A federal statute prohibits discrimination based on age for all persons between the ages of 50 and 70 in matters relating to employment. A state constitutional provision requires that all state judges retire at the age of 65. A judge in the state trial court reached his 65th birthday, and the governor of the state named his replacement. The judge refused to retire and brought suit in federal court to enjoin the governor from replacing him on the bench. Who is likely to prevail in the lawsuit
Answer:
A Federal Statute and a State Constitutional Provision
The judge is likely to prevail in this case.
Explanation:
In any matter where the federal statute prohibiting age discrimination conflicts with a state constitutional provision, the U.S. Constitution or the federal statute will prevail. This means that based on this conflict, the state constitutional provision will be declared unconstitutional and unenforceable. The reason is that federal statutes or the U.S. Constitution takes priority over all other laws. Therefore, the judge will prevail in the lawsuit and prevent the state governor from replacing him.
15. The House of Representatives has the special power to
If you have been convicted of murder in a federal district court, and you appeal your conviction to a regional Court of Appeals, you will certainly get your case overturned by the federal appellate court based on the fact that you presented new evidence before a jury in an appellate court, new evidence not heard in you trial that absolutely proves you are innocent.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
1. Vehicles driving in the opposite direction on a multi-lane highway with opposite lanes separated by a raised barrier do not have to stop for school buses.
what is special crime investigation
Answer:
a investigación de delitos es el proceso por el cual se descubre al autor de un delito, cometido o planeado.
Explanation:e spero que te ayude xd
The number of cases filed in the Supreme Court
a. has remained the same since 1940.
b. increased between 1940 and 1965 but has decreased since 1965.
c. has increased dramatically since 1940.
d. decreased between 1940 and 1965 but has increased since 1965.
Answer:
D. decrease between 1940 and 1965 but has increase since 1965.
Explanation:
The number of law suits and filed cases in Supreme Court has increase after 1965. Earlier than that the number of cases filed in Supreme Court were very few and usually the high court decides and provides the judgement regarding the case. After 1965, people started filing an appeal of review to Supreme court over the decision of High Court.
What makes someone a "Civic Role Model?" People are certain to have a variety of opinions about this topic.
Explanation:
A "civic role model," in my perspective, is someone who expresses their views to the public in order to assist people see the positive side of things. They must be goal-oriented, a good leader, assertive, humble, and convey a positive message to their audience in order to achieve their objectives. Many civic life experiences provide us with a legacy that we may use to our daily lives.
Which of the following is not a goal of the interrogation process?
to provide information for use by prosecutors in possible court action
to obtain a conviction of the person suspected of committing the crime
to gather information that enables investigators to arrive at logical conclusions
to obtain an admission of guilt from the person suspected of committing the crime
Answer:
I believe the answer is B. To obtain a conviction of the person suspected of committing the crime.
Explanation:
While the ultimate goal of an interrogation would be for it to lead to a conviction of a person suspected of committing a crime, that is not the present goal of an interrogation. Additionally, an interrogation suspect might be innocent so a interrogator should not be entering an interrogation looking to force a conviction.
Which of the following is an argument?
It's going to rain today because the meteorologist says it will.
If it rains, then I won't go outside.
Everyone should experience standing out in the rain.
Rainy days are the best. I like to put on a sweater and read a good book.
A meteorologist is termed as a scientist who employs scientific concepts to understand, comprehend, analyze, and estimate the country's environmental occurrences, as well as how the weather influences the planet and life on earth. A meteorologist is another term for someone who works in this field.
The correct answer in regard to the context is It's going to rain today because the meteorologist says it will.
This is the correct answer because it states the best example of the argument denying the fact or the universal realities or facts. An argument is termed as the collection of words called premises or propositions that are used to establish the degree of truth of another statement, the conclusion, in logic and philosophy.
The formal shape of argumentation in basic language can be reflected in a symbol's precise manner, and clearly specified "assertions" in mathematics and computer engineering can be produced irrespective of basic language.
To know more about the happenings of the argument, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/2495254
critically examine any ethical system or code (e.g., a religious cod or system used in business or any of the professions), and show how each of the do/ don'ts of this code apply to the various aspects of morality
Answer:
I am writing on principal of disclosure in business ethics. As per the principal, a finance professional shall not disclose his or hr clients personal information to someone other, for his or her own personal benefit. This concept directly relates to general morality as one should not use others confidential and resources for personal gain.
Although this code prohibits disclose but in case, the professional gets to know something illegal happening, then he or she is obliged to disclose that data to concerned authorities.
A protester entered an IRS office during business hours. He denounced the income tax and set fire to pages from his copy of the Internal Revenue Code. The fire was extinguished before it caused any other damage. The protester was arrested and charged with violating a state law that prohibited igniting a fire in a public building. He claimed that his prosecution was unconstitutional under the First Amendment. May the protester constitutionally be convicted?
Answer:
The protester can constitutionally be convicted for frustrated arson since he only lit and burnt the tool.
Explanation:
Arson can be destructive. As a crime, arson is grievous and hateful. There is inherent and manifest wickedness in committing arson, which is a federal crime. Destructive arson carries a life sentence. The protest looks like a desperate demonstration of unsound mental health. However, the protester will be convicted for frustrated arson, which carries a reduced sentence.
Chấp hành quy phạm pháp Luật Hành chính luôn dẫn đến áp dụng quy phạm pháp Luật Hành chính. là dúng hay sai
If you are involved in a collision, what should you do?
Answer:
1. Assist the Injured.
2. Control the Scene.
3. Notify the Police and Submit a Report.
4. Document the Scene and Exchange Information.
5. Notify Your Insurance Carrier.
6. Get Your Vehicle Repaired.
7. Unattended Vehicle or Property.
the criminal justice does not include which of the following
Police
Courts
Corrections
Crime scholars
If U.S. law discriminates against a particular class of persons in order to achieve a critical, compelling state interest, it must pass the __________ test in order to be lawful.
Answer:hate crime I think
Explanation:
Dany is an international trader in computer. In June 2018 he wrote a proposal to his most frequent client, Alan, saying that he was offering to sell 100 motorbikes, XYZ brand, latest version for US$1000/a motorbike. The detail description of a motorbike was in the Exhibit A attached with the contract.Alan immediately responded that he accepted the proposal, but he was only willing to receive the good in a safe and sound condition. Decide what are the legal nature of Dany's proposal and Alan’s reply?
Answer to the following question is as follows;
⇒ The Legality of Danny's Proposal;
In this case, Danny's proposal is regarded an offer until it is approved by Alan in the market. As Danny's promised to sell 100 motorcycles for US$1000 each.The proposal from Danny's perspective is an offer since Alan did not acknowledge the agreement in the beginning. Once acknowledged by Allen, this exchanging of bikes becomes an offer.⇒ Allan's response;
Allan's response, on the other hand, was interpreted as offer and acceptance because no agreement was reached among them and Allan takes the bike only when it is in good shape. If the bikes are not in excellent condition, Allen has the right to decline the seller's contract at any moment.Learn more about "Legal proposal"
https://brainly.com/question/13460236?referrer=searchResults
with the adaption of the rebellion, people reject both the goal and the means of reaching the goal but replace them with different goals and means of reaching them
1. true
2. false
Answer: True
Explanation:
Rebellion occurs when an individual rejects the society and culturally defined goals and means and then replaces such goals with the culturally unacceptable ones.
According to the strain theory states, people may deviate when there is an inconsistency between the culturally defined goals and the means that are accessible to obtain those goals and this inconsistency can lead to violence, crime etc.
What is the schedule for the California border patrol tomorrow what time they start and leave please help it would mean a lot my grandmother is sick and need to visit her with any of the mean men
Answer:I think the start at 9 AM and leave At 7 PM
Explanation:
Which statement applies to civil cases but not to criminal cases?
A. The person accused of breaking the law is called the defendant
B. The prosecution presents evidence that a defendant is guilty.
C. The case begins when a plaintiff makes an accusation in a
lawsuit.
O D. Ajury is given the power to decide the outcome of the case.
A jury is given the power to decide the outcome of the case by the way of majority votes in a civil case, but not in a criminal case. Therefore, the option D holds true.
What is the significance of the powers of a jury?Jury is a body of members who are involved in a court case in order to decide whether the decision of the court shall go in a favor or against the claims made by a plaintiff. A defendant is allowed to put his views in front of the jury.
The jury has the powers to entertain the matters related only to civil cases, but not in criminal cases, as the guilty mind of a criminal activity is determined a judge of the court based upon the regulations provided under the law.
Hence, the option D holds true and states about the powers of a jury to decide the outcome of the case.
Learn more about the powers of jury here:
https://brainly.com/question/10379635
#SPJ2
Explain the legal parameters for patient rights and the role that Dr. S and Dr. V play in protecting those rights.
Answer:
The legal parameters for patient rights are set by HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1966).
The laws give the patient some bills of rights, which cannot be denied to any person of sound mind.
These rights include the right to be treated respectfully and without discrimination, rights of privacy and personal access to medical records, rights of treatment refusal and choice, and the right to informed consent.
Explanation:
These patient rights ensure that Dr. S and Dr. V practice medicine ethically. They cannot divulge a patient's medical information without her consent. Every treatment and test to be administered to the patient must go with her consent. Dr. S and Dr. V cannot deny the patient access to her medical records. They are also not permitted to transfer her medical records to another person or institution without the patient's authorization. Dr. S and Dr. V must discuss the treatment and test, including any other information with the patient, to obtain her full consent before taking any action. They cannot bill the patient without discussing the cost of treatment.
justify why political parties should have intra party elections
Answer:
Political parties must have intra-party elections because this allows a greater democratic exercise for the members of each political party, who through real political participation can participate in the internal determinations of their parties, especially in the appointment of candidates.
Thus, in addition, they allow greater transparency in the decision-making of each group, as it is shown that the decisions are made jointly by all the members of the party.
Your class D license expires:
•December 31st
•On your birthday, every five years
•On Christmas Day
•None of these
The purpose of an interview is to
obtain information.
search a suspect.
arrest a suspect.
stop a suspect.
Answer:
Choice A. Search a suspect.
Explanation:
During an interview the interviewer is trying to prove information out of the interviewee as they are trying to understand/gather/obtain any sort of evidence that can be used to develop a strong hole-proof case.
Question 1: Does this new law violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? If it does, what section(s) and why?
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, I provided explanations about the Charter of Rights and Freedoms law.
Explanation:
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms law is a law applied in Canada, which was first signed as law dating back to the year 1982. It basically consists of laws meant to safeguard the rights and freedoms of citizens, such as their:
freedom of expression,right to equality, andright to privacy, etc.If I am riding a motorcycle in a state that has a helmet law, however, I am riding on a road that is owned and maintained by the Federal Government, such as a road in a Federal park that is governed by the Department of Interior. Am I required to wear a helmet?
Answer:
yes you are required to wear helmet because it is for your safety not for others.
Categories under ECOA on which creditors may not base credit decisions
Answer:
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation's consumer protection agency, enforces the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), which prohibits credit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, or because you get public assistance
example of special crime investigation
Answer:
it concentrates more physical evidence its collection handing identification
In cities, about _____ of every _____ _______ killed by motor vehicle crashes are ___________; in rural areas, the rate is about ______ of every ____.
What is the most important requirement to perform a legal search?
suspicion
reasonable cause
probable cause
related cause
Answer:
Choice C. Probable Cause
Explanation:
Probably cause gives legal standing to conduct a search, having to receive a court ordered warrant is the main factor that allows for legal search.
Even though security training varies from agency to agency, for which of the following jobs might a trained private security officer be qualified?
private investigator
gaming surveillance officer
a New York security guard with a firearm permit
loss prevention security officer
