When one person files a lawsuit against another, it means that they believe they have been harmed by that person, and they are seeking legal remedies to hold the other person responsible for the damages.
This usually takes the form of a monetary award. The following are the most frequent forms of relief sought in civil litigation: Compensatory damages are damages awarded to the plaintiff to reimburse them for the actual financial loss incurred as a result of the defendant's misconduct. The main goal is to compensate the victim and restore them to the same position they were in before the wrongdoing occurred.
Punitive damages are monetary awards paid by a defendant to a plaintiff to punish them for outrageous or harmful behavior. They are not awarded in every case and are used to deter future similar behavior. Equitable relief: A court directs a person to do something, refrain from doing something, or change the way they are behaving.
This type of relief is normally used when the law is unable to provide a monetary judgment, and a court directs a party to seek equitable relief. Therefore, in the given case, A court would likely direct Cad to request equitable relief when the law is unable to provide a monetary judgment.
To know more about lawsuit refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30392587#
#SPJ11
These men argue that concepts such as individual freedom and democracy are so important, they are worth fighting for.
Values are important and not just abstract concepts for these men who argue that concepts such as individual freedom and democracy are so important, they are worth fighting for.
Individual freedom and democracy are two important factors of human society and are often the basis for how a society organizes itself and governs its people. Individual freedom gives people the right to decide for themselves to make choices without interference while democracy is a form of government in which the people have the right to choose their own leaders and make decisions about how their society is run. Hence these men wanted to argue that individuals must be willing to fight for these principles in order to ensure that their society is just, fair, and equal.
To learn more about democracy click here https://brainly.com/question/30812351
#SPJ1
complete question: For jake and Tyron, U.S. army veterans, _______ are not just abstract concepts. These men argue that concepts such as individual freedom and democracy are so important, they are worth fighting for.
which of the following sections of the united states constitution is most related to the case marbury v. madison (1803) ?
The section of the United States Constitution that is most related to the case Marbury v. Madison (1803) is Article III, which establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. Marbury v.
Madison is a landmark case in American law that established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. In the case, Chief Justice John Marshall argued that the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to interpret the law and determine the constitutionality of acts of Congress. This interpretation of the Constitution is rooted in Article III, which establishes the judicial branch as a co-equal branch of government with the power to interpret the law.
To know more about judicial click here:
brainly.com/question/30035277
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. every vehicle operated on your state roadways must be covered by___insurance through a company that is authorized to do business in your state.
Every vehicle operated on state roadways must be covered by insurance through a company that is authorized to do business in the state.
This insurance coverage is mandated to ensure that drivers are financially responsible in case of accidents or damage caused to others. The minimum insurance coverage required varies by state, but typically includes liability coverage, which covers the cost of damages or injuries caused by the insured driver to others. Some states may also require additional coverage such as personal injury protection or uninsured motorist coverage. It is important for drivers to obtain the required insurance coverage to avoid legal and financial consequences, such as fines, license suspension, or even lawsuits.
To learn more about insurance visit;
https://brainly.com/question/27822778
#SPJ4
California real estate disclosure forms include
A collection of legal documents known as California real estate disclosure forms gives details regarding the state of a property that is up for sale or lease in the state of California.
What must be disclosed in California real estate transactions?According to California law, sellers are only required to report existing flaws; they are not required to look for further issues or hire a professional inspector to look over the property.
What disclosure is needed by law?The Required Disclosure or Mandatory Disclosure clause outlines the conditions under which a party may divulge private information when forced to do so by a court or other government entity.
To know more about disclosure forms visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/13947342
#SPJ1
Question:
What California real estate disclosure forms are required to be filled out by sellers and/or their agents when selling a residential property, and what information do they typically include?
t/f prisons are violent mainly because they house large numbers of people who disobey social norms.
The given statement "prisons are violent mainly because they house large numbers of people who disobey social norms." is true because of diversity of inmates with varied criminal backgrounds in penitentiaries.
Due to the diversity of inmates with different criminal histories in prisons, prison violence occurs frequently. Inmate on inmate, inmate on guard (and vice versa), and self-inflicted are the three distinct types of attacks.
These carveouts undermine the impact of otherwise well-designed policies because more than 40% of those incarcerated and detained are there for "violent" offenses. Physical violence is the most prevalent type of violence in the prison system. Sexual violence is another prevalent type of violence in this setting.
In addition to adding to their trauma and exposure to violence, it also reinforces their disadvantage and fuels more crime and social harm. Additionally, the prison does very little to address the root causes of crime in communities.
Learn more about prison system at:
brainly.com/question/30267061
#SPJ4
the decision in miranda required the police to read suspects their miranda warnings when a suspect is and prior to .
The decision in Miranda v. Arizona required the police to read suspects their Miranda warnings when a suspect is in custody and prior to questioning.
What are the Maranda warnings?The Miranda warnings are a set of statements that inform a suspect of their constitutional rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.
The purpose of these warnings is to ensure that suspects understand their rights and to protect them from self-incrimination during custodial interrogations.
Failure to read Miranda warnings to a suspect prior to questioning can result in the suppression of any statements or confessions made during the interrogation in court.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona at:
https://brainly.com/question/4429252
#SPJ1
which of the following is a way to deal with the different status of detectives and patrol officers?
Use a community-policing model is a way to deal with the different status of detectives and patrol officers.The correct option is c.
An unwritten agreement between the police and the community known as "community-oriented policing" enables them to collaborate actively in order to prevent, identify, and creatively address localized crime and disorder in order to keep their neighborhood free of criminal activity.
Communities' differences matter just as much as their similarities. According to community policing, police must establish trusting bonds with every aspect of the community and focus on the fundamental concerns of quality of life and public safety. According to studies, the community-oriented policing model is the one that is most frequently employed by police departments throughout the country. Due to the fact that they have started introducing specific courses on community policing, police training institutions are extremely important. The correct option is c.
The question is incomplete, complete question will be " Which of the following is a way to deal with the different status of detectives and patrol officers?
a. Treat detectives with more respect than patrol officers.
b. Have detectives specialize in certain types of cases, such as robbery.
c. Use a community-policing model.
d. Pay detectives twice what patrol officers make."
Learn more about community-policing model at:
brainly.com/question/13085232
#SPJ4
discuss the differences between individualizing items of evidence and associative items of evidence?
Answer:
Individualizing evidence is evidence that can be linked to a specific person or thing, such as DNA or fingerprints. Associative evidence is evidence that does not have a direct link to a specific person or thing, but can be used to make connections or draw inferences, such as a witness testimony or surveillance footage. The main difference is that individualizing evidence can provide more direct and conclusive proof of a person's involvement, while associative evidence requires more interpretation and analysis to draw conclusions.
Explanation:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 prohibits unlawful discrimination in the workplace. It is located in Chapter 42 of the United States Code. It begins at section 2000e. If a lawyer was going to properly cite this statute, what would the Citation look like?
The policies passed in response to the Great Depression contributed to a change in which of the following earlier popular beliefs?
A. Big business should have significant influence over federal legislation.
B. Labor unions should have the sole power to negotiate with corporations.
C. Government should be noninterventionist during economic downturns.
D. Federal programs should contribute to the welfare of older Americans
The correct option is C) Government should be noninterventionist during economic downturns.
The Great Depression led to a shift in attitudes and beliefs about government intervention. The federal government passed a series of legislation, with the Social Security Act, that provided financial assistance to older Americans in 1930s. These programs were designed to protect the elderly from poverty and provide them with a financial safety net. Hence this shift in policy marked a major change from the earlier popular belief that government should remain noninterventionist during economic downturns. This marked a departure from the earlier popular belief that government should be noninterventionist during economic downturns.
To learn more about policy click here https://brainly.com/question/30812351
#SPJ1
when is student loan forgiveness supreme court decision date
Biden v. Nebraska and U.S. Department of Education v. Brown, two lawsuits involving the Biden administration's planned student loan forgiveness programme, were considered by the Supreme Court on February 28.
How long does it take to forgive student loans?If you haven't returned your loan in full after 20 years (assuming all of your loans were taken out for undergraduate studies) or 25 years, any remaining debt will be forgiven (if any loans were taken out for graduate or professional study).
How can I find out if my student loans will be discharged?How can I determine if I qualify for debt relief? Your yearly income must have been less than $125,000 (for people) or $250,000 to be eligible (for married couples or heads of households). You are qualified for up to $20,000 in debt relief if you were awarded a Pell Grant while in college and your salary is within the range.
Learn more about student loan
https://brainly.com/question/24501576
#SPJ4
Full Question: Student loan forgiveness supreme court decision date ?
true/false. find, cite and summarize an article where corporate directors or corporate officers were punnished for their bad actions with jail time, fines, or both
True. In 2020, former Nissan Motor Co. Chairman Carlos Ghosn was sentenced to more than four years in prison and ordered to pay a $6.5 million fine for financial misconduct during his time leading the company.
Ghosn was accused of underreporting his compensation and misusing company funds for personal gain.
The case against Ghosn was a high-profile example of corporate leaders being held accountable for their actions, and it drew attention to the growing trend of increased enforcement of corporate governance laws around the world. The case also highlighted the importance of transparency and accountability in corporate leadership, and the need for companies to have strong systems in place to detect and prevent financial misconduct.
Overall, the case against Ghosn is a powerful reminder that corporate directors and officers can face serious consequences for their actions, including jail time, fines, and damage to their reputations. This underscores the importance of strong corporate governance practices and a culture of ethical behavior throughout organizations at all levels.
To learn more about corporate directors visit;
https://brainly.com/question/14479663
#SPJ4
which constitutional principle did the supreme court decision in marbury v. madison strengthen?
The Supreme Court's decision in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) strengthened the constitutional principle of judicial review.
In this landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) , Chief Justice John Marshall and the Supreme Court held that the Court has the power to declare acts of Congress as unconstitutional. This decision established the principle of judicial review in this case , which is the power of the federal courts to determine the constitutionality of laws and executive actions.
By establishing the principle of judicial review, the Supreme Court upheld its authority as an equal branch of government and established an important control and check on the power of the other branches. This decision also helped to establish the role of the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of constitutional questions in the United States.
Learn more about judicial review :
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
