A semi-circular loop consisting of one turn of wire is place in the x-y plane. A constant magnetic field B=1.7T points along the negative z-axis(into the page), and a current I=0.7A flows counterclockwisefrom the positive z-axis. The net magnetic force on the circular section of the loop points in what direction? What is the net magnetice force on the circular section of the loop?

Answer:

Explanation:

Christian Huygens

Light Is a Wave!

Then, in 1678, Dutch physicist Christian Huygens (1629 to 1695) established the wave theory of light and announced the Huygens' principle.

Answer:

genus yds it's the

Explanation:

xmgxfjxfjxgdfjusufzjyhmfndVFHggssjtjhryfjftjsrhrythhrsrhrhsfhsgdagdah vhj

Answer and Explanation:

Data provided as per the question is as follows

Speed at point A = 20 m/s

Acceleration at point C = [tex]5 m/s^2[/tex]

[tex]r_A = 25 m[/tex]

The calculation of the magnitude of the acceleration at A is shown below:-

Centripetal acceleration is

[tex]a_c = \frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]

now we will put the values into the above formula

= [tex]\frac{20^2}{25}[/tex]

After solving the above equation we will get

[tex]= 16 m/s^2[/tex]

Tangential acceleration is

[tex]= \sqrt{ac^2 + at^2} \\\\ = \sqrt{16^2 + 5^2}\\\\ = 16.703 m/s^2[/tex]

Answer:

F = 2.7×10¯⁶ N.

Explanation:

From the question given:

F = (9×10⁹ Nm/C²) (3.2×10¯⁹ C × 9.6×10¯⁹ C) /(0.32)²

Thus we can obtain the value value of F by carrying the operation as follow:

F = (9×10⁹) (3.2×10¯⁹ × 9.6×10¯⁹) /(0.32)²

F = 2.7648×10¯⁷ / 0.1024

F = 2.7×10¯⁶ N.

Therefore, the value of F is 2.7×10¯⁶ N.

Answer:

 cost = $ 243.00

Explanation:

This exercise must assume that it uses a complete table for each piece, we can use a direct ratio of proportions, if 1 table is 0.20 m wide, how many tables will be 3.00 m

                 #_tables = 3 m (1 / 0.20 m)

                #_tables = 15 tables

Let's use another direct ratio, or rule of three, for cost. If a board costs $ 16.20, how much do 15 boards cost?

              Cost = 15 (16.20 / 1)

              cost = $ 243.00

Explanation:

Given that,

Linear speed of both disks is 5 m/s

Mass of disk 1 is 10 kg

Radius of disk 1 is 35 cm or 0.35 m

Mass of disk 2 is 3 kg

Radius of disk 2 is 7 cm or 0.07 m

(a) The angular velocity of disk 1 is :

[tex]v=r_1\omega_1\\\\\omega_1=\dfrac{v}{r_1}\\\\\omega_1=\dfrac{5}{0.35}\\\\\omega_1=14.28\ rad/s[/tex]

(b) The angular velocity of disk 2 is :

[tex]v=r_2\omega_2\\\\\omega_2=\dfrac{v}{r_2}\\\\\omega_2=\dfrac{5}{0.07}\\\\\omega_2=71.42\ rad/s[/tex]

(c) The moment of inertia for the two disk system is given by :

[tex]I=I_1+I_2\\\\I=\dfrac{1}{2}m_1r_1^2+\dfrac{1}{2}m_2r_2^2\\\\I=\dfrac{1}{2}(m_1r_1^2+m_2r_2^2)\\\\I=\dfrac{1}{2}\times (10\times (0.35)^2+3\times (0.07)^2)\\\\I=0.619\ kg-m^2[/tex]

Hence, this is the required solution.

Answer:

The electric field is [tex]E = 5.25 V/m[/tex]

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The peak magnitude of the magnetic field is  [tex]B = 17.5 nT = 17.5 *10^{-9}\ T[/tex]

Generally the peak magnitude of the electric field is mathematically represented as

         [tex]E = c * B[/tex]

Where c is the speed of light with value [tex]c = 3.0 *10^{8} \ m/s[/tex]

So

       [tex]E = 3.0 *10^{8} * 17.5 *10^{-9}[/tex]

       [tex]E = 5.25 V/m[/tex]

The peak magnitude of the electric field will be "5.25 V/m".

According to the question,

Magnetic field's peak magnitude, B = 17.5 nT or,

                                                           = 17.5 × 10⁻⁹ T

Speed of light, c = 3.0 × 10⁸ m/s

We know the relation,

→ E = c × B

By substituting the values, we get

      = 3.0 × 10⁸ × 17.5 × 10⁻⁹

      = 5.25 V/m

Thus the above approach is appropriate.

Find out more information about magnetic field here:

https://brainly.com/question/26257705

Answer:

C. 0.25J

Explanation:

Energy stored in the magnetic field of the inductor is expressed as E = 1/2LI² where;

L is the inductance

I is the current flowing in the inductor

Given parameters

L = 20mH = 20×10^-3H

I = 5A

Required

Energy stored in the magnetic field.

E = 1/2 × 20×10^-3 × 5²

E = 1/2 × 20×10^-3 × 25

E = 10×10^-3 × 25

E = 0.01 × 25

E = 0.25Joules.

Hence the energy stored in the magnetic field of this inductor is 0.25Joules

Answer:

a

   [tex]F = 67867.2 \ N[/tex]

b

  [tex]\Delta L = 2.6 \ mm[/tex]

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

      The Young modulus is  [tex]Y = 1.50 *10^{10} \ N/m^2[/tex]

      The stress is  [tex]\sigma = 1.50 *10^{8} \ N/m^2[/tex]

      The  diameter is  [tex]d = 2.40 \ cm = 0.024 \ m[/tex]

The radius is mathematically represented as

       [tex]r =\frac{d}{2} = \frac{0.024}{2} = 0.012 \ m[/tex]

The cross-sectional area is  mathematically evaluated as

        [tex]A = \pi r^2[/tex]

         [tex]A = 3.142 * (0.012)^2[/tex]

        [tex]A = 0.000452\ m^2[/tex]

Generally the stress is mathematically represented as

        [tex]\sigma = \frac{F}{A}[/tex]

=>     [tex]F = \sigma * A[/tex]

=>    [tex]F = 1.50 *10^{8} * 0.000452[/tex]

=>    [tex]F = 67867.2 \ N[/tex]

Considering part b

      The length is given as [tex]L = 26.0 \ cm = 0.26 \ m[/tex]

Generally Young modulus is mathematically represented as

           [tex]E = \frac{ \sigma}{ strain }[/tex]

Here strain is mathematically represented as

         [tex]strain = \frac{ \Delta L }{L}[/tex]

So    

       [tex]E = \frac{ \sigma}{\frac{\Delta L }{L} }[/tex]

        [tex]E = \frac{\sigma }{1} * \frac{ L}{\Delta L }[/tex]

=>     [tex]\Delta L = \frac{\sigma * L }{E}[/tex]

substituting values

       [tex]\Delta L = \frac{ 1.50*10^{8} * 0.26 }{ 1.50 *10^{10 }}[/tex]

       [tex]\Delta L = 0.0026[/tex]

Converting to mm

      [tex]\Delta L = 0.0026 *1000[/tex]

      [tex]\Delta L = 2.6 \ mm[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\huge \boxed{\mathrm{Option \ D}}[/tex]

Explanation:

Two forces are acting on the object.

Subtracting 2 N from both forces.

2 N → Object ← 5 N

- 2 N                 - 2N

0 N → Object ← 3 N

The force 3 N is pushing the object to the left side.

The mass of the object is 10 kg.

Applying formula for acceleration (Newton’s Second Law of Motion).

a = F/m

a = 3/10

a = 0.3

Answer:

photon density = 1.0 × [tex]10^{16}[/tex] photon/m³

Explanation:

given data

frequency f = 100 mhz = 100 × [tex]10^{6}[/tex] Hz

we consider here intensity I = 0.2 W/m²

solution

we take here plank constant is h i.e = 6.626 × [tex]10^{-34}[/tex] s

and take energy density is E

so here

E × C = I  

E = [tex]\frac{I}{C}[/tex]   ................1

here C = 3 × [tex]10^{8}[/tex] m/s

so photon density is

photon density = [tex]\frac{I}{C} \times \frac{1}{f \times h}[/tex]     ...............2

photon density = [tex]\frac{0.2}{3 \times 10^8} \times \frac{1}{100 \times 10^6 \times 6.626 \times 10^{-34} }[/tex]

photon density = 1.0 × [tex]10^{16}[/tex] photon/m³

Answer:

A) 2

Explanation:

Given;

magnetic field of the coil, B = 1.6 T

frequency of the coil, f = 75 Hz

maximum emf developed in the coil, E = 56.9 V

area of the coil, A = 0.15 m x 0.25 m = 0.0375 m²

The maximum emf in the coil is given by;

E = NBAω

Where;

N is the number of turns

ω is the angular velocity = 2πf = 2 x 3.142 x 75 = 471.3 rad/s

N = E / BAω

N = 56.9 / (1.6 x 0.0375 x 471.3)

N = 2 turns

Therefore, the value of N is 2

A) 2

Answer:

[tex]density \: = \frac{mass}{volume} [/tex]

1 / 5.587 is equal to 0.179 kg/m³

Hope it helps:)

Answer:

The answer is

Explanation:

Density of a substance is given by

[tex]Density \: = \frac{mass}{volume} [/tex]

From the

mass = 1 kg

volume = 5.583 m³

Substitute the values into the above formula

We have

[tex]Density \: = \frac{1 \: kg}{5.583 \: {m}^{3} } [/tex]

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer:

None of the above

Explanation:

The formula of the magnetic field of a point next to a wire with current is:

B = 2×10^(-7) × ( I /d)

I is the intensity of the current.

d is the distance between the wire and the point.

● B = 2*10^(-7) × (20/5) = 8 ×10^(-7) T

Answer:

F = 4212 N

Explanation:

Given that,

Mass of a car, m = 1300 kg

Speed of car on the road is 9 m/s

Radius of curve, r = 25 m

We need to find the magnitude of the unbalanced force that steers the car out of its natural straight-  line path. The force is called centripetal force. It can be given by :

[tex]F=\dfrac{mv^2}{r}\\\\F=\dfrac{1300\times 9^2}{25}\\\\F=4212\ N[/tex]

So, the force has a magnitude of 4212 N

Answer:

E = VdB

Explanation:

This is because canceling the electric and magnetic force means

q.vd. B= we

E= Vd. B

Answer:

The current is  [tex]I = 1420 \ A[/tex]

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  diameter of the wire is  [tex]d = 5.68 \ mm = 0.00568 \ m[/tex]

    The  magnetic field is  [tex]B = 0.100 \ T[/tex]

Generally the radius of the wire is mathematically evaluated as

       [tex]r = \frac{d}{2}[/tex]

substituting values

     [tex]r = \frac{ 0.00568}{2}[/tex]

     [tex]r = 0.00284 \ m[/tex]

Generally the magnetic field is mathematically represented as

       [tex]B = \frac{\mu_o * I}{ 2 \pi r }[/tex]

=>    [tex]I =\frac{ B * 2 \pi r }{\mu_o}[/tex]

Here [tex]\mu_o[/tex] is the permeability of free space  with value [tex]\mu_o = 4 \pi *10^{-7} N/A^2[/tex]

substituting values

=>     [tex]I =\frac{ 0.100 * 2 * 3.142 * 0.00284 }{ 4 \pi * 10^{-7}}[/tex]

=>     [tex]I = 1420 \ A[/tex]

Answer:

Frequency

Explanation:

When waves travel from one medium to another, it is only the frequency of the wave that remains constant . when a wave is refracted at the boundary between two media, the wave will slow down and its wavelength decreases. The wave usually bends at the interface between the two media. The wavelength and speed of a wave may change at the boundary between two media but its frequency remains the same.

Hence the frequency of light is its only property that remains constant.

Answer:

The wavelength is  [tex]\lambda = 589 nm[/tex]

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The  distance of the mirror shift  is  [tex]k = 0.233 \ mm = 0.233*10^{-3} \ m[/tex]

      The number of fringe shift is  n =  792

Generally the wavelength producing this fringes is mathematically represented as

               [tex]\lambda = \frac{ 2 * k }{ n }[/tex]

substituting values

              [tex]\lambda = \frac{ 2 * 0.233*10^{-3} }{ 792 }[/tex]

             [tex]\lambda = 5.885 *10^{-7} \ m[/tex]

            [tex]\lambda = 589 nm[/tex]

Answer:

The value of resistance of each resistor, R is 2.25 Ω

Explanation:

Given;

voltage across the three resistor, V = 1.5 V

power dissipated by the resistors, P = 3.00 W

the resistance of each resistor, = R

The effective resistance of the three resistors is given by;

R(effective) = R/3

Apply ohms law to determine the current delivered by the source;

V = IR

I = V/R

I = 3V/R

Also, power is calculated as;

P = IV

P = (3V/R) x V

P = 3V²/R

R = 3V² / P

R = (3 x 1.5²) / 3

R = 2.25 Ω

Therefore, the value of resistance of each resistor, R is 2.25 Ω

Answer:

380 kHz

Explanation:

The speed of sound is taken as 1500 m/s

The length of the fetus is 1.6 cm long

The condition is that the wavelength used must be at most 1/4 of the size of the object that is to be imaged.

For this 1.6 cm baby, the wavelength must not exceed

λ = [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] of 1.6 cm = [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] x 1.6 cm = 0.4 cm =

0.4 cm = 0.004 m   this is the wavelength of the required ultrasonic sound.

we know that

v = λf

where v is the speed of a wave

λ is the wavelength of the wave

f is the frequency of the wave

f = v/λ

substituting values, we have

f = 1500/0.004 = 375000 Hz

==> 375000/1000 = 375 kHz ≅ 380 kHz

Answer:

The number of turns in the secondary coil is 4145 turns

Explanation:

Given;

the induced emf on the primary coil, [tex]E_p[/tex] = 95 V

the induced emf on the secondary coil, [tex]E_s[/tex] = 875 V

the number of turns in the primary coil, [tex]N_p[/tex] = 450 turns

the number of turns in the secondary coil, [tex]N_s[/tex] = ?

The number of turns in the secondary coil is calculated as;

[tex]\frac{N_p}{N_s} = \frac{E_p}{E_s}[/tex]

[tex]N_s = \frac{N_pE_s}{E_p} \\\\N_s = \frac{450*875}{95} \\\\N_s = 4145 \ turns[/tex]

Therefore, the number of turns in the secondary coil is 4145 turns.

Answer:

the new length is 17.435cm

Explanation:

the new length is 17.435cm

pls give brainliest

The new length of aluminum rod is 17.435 cm.

The linear expansion coefficient is given as,

                      [tex]\alpha=\frac{L_{1}-L_{0}}{L_{0}(T_{1}-T_{0})}[/tex]

Given that, An aluminum rod 17.400 cm long at 20°C is heated to 100°C.

and linear expansion coefficient is [tex]25*10^{-6}C^{-1}[/tex]

Substitute,  [tex]L_{0}=17.400cm,T_{1}=100,T_{0}=20,\alpha=25*10^{-6}C^{-1}[/tex]

                   [tex]25*10^{-6}C^{-1} =\frac{L_{1}-17.400}{17.400(100-20)}\\\\25*10^{-6}C^{-1} = \frac{L_{1}-17.400}{1392} \\\\L_{1}=[25*10^{-6}C^{-1} *1392}]+17.400\\\\L_{1}=17.435cm[/tex]

Hence, The new length of aluminum rod is 17.435 cm.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/19495810

Answer:

Explanation:

In the given case for destructive interference , the condition is,

path difference = (2n+1)λ /2  where n is an integer and λ is wavelength

2 μ d = (2n+1)λ /2

Putting λ = 653 nm

for minimum thickness n = 0

2 μ d = 653 / 2 nm

= 326.5 nm

For constructive interference the condition is

2 μ d = n λ₁

326.5 nm = n λ₁

λ₁ = 326.5 / n  

For n = 1

λ₁ = 326.5 nm ,

or , 326.5nm .

Longest wavelength possible is 326.5

Answer:

They both have the same acceleration

Answer:

Fluoroscopy

Explanation:

A Fluoroscopy is an imaging technique that uses X-rays to obtain real-time moving images of the interior of an object. In its primary application of medical imaging, a fluoroscope allows a physician to see the internal structure and function of a patient, so that the pumping action of the heart or the motion of swallowing, for example, can be watched.

Answer:

the two ice skater have the same momentum but the are in different directions.

Paula will have a greater speed than Ricardo after the push-off.

Explanation:

Given that:

Two ice skaters, Paula and Ricardo, initially at rest, push off from each other. Ricardo weighs more than Paula.

A. Which skater, if either, has the greater momentum after the push-off? Explain.

The law of conservation of can be applied here in order to determine the skater that possess a greater momentum after the push -off

The law of conservation of momentum states that the total momentum of two  or more objects acting upon one another will not change, provided there are no external forces acting on them.

So if two objects in motion collide, their total momentum before the collision will be the same as the total momentum after the collision.

Momentum is the product of mass and velocity.

SO, from the information given:

Let represent the mass of Paula with [tex]m_{Pa}[/tex] and its initial velocity with [tex]u_{Pa}[/tex]

Let represent the mass of Ricardo with [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex] and its initial velocity with [tex]u_{Ri}[/tex]

At rest ;

their velocities will be zero, i.e

[tex]u_{Pa}[/tex] = [tex]u_{Ri}[/tex] = 0

The initial momentum for this process can be represented as :

[tex]m_{Pa}[/tex][tex]u_{Pa}[/tex] +  [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex][tex]u_{Ri}[/tex] = 0

after push off from each other then their final velocity will be [tex]v_{Pa}[/tex] and [tex]v_{Ri}[/tex]

The we can say their final momentum is:

[tex]m_{Pa}[/tex][tex]v_{Pa}[/tex] +   [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex][tex]v_{Ri}[/tex] = 0

Using the law of conservation of momentum as states earlier.

Initial momentum = final momentum = 0

[tex]m_{Pa}[/tex][tex]u_{Pa}[/tex] +  [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex][tex]u_{Ri}[/tex] =  [tex]m_{Pa}[/tex][tex]v_{Pa}[/tex] +   [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex][tex]v_{Ri}[/tex]

Since the initial velocities are stating at rest then ; u = 0

[tex]m_{Pa}[/tex](0) + [tex]m_{Pa}[/tex](0) = [tex]m_{Pa}[/tex][tex]v_{Pa}[/tex] +   [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex][tex]v_{Ri}[/tex]

[tex]m_{Pa}[/tex][tex]v_{Pa}[/tex] +   [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex][tex]v_{Ri}[/tex]  = 0

[tex]m_{Pa}[/tex][tex]v_{Pa}[/tex] = - [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex][tex]v_{Ri}[/tex]

Hence, we can conclude that the two ice skater have the same momentum but the are in different directions.

 B. Which skater, if either, has the greater speed after the push-off? Explain.

Given that Ricardo weighs more than Paula

So [tex]m_{Ri} > m_{Pa}[/tex] ;

Then [tex]\mathsf{\dfrac{{m_{Ri}}}{m_{Pa} }= 1}[/tex]

The magnitude of their momentum which is a product of mass and velocity can now be expressed as:

[tex]m_{Pa}[/tex][tex]v_{Pa}[/tex] =  [tex]m_{Ri}[/tex][tex]v_{Ri}[/tex]

The ratio is

[tex]\dfrac{v_{Pa}}{v_{Ri}} =\dfrac{m_{Ri}}{m_{Pa}} = 1[/tex]

[tex]v_{Pa} >v_{Ri}[/tex]

Therefore, Paula will have a greater speed than Ricardo after the push-off.

(A) Both the skaters have the same magnitude of momentum.

(B) Paula has greater speed after push-off.

Given that two skaters Paula and Ricardo are initially at rest.

Ricardo weighs more than Paula.

Let us assume that the mass of Ricardo is M, and the mass of Paula is m.

Let their final velocities be V and v respectively.

(A) Initially, both are at rest.

So the initial momentum of Paula and Ricardo is zero.

According to the law of conservation of momentum, the final momentum of the system must be equal to the initial momentum of the system.

Initial momentum = final momentum

0 = MV + mv

MV = -mv

So, both of them have the same magnitude of momentum, but in opposite directions.

(B) If we compare the magnitude of the momentum of Paula and Ricardo, then:

MV = mv

M/m = v/V

Now, we know that M>m

so, M/m > 1

therefore:

v/V > 1

v > V

So, Paula has greater speed.

Learn more about conservation of momentum:

https://brainly.com/question/2141713?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

A light beam incident on a diffraction grating consists of waves with two different wavelengths. The separation of the two first order lines is great if

the dispersion is great

Answer:

The magnification is  [tex]m = 12[/tex]

Explanation:

From the question  we are told that

   The object distance is [tex]u = 36.2 \ cm[/tex]

     The focal length is  [tex]v = 39.5 \ cm[/tex]

From the lens equation we have that

         [tex]\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{u} + \frac{1}{v}[/tex]

=>     [tex]\frac{1}{v} = \frac{1}{f} - \frac{1}{u}[/tex]

substituting values

       [tex]\frac{1}{v} = \frac{1}{39.5} - \frac{1}{36.2}[/tex]

       [tex]\frac{1}{v} = -0.0023[/tex]

=>   [tex]v = \frac{1}{0.0023}[/tex]

=>   [tex]v =-433.3 \ cm[/tex]

The magnification is mathematically represented as

         [tex]m =- \frac{v}{u}[/tex]

substituting values

        [tex]m =- \frac{-433.3}{36.2}[/tex]

         [tex]m = 12[/tex]

Answer:

The planet that is farther from the star must have a time period greater.

Explanation:

We can determine the ratio of the period's planet with the radius of the circular orbit in the star's equatorial plane:

[tex] T = 2\pi*\sqrt{\frac{r^{3}}{GM}} [/tex]     (1)

Where:

r: is the radius of the circular orbit of the planet and the star

T: is the period

G: is the gravitational constant

M: is the mass of the planet

From equation (1) we have:

[tex] T = 2\pi*\sqrt{\frac{r^{3}}{GM}} = k*r^{3/2} [/tex]   (2)          

Where k is a constant

From equation (2) we have that of the two planets, the planet that is farther from the star must have a time period greater.

I hope it helps you!