Answer:
D). No, because the man was acting in self-defense.
Explanation:
In the given situation, the man would not be considered guilty of murdering the woman and this is because the action took place when was defending himself from the attacks made by that woman on him. However, the man was attempting to steal the sweater at the store yet the deadly attack made by the woman on his head with the baseball bat cannot be justified in any case. Her act would be categorized under 'dangerous felony' and therefore, the use of a knife by the man was enforced on him to save himself. Hence, the action was in 'self-defense' and he will not be punished for it as it was the woman who initiated the physical violence and harm and he just reacted. Thus, option D is the correct answer.
Which of the following would an accused be automatically tried by jury?
a) Disturbing the peace
b) Murder charges
c) Drug possession charges
d) Assault and battery charges
e)Trespassing charges
B.. murder...
family want answers, why, how...
motive...
xbfrnd, spouse, b...
consider defense........
Giving brainliest to correct answer
Which situation best illustrates the problem of scarcity?
A. A local government forces all city employees to take a pay cut of 5 percent of their current salary.
B. A local government uses the money from a tax levy to build a new school and add lanes to a highway.
C. A local government has to choose between building a new school and adding lanes to a busy highway.
D. A local government decides to provide free health care for all employees and their families.
1. If your vehicle breaks down while moving, pull off the road as far as
ten feet
the shoulder
the ditch
possible
(6) Match the columns :
Column 1
(1) Funaria
(2) Spirogyra
Column II
ka) Spiral chloroplast
b) Capsule
(c) Leaflets
d) Flowers
2----------------------------------------1
how did john get the alcohol
Answer:
Get first aid advice about alcohol poisoning. Learn about what alcohol positioning is,
A 15-year-old sophomore high school student became pregnant, and the school board required her to attend a special program for pregnant students instead of her regular classes. The girl did not want to attend a special program; rather, she wanted to attend her regular classes. She sued the school district in federal district court, demanding that she be allowed to attend her regular classes. Before her case came to trial, the girl gave birth to the child. Subsequently, the district reinstated her in her regular classes. When her suit comes before the federal district court, what should the court do
Answer:
No case; she gave birth and made the case moot.
A patient properly filed a medical malpractice claim against a doctor in federal district court. The complaint simply asserted negligence as the grounds for relief without any facts supporting the claim. The doctor filed a pretrial motion for a more definite statement, which the court denied. Immediately thereafter, and without submitting an answer, the doctor filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacked personal jurisdiction. Will the court grant this motion to dismiss
Answer:
No. The Plaintiff should re-file with more substantiating evidence.
The "crime index" reflects which of the following?
Answer:
2222222222222222
yesssssssssssssss
Can someone help me with this word search?