Why can long chain fatty acids can form micelles in solutions with pH > 7 but are insoluble in pH < 5

Answer:

Exceed the buffer capacity and Raise the pH by several units

Explanation:

Options are:

Raise the pH slightly

Lower the pH slightly

Raise the pH by several units

Lower the pH by several units

Not change the pH

Exceed the buffer capacity

The hypochlorous acid, HClO, is in equilibrium with Hypochlorite ion (From potassium hypochlorite, ClO⁻) producing a buffer. Using H-H equation, pH of initial buffer is:

pH = pKa + log [ClO⁻] / [HClO]

pKa for hypochlorous acid is 7.53

pH = 7.53 + log [0.581M] / [0.436M]

pH = 7.65

Barium hydroxide reacts with HClO producing more ClO⁻, thus:

Ba(OH)₂ + 2HClO →  2ClO⁻ + 2H₂O

As 0.479 moles of Barium hdroxide are added. For a complete reaction you require 0.479mol * 2 = 0.958 moles of HClO

As you have just 0.436 moles (Volume = 1L),

The addition will:

The Ba(OH)₂ that reacts is:

0.436 moles HClO * (1mole (Ba(OH)₂ / 2 mol HClO) = 0.218 moles Ba(OH)₂ and will remain:

0.479 mol - 0.218 mol = 0.261 moles Ba(OH)₂

As 1 mole of Ba(OH)₂ contains 2 moles of OH⁻, moles of OH⁻ and molarity is:

0.261 moles* 2 = 0.522 moles OH⁻ = [OH⁻]

pOH = -log [OH⁻]

pOH = 0.28

And pH = 14 - pOH:

pH = 13.72

Thus, after the addition the pH change from 7.65 to 13.62:

Answer and Explanation:

a. The equation of K of this reaction is shown below:-

3 A + 5 B + 4 C↔5 D + 7 E + F

[tex]K = \frac{(D)^5 (E)^7 (F)}{(A)^3 (B)^5 (C)^4}[/tex]

b. The moles of compound F is shown below:-

3 A + 5 B + 4 C↔5 D + 7 E + F

               2 moles

Now, the mole of produced is

[tex]= \frac{1}{4} \times \ moles\ of\ c[/tex]

Now, we will the value of c by using the above equation

[tex]= \frac{1}{4} \times 2[/tex]

After solving the above equation we will get

0.5 moles

Answer:

The answer is

Explanation:

The Ka of an acid when given the pH and concentration can be found by

where

c is the concentration of the acid

From the question

pH = 5.82

c = 0.010 M

Substitute the values into the above formula and solve for Ka

We have

Multiply through by - 2

Find antilog of both sides

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer:

CH3CH=NH2+>CH3CH2NH3 +

Explanation:

There are certain structural features that determine the stability of cationic species. These features that lead to the stability and higher acid strength of cations are those features that stabilize the cation.

CH3CH=NH2+ is more acidic than CH3CH2NH3 + owing to the fact that CH3CH=NH2+ contains a double bond in close proximity with the hydrogen that can be lost as a proton. Electron withdrawal by the double bond (greater s character) makes it easier for this hydrogen to be lost as a proton compared to CH3CH2NH3 +.

Answer:

1.05 V

Explanation:

Since;

E°cell= E°cathode- E°anode

E°cathode= -0.40 V

E°anode= -1.45 V

E°cell= -0.40-(-1.45) = 1.05 V

Equation of the process;

2Zr(s) + 4Cd^2+(aq) ---->2Zr^4+(aq) + 4Cd(s)

n= 8 electrons transferred

From Nernst's equation;

Ecell = E°cell - 0.0592/n log Q

Ecell= E°cell - 0.0592/8 log [0.5]/[0.5]

Since log 1=0

Ecell= E°cell= 1.05 V

Answer:

2.8x10⁻¹⁵ M.

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, the dissociation reaction for silver phosphate is:

[tex]Ag_3PO_4(s)\rightleftharpoons 3Ag^+(aq)+PO_4(aq)[/tex]

Therefore, the equilibrium expression is:

[tex]Ksp=[Ag^+]^3[PO_4^-][/tex]

In such a way, since the initial solution contains an initial concentration of silver ions (from silver nitrate) of 0.10M, we can write the equilibrium expression in terms of the reaction extent [tex]x[/tex]:

[tex]2.8x10^{-18}=(0.10+3x)^3*(x)[/tex]

Thus, solving for [tex]x[/tex] we have:

[tex]x=2.8x10^{-15}M[/tex]

Thus, the molar solubility of silver phosphate is 2.8x10⁻¹⁵ M.

Regards.

Answer:

[tex]m_{NaNH_2}=30.42gNaNH_2[/tex]

[tex]m_{H_2}=0.783gH_2[/tex]

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, the reaction between sodium and ammonia is:

[tex]2Na+2NH_3\rightarrow 2NaNH_2+H_2[/tex]

Thus, as we know the initial masses of both sodium and ammonia, we should first identify the limiting reactant, for which we firstly compute the available moles of sodium:

[tex]n_{Na}=18.0gNa*\frac{1molNa}{23.0gNa}=0.783molNa[/tex]

And the moles of sodium consumed by 21.4 g of ammonia (2:2 mole ratio):

[tex]n_{Na}^{\ consumed}=21.4gNH_3*\frac{1molNH_3}{17gNH_3} *\frac{2molNa}{2molNH_3} =1.26molNa[/tex]

In such a way, since less moles of sodium are available than consumed by ammonia, we can say, sodium is the limiting reactant. Furthermore, the mass of both sodium amide (39 g/mol) and hydrogen gas (2 g/mol) that are produced turn out:

[tex]m_{NaNH_2}=0.783molNa*\frac{2molNaNH_2}{2molNa}*\frac{39gNaNH_2}{1molNaNH_2}=30.42gNaNH_2[/tex]

[tex]m_{H_2}=0.783molNa*\frac{1molH_2}{2molNa}*\frac{2gH_2}{1molH_2}=0.783gH_2[/tex]

Best regards.

from

1moles=iatom

Mole=mass÷avogardos

Where

Avogadro's= 6.02×10²³

So moles = 65.0÷6.02×10²³

Atoms of zinc = 391.6 ×10²³

The number of atoms present in the given mass of Zinc that is 65.0gm is [tex]5.99\times10^{ 23}[/tex].

Atoms are the basic building blocks of matter. They are the smallest units of an element that retain the chemical properties of that element.

Now, to determine the number of atoms in a given number of moles, we can use Avogadro's number, which is approximately  [tex]6.022 \times10^{23}[/tex]atoms per mole.

First, we calculate the number of moles of zinc in 65.0g by dividing the given mass by the molar mass of zinc. The molar mass of zinc (Zn) is 65.38 g/mol.

Number of moles = Mass / Molar mass

Number of moles = 65.0g / 65.38 g/mol ≈ 0.9942 mol

Next, multiply the number of moles by Avogadro's number to find the number of atoms.

Number of atoms =[tex]Number of moles \times Avogadro's number[/tex]

Number of atoms = [tex]0.9942[/tex]mol × [tex]6.022 \times10^{23}[/tex] atoms/mol

Therefore, approximately [tex]5.99\times10^{ 23}[/tex] atoms are present in 65.0g of zinc.

Learn more about atoms here:

https://brainly.com/question/1566330

#SPJ2

Answer:

Explan ionization energy, atomic radius, and electron affinityation:

This question most likely has answer choices. The possible answer choices are as followed:

The answers are Ionic radii tend to increase down a group, Cationic radii tend to decrease across a period, and Ionic radii increase when switching from cations to anions in a period (1st, 4th, and 5th options).

Answer:

the acid strength is the order of [tex]\mathsf{HF _{(aq)} }[/tex] > [tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5COOH _{(aq)} }[/tex] > [tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5OH _{(aq)} }[/tex]

Explanation:

Given that :

a . [tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5COO^- _{(aq)} + C_6H_5OH _{(aq)} \to C_6H_5COOH _{(aq)} + C_6H_5O^- _{(aq)}}[/tex]

b.  [tex]\mathsf{ F^- _{(aq)} + C_6H_5OH _{(aq)} \to C_6H_5O^- _{(aq)} + HF _{(aq)} }[/tex]

c.  [tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5COOH _{(aq)} + F^- _{(aq)} \to HF _{(aq)} + C_6H_5COO^- _{(aq)} }[/tex]

Acid strength is the ability of an acid  to dissociate into a proton and an anion. Take for instance.

HA  ↔ H⁺ + A⁻

The  acid strength of the following compounds above are:

[tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5OH _{(aq)} }[/tex] = 1.00 × 10⁻¹⁰

[tex]\mathsf{HF _{(aq)} }[/tex] = 6.6 × 10⁻⁴

[tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5COOH _{(aq)} }[/tex] = 6.3 × 10⁻⁵

As the acid dissociation constant increases the relative acid strength also increases.

From above, the acid strength is the order of [tex]\mathsf{HF _{(aq)} }[/tex] > [tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5COOH _{(aq)} }[/tex] > [tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5OH _{(aq)} }[/tex]

[tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5COO^- }[/tex], [tex]\mathsf{C_6H_5O^- _{(aq)}}[/tex] and F⁻ are Bronsted- Lowry acid

Bronsted- Lowry acid are molecule or ion that have the ability to donate a proton.

Answer:

Molar solubility is 1.12x10⁻⁴M

Explanation:

The dissolution of magnesium hydroxide is:

Mg(OH)₂(s) ⇄ Mg²⁺ + 2OH⁻

The molar solubility represents the moles of the solid that the solution can dissolve, that could be written as:

Mg(OH)₂(s) ⇄ X + 2X

Where X is solubility.

If you obtained a [OH⁻] = 2.24x10⁻⁴M and you know [OH⁻] = 2X:

2X = 2.24x10⁻⁴M

X = 2.24x10⁻⁴M/2

X =1.12x10⁻⁴M

Answer:

Siδ⁺ -- Pδ⁻⁻

Clδ⁻⁻ -- Pδ⁺

Siδ⁺ -- Clδ⁻⁻

Of the mentioned bonds the most polar bond is Si -- Cl

The polarity of the bond primarily relies upon the electronegativity difference between the two atoms that forms the bond. Therefore, if the electronegativity difference between the two atoms that forms the bond is more the bond will be more polar, and if it is less then the bond will be less polar. The electronegativity of the atoms mentioned is Si = 1.8 , P = 2.1 and Cl = 3.00.  

Therefore, the Si - Cl atoms exhibit more electronegativity difference, thus, the Si - Cl bond will be the most polar bond.  

Answer:

The answer is a.

Explanation:

Most of the costs associated with using renewable resources are due to overuse of the resources.

Most of the costs associated with using renewable resources are due to overuse of resources.

Renewable resources are those resources which will be generated naturally and continously from the nature and these are also inexhaustible means non ended.

As from the definition it is clear that we can reuse or will use again and again these types of resources, that's why cost associated with these renewable resources are high.

Hence, overuse of resouces is one of the reason.

To know more about renewable resorces, visit the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/79953

Answer:

D. Reduction takes place at the cathode, which is negatively charged.

Explanation:

In an electrolytic cell there are two electrodes; the cathode and the anode. The anode is the positive electrode while the cathode is the negative electrode. Oxidation occurs at the anode while reduction occurs at the cathode.

At the anode, species give up electrons and become positively charged ions while at the cathode species accept electrons and become reduced.

Answer:

A divergent plate boundary  

Explanation:

At a divergent boundary, the plates pull away from each other and generate new crust.

Answer:

Because the ocean becomes larger, this is a divergent plate boundary. Divergent plates cause the ocean floor to expand, making the ocean larger.

Explanation:

PLATO ANSWER

Answer:

A double bond is formed when two pairs of electrons are shared between the two participating atoms. It is represented by two dashes (=). It is represented by two dashes (=). Double covalent bonds are much stronger than a single bond, but they are less stable

Explanation:

Answer:

[tex]m_{PtBr_4}=0.306gPtBr_4[/tex]

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, since the solubility product of platinum (IV) bromide is 8.21x10⁻⁹, and the dissociation is:

[tex]PtBr_4(s)\rightleftharpoons Pt^{4+}(aq)+4Br^-(aq)[/tex]

The equilibrium expression is:

[tex]Ksp=[Pt^{4+}][Br^-]^4[/tex]

Thus, since the salt is added to a solution initially containing 1.00 grams of potassium bromide, there is an initial concentration of bromide ions:

[tex][Br^-]_0=\frac{1.00gKBr*\frac{1molKBr}{119gKBr}*\frac{1molBr^-}{1molKBr} }{0.250L}=0.0336M[/tex]

Hence, in terms of the molar solubility [tex]x[/tex], we can write:

[tex]8.21x10^{-9}=(x)(0.0336+4x)^4[/tex]

In such a way, solving for [tex]x[/tex], we obtain:

[tex]x=0.00238M[/tex]

Which is the molar solubility of platinum (IV) bromide. Then, since its molar mass is 514.7 g/mol, we can compute the grams that get dissolved in the 250.0-mL solution:

[tex]m_{PtBr_4}=0.00238\frac{molPtBr_4}{1L}*0.250L *\frac{514.7gPtBr_4}{1molPtBr_4} \\\\m_{PtBr_4}=0.306gPtBr_4[/tex]

Best regards.

Answer:

- Weight 333.3 grams of iodine.

- Measure 500 mL of water.

- Vigorously mix the resulting solution.

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, since 500 mL of a 40% (w/v) aqueous solution iodine is required, we can compute the required mass of iodine by defining the given mass-volume percent:

[tex]\% w/v=\frac{m_{iodine}}{m_{solution}} *100%=\frac{m_{iodine}}{m_{water}+m_{iodine}} *100%[/tex]

In such a way, we need to find mass of iodine, which is computed as:

[tex]m_{iodine}=\frac{\%w/v*m_{water}}{100w/v-\%} \\\\m_{iodine}=\frac{40*500}{100-40}\\ \\m_{iodine}=333.3g\\[/tex]

Thereby, the procedure will be:

- Weight 333.3 grams of iodine.

- Measure 500 mL of water.

- Vigorously mix the resulting solution.

Best regards.

Answer:

1. The balanced molecular equation is given below:

Na2SO4(aq) + Ba(NO3)2(aq) —> BaSO4(s) + 2NaNO3(aq)

2. The net ionic equation is given below:

SO4^2-(aq) + Ba^2+(aq) —> BaSO4(s)

Explanation:

1. The balanced molecular equation

Na2SO4(aq) + Ba(NO3)2(aq) —> BaSO4(s) + NaNO3(aq)

The above equation can be balance as follow:

Na2SO4(aq) + Ba(NO3)2(aq) —> BaSO4(s) + NaNO3(aq)

There are 2 atoms of Na on the left side and 1 atom on the right side. It can be balance by putting 2 in front of NaNO3 as shown below:

Na2SO4(aq) + Ba(NO3)2(aq) —> BaSO4(s) + 2NaNO3(aq)

Now, the equation is balanced.

2. The bal net ionic equation.

This can be obtained as follow:

Na2SO4(aq) + Ba(NO3)2(aq) —>

In solution, Na2SO4 and Ba(NO3)2 will dissociate as follow:

Na2SO4(aq) —> 2Na^+(aq) + SO4^2-(aq)

Ba(NO3)2(aq) —> Ba^2+(aq) + 2NO3^-(aq)

Na2SO4(aq) + Ba(NO3)2(aq) —>

2Na^+(aq) + SO4^2-(aq) + Ba^2+(aq) + 2NO3^-(aq) —> BaSO4(s) + 2Na^+(aq) + 2NO3^-(aq)

Cancel the spectator ions i.e Na^+ and NO3^- to obtain the net ionic equation.

SO4^2-(aq) + Ba^2+(aq) —> BaSO4(s)

Answer:

37.8 L OF CARBON MONOXIDE IS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE 18.9 L OF NITROGEN.

Explanation:

Equation for the reaction:

2 CO + 2 NO ------> N2 + 2 CO2

2 moles of carbon monoxide reacts with 2 moles of NO to form 1 mole of nitrogen

At standard temperature and pressure, 1 mole of a gas contains 22.4 dm3 volume.

So therefore, we can say:

2 * 22.4 L of CO produces  22.4 L of N2

44.8 L of CO produces 22.4 L of N2

Since, 18.9 L of Nitrogen is produced, the volume of CO needed is:

44.8 L of CO = 22.4 L of N

x L = 18.9 L

x L = 18.9 * 44.8 / 22.4

x L = 18.9 * 2

x = 37.8 L

The volume of Carbon monoxide required to produce 18.9 L of N2 is 37.8 L

Answer:

37.8

Explanation:

Answer:

Companies know that people will be willing to spend more to get an in-demand product.

Explanation:

When a product is really in demand, many customers are willing to part with more money order to purchase the product, as a result of that, many companies may take advantage of the increasing demand for the product to hike it's price.

Hence, the increase in price may not really have a negative impact on the quantity demanded because the demand for the product is high and customers are willing to spend more money in order to purchase an in-demand product, hence the answer above.

Prices increase when demand is high because companies know that people will be willing to spend more to get in-demand products.

Prices generally increase with higher demand for goods because the higher demand creates pressure for the supply to meet up.

Manufacturing companies can either increase their production to meet up with demand at the same price or capitalize on the situation to make more money by increasing the price without increasing the supply.

Since there is a buying pressure on the product in the market already, people would still be open to buying even at higher prices.

More on demand and prices can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/16170198?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

See explanation

Explanation:

The reaction of chlorine with the pictured compound will occur via free radical mechanism. The stability of the free radical formed will depend on its structure.

The order of stability of free radicals is methyl < primary < secondary < tertiary. Hence a tertiary carbon free radical is the most stable.

Looking at the compound, the radical will form at the position shown in the image attached since it will lead to a secondary free radical which is more stable.

The structure that should be drawn is shown below.

It should be within the pictured compound that will arise via a free radical mechanism. The stability should be based on the structure. The stability of the order of free radicals should be methyl < primary < secondary < tertiary. Thus, a tertiary carbon free radical should be most stable.

Here look at the compound, the radical should form at the position that should be shown in the image that resulted in the secondary free radical i.e. more stable.

Answer:

ΔT = 2.28°C

Explanation:

Heat, H = 75.4J

Number of moles = 0.25 mol

Specific heat capacity, c = 0.861 J/g·°C

Change in temperature, ΔT = ?

These quantities are related by the following equation;

H = mc ΔT

Mass, m = Number of moles * Molar mass

m = 0.25mol * 153.82 g/mol

m = 38.455g

S back to the equation;

H = mc ΔT

Substituting the values;

75.4 = 38.455 * 0.861 * ΔT

ΔT = 75.4 /  33.11

ΔT = 2.28°C

The change in temperature is 2.28 °C

First, we will determine the mass of CCl₄ absorbed

From the given information,

Number of moles of CCl₄ absorbed = 0.25 mol

Using the formula

Mass = Number of moles × Molar mass

Molar mass of CCl₄ = 153.82 g/mol

∴ Mass of CCl₄ absorbed = 0.25 × 153.82

Mass of CCl₄ absorbed = 38.455 g

Now, using the formula

Q = mcΔT

Where Q is the quantity of heat

m is the mass

c is the specific heat of substance

and ΔT is the change in temperature

From the given information

Q = 75.4 J

c = 0.861 J/g.°C

Putting the parameters into the formula, we get  

75.4 = 38.455 × 0.861 ×ΔT

75.4 = 33.109755 × ΔT

∴ ΔT = 75.4 ÷ 33.109755

ΔT = 2.28 °C

Hence, the change in temperature is 2.28 °C

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/13439286

Answer:

0.101 M

Explanation:

Step 1: Given data

Step 2: Calculate [A]

For a second-order reaction, we can calculate [A] using the following expression.

1/[A] = 1/[A]₀ + k × t

1/[A] = 1/0.250 M + 0.117 M⁻¹.min⁻¹ × 50.7 min

[A] = 0.101 M

Answer:

D. Pure gold

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, since gold, as a heavy metal, is said to be less reactive than hydrogen, when it undergoes electrolysis process when forming a salt, due to the action of the electric current, we can appreciate the formation of a layer of gold on the surface of the cathode via a reduction half-reaction from gold (I) to metallic gold:

[tex]Au^++1e^-\rightarrow Au^0[/tex]

Thereby, D. Pure gold is formed as the product of the reaction.

In contrast, more reactive metals than hydrogen such as sodium or potassium, will remain in solution so the hydrogen converted to hydrogen gas.

Best regards-

Answer:

[tex]H_2O[/tex]

Explanation: Research has proven that ;

Water is a Polar Covalent Molecule

It consists of 2 Hydrogen molecules bonded to one Oxygen molecule and  the two hydrogen atoms are not evenly distributed around the oxygen atom.

Answer:

²³⁴₉₀Th --> ²³⁴₉₁Pa + ⁰₋₁e

Explanation:

thorium-234 = ²³⁴₉₀Th

beta decay = ⁰₋₁e

protactinium-234 = ²³⁴₉₁Pa

The balanced nuclear equation is given as;

²³⁴₉₀Th --> ²³⁴₉₁Pa + ⁰₋₁e

Answer:

68%

Explanation:

Since we need a percentage we can use any number we want for our initial value.

5(1/2)^900/1620 = 3.40

(3.40 / 5)*100 = 68%

To make sure lets use a different initial amount

1(1/2)^900/1620 = 0.68

(0.68/1) * 100 = 68%

To solve this question, we'll assume the initial amount of radium-226 to be 1.

Now, we shall proceed to obtaining the percentage of radium-226 that will after 900 years. This can be obtained as illustrated below:

Determination of the number of half-lives that has elapsed.

Half-life (t½) = 1620 years

Time (t) = 900 years

[tex]n = \frac{t}{t_{1/2}}\\\\n = \frac{900}{1620}\\\\n = \frac{5}{9}[/tex]

Determination of the amount remaining

Initial amount (N₀) = 1

Number of half-lives (n) = 5/9

[tex]N = \frac{N_{0} }{2^{n}}\\\\N = \frac{1}{2^{5/9}}[/tex]

Determination of the percentage remaining.

Initial amount (N₀) = 1

Amount remaining (N) = 0.68

Percentage remaining = N/N₀ × 100

Percentage remaining = 0.68/1 × 100

Therefore, the percentage amount of radium-226 that remains after 900 years is 68%

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/10406952

Answer:

[tex]SF_4[/tex]

Explanation:

The first thing would be to calculate the number of moles of each element in the compound.

No of moles of sulfur (S) = mass/molar mass

                                        = 29.68/32.065 = 0.9256

No of moles of fluorine (F) = mass/molar mass

                                       = 70.32/18.998 = 3.7014

Then, let us find the atomic ratio of each of the element in the compound by dividing by the no of moles by the smallest no of mole:

            S            :             F

      [tex]\frac{0.9256}{0.9256}[/tex] = 1       :       [tex]\frac{3.7014}{0.9256}[/tex] = 4

Therefore, the empirical formula for the compound is [tex]SF_4[/tex]

Answer:

1. the siren has a lower pitch to Jane

2. the siren has a higher pitch to John

3. sound different due to moving away from Jane making the sound wave lengths longer and moving toward John making the wave lengths shorter

Explanation:

The Doppler effect expresses that sound is comparative with the spectator or observer. This is demonstrated valid by the model given with Jane and John. To one individual it could sound low and to someone else it could sound high, in light of where they are tuning in from. To John, the police alarm playing is a higher pitch. Be that as it may, to Jane this equivalent alarm is a totally extraordinary pitch and is heard lower than in comparison to the john.

This is a prime case of the Doppler Effect. They sound distinctive on the grounds that the sound is moving far from Jane making the sound frequencies longer and it is advancing toward John making the frequencies shorter. This impacts how the sound is heard by the human ear.