A football field has the shape of a rectangle with dimensions of 300 feet long and 160 feet wide. If a fan was to run diagonally from one end zone to the opposite end zone, how far would she run to the nearest foot? Enter only the number.

Answer:  sqrt(27.2) =approx 5.215

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between 2 points can be calculated using Phitagor theorem

L= sqrt( (x1-x2)²+(y1-y2)²)

Where x1, y1 are the coordinates of the first point and  x2, y2 are the coordinates of the 2-nd point.

L=sqrt((3.1-2.7)²+(0.3-(-4.9))²)= sqrt(0.4²+5.2²)=sqrt(27.2) - this is exact answer.

sqrt(27.2)=5.21536...=approx 5.215

Answer:

7.5 < x≤10.5

Step-by-step explanation:

14<2x−1≤20

Add 1 to all sides

14+1<2x−1+1≤20+1

15<2x≤21

Divide each side by 2

15/2 <2x/2 ≤21/2

7.5 < x≤10.5

Steps to solve:

14 < 2x - 1 <= 20

~Add 1 to everything

15 < 2x <= 21

~Divide 2 to everything

7.5 < x <= 10.5

Best of Luck!

Answer:

C=x (x+3)

Step-by-step explanation:

x cannot divide x+3 definitely so the denominators must be multiplied to get the least common denominator.

Answer:

Below.

Step-by-step explanation:

As both the right sides of the 2 equations are equal to y, by the transitive law of equality 3x + 1 = -2x + 3.

W then solve this equation for x then substitute this value of x  in the first equation ( y = 3x + 1) to find the value of y.  

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the first number be 'a' and the second number be 'b'. If the sum of the first and twice the second is 400 then;

a+2b = 400 ....

From the equation above, a = 400 - 2b ... 2

If the product of the numbers is a maximum then;

ab = (400-2b)b

let f(b) be the product of the function.

f(b) = (400-2b)b

f(b) = 400b-2b²

For the product to be at the maximum then f'(b) must be equal to zero i.e f'(b) = 0

f'(b)= 400-4b = 0

400-4b = 0

400 = 4b

b = 400/4

b = 100

Substituting b= 100 into the equation a = 400 - 2b to get a;

a = 400 - 2(100)

a = 400 - 200

a = 200

The two positive integers are 100 and 200.

Answer:

THe answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The distribution is  Poisson distribution

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   An expected number of fish was caught per hour is  1.5

The distribution that best characterize the number of fish you catch in one hour of fishing is the Poisson distribution

   This because generally the  Poisson distribution is a distribution that shows the number of times a given event will occur within a defined period of time

Answer:

12:12

Step-by-step explanation:

first add 3 hours to 7:30 which makes it 10:30

then add 47 min and it becomes 11:17

add 55 min to that and its 12:12

Answer:

The answer is

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the equation of the line using a point and slope we use the formula

where m is the slope

(x1 ,y1) is the given point

From the question

slope = 3/2

point = ( 2 , - 1)

Substitute these values into the above formula

That's

[tex]y + 1 = \frac{3}{2} (x - 2)[/tex]

[tex]y + 1 = \frac{3}{2} x - 3[/tex]

[tex]y = \frac{3}{2} x - 3 - 1[/tex]

We have the final answer as

[tex]y = \frac{3}{2} x - 4[/tex]

Hope this helps you

Answer:

y= 3/2x -4

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we are given a point and a slope, we can use the point-slope formula.

[tex]y-y_{1} = m(x-x_{1})[/tex]

where m is the slope and (x1, y1) is a point the line passes through.

We know the slope is 3/2 and the point we are given is (2, -1).

[tex]m=\frac{3}{2} \\\\x_{1} = 2\\\\y_{1} = -1[/tex]

Substitute the values into the formula.

[tex]y- -1 = \frac{3}{2} (x-2)[/tex]

[tex]y+1=\frac{3}{2} (x-2)[/tex]

We want to find the equation of line , which is y=mx+b ( m is the slope and b is the y-intercept). Therefore, we must get y by itself on the left side of the equation.

First, distribute the 3/2. Multiply each term inside the parentheses by 3/2.

[tex]y+1= (\frac{3}{2} * x) + (\frac{3}{2} *-2)[/tex]

[tex]y+1= \frac{3}{2}x + (\frac{3}{2} *-2)[/tex]

[tex]y+1=\frac{3}{2} x + -3[/tex]

[tex]y+1=\frac{3}{2} x -3[/tex]

Next, subtract 1 from both sides.

[tex]y+1-1=\frac{3}{2} x + -3 -1[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{3}{2} x + -3 -1[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{3}{2} x -4[/tex]

Now the line is in slope intercept form, therefore the equation of the line is y=3/2x -4. The slope of the line is 3/2 and the y-intercept is -4.

Answer:

X`= -0.60872 Y + 176.4085

or X`=   176.4085-0.60872 Y

Step-by-step explanation:

Country  Gold Value  Debt (% of GDP)

               ($ billions) X           Y                 XY          X²            Y²

China            63                 17.7              1115.1         3969       313.29

France         146                81.7              11928.2    21316       6674.89

Indonesia    203               83.2            16889.6    41209       6947.2

Germany       33               69.2             2283.6     1089          4788.64

Italy              147                 119              17493       21609        14161

Netherlands   36             63.7              2293.2      1296         4057.69

Russia           50                9.9              495            2500        98.01

Switzerland  62                   55            3410           3844         3025

United States 487             93.2           45,388.2      237169    8686.24      

∑                     1227           592.6          101245.9      334001      48751.96

The estimated regression equation that can be used to predict the debt of a country given the total value of its gold holdings

X =  a1 + bxy Y

wher e

bxy = n ∑XY -∑X∑Y/ n ∑Y²- (∑Y)²

= 9( 101245.9 )-  (1227 *592.6)/  48751.96-(592.6)²

911213.1 - 727120.2/ - 302422.8= - 0.60872

a1= X` -bxy Y`= 136.33- (-0.60872)(65.84)

= 136.33+ 40.07858= 176.4085

Hence X`= -0.60872 Y + 176.4085

or X`=   176.4085-0.60872 Y

Answer:

a) No sufficient evidence to support the claim that the two machines produce rods with different mean diameters.

b) P-value is 0.80

c)  −0.3939 <μ< 0.4939

Step-by-step explanation:

Given Data:

sample sizes

n1 = 15

n2 = 17

sample means:

x1 = 8.73

x2 = 8.68

sample variances:

s1² = 0.35

s2² = 0.40

Hypothesis:

H₀ : μ₁ = μ₂

H₁ :  μ₁ ≠ μ₂

Compute the pooled standard deviation:

[tex]s_{p} = \sqrt{\frac{(n_{1} - 1)s_{1}^{2} + (n_{2} - 1)s_{2}^{2}}{n_{1} +n_{2} -2} }[/tex]

    [tex]= \sqrt{\frac{(15-1)0.35+(17-1)0.40}{15+7-2}}[/tex]

    [tex]= \sqrt{\frac{(14)0.35+(16)0.40}{30}}[/tex]

 [tex]= \sqrt{\frac{4.9+6.4}{30}}[/tex]

 [tex]= \sqrt{\frac{11.3}{30}}[/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{0.376667}[/tex]

= 0.613732

= 0.6137

Compute the test statistic:

[tex]t = \frac{x_{1} -x_{2} }{s_{p} \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } } }[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{8.73-8.68}{0.6137\sqrt{\frac{1}{15}+\frac{1}{17} } }[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{0.05}{0.6137\sqrt{0.06667+0.05882} } }[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{0.05}{0.6137\sqrt{0.12549} } }[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{0.05}{0.6137(0.354246)} } }[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{0.05}{0.6137(0.354246)} } }[/tex]

= 0.05 / 0.217401

= 0.22999

t = 0.230

Compute degree of freedom:

df = n1 + n2 -2 = 15 + 17 - 2 = 30

Compute the P-value from table using df = 30

P > 2 * 0.40 = 0.80

P > 0.05 ⇒ Fail to reject H₀

Null hypothesis is rejected when P-value is less than or equals to level of significance. But here the P-value = 0.80 and level of significance = 0.05. So P-value is greater than significance level. Hence there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that population means are different.

Construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean rod diameter:

confidence = c = 95% = 0.95

α = 1 - c

  = 1 - 0.95

α = 0.05

Compute degree of freedom:

df = n1 + n2 -2 = 15 + 17 - 2 = 30

Compute [tex]t_{\alpha /2}[/tex] with df = 30 using table:

t₀.₀₂₅ = 2.042

Compute confidence interval:

= [tex](x_{1}-x_{2})-t_{\alpha/2} ( s_{p} )\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } }[/tex]

= (8.73 - 8.68) -  2.042 ( 0.6137 ) [tex]\sqrt{\frac{1}{15} +\frac{1}{17} }[/tex]

= 0.05 - 2.042 ( 0.6137 ) [tex]\sqrt{\frac{1}{15} +\frac{1}{17} }[/tex]

= 0.05 - 1.253175 [tex]\sqrt{0.06667+0.05882} } }[/tex]

= 0.05 - 1.253175 [tex]\sqrt{0.12549} } }[/tex]

= 0.05 - 1.253175 (0.35424))

= 0.05 - 0.443925

= −0.393925

= −0.3939

[tex](x_{1}-x_{2})+t_{\alpha/2} ( s_{p} )\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } }[/tex]

= (8.73 - 8.68) +  2.042 ( 0.6137 ) [tex]\sqrt{\frac{1}{15} +\frac{1}{17} }[/tex]

= 0.05 + 2.042 ( 0.6137 ) [tex]\sqrt{\frac{1}{15} +\frac{1}{17} }[/tex]

= 0.05 + 1.253175 [tex]\sqrt{0.06667+0.05882} } }[/tex]

= 0.05 + 1.253175 [tex]\sqrt{0.12549} } }[/tex]

= 0.05 + 1.253175 (0.35424))

= 0.05 + 0.443925

= 0.493925

= 0.4939

−0.3939 <μ₁ - μ₂< 0.4939

Answer:

[tex]y+6=-\frac{1}{2} (x-3)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Since point-slope form is  [tex]y-y1=m(x-x1)[/tex], you have to plug in the values given to you to create the equation. The "y1" is the "y" coordinate given to us, while the x1 is the x coordinate given to us. So, you have to plug in the x and y coordinates, 3 and -6, into the equation. Since two negatives cancel out to be a positive, y--6= y+6. The "m" stands for the slope, so -1/2 is inserted into the equation, giving us  [tex]y+6=-\frac{1}{2} (x-3)[/tex].

Answer:

d = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Distance formula: [tex]d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}[/tex]

d = sqrt[(1-4)^2+(-1-3)^2]

d = 5

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

distance =  square root of (1-4)^2 + (-1-3)^2

=> distance = square root of -3^2 +  (-4)^2

=> distance = square root of 9 + 16

=> distance = square root of 25

=> distance = 5

Answer:

[tex]t = 0.811\,s[/tex] contains the cheapest reference to sugar; [tex]t = 4.511\,s[/tex] contains the most expensive reference to sugar.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let be [tex]s(t) = -0.00003237\cdot t^{5} + 0.0009037\cdot t^{4}-0.008956\cdot t^{3}+0.03629\cdot t^{2}-0.04547\cdot t + 0.4778[/tex], the times when sugar is the cheapest and the most expensive (absolute minimum and maximum) are determined with the help of first and second derivatives of this function (First and Second Derivative Tests):

First Derivative Test

[tex]s'(t) = -0.00016185\cdot t^{4}+0.0036148\cdot t^{3}-0.026868\cdot t^{2}+0.07258\cdot t - 0.04547[/tex]

Let equalize the polynomial to zero and solve the resulting expression:

[tex]-0.00016185\cdot t^{4}+0.0036148\cdot t^{3}-0.026868\cdot t^{2}+0.07258\cdot t - 0.04547 = 0[/tex]

[tex]t_{1} \approx 9.511\,s[/tex], [tex]t_{2}\approx 7.431\,s[/tex], [tex]t_{3}\approx 4.511\,s[/tex] and [tex]t_{4}\approx 0.881\,s[/tex]

Second Derivative Test

[tex]s''(t) = -0.0006474\cdot t^{3}+0.0108444\cdot t^{2}-0.053736\cdot t+0.07258[/tex]

This function is now evaluated at each root found in the First Derivative section:

[tex]s''(9.511\,s) = -0.0006474\cdot (9.511\,s)^{3}+0.0108444\cdot (9.511\,s)^{2}-0.053736\cdot (9.511\,s)+0.07258[/tex]

[tex]s''(9.511\,s) = -0.015[/tex] (A maximum)

[tex]s''(7.431\,s) = -0.0006474\cdot (7.431\,s)^{3}+0.0108444\cdot (7.431\,s)^{2}-0.053736\cdot (7.431\,s)+0.07258[/tex]

[tex]s''(7.431\,s) = 6.440\times 10^{-3}[/tex] (A minimum)

[tex]s''(4.511\,s) = -0.0006474\cdot (4.511\,s)^{3}+0.0108444\cdot (4.511\,s)^{2}-0.053736\cdot (4.511\,s)+0.07258[/tex]

[tex]s''(4.511\,s) = -8.577\times 10^{-3}[/tex] (A maximum)

[tex]s''(0.811\,s) = -0.0006474\cdot (0.811\,s)^{3}+0.0108444\cdot (0.811\,s)^{2}-0.053736\cdot (0.811\,s)+0.07258[/tex]

[tex]s''(0.811\,s) = 0.036[/tex] (A minimum)

Each value is evaluated in order to determine when sugar was the cheapest and the most expensive:

Cheapest (Absolute minimum)

[tex]s(0.811\,s) = -0.00003237\cdot (0.811\,s)^{5}+0.0009037\cdot (0.811\,s)^{4}-0.008956\cdot (0.811\,s)^{3}+0.03629\cdot (0.811\,s)^{2}-0.04547\cdot (0.811\,s)+0.4778[/tex]

[tex]s(0.811\,s) = 0.460[/tex]

[tex]s(7.431\,s) = -0.00003237\cdot (7.431\,s)^{5}+0.0009037\cdot (7.431\,s)^{4}-0.008956\cdot (7.431\,s)^{3}+0.03629\cdot (7.431\,s)^{2}-0.04547\cdot (7.431\,s)+0.4778[/tex]

[tex]s(7.431\,s) = 0.491[/tex]

[tex]t = 0.811\,s[/tex] contains the cheapest reference to sugar.

Most expensive (Absolute maximum)

[tex]s(4.511\,s) = -0.00003237\cdot (4.511\,s)^{5}+0.0009037\cdot (4.511\,s)^{4}-0.008956\cdot (4.511\,s)^{3}+0.03629\cdot (4.511\,s)^{2}-0.04547\cdot (4.511\,s)+0.4778[/tex]

[tex]s(4.511\,s) = 0.503[/tex]

[tex]s(9.511\,s) = -0.00003237\cdot (9.511\,s)^{5}+0.0009037\cdot (9.511\,s)^{4}-0.008956\cdot (9.511\,s)^{3}+0.03629\cdot (9.511\,s)^{2}-0.04547\cdot (9.511\,s)+0.4778[/tex]

[tex]s(9.511\,s) = 0.498[/tex]

[tex]t = 4.511\,s[/tex] contains the most expensive reference to sugar.

The required values are,

[tex]t=0.881199[/tex] at the cheapest.

[tex]t=4.51081[/tex] at the most expensive.

A high point is called a maximum (plural maxima ). A low point is called a minimum (plural minima ).

Given equation is,

[tex]S(t) = -0.00003237t^5 + 0.0009037t^4- 0.008956t^3 + 0.03629t^2-0.04547t + 0.4778[/tex]

Differentiating the given equation we get,

[tex]S'(t)=-0.00003237\times 5t^4+0.0009037\times 4t^3-0.008956\times 3t^2+0.03629\times 2t-0.04547+0\\S'(t)=0\\-0.00003237\times 5t^4+0.0009037\times 4t^3-0.008956\times 3t^2+0.03629\times 2t-0.04547+0=0\\t=0.881199\\t=4.51081\\t=7.43087\\t=9.51137\\[/tex]

Now we can directly plug those fours values of t into given function S(t) to find which one gives max or minimum or you can also use the 2nd derivative test. Although that is not compulsory

[tex]t=0.881199,S(t)=0.46031095\\t=4.51081, S(t)=0.50278423\\t=7.43087, S(t)=0.49096762\\t=9.51137, S(t)=0.49832202\\[/tex]

We see that sugar is cheapest at [tex]t=0.881199[/tex] which is approx 1 and corresponds to the year [tex]1993+1=1994[/tex]

Similarly sugar is most expensive at [tex]t=4.51081[/tex] which is approx 5 and corresponds to year [tex]1993+5=1998[/tex]

Learn more about the topic Minimum or Maximum:

https://brainly.com/question/10359210

Answer:

k = 4 ; N = 106

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the result of the one way ANOVA :

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SS - - - - df - - MS - - - - - F

Between groups - 1,959.79 - 3 - - 653.26 - 21.16*

Error - - - - - - - - - - 3,148.61 - -102 --30.86

Total - - - - - - - - - - 5,108.41 - 105

To obtain the value of 'k' which is the number of groups observed :

The degree of freedom between groups or degree of freedom of treatment (DFT) is obtained by the formula:

Number of observed groups(k) - 1

DFT = k - 1

From the ANOVA result ; degree of freedom between groups = 3

Hence,

3 = k - 1

k = 3 +1 = 4

Hence, number of observed groups = 4

To obtain N;

N is related to k and the degree of freedom Error (DFE)

DFE = N - k

From the ANOVA result, DFE = 102 and k = 4

102 = N - 4

102 + 4 = N

N = 106

Answer:

3x+2+x-3+2x+1+2(2x+5)=360

10x+10=360

x=35

Answer:

Solution : Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

The first thing we want to do here is isolate the cos(t) and sin(t) for both the equations --- ( 1 )

x = - 3cos(t) ⇒ x / - 3 = cos(t)

y = 4sin(t) ⇒ y / 4 = sin(t)

Let's square both equations now. Remember that cos²t + sin²t = 1. Therefore, we can now add both equations after squaring them --- ( 2 )

( x / - 3 )² = cos²(t)

+ ( y / 4 )² = sin²(t)

_____________

x² / 9 + y² / 16 = 1

Remember that addition indicates that the conic will be an ellipse. Therefore your solution is option d.

Answer:

Bank A spending= $20

Bank B spending= $22.5

Bank A is cheaper with $2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Bank A charges $20 monthly fee for a checking account and debit card, with unlimited transactions.

Sheade 35 transactions.

Total charges from bank A

= $20 monthly

Bank B charged a $5 monthly fee for a checking account and debit card, plus

$ 0.50 for each transaction.

She made 35 transactions.

Total charges on bank B= $5 + (0.5)35

Total charges on bank B= $5+17.5

Total charges on bank B= $22.5

Answer:

Option 1: The terms in Pattern B is 4 times the corresponding terms of Pattern A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Pattern B has more then pattern A so option 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

3*(-2)=-6

-6+1=-5

So over the course of 15 holes, he had a COMBINED total of +1.

The three remaining holes, he scored -2 on each of them.

The golfer score -2 in the three remaining holes.

The unitary method is a method for solving a problem by the first value of a single unit and then finding the value by multiplying the single value.

It is given that the more negative the score, the better it is. A golfer's combined score for the 18 holes is -5.

The golfer score -2 on each of the several holes.

3*(-2)=-6

Then on all the other holes the golfer scored a combined total of +1.

-6+1 = -5

So, the course of 15 holes, he had a combined the total of +1.

Then the three remaining holes, he scored -2 on each of them.

Hence, the golfer score -2 in the three remaining holes.

Learn more about the unitary method;

https://brainly.com/question/23423168

#SPJ2

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

1+3=4

4 divided by 32 is 8

8 white ones

then 8-32 is 24

24 black ones

Answer:

The correlation of X and Y is 1.006

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

X: 2, 3, 5, 6

Y: 1, 2, 4, 5

n = 4

Required

Determine the correlation of x and y

Start by calculating the mean of x and y

For x

[tex]M_x = \frac{\sum x}{n}[/tex]

[tex]M_x = \frac{2 + 3+5+6}{4}[/tex]

[tex]M_x = \frac{16}{4}[/tex]

[tex]M_x = 4[/tex]

For y

[tex]M_y = \frac{\sum y}{n}[/tex]

[tex]M_y = \frac{1+2+4+5}{4}[/tex]

[tex]M_y = \frac{12}{4}[/tex]

[tex]M_y = 3[/tex]

Next, we determine the standard deviation of both

[tex]S = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x - Mean)^2}{n - 1}}[/tex]

For x

[tex]S_x = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x_i - Mx)^2}{n -1}}[/tex]

[tex]S_x = \sqrt{\frac{(2-4)^2 + (3-4)^2 + (5-4)^2 + (6-4)^2}{4 - 1}}[/tex]

[tex]S_x = \sqrt{\frac{-2^2 + (-1^2) + 1^2 + 2^2}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]S_x = \sqrt{\frac{4 + 1 + 1 + 4}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]S_x = \sqrt{\frac{10}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]S_x = \sqrt{3.33}[/tex]

[tex]S_x = 1.82[/tex]

For y

[tex]S_y = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (y_i - My)^2}{n - 1}}[/tex]

[tex]S_y = \sqrt{\frac{(1-3)^2 + (2-3)^2 + (4-3)^2 + (5-3)^2}{4 - 1}}[/tex]

[tex]S_y = \sqrt{\frac{-2^2 + (-1^2) + 1^2 + 2^2}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]S_y = \sqrt{\frac{4 + 1 + 1 + 4}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]S_y = \sqrt{\frac{10}{3}}[/tex]

[tex]S_y = \sqrt{3.33}[/tex]

[tex]S_y = 1.82[/tex]

Find the N pairs as [tex](x-M_x)*(y-M_y)[/tex]

[tex](2 - 4)(1 - 3) = (-2)(-2) = 4[/tex]

[tex](3 - 4)(2 - 3) = (-1)(-1) = 1[/tex]

[tex](5 - 4)(4 - 3) = (1)(1) = 1[/tex]

[tex](6-4)(5-3) = (2)(2) = 4[/tex]

Add up these results;

[tex]N = 4 + 1 + 1 + 4[/tex]

[tex]N = 10[/tex]

Next; Evaluate the following

[tex]\frac{N}{S_x * S_y} * \frac{1}{n-1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{10}{1.82* 1.82} * \frac{1}{4-1}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{10}{3.3124} * \frac{1}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{10}{9.9372}[/tex]

[tex]1.006[/tex]

Hence, The correlation of X and Y is 1.006

Answer:

I dont Know

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The value of x is 30°

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the outer angle of the parallelogram is 60 degrees. Therefore it's respective inner angle will be 180 - 60 = 120 degrees. And, by properties of a parallelogram, the angle opposite to this angle will be 120 degrees as well.

If we draw extend the line creating angle 2x, then we will make ( 1 ) a vertical angle to 2x, ( 2 ) a 90 degree angle, and ( 3 ) and angle that we can let be y. Therefore, 2x + y = 90, and 3x + y = 120.

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}2x+y=90\\ 3x+y=120\end{bmatrix}[/tex] ,

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}6x+3y=270\\ 6x+2y=240\end{bmatrix}[/tex] ,

[tex]6x+2y=240\\-\\\underline{6x+3y=270}\\y=30[/tex],  

[tex]2x + (30) = 90,\\2x = 60,\\x = 30[/tex]

Solution : x = 30°

Answer:

a) P(x<40) = 0.90824

Therefore, the percent of the women watch TV less than 40 hours per week is 0.90824 × 100 = 90.8240%

b)P(x>25) = 1 - P(z = -0.78) = 0.7823

Therefore, percent of the men watch TV more than 25 hours per week?is 0.7823 × 100 = 78.230%

c)The number of hours that the one percent of WOMEN who watch the most TV per week watch is for 44.485hours

While, for the MEN, the number of hours that the one percent of men who watch the most TV per week watch is for 40.883 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we would be using z score formula:

z = (x-μ)/σ,

where x is the raw score

μ is the population mean

σ is the population standard deviation.

a. What percent of the women watch TV less than 40 hours per week? (Round z-score computation to 2 decimal places and your final answer to 4 decimal places.)

z = (x-μ)/σ,

where x is the raw score = 40 hours

μ is the population mean = 34 hours

σ is the population standard deviation = 4.5

z = (40 - 34)/4.5

z = 1.33333

Approximately to 2 decimal places = z score = 1.33

Using the normal distribution z score table

Probabilty value from Z-Table:

P(z = 1.33) = P(x<40) = 0.90824

Therefore, the percent of the women watch TV less than 40 hours per week is 0.90824 × 100 = 90.8240%

b. What percent of the men watch TV more than 25 hours per week? (Round z-score computation to 2 decimal places and your final answer to 4 decimal places.)

z = (x-μ)/σ,

where x is the raw score = 25 hours

μ is the population mean = 29 hours

σ is the population standard deviation = 5.1

z = (25 - 29)/5.1

z = -0.78431

Approximately to 2 decimal places

z score = -0.78

Using the z score normal distribution table:

Probability value from Z-Table:

P(z = -0.78) = P(x<Z) = 0.2177

P(x>25) = 1 - P(z = -0.78) = 0.7823

Therefore, percent of the men watch TV more than 25 hours per week?is 0.7823 × 100 = 78.230%

c. How many hours of TV do the one percent of women who watch the most TV per week watch? Find the comparable value for the men. (Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)

First, we find what the z score is.

We were asked in the question to find how many hours 1% of the women watch TV the most.

We have to find the confidence interval

100 - 1% = 99%

The z score for the confidence interval of 99% or 0.99(in decimal form) = 2.33

z score = 2.33

Since we know the z score now, we proceed to find x = raw score.

z = (x-μ)/σ,

where x is the raw score = unknown

μ is the population mean = 34 hours

σ is the population standard deviation = 4.5

2.33= (x - 34)/4.5

Cross Multiply

2.33 × 4.5 = x - 34

10.485 = x - 34

x = 10.485 + 34

x = 44.485 hours.

Therefore, the number of hours that the one percent of women who watch the most TV per week watch is for 44.485hours

In the question, we were also asked to find the comparable value for men.

Hence, for one percent of the men.

We determine what the z score is.

We were asked in the question to find how many hours 1% of the men watch TV the most.

We have to find the confidence interval

100 - 1% = 99%

The z score for the confidence interval of 99% or 0.99(in decimal form) = 2.33

We already have our z score as 2.33

z = (x-μ)/σ,

where x is the raw score = unknown

μ is the population mean = 29 hours

σ is the population standard deviation = 5.1

2.33= (x - 29)/5.1

Cross Multiply

2.33 × 5.1 = x - 29

11.883 = x - 29

x = 11.883 + 29

x = 40.883 hours.

Therefore, the number of hours that the one percent of men who watch the most TV per week watch is for 40.883 hours

Answer:

The angle measures are 53.5° and 36.5°.

Step-by-step explanation:

We can create a systems of equations, assuming x and y are the angle measures.

Since the two angles are complementary, their angle measures will add up to 90.

x + y = 90

x - y = 17

We can now use the process of elimination, and end up with:

2x = 107

Dividing both sides by two gets us

x = 53.5

Substituting this value into an equation will get us y

53.5 + y = 90

y = 36.5

Hope this helped!

Step-by-step explanation:

Option A and B are the correct answer because it equal to 688.5 and 688.05

Answer:

it is 1377/2 and 688 1/17 thats the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

answer is 71.08745247

in mix form or in short form it is =

71/23/263

Answer:

10/9

Step-by-step explanation:

5x-15      4x+12

--------- * ------------

3x+9        6x-18

Factor

5(x-3)       4( x+3)

----------- * ----------

3(x+3)        6( x-3)

Cancel like terms

5/3 * 4/6

20/18

Divide top and bottom by 2

10/9

Answer:

0.22

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability distribution is the function which describes the likelihood of possible values assuming a random variable. The alkalinity of lake is determined by dividing the high shallow depthness by the total of lake alkalinity. The shallow depth is 209 and the total alkalinity of the lake is 966. By dividing the depthness with alkalinity we get 0.22.

209/966 = 0.219

approximately 0.22