1. The most obvious similarity between the two documents is their intended purpose. Both of these Bills of Rights are expressly designed to amend the constitution of each nation and act as a living document to spell out various legal matters, particularly rights and liberties.
2. The UN upholds the same 5 basic rights such as: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.
3. Democracy, based on the rule of law, is ultimately a means to achieve international peace and security, economic and social progress and development, and respect for human rights – the three pillars of the United Nations mission as set forth in the UN Charter. At the 2005 World Summit, all the world’s governments reaffirmed “that democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives” and stressed “that democracy, development, and respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing”. Democratic principles are woven throughout the normative fabric of the United Nations. The 2009 Guidance Note on Democracy of the Secretary-General sets out the United Nations framework for democracy based on universal principles, norms and standards and commits the Organization to principled, coherent, and consistent action in support of democracy.
The correct set of striking similarities between the rights of the UN document and the fundamental rights of the citizens of the US are that under Freedom, Petition, Amendment of the constitution.
These three similarities are found in not only the rights of the UN and the US but in most of the countries' following the way of constitutional governance.
Fundamental Rights The fundamental rights of the articles include freedom of speech, freedom of movement, right to press, right to information, right to conduct business, etc. These rights are universally applicable and contained in the documents of most of the countries and also in the UN document. US follows constitutional democracy in its governance, and it enables that the rights can be amended and revoked by the Supreme Court at any such time it may deem fit.Hence, the rights as mentioned above in the paraphrase are the similar fundamental rights contained in the UN documents as well as the Bill of Rights as per US Constitution.
Learn more about fundamental rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
Due within 15 minutes. Please help.
Define intent and describe the types of intent which must exist to constitute a crime. Explain how intent may be proven and give two examples.
Answer:
The three common-law intents ranked in order of culpability are malice aforethought, specific intent, and general intent. Specific intent is the intent to bring about a certain result, do something other than the criminal act, or scienter. General intent is simply the intent to perform the criminal act.
Explanation:
The Constitution gives each branch of government different powers through checks and balances
and separation of powers. Define both checks and balances and separation of powers, and
explain why you think it is important for our government to have both of these.
Answer: Its important for the branches of government to have these because it stops one branch from being too powerful and allows the branches to keep watch on one another
Explanation: for example congress passes a law but the supreme court finds it unconstitutional example of separation of power and checks and balances
These are crucial for the government's branches to have because they prevent one branch from becoming overly dominant and enable the branches to keep an eye on one another.
What is separation of powers?The founding fathers included the "separation of powers" principle into their ideas for the American government as a result of their reading of Enlightenment political philosophy. Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu, coined the phrase "separation of powers." (Most often, he is simply referred to as "Montesquieu. The Spirit of the Laws, a significant work of political theory he wrote, was published in 1748.
In his discussion of the best ways for governments to operate, Montesquieu argued that the executive, legislative, and judicial powers of the government should be distributed among its various branches so that no one individual.
Thus, they prevent one branch from becoming overly dominant
For more details about separation of powers, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12108126
#SPJ5
The states still retain much power and authority, but there are 5 things that the state are expressly forbidden to do. Which of the following are amping those things
Answer:
you'll go to jail
Explanation:
Officers Jack and Daniels witness a suspect breaking into a parked car on the Bellevue College campus and observe him removing a purse from the front seat. The suspect then runs down the street and the officers follow him. The suspect then runs into a neighboring apartment and refuses to allow the officers into his apartment, claiming that they need a search warrant. Is the suspect correct
Answer:
The suspect is not correct.
Explanation:
It is true that police officers can only enter an apartment with a search warrant. However, federal law makes an exception for cases of flagrante delicto where the police have to chase a suspect and he enters an apartment to seek shelter, as shown in the above question. In that case, the police could, in fact, enter the apartment even without the search warrant and make the arrest of the miscreant.
If an employee is injured in an automobile accident while she is driving to an off-premises restaurant during her personal lunch hour, the injury is?