Explanation:
it depends on the Mayor's behaviour and attitude
and how he does his job as a mayor
Q:3-Which of the following best describes the manned
security sector?
Mark one answer:
Using barriers and grills over windows and doors
Guarding property against destruction or damage, against
being stolen or against being otherwise dishonestly taken or
obtained
The use of CCTV equipment in a shopping mall
Using a steel gate to prevent people entering a construction
site
Answer:
m k;looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo'[;pk,l'lop;\ ;pol ;[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[l[lo
Explanation:
WHAT IS THE PROCESS IN WHICH A PERSON OPENLY REJECTS SOMETHING HE OR SHE WANTS BUT CANNOT OBTAIN OR ACHIEVE
Answer:
Reaction formation!
Explanation:
:)))))))))
Which of the following statement is true? a) Consideration need not be any particular value. b) Consideration should accord the deed of the person who is at the position to do it. c) Consideration may proceed the promise that the promise or promisor pass to each other. d) An act done at the desire of a third party is equal to consideration.
A state owned a large natural gas field and took bids for its exploitation. The highest bid came from an interstate pipeline company that distributed natural gas to providers throughout the country. A local gas company submitted the next highest bid, which included the commitment that it would pass along to local customers any savings if it was awarded the contract. The state awarded the contract to the local company. The interstate company sued to overturn this decision.
Should the interstate company prevail?
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
is democracy a type of government? Or is it just a law/rule of government? help me out yall pls
Answer:
Democracy, meaning "rule of the people", is a system of government in which the citizens exercise power directly or elect representatives from among themselves to form a governing body, such as a parliament. Democracy is sometimes referred to as "rule of the majority".
Explanation:
Based on the three elements of the contract intended to create a legal relationship, capacity and judgment, advise Sandhu if there is a prospect for him to recover the additional commission as promised. (15 marks)
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
There is a remote prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf.
1. One can conclude that the promise of extra commission was made under undue influence when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. We were not told that Sandhu did the job based on this additional commission. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended it to be legal.
3. There is a lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? There is absolutely no consideration from Sandhu.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached, signed, and sealed. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? Certainly not.
Imagine you just graduated with your criminal justice degree and landed a job at a police department in a major U.S. city—one experiencing the now very common issues we hear occurring every day in the news. The captain has asked you to come up with plans he/she wants you to share in a month with the entire department on how to improve policing for your new city—in particular, policing as it relates to black and brown communities.
Answer and Explanation:
A plan to improve policing in black and brown communities should start with training for police officers. This training should educate them about social issues related to these communities, as well as educate them to combat racist concepts and violent behavior that they may have towards these communities. Then, it would be necessary to establish a police patrol scheme, where officers would be separated into groups, which would patrol at different times, to combat possible crimes.
It would also be necessary to establish a strategy to combat drug trafficking that may exist in the region, since it is very common for crimes in disadvantaged communities to be related to trafficking.
These strategies should always take into account police action based on justice and not prejudice or racism, as the police should establish peace and prosperity in the community and not terrorize citizens.
hội nghị trao đổi thông tin là gì ?
Answer: Trao đổi thông tin hoặc chia sẻ thông tin có nghĩa là mọi người hoặc các thực thể khác truyền thông tin từ người này sang người khác. Điều này có thể được thực hiện bằng điện tử hoặc thông qua các hệ thống nhất định. Đây là những thuật ngữ có thể đề cập đến việc truyền thông tin hai chiều trong viễn thông và khoa học máy tính hoặc truyền thông được nhìn từ quan điểm lý thuyết hệ thống hoặc lý thuyết thông tin. Như, "thông tin", trong ngữ cảnh này luôn đề cập đến dữ liệu (điện tử) mã hóa và đại diện cho thông tin có sẵn, một phương pháp xử lý rộng hơn có thể được tìm thấy trong quá trình trao đổi dữ liệu.
Explanation:
Flashing blue lights are prohibited as their use is strictly reserved for which of these?
Leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), but only if there are major injuries to others or private property.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
The Uniform Code of Military Justice refers to the legal system which governs all the members of the military of the United States of America. It covers a number of legal issues from the apprehension and the confinement of military personnel to the regulations covering courts of the military appeals.
It defines criminal offenses under military system.
The German Law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice has strict laws against road accidents.
Incase of a accident, the drive must stay at the scene. If the driver leaves the scene, a serious criminal offense will be register against him of hit and run. The driver must stay and turn on the emergency flashers and also put up the warning triangle.
Thus the answer is TRUE.
It is A. TRUE that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense under German law and the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
What is UCMJ?The United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) applies to soldiers and other members of the armed forces when they are on active duty or on recall to active duty. It requires that these military personnel do not abandon victims of accidents at the scene.
Even the German law forbids persons from abandoning victims of accidents.
Thus, it is true that leaving the scene of an accident is a serious offense both under the German law and Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Learn more about the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) at https://brainly.com/question/6545593
mCours
days must register their vehidets).
Question 2:
Select the best answer from the multiple choices below
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than
29
03
13
30
300
were
Posto
mpleted
answered
answered
answered
answered
answered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
unanswered
21 answered
22. Unanswered
23 Unanswered
Suhant Exam for Crossing
Time remaining to complete exam in minutes): 180
wered
Answer:
It's 90 days but u don't have that a optionExplanation:
90 days
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than 90 days must register their vehicles. If you are a new Texas resident, you are allowed to drive with your valid and unexpired licence from another U.S. state, U.S territory or a Canadian province for up to 90 days after moving here.
Answer: I don’t know how to answer this question
Explanation:
there is also no possible question, sorry
18. Which technique provides a smooth transition from acceleration to braking? A. Skid braking B. Cover braking C. Squeeze braking D. Gentle braking
Answer:
D
Explanation:
when the car weight transfers to the front end, the nose of the car is pointing down. easing off the brake will the nose back up making the braking smooth.
Discuss what traits successful law enforcement leaders have. If you had to select one most important characteristic of a law enforcement leader, explain which characteristic you would select. Defend and be specific. Of the common errors made by those who manage, supervise and lead, explain which has the most potential for the most ill effects on a department. Give examples and support your decision.
Answer and Explanation:
A successful leader must be someone who is incorruptible, fair, tolerant and egalitarian, who does his job in a peaceful, correct and progress-promoting way, free from prejudice. The absence of prejudice and the ability to act in a peaceful manner are the main characteristics that a police leader must present. This is because a police leader who has these characteristics serves as an example to other police officers, who can shape their work and behavior to be less violent professionals and who judge people correctly, without considering racism and prejudice.
Within a department, corruption is the most harmful characteristic among legal professionals. This corruption takes away from the sense of fairness that is so essential within a police department. An example of this can be seen in corrupt police officers who facilitate illegal activities of powerful people, but fight and destroy black families and other social minorities based only on prejudice.
How soon after the conviction for driving while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs shall it be reported to the FAA and to which division should this be reported to?
Answer:
Within 60 days to the civil aviation security division
Explanation:
You have to report to the security and hazardous materials safety office which is under the civil aviation security division. Anybody that is holding any certificates under part 61 has to give a written report of every motor vehicle action that has to do with alcohol or drug-related, to the security personnel's in faa no later than 60 days after this action was done.
Now that you have listened to the first chapter of Common Sense, what do you think of Paine's philosophy? Particularly, what do think about how he views the government? Do you think he is right or wrong, and why?
Công ty TNHH Hết hạn có 03 thành viên. Công ty muốn phát hành cổ phần vào tháng 12/2021 để chuyển đổi thành công ty cổ phần. Nhận định nào sau đây đúng? Tất cả đều đúng. "Được vì đây là trường hợp để chuyển thành công ty cổ phần", Bạn học giỏi nhất lớp nói. "Không được vì Công ty TNHH không được phát hành cổ phần trong mọi trường hợp", Chiên gia nói.
Answer:
Tôi khá chắc chắn là "Được rồi.".
Explanation:
Ram has just sold his share in a company and decided to buy a new car for his wife. On 15 April 2019, Ram appointed Gan as his agent to buy a car at the price not exceeding RM 75,000. The next day, Gan went to see Song, a car dealer and booked a car at the price of RM 85,000 and paid the deposit of RM 8,500. Gan told Song that the car was meant for Ram’s personal use. Song gave Gan RM 500 as a commission for booking the car with him. One month after the booking date, Song sent the car to Ram and claimed for the balance purchase price of the car. Ram told Song that he has never authorized Gan to purchase the car at that price and refused to accept the car. Advise Ram with regards to his rights as a principal. 2. Describe the circumstances under which a principal cannot revoke/ terminate the authority of his agent.
Answer:
Principal and Agent
1. Rights of the Principal:
a. The principal can enforce the various duties of an agent.
b. The principal can recover compensation for any breach of duty by the agent.
c. The principal can forfeit agent’s remuneration where the agent is guilty of misconduct in the agency business.
d. The principal is entitled to any extra profit that the agent has made out of his agency. This includes the illegal gratification of RM500 that Song paid to Gan.
2. Circumstances under which the principal cannot revoke/terminate the authority of his agent are:
a. The agent has performed his authority partially.
b. When the agency is coupled with a legal interest in the agency and the interest has not been realized by the agent or the interest has not expired.
Explanation:
a) Some facts of the case:
Principal = Ram
Agen = Gan
Car dealer = Song
Authority limit for the purchase of the car = RM 75,000
Actual amounted booked for the car by the agent = RM 85,000
Deposit for the car = RM 8,500
Commission received from Song by Gan = RM 500
b) Gan did not actually act in the best interest of his principal, Ram, who gave him limited authority to buy a car at a price not exceeding RM 75,000. It looks like Gan was more interested in the commission (bribe) that he received from Song instead of performing his duties as an agent to Ram. If the agency authority is written down, Ram can use it as evidence that Gan's authority was limited.
A gardener, a citizen of State A, sues a homeowner, a citizen of State B, in a State A federal court seeking damages for breach of contract. It would not violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution for a State A federal court to hear the case. However, State A's long-arm statute would not grant a State A state court jurisdiction over the homeowner.
Required:
Can the State A federal court exert personal jurisdiction over the homeowner?
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
The answer is "No" because, in the given scenario, the Federal Court has little ownership of the property. In line with the Rules of Civil Procedure, that's used to explains the process and how plaintiffs need to exhibit their arguments by a court or decision. In this the States, A lengthy statute needs to be applied, therefore the Federal judges apply the law of the civil procedure law.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to a. whatever is reasonable. b. the new terms of the acceptance. c. none of the terms. d. the terms of the original offer.
D. The terms of the original offer.
Dona offers to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Erma responds that she will pay that price if Dona’s TV set is included. Neither party is a merchant. Their contract is formed according to the terms of the original offer. Thus, option (d) is correct.
What is contract?
An agreement between two or more people to do something is referred to as a contract. Two or more parties must agree to the terms of the agreement in order to create a legally binding commitment. A contract was the deal with the two parties are the agreed to the terms and the conditions.
Dona is offered the to sell her used sofa, chair, coffee table, end table, and lamp to Erma for $700. Ema was the suggested to also add the TV set are the pay for $700. The terms according to case are the original offer. Original Offer are those type of the contract are the purchased to the all the items or asset to the other parties.
Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ2
how does the criminal justice system deals with vulnerable groups such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex ( LGBTQI) community amongst others when they are victims of hate crimes
Answer:
depending on the country of justice system implementation we are talking about, some countries protect their rights as minorities while others prohibited the prevalence of such groups
Answer:by using the law
Explanation:
Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Courtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
what are the elements of access control
Answer: Identification: For access control to be effective, it must provide some way to identify an individual. ...
Authentication: Identification requires authentication. ...
Authorization: The set of actions allowed to a particular identity makes up the meat of authorization.
Explanation:
You are an off-duty officer who has just completed a three-mile run. You decide to cool off and rest under a big oak tree. You sit down under the tree and see a brown wallet close by. Curiosity gets the best of you, and you open the waller. Interestingly enough, you find credit cards, identification, and $300 in cash. Nobody else is around. What would you do?
what search on seizure and how it is conducted?
Answer:
Search and seizure, practices engaged in by law enforcement officers in order to gain sufficient evidence to ensure the arrest and conviction of an offender. The latitude allowed police and other law enforcement agents in carrying out searches and seizures varies considerably from country to country. There is considerable variance in the amount of protection given to the individual rights of the accused person.
which one of the following statements regarding the right to freedom of association is correct?
1)An employer may give an employee a bonus as exchange for him or her not exercising the right to freedom of association.
2)Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unioun.
3)The right of workers to freedom of association is only protected in terms of the constitution.
4)Close shop agreement are unconstitutional as the infringe workers right to freedom of association.
Answer:
The correct answer is 2. Freedom of association for worker entails the right to form and join trade unions.
Explanation:
The freedom of association is a fundamental right for groups of people, which has been formulated in various places. This fundamental right is sometimes used in conjunction with the freedom of assembly.
With the emergence of the new, large and important class in the form of industrial workers, there was a greater awareness of the essence of freedom, which was reflected in freedom of speech, freedom of the press and thus freedom of association. At that time it was about the principle that workers and other citizens can unite in a group (trade unions, political parties) that promote the interests of this group of people. Freedom of association is a logical feature of a liberal vision because it represents the ultimate means of exerting (political) pressure on government and society. Without this right one would not have been able to participate in the governance of a country or company. That is why this right became essential for the formation of a democratic, liberal state.
Who must be properly licensed and receive general awareness/familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazmat
Answer:
All Hazmat (hazard materials) employees must be properly licensed and receive general awareness and familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazardous materials.
Explanation:
This unique training is called the "HAZMAT Familiarization and Safety in Transportation" course. The course aims to provide the following trainings: applicability and responsibility, emergency response, general awareness/familiarization, and security awareness. HAZMAT employees learn the hazard class (gas, liquid, explosive, etc.) and what each class is capable of doing. This knowledge allows the HAZMAT employee to safely transport or store hazardous materials and to correctly respond to emergencies that they could face. The training also enables HAZMAT employees to safely control and contain a HAZMAT accident, thereby protecting the general public.
Country B has a GDP of $1 trillion and a GDP per capita of $27,000. Its economy is a mix of manufacturing, high tech, services, aviation, agriculture, and mining. It has laws favorable to entrepreneurship and private sector growth. It has multinational corporations that have recently begun outsourcing jobs overseas, resulting in a rise in unemployment. Look for factors that will help you determine what type of economy exists in Country B. Which type of economy does Country B have?
Answer:
The answer is "GDP and GDP per capita are also the increased concentrations of economic growth".
Explanation:
In the developed country, growth and security are high. These are evaluated on a per meter and per person gross national savings, which would represent the whole value of all finished products and services generated for a specific time within a certain nation.
In developing countries, low infant mortality, long average lifespan, improved levels of use, great work as well as the exportation of goods are additional characteristics.
In this situation, you can see that GDP is fairly high and it gives us information that must be acknowledged as just a nation to its advanced economy.
Answer:
A. developed
Explanation:
i got it right on edge
Phân tích cấu trúc pháp lý của quy phạm pháp luật sau:
“ người nào sản xuất, buôn bán hàng giả là thuốc chữa bệnh, thuốc phòng bệnh, thì bị phạt tù từ 02 năm đến 07 năm”’
Trích khoản 1, điều 194 bộ luật hình sự Việt Nam. Tội sản xuất, buôn bán hàng giả là thuốc chữa bệnh, thuốc phòng bệnh.
Answer:
Analyze the legal structure of the following legal norm:
Any person who manufactures or trades in counterfeit goods being curative or preventive drugs shall be sentenced to between 2 and 7 years of imprisonment.
Excerpt from Clause 1, Article 194 of Vietnam's penal code. Crime of producing and trading in counterfeit goods being curative and preventive drugs.
Explanation:
I don't know the answer but I am helping those people who doesn't understand vetnamese...they could understand this
Answer:
Người nào sản xuất, buôn bán hàng giả là thuốc chữa bệnh, thuốc phòng bệnh, thì bị phạt tù từ 02 năm đến 07 năm.
2. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù từ 05 năm đến 12 năm:
a) Có tổ chức;
b) Có tính chất chuyên nghiệp;
c) Tái phạm nguy hiểm;
d) Lợi dụng chức vụ, quyền hạn;
đ) Lợi dụng danh nghĩa cơ quan, tổ chức;
e) Buôn bán qua biên giới;
g) Hàng giả tương đương với số lượng của hàng thật hoặc hàng hóa có cùng tính năng kỹ thuật, công dụng trị giá từ 150.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng;
h) Thu lợi bất chính từ 100.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng;
i) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của người khác mà tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể từ 31% đến 60%;
k) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản từ 100.000.000 đồng đến dưới 500.000.000 đồng.
3. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù từ 12 năm đến 20 năm:
a) Hàng giả tương đương với số lượng của hàng thật hoặc hàng hóa có cùng tính năng kỹ thuật, công dụng trị giá 500.000.000 đồng trở lên;
b) Thu lợi bất chính từ 500.000.000 đồng đến dưới 2.000.000.000 đồng;
c) Làm chết người;
d) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của người khác mà tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể 61% trở lên;
đ) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của 02 người trở lên mà tổng tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể của những người này từ 61% đến 121%;
e) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản từ 500.000.000 đồng đến dưới 1.500.000.000 đồng.
4. Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp sau đây, thì bị phạt tù 20 năm, tù chung thân hoặc tử hình:
a) Thu lợi bất chính 2.000.000.000 đồng trở lên;
b) Làm chết 02 người trở lên;
c) Gây thương tích hoặc gây tổn hại cho sức khỏe của 02 người trở lên mà tổng tỷ lệ tổn thương cơ thể của những người này 122% trở lên;
d) Gây thiệt hại về tài sản 1.500.000.000 đồng trở lên.
5. Người phạm tội còn có thể bị phạt tiền từ 20.000.000 đồng đến 100.000.000 đồng, cấm đảm nhiệm chức vụ, cấm hành nghề hoặc làm công việc nhất định từ 01 năm đến 05 năm hoặc tịch thu một phần hoặc toàn bộ tài sản.
6. Pháp nhân thương mại phạm tội quy định tại Điều này, thì bị phạt như sau:
a) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 1 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 1.000.000.000 đồng đến 4.000.000.000 đồng;
b) Phạm tội thuộc một trong các trường hợp quy định tại các điểm a, b, c, e, g, h, i và k khoản 2 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 4.000.000.000 đồng đến 9.000.000.000 đồng;
c) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 3 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 9.000.000.000 đồng đến 15.000.000.000 đồng;
d) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại khoản 4 Điều này, thì bị phạt tiền từ 15.000.000.000 đồng đến 20.000.000.000 đồng hoặc đình chỉ hoạt động có thời hạn từ 01 năm đến 03 năm;
đ) Phạm tội thuộc trường hợp quy định tại Điều 79 của Bộ luật này, thì bị đình chỉ hoạt động vĩnh viễn;
e) Pháp nhân thương mại còn có thể bị phạt tiền từ 100.000.000 đồng đến 300.000.000 đồng, cấm kinh doanh, cấm hoạt động trong một số lĩnh vực nhất định hoặc cấm huy động vốn từ 01 năm đến 03 năm.
'न्यायपालिकाको महत्व,कानुन सुसासनको निम्ति' यो शिर्षकमा निबन्ध लेख।
Answer:
Judicial power is The court system that interprets and enforces the law (apply the law) on behalf of the state. The judiciary is also a mechanism for dispute resolution. Under the doctrine of segregation, the judiciary often does not make laws. (Which is the responsibility of the legislature) or enforce the law (which is the responsibility of the administration), but interpret the law and apply the law to the facts of each case. The judiciary is often tasked with ensuring equal justice under the law. It usually consists of the supreme court of final appeal, known as the "supreme court" or "constitutional court", together with the lower courts.
In a wrongful death action for the death of his wife in an automobile accident, the plaintiff alleged that the accident was caused by a mudflap assembly that fell off the defendant's truck. The plaintiff wishes to introduce the testimony of a witness, another truck driver who was on the same highway at the time, who heard someone tell the defendant over CB radio that he had noticed at the truck stop that the defendant's mudflap assembly on his truck was loose. The witness does not know the identity of the person who gave the warning. Should the court admit the testimony
Answer: Yes. The court should admit the testimony.
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the court should admit the testimony in order to prove that the defendant was aware about the fact that the mudflap assembly was loose.
This can be infered from the information given from the testimony of
the witness, whom was another truck driver who was on the same highway at the time, as he heard someone tell the defendant over CB radio that he had noticed at the truck stop that the defendant's mudflap assembly on his truck was loose.
