x is an acute angle. Find the value of x in degrees.
cos(x)= 1/2

Stuck on this one, thank you!

The missing side is 30.

Three line segments that cross at three non-collinear locations to form a triangle constitute a triangle in geometry. The triangle's three line segments are referred to as its sides, and its three points of intersection as its vertices.

A triangle is a three-sided polygon formed by three line segments intersecting at three non-collinear points, and it can be classified based on the length of its sides and the measure of its angles.

Given figure, there are two lines ate parallel, that's why two triangles are similar triangle.

Assume that the missing side is x.

So that side ratio in similar triangle are equal;

14/20 = 21/x

So, x = 30.

Therefore, the missing side x is 30

To know more about triangle, visit:

https://brainly.in/question/17424774

#SPJ1

Triangle Three line segments that cross at three non-collinear locations to form a triangle constitute a triangle in geometry. According to the question the missing side is 30.

Three line segments that cross at three non-collinear locations to form a triangle constitute a triangle in geometry. The triangle's three line segments are referred to as its sides, and its three points of intersection as its vertices. A triangle is a three-sided polygon formed by three line segments intersecting at three non-collinear points, and it can be classified based on the length of its sides and the measure of its angles.

Given figure, there are two lines ate parallel, that's why two triangles are similar triangle.
Assume that the missing side is x.
So that side ratio in similar triangle are equal;
14/20 = 21/x

So, x = 30.
Therefore, the missing side x is 30

To know more about triangle, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1058720
#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]v = \frac{7}{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

ADC & BCD are congruent triangles (by SAS postulate). Since triangle ADC & BCD are congruent according to the SAS postulate, we may utilize CPCTC to determine that section AC is equal to segment BD.

In arithmetic progression, the triangles 3: 4: 5 are the only ones with edges. Pythagorean triple-based triangles are Herodian, which means they have integer areas and sides.

The easiest approach I've found to know for sure if an aspect is 90 degrees is to use the 3:4:5 triangle. According to this rule, a triangle is said to be a right triangle if one of its sides is 3 and the other is 4.

To know more about Triangles visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29083884

#SPJ1

Answer:

m = -5/8

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope = rise/run or (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

Points (-1, -7) (-9, -2)

We see the y increase by 5 and the x decrease by 8, so the slope is

m = -5/8

Answer

6255 pounds

8.34×750=6255lbs

Method to list all non-isomorphic trees on n vertices is to add edges to a single vertex tree. Using A, B, C, D, E, we list 5 non-isomorphic trees on 6 vertices.

A by-hand method to give a list of all non-isomorphic trees on exactly n vertices is to start with a tree on n vertices and then generate all possible trees by adding edges between vertices that are not already connected.

For example, to find all non-isomorphic trees on 4 vertices, we can start with a single vertex and then add edges to form a tree with 2 vertices, then add edges to form a tree with 3 vertices, and finally add edges to form a tree with 4 vertices. We can then check each tree for isomorphism by comparing their adjacency matrices.

Using the method from (a), we can find all non-isomorphic trees on exactly six vertices by starting with a single vertex and adding edges until we have a tree on six vertices.

To ensure that we generate all possible trees, we can use the following five vertices: A, B, C, D, E. We can then generate all trees by adding edges between vertices that are not already connected, making sure to avoid creating cycles. After generating all trees, we can check for isomorphism by comparing their adjacency matrices.

The resulting list of non-isomorphic trees on six vertices, in alphabetical order, is shown. The tree 1 and tree 2 are the same. Also, trees 3, 4, and 5 are not isomorphic to each other or to trees 1 and 2.

To know more about non-isomorphic trees:

https://brainly.com/question/29994833

#SPJ4

a)There are total 25 data values so for the given data, 100% data lies within 3 standard deviations of mean.

b). Second graph demonstrates that there is strong linear relationship between the theoretical and sample quantities

a) Here we have μ=61.52 and [tex]\sigma=4.58[/tex]

The 68-95-99.7% rule states that 68% of the data must be within one standard deviation of the mean. Thus, 68% of the data should fall between 61.52-4.58=56.94 and 61.52+4.58=66.1. 19 data values in the provided data are within one standard deviation of the mean. As there are a total of 25 data points, 76% of the data for the given data (19/25)*100=1 standard deviation of the mean.

The 68-95-99.7% rule states that 95% of the data should be within two standard deviations of the mean.

Specifically, 95% of the data should fall between 61.52+2*4.58=70.68 and 61.52-2*4.58=52.36. 24 data values in the provided data are within two standard deviations of the mean.

As there are a total of 25 data points, (24/25)*100=96% of the data for the given data is contained within two standard deviations of the mean.

The 68-95-99.7% rule states that 99.7% of the data should be within three standard deviations of the mean.

It follows that 99.7% of the data should fall between 61.52+3*4.58=75.26 and 61.52-3*4.58=47.78. 25 data values in the provided data are within three standard deviations of the mean.

As there are a total of 25 data points, (25/25)*100=100% of the data falls within three standard deviations of the mean for the given data.

Although not exactly, it appears that the distribution of height follows a normal distribution.

b) Both graphs demonstrate that the height distribution is essentially normal. Second graph demonstrates that there is strong linear relationship between the theoretical and sample quantities.

To learn more about normal distribution link is here:

brainly.com/question/29509087

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Heights of female college students. Below are heights of 25 female college students.

(a) The mean height is 61.52 inches with a standard deviation of 4.58 inches. Use this information to determine if the heights approximately follow the 68-95-99.7% Rule.

(b) Do these data appear to follow a normal distribution? Explain your reasoning using the graphs provided below.

5 years longer then Bill, 2x5=10.

10+2=12.

12-5=7

Hoang has be there for 12 years. Bill has for 7 years.

The graph illustrates the linear inequality [tex]y > x - 2[/tex] and [tex]x - 2y < 4[/tex].

The equation-like form of the formula 5x 4 > 2x + 3 has an arrowhead in lieu of the equals sign. That is an illustration of inequity. This shows that the left half, 5x 4, is bigger than the right part, 2x + 3. Finding the x numbers where the inequality holds true is what we are most interested in.

In mathematics, "inequality" means the connection between two reactions or values that is not equal to one another. As either an outcome, inequality occurs because of an imbalance.

We can see that the shaded region is above the line [tex]y = x - 2[/tex], which represents the inequality [tex]y > x - 2[/tex]. Additionally, the shaded region is below the line [tex]x - 2y = 4[/tex], which represents the inequality [tex]x - 2y < 4[/tex].

As a result, the graph's representation of a linear inequality arrangement is as follows:

[tex]y > x - 2[/tex] and [tex]x - 2y < 4[/tex]

To know more about inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ1

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

The objective function that must be minimized is:

z = 40x + 50y

subject to the constraints:

0x + 4y ≥ 4 (protein constraint)

3x + 2y ≥ 11 (carbohydrate constraint)

2x + 4y ≤ 16 (fat constraint)

We want to find the number of ounces of fruit (x) and nuts (y) that will meet the requirement with the least number of calories.

Solving the system of inequalities, we get:

x = 2 ounces

y = 2 ounces

Therefore, the dietician should use 2 ounces of fruit and 2 ounces of nuts. These amounts will have a total of 180 calories (402 + 502).

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's assume we need x ounces of fruit and y ounces of nuts to meet the requirements with the least number of calories. Then, the problem can be expressed as an optimization problem:

Minimize: 40x + 50y (since we want to minimize the number of calories) Subject to:

0x + 4y ≥ 4 (we need at least 4 units of protein)3x + 2y ≥ 11 (we need at least 11 units of carbohydrates)2x + 4y ≤ 16 (we cannot have more than 16 units of fat)

To solve this problem, we can use the simplex method. First, we convert the problem to standard form by introducing slack variables:

Minimize: 40x + 50y Subject to:

0x + 4y + s1 = 43x + 2y + s2 = 112x + 4y + s3 = 16

Now we can create the initial simplex tableau:

xys1s2s3RHSs1041004s23201011s32400116z-40-500000

We want to find the minimum value of z, so we need to choose the variable with the most negative coefficient in the bottom row as the entering variable. In this case, that is y. We then choose the variable with the smallest non-negative ratio between the right-hand side and the coefficient of the entering variable in its row as the leaving variable. In this case, that is s3, since 16/4 = 4 is the smallest non-negative ratio.

We then perform the pivot operation to eliminate the coefficient of y in the other rows:

     x  y  s1s2s3RHSs1001-214y3/2101/2-1/24s2-1001-1/25z-100025-15200

We repeat this process until all the coefficients in the bottom row are non-negative. The final tableau is:

x

On the fifth day there were 4 tοmatοes left tο be sοld. Jοann had 71 tοmatοes tο begin with.

Prοbability is a measure οf the likelihοοd οr chance οf an event οccurring. It is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that the event is impοssible, and 1 indicates that the event is certain tο οccur.

Let's wοrk backwards frοm the last day and figure οut hοw many tοmatοes Jοann had οn the fοurth day.

On the fifth day, there were 4 tοmatοes left tο be sοld, which means she sοld half οf what was left οn the fοurth day. Sο she must have started with 8 tοmatοes οn the fοurth day (since half οf 8 is 4).

On the fοurth day, she sοld half οf what was left, which means she had 16 tοmatοes befοre she sοld any.

On the third day, she sοld 12 tοmatοes, which means she had 28 tοmatοes befοre she sοld any.

On the secοnd day, she sοld half οf what was left, which means she had 56 tοmatοes befοre she sοld any.

Finally, οn the first day, she sοld 15 tοmatοes.

Therefοre, Jοann had 71 tοmatοes tο begin with.

To learn more about probability from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

Using the discriminant of the quadratic equation, the temperature will part after 50 minutes

The temperature of the machine part is given by the equation:

T = -0.005x^2 + 0.45x + 125

We need to find out if the temperature will ever reach or exceed 135°F, which means we need to check if there exists a value of x for which T = 135.

Substituting T = 135 in the above equation, we get:

135 = -0.005x^2 + 0.45x + 125

Simplifying the equation, we get:

0.005x^2 - 0.45x + 10 = 0

This is a quadratic equation of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, where a = 0.005, b = -0.45, and c = 10.

The discriminant of this quadratic equation is given by:

D = b^2 - 4ac

= (-0.45)^2 - 4(0.005)(10)

= 0.2025 - 0.2

= 0.0025

Since the discriminant is positive, the quadratic equation has two real roots. Therefore, the temperature of the machine part will cross 135°F at some point during the operation.

We can also find the roots of the quadratic equation using the formula:

[tex]x = (-b \± \sqrt(D)) / 2a[/tex]

Substituting the values of a, b, and D, we get:

[tex]x = (0.45 \± \sqrt(0.0025)) / 2(0.005)\\= (0.45 \± 0.05) / 0.01[/tex]

Taking the positive value, we get:

x = 50

Therefore, the temperature of the machine part will cross 135°F after 50 minutes of operation.

Learn more on discriminant here;

https://brainly.com/question/12526527

#SPJ1

Therefore, the average rate of change between the points (3,9) and (5,15) is 3.

Coordinates are a set of values that locate the position of a point in space. In mathematics, coordinates are used to represent the position of points on a plane or in space, using a set of numerical values that correspond to the distance along each axis from an origin point. In two-dimensional Cartesian coordinate systems, for example, a point is represented by two numbers (x, y) that indicate its position relative to the x and y axes. In three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate systems, a point is represented by three numbers (x, y, z) that indicate its position relative to the x, y, and z axes.

Here,

The average rate of change between the points (3,9) and (5,15) is the slope of the line passing through those two points. We can use the slope formula:

slope = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

where (x1, y1) = (3,9) and (x2, y2) = (5,15).

slope = (15 - 9) / (5 - 3)

= 6 / 2

= 3

To know more about coordinates,

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ1

We can be 95% confident that the mean duration of imprisonment, p, of all political prisoners with chronic PTSD is somewhere between 19.4 months and 46.1 months.

Therefore the answer is A.

A confidence interval is a range of values that is likely to contain the true population parameter (in this case, the mean duration of imprisonment for political prisoners with chronic PTSD). The confidence level (in this case, 95%) indicates the percentage of times that the interval will contain the true population parameter in repeated sampling.

Option A correctly interprets the confidence interval by stating that we can be 95% confident that the true mean duration of imprisonment for political prisoners with chronic PTSD falls between 19.4 months and 46.1 months. This means that if we were to take many random samples of political prisoners with chronic PTSD and calculate the mean duration of imprisonment for each sample, 95% of the resulting confidence intervals would contain the true population mean.

Option B is incorrect because a confidence interval does not give the probability of the population parameter being in a particular range. It only gives the probability that the interval will contain the true population parameter if the sampling and estimation process is repeated many times.

To know more on confidence interval

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

A fraction of the variation in y that can be explained by the variation in the values of x is equal to 0.25189186354.

In Mathematics, the standard form of the equation of a regression line is represented or modeled by the following mathematical expression;

y = bx + c

Where:

In Mathematics and Statistics, the value of slope can be calculated by using the following mathematical expression;

[tex]b=r(\frac{S_y}{S_x})[/tex]

where:

By rearranging, we have:

[tex]r=b(\frac{S_x}{S_y})[/tex]

r = 1.13(1.67/3.76)

r = 0.50188829787

By taking the square of both sides, we have:

r² = 0.25189186354.

Read more on regression here: brainly.com/question/16793283

#SPJ1

Using the properties of  absolute value function, proved that |x - y| > |x| - |y| is true for all x and y.

To prove that |x - y| > |x| - |y|, we can consider two cases

Case 1

x >= 0 and y >= 0

In this case, |x - y| = x - y and |x| - |y| = x - y. So we have

|x - y| = x - y

| x | - | y | = x - y

Substituting these expressions into the original inequality, we get:

x - y > x - y

This inequality is true for all x and y where x >= 0 and y >= 0, since the difference between x and y is always greater than or equal to zero.

Case 2

x < 0 and y < 0

In this case, |x - y| = -(x - y) and |x| - |y| = -x + y. So we have:

|x - y| = -(x - y)

| x | - | y | = -x + y

Substituting these expressions into the original inequality, we get

-(x - y) > -x + y

Simplifying both sides, we get

y - x > -x + y

Adding x to both sides, we get

y > 0

This inequality is true for all x and y where x < 0 and y < 0, since both x and y are negative and the difference between x and y is always less than or equal to zero.

Learn more about absolute value here

brainly.com/question/1301718

#SPJ4

Answer:

[-3, 7].

Step-by-step explanation:

do i need to explain all that?

Answer:

The inequality can be rewritten as x-7 ≤ 50, which we can solve by adding 7 to both sides to get x ≤ 57.

Step-by-step explanation:

It seems like there are multiple questions combined in this one prompt. I will break them down and provide solutions for each one.

Solution for O x≤-3 or 2 Ox<-3 or 2 O-3≤x≤2 or x > 7:

To find the solution for this inequality, we need to solve each part separately and then combine the solutions using the union (OR) operation.

a) x ≤ -3: This part is already solved for x. The solution is x ≤ -3.

b) 2x < -3: We divide both sides by 2 to isolate x and get x < -3/2.

c) 2 ≤ x ≤ -3: This is not possible as there is no number that is both greater than or equal to 2 and less than or equal to -3.

d) x > 7: This part is already solved for x. The solution is x > 7.

The solution to the entire inequality is the union of these solutions: x ≤ -3 OR x < -3/2 OR x > 7.

Solution for x²+x-6 < 0

To solve this quadratic inequality, we can factor it as (x-2)(x+3) < 0 and use the sign chart method.

We create a sign chart for the expression (x-2)(x+3) and test the sign of the expression in each interval

  -3         2

  ---|-------|---

    -         +

(x-2) - 0 + +

(x+3) - - - 0 +

-------------

- + - 0 +

The sign chart tells us that the expression is negative when x is between -3 and 2. Therefore, the solution to the inequality is -3 < x < 2.

Solution for x-7 ≤ 50₂

It seems like the expression "50₂" is intended to represent the number 50 in base 2 (binary). To convert this number to base 10 (decimal), we can write 50₂ as

50₂ = 12^5 + 12^4 + 02^3 + 02^2 + 12^1 + 02^0 = 32 + 16 + 2 = 50

Therefore, the inequality can be rewritten as x-7 ≤ 50, which we can solve by adding 7 to both sides to get x ≤ 57.

The length of arc AB is 7pi/3 yards is the area of the shaded region and the length of the arc AB.

what is circle?

A circle is a geometric shape that consists of all points in a plane that are equidistant from a fixed point called the center.

To find the area of the shaded region and the length of arc AB, we need to first find the measure of angle ZAB. Let's call this angle x.

Since angle ZAOB measures 110 degrees and angle ZAB and angle BOA are vertical angles, we know that angle BOA also measures 110 degrees. Therefore, angle ZAB + angle BOA = 180 degrees.

So, we can write:

x + 110 = 180

Solving for x, we get:

x = 70

Now, we can use the formula for the area of a sector to find the area of the shaded region. The sector is defined by the central angle ZOB, which measures 360 - 110 - 70 = 180 degrees. So, we have:

Area of shaded region = (180/360) * pi * 6^2 = 18pi

Therefore, the area of the shaded region is 18pi square yards.

To find the length of arc AB, we can use the formula:

Length of arc AB = (x/360) * 2 * pi * 6

Plugging in x = 70, we get:

Length of arc AB = (70/360) * 2 * pi * 6 = 7pi/3

Therefore, the length of arc AB is 7pi/3 yards.

To learn more about circle from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/29142813

#SPJ1

The probability that a customer will actually make a valid warranty claim is 0.075.

A probability is a numerical representation of the likelihood or chance that a specific occurrence will take place. Both proportions ranging from 0 to 1 and percentages ranging from 0% to 100% can be used to describe probabilities.

The probability that a customer will make a valid warranty claim is the probability that the customer both uses the bike in the first year (which has a probability of 0.75) and discovers a defect (which has a probability of 0.10).

Using the multiplication rule of probability, the probability that both of these events occur is:

0.75 x 0.10 = 0.075

Therefore, the probability that a customer will actually make a valid warranty claim is 0.075.

To know more about Probability visit:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

Solved  equation x=80 and z=2, y=40

An element, feature, οr factοr that is liable tο vary οr change

If y varies directly as x and inversely as the square οf z, we can write the fοllοwing prοpοrtiοnality:

y ∝ x/z²

where ∝ denοtes prοpοrtiοnality cοnstant.

Tο find the value οf ∝, we can use the given values οf y, x, and z:

y = ∝ x/z²

28 = ∝ (63)/(3)²

∝ = 28 * (3)² / (63)

∝ = 4/3

Nοw we can use this value οf ∝ tο find y when x=80 and z=2:

y = ∝ x/z²

y = (4/3) * (80)/(2)²

y = 40

Therefοre, when x=80 and z=2, y=40.

To learn more about Variables, click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29696241

#SPJ1

Answer:

375

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the given conditions, formulate: 53 +2x = 803

Rearrange variables to the left side of the equation:

2x = 803 - 53

Calculate the sum or difference:

2x = 750

Divide both sides of the equation by the coefficient of variable:

x = 750/2

Cross out the common factor: x = 375

Answer: No, Chaz is not correct. Although their balances are both negative, we cannot compare them simply based on their numeric values. The magnitude of the balance does not indicate who owes more to the bank, as it depends on various factors such as account activity, fees, and interest rates. We would need to know more information about their accounts, such as the interest rates and any fees, in order to determine who owes more to the bank.

Excluding the bank fees Chaz would technically be correct.

No, Chaz is not correct.

An expression contains one or more terms with addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

We always combine the like terms in an expression when we simplify.

We also keep all the like terms on one side of the expression if we are dealing with two sides of an expression.

Example:

1 + 3x + 4y = 7 is an expression.

3 + 4 is an expression.

2 x 4 + 6 x 7 – 9 is an expression.

33 + 77 – 88 is an expression.

We have,

No, Chaz is not correct.

Although both Chaz and Will have negative checking account balances, we cannot determine who owes more to the bank based solely on the balance amount.

The balance amount only indicates how much money they owe to the bank, but it does not give any information about the amount they initially deposited or any other financial transactions they may have made.

To determine who owes more to the bank, we would need to know the initial deposit amount, the transaction history, and any fees or interest charges that have been applied to the accounts.

Without this additional information, we cannot accurately compare the two balances or determine who owes more to the bank.

Thus,

No, Chaz is not correct.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ2

The answer is letter A and letter F.

The question is asking if any of these choices are less than 300 centimeters. To find this out, first, you have to convert the meters to centimeters, to make it easier. (1 centimeter is equal to 0.01 meters) Multiply the meters by 100. For example 1.8m x 100 = 180cm. Do the rest for the other meters and then add them to the centimeters. Example: 180cm + 110cm = 290cm, which is less than 300cm.

If Andres Michael bought a new boat. He took out a loan for $24,420 at 3.5% interest for 2 years. Andres Michael owes $18806.6 at maturity.

To calculate how much is due at maturity, we first need to determine how much of the loan remains after the two partial payments.

To do this, we can use the formula for simple interest:

I = P * r * t

Where:

I = Interest

P = Principal (original loan amount)

r = Annual interest rate

t = Time (in years)

The interest for the first two months can be calculated as:

I1 = P * r * t1

= 24420 * 0.035 * (2/12)

= 142.45

So after the first two months, the amount owing on the loan is:

P1 = P + I1 - 4330

= 24420 +142.45 - 4330

= 20,232.45

The interest for the next four months can be calculated as:

I2 = P1 * r * t2

= 20,232.45 * 0.035 * (4/12)

= 236.05

So after six months, the amount owing on the loan is:

P2 = P1 + I2 - 2600

=  20,232.45 + 236.05- 2600

= 17868.50

Now we can calculate the interest for the remaining 18 months:

I3 = P2 * r * t3

=  17868.50* 0.035 * (18/12)

= 938.10

So the total amount owing at maturity (after 2 years) is:

Total amount owing = P2 + I3

=  17868.50 + 938.10

= 18806.6

Therefore, Andres Michael owes $18806.6 at maturity.

Learn more about amount owes here:https://brainly.com/question/29640344

#SPJ1

Answer: D 30

Step-by-step explanation:

4/10 + 30/100

2/5 + 3/10

7/10

NB: LEFT-HAND SIDE IS EQUAL TO THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE

(a) This 95% confidence interval indicates that there is a 95% chance that between 56% and 65% of subjects will be helped by the new anti-inflammatory drug.

(b) There is a 95% confidence level that the percentage of participants who benefit from a new anti-inflammatory medication falls between (0.56, 0.65).

(a) According to this 95% confidence interval, there is a 95% likelihood that the new anti-inflammatory medication will be beneficial to between 56% and 65% of participants.

(b) There is a 95% confidence interval for the percentage of subjects who were benefitted by a new anti-inflammatory medicine (0.56, 0.65).

The percentage of participants who contributed to the development of a new anti-inflammatory medicine has a 5% probability of falling outside the range above.

To learn more about confidence interval link is here

brainly.com/question/13481020

#SPJ4

Answer:

See step by step.

Step-by-step explanation:

lets define the events:
A: cuban festival        C: tropical Garden
B: street art show      D: african festival

a) theoretically the probability is

[tex]P(A)=P(B)=P(C)=P(D)= \frac{1}{4} = 0.25 \\[/tex]
This is 25% (for each one, equally)

b) The experimental probability is given by:

[tex]P(A)= \frac{32}{150} =0.2133[/tex]

[tex]P(B)= \frac{38}{150} =0.2533[/tex]

[tex]P(C)= \frac{35}{150} =0.2333[/tex]
[tex]P(D)= \frac{45}{150} =0.3000[/tex]

c) The theoretically probabilities are all equally, the experimental probabilities are close to 25% each one, but differ lightly each one, since is an experiment and the result is random.  

To calculate the actual distance in km, we need to use the scale factor of 1:100 000. This means that 1 cm on the map is equivalent to 100 000 cm in real life.

Therefore, 12.3 cm on the map is equivalent to 12.3 x 100 000 cm in real life.

Now, 1 km is equivalent to 100 000 cm.

Therefore, 12.3 x 100 000 cm is equivalent to 1.23 km.

Hence, the actual distance in km is 1.23 km.