An affirmative action programs which would be a clear violation of the Supreme Court's decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) are:
setting aside a certain percentage of admissionsslots for African American studentsWhat is an affirmative action?In social science, these are actions that involves sets of policies and practices within a government seeking to include particular groups based on their gender, race, nationality etc in the areas in which such groups are underrepresented.
According to a poll, majority of whites and 1/3 of blacks oppose a preferential treatment for minorities. The opponents of the affirmative action have long charged that the programs discriminate against white males.
Also, recent critics argues that preferential treatment programs victimize and stigmatize minorities, thereby, its increases the friction among groups.
Read more about affirmative action
brainly.com/question/29550895
#SPJ1
FILL IN THE BLANK. ___ are only lidely to include member from allthree brances of government when contorl of congress is divided
Congress is only likely to include a member from all three branches of government when control of congress is divided.
The united states Congress is the legislature of the federal government of the USA. it's far bicameral, composed of a lower frame, the residence of Representatives, and a top frame, the Senate. It meets in the America Capitol in Washington, D.C. Senators and representatives are chosen through direct election, although vacancies inside the Senate can be stuffed through a governor's appointment. Congress has 535 vote-casting participants: one hundred senators and 435 representatives. The vice chairman of the united states has a vote in the Senate most effective when senators are evenly divided. The residence of Representatives has six non-balloting members.
The setting of a Congress is for a -12 months time period, at present, beginning every different January. Elections are held each even-numbered 12 months on Election Day. The members of the House of Representatives are elected for the two-yr time period of a Congress. The Reapportionment Act of 1929 establishes that there be 435 Representatives and the Uniform Congressional Redistricting Act calls for them to be elected from unmarried-member constituencies or districts. it is also required that the Congressional districts be apportioned amongst states by using populace every ten years the usage of the America Census consequences, supplied that each nation has at least one Congressional representative. each senator is elected at-large in their country for a six-yr term, with phrases staggered, so each year about one-third of the Senate is up for election. each nation, regardless of population or length, has two senators, so presently, there are one hundred senators for the 50 states.
Learn more about Congress here https://brainly.com/question/779570
#SPJ4
a defendant's failure to do what a reasonable and prudent person would do in the samecircumstances creates liability for
Answer: Negligence
Explanation:
What type of insurance IS NOT REQUIRED by the Government?
Which one do you think it could be
Answer:
Explanation:
2
The threat, use, or conspiracy to use _____ within the United States or against an American citizen abroad is punishable under federal law.
The threat, use, or conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction within the United States or against an American citizen abroad is punishable under federal law.
The municipalities, states, and the federal government each tend to have their own criminal codes, which tend to define the types of conduct that constitute crimes. So, the Title 18 of the U.S. Code outlines all the federal crimes.
However, a crime is an unlawful act which is said to be punishable by a state or the other authority. Thus, the use of mass destruction is said to be punishable under the federal law.
Hence, treason is the only crime which is defined in the U.S. Constitution.
To learn more about federal law here:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ4
Explain how Congress could have addressed the increasing cost of insulin prior to 2017.
Prior to 2017, Congress has complete authority to enact legislation that covers both biologics and certain chemically created goods, such as insulin. The cost of insulin would have been lower if this legislation and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act had been approved together in 2009.
What is Congress?Generally, The legislative body of the federal government of the United States of America is known as the United States Congress. It is bicameral, meaning that it is made up of two chambers: the House of Representatives, which is the lower body, and the Senate, which is the upper body. It has its meetings at the Capitol Building in Washington, District of Columbia.
Before 2017, Congress has all of the authority necessary to enact a statute that will not only encompass the chemically created items but also certain chemically produced biologics, such as insulin.
If this legislation and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act had been approved in 2009 together, the cost of insulin may have been brought down to a more reasonable level.
Read more about Congress
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ1
cases in which the government charges an individual with violating a statute enacted to protect public health, safety, morals, or welfare fall under
Criminal law cases are when the government charges an individual with violating a statute enacted to protect public health, safety, morals, or welfare fall under.
government . noun. the exercise of political authority over the movements, affairs, and so on, of a political unit, human beings, and so forth, in addition to the overall performance of sure capabilities for this unit or frame; the action of governing; political rule and administration. a central authority is the system to govern a state or community.
The Columbia Encyclopedia defines authorities as "a device of social control beneath which the right to make legal guidelines, and the proper to enforce them, is vested in a particular group in society". a government is an institution via which leaders exercising electricity to make and enforce legal guidelines. a central authority's simple capabilities are imparting management, retaining order, providing public offerings, providing country wide security, imparting financial security, and imparting monetary assistance.
Learn more about government here: https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ4
the injured party makes the case for duress by demonstrating that . question 51 options: the threat left him or her no reasonable alternatives the other party had a higher level of education the threat was non-material in nature the other party was a merchant there was a special relationship that caused him or her not to use free will
The injured party makes the case for duress by demonstrating that there was a special relationship that caused him or her not to use free will. Therefore, the option E holds true.
An injured party can be referred to or considered as a party that has faced the damages or harm to himself or herself in case of an accident, which may be a tort committed by an individual. Although in such cases the injured party can make the case for duress, they need to demonstrate that the existence of a special relationship in the case caused physical damages to him or her for not using the free will.
Learn more about an injured party here:
https://brainly.com/question/15312531
#SPJ4
a major risk faced by a swap dealer is sovereign risk. this is the probability that a sovereign counterparty will default. the probability that a country will impose exchange restrictions on a currency involved in an existing swap. the probability governments will intervene to support an exchange rate. none of the above
Option A, the probability that a counterparty will default
Counterparty risk is the likelihood that the other party in an investment, credit, or trading transaction won't carry out its end of the bargain and will break the terms of the agreement. Default risk is another name for counterparty risk. Default risk is the possibility that organisations or people won't be able to fulfil their debt obligations. Almost all types of credit extensions subject lenders and investors to default risk. The possibility that the other party in a credit, trade, or investment transaction won't fulfil their half of the deal and will violate the terms of the agreement is known as counterparty risk.
Know more about the Counterparty risk at: https://brainly.com/question/29658375
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. when detectives set out to solve a crime, they conduct extensive (1) investigations. gathering evidence, collecting clues, and interviewing witnesses. those who believe in the supernatural follow a similar approach. their hope is to establish a case for the existence of ghosts in haunted places.
True. When detectives set out to solve a crime, they conduct extensive investigations. gathering evidence, collecting clues, and interviewing witnesses. those who believe in the supernatural follow a similar approach. their hope is to establish a case for the existence of ghosts in haunted places.
An investigator who works for a law enforcement agency is known as a detective. Talking to witnesses and informants, gathering tangible evidence, reviewing databases, and interviewing sources are all common ways that investigators get information to solve crimes. As a result, they are able to apprehend offenders and prosecute them in court.
Learn more on crime
https://brainly.com/question/27187116
#SPJ4
Joint rate means a rate which applies over the lines or routes of 2 or more carriers, which is made by arrangement or agreement between such carriers, and which is evidenced by concurrence or power of attorney." Joint tariffs " are those which contain joint rates.
Joint rate refers to a rate established between places on and over the permitted lines or routes of two or more carriers and supported by a power of attorney or concurrence. Such a tariff is referred to as a "combined tariff."
A rate established by agreement and published in a single tariff by all transportation lines to which it applies, and applicable from a point on one line to a point on another. The Commission gives filers the option of choosing between individual tariffs or a single market-based rate tariff for their whole company family. Corporate families can more easily arrange their computerized tariff databases, tariff records, and reporting requirements thanks to these so-called shared tariffs. When a corporate family uses a shared tariff, only the designated filer is required to submit tariff updates, such as when the category status changes or when the language in the tariff that has been approved by the Commission needs to be updated.
Learn more about Joint rate from
brainly.com/question/22595619
#SPJ4
in california, when the bailee has exclusive possession and control of objects belonging to its customers in the normal course of its business, a court is likely to enforce the exculpatory clause.
Indeed in California, when the bailee has exclusive possession and control of objects belonging to its customers in the normal course of its business, a court is likely to enforce the exculpatory clause.
About Exculpatory Clause
A contract's exculpatory provision forbids one party of holding the other party accountable for harm caused by the contract. Exculpatory clauses are frequently included in purchases like those that come with a ticket to a theme park or a flight. Courts may strike down exculpatory terms when they are buried inside a contract or have too broad of scope that goes against public policy. Courts frequently disapprove of exculpatory clauses since they allow a party to avoid accountability.
It is a clause in a contract that aims to absolve one party of responsibility if the other party suffers harm.
To know more about Exculpatory Clause:
brainly.com/question/27222495
#SPJ4
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non verbal expressions.
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non-verbal expressions is known as a symbolic speech. Therefore, the option A holds true.
A symbolic speech can be referred to or considered as a speech wherein the expression is done in completely non-verbal modes of communication with the audience. Moreover, it may also involve actions and gestures to be used as symbols in the scope of development of a speech to connect better with the audience.
Learn more about symbolic speech here:
https://brainly.com/question/29794726
#SPJ4
Complete Question
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non verbal expressions.
Symbolic Speech
Seditious Speech
Commercial Speech
interest groups that rely on a judicial strategy to advance their cause are careful in which of the following ways?
Interest groups that rely on a judicial strategy to advance their cause are careful in their choice of cases that have a chance of success.
About Interest groups
Interest group lobbying is a sort of marketing and advertising used by our government. Interest groups are formalised associations of people with related goals who make an effort to sway policy makers. Additionally, interest groups typically unite around a single central issue, such as gun control, labour rights, marriage equality, etc., and employ lobbyists or other individuals who work to influence legislation and governmental administrative decisions in an effort to pass laws that advance their primary objectives. Thus, much as advertisements sway our purchasing decisions, interest groups lobby for the passage of legislation that advances their goals.
To know more about Interest groups:
brainly.com/question/28590155
#SPJ4
greg ousley is sorry for killing his parents. is that enough? ... not just the idea that he is sorry but the totality of circumstances, should he be released? (make sure you support your answer)
Members of the Texas Supreme Court are ____.
always appointed to the bench by the governor of Texas.
normally elected to the bench by the voters of Texas.
appointed for a life term by a vote of the plural executive.
always appointed to the bench by the president of the United States.
elected to the bench by the Texas Senate in a vote of the full Senate under the authority of their advice and consent power.
Members of the Texas Supreme Court are normally elected to the bench by the voters of Texas. Thus correct option (b)
The Supreme Court of Texas (SCOTX) is the court of last resort for civil matters (including juvenile delinquency cases, which are categorized as civil under the Texas Family Code) in the U.S. state of Texas. A different court, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA), is the court of last resort in criminal matters.
The Court has its seat at the Supreme Court Building on the State Capitol grounds in Austin, Texas.
The Texas Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and eight associate justices. All nine positions are elected, with a term of office of six years and no term limit.
Learn more about Texas Supreme Court are to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/12536385
#SPJ4
Governors' formal powers to force the legislature to enact legislation, especially the veto authority and the power to call special sessions, are referred to as ____________ powers.
Governors' formal powers to force the legislature to enact legislation, especially the veto authority and the power to call special sessions, are referred to as legislative powers.
Legislative power is the capacity of a legislative chamber or actors within that chamber to thwart, encourage, or compel actions by others. introduction. energy is a hard concept to outline and possibly even harder to measure.
All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it's miles the only part of the government that could make new legal guidelines or trade current legal guidelines. govt department groups problem policies with the full pressure of law, but these are only below the authority of laws enacted by Congress.
The legislative branch of government is liable for enacting the laws of the country and appropriating the cash necessary to operate the government.
Learn more about Legislative here: https://brainly.com/question/13267720
#SPJ4
You are asked to advise your client Mary on the following issues; please do subheading for each answer:
Mary; Mary has stolen an 18ct diamond ring worth €17,000 from a jewellery shop and has been arrested. She is unsure what court she will have to attend and if she isn’t satisfied with the outcome what court she can appeal to. She is unsure about the potential public profile her case will attract, principally if the court case details can be published in the paper and if a public gallery can attend the court hearing. She also wants to know will she face a criminal or civil case; could the presiding judge give her a jail sentence; and how will the judge come up with her sentence or fine or how will it be determined.
1. Which court will she attend and how can she appeal the decision
2. Will the case be a matter of public knowledge and/or can the public attend the court
3. Is this a Criminal or Civil case. Explain why and give an example of a civil offence and a criminal offence.
4. Describe the court proceedings that will arise in this case i.e. what is the role of the judge, will the case be heard before a jury, what type of sentence could apply
Answer:
Explanation:
You are asked to advise your client Mary on the following issues; please do subheading for each answer:Mary; Mary has stolen an 18ct diamond ring worth €17,000 from a jewellery shop and has been arrested. She is unsure what court she will have to attend and if she isn’t satisfied with the outcome what court she can appeal to. She is unsure about the potential public profile her case will attract, principally if the court case details can be published in the paper and if a public gallery can attend the court hearing. She also wants to know will she face a criminal or civil case; could the presiding judge give her a jail sentence; and how will the judge come up with her sentence or fine or how will it be determined.1. Which court will she attend and how can she appeal the decision2. Will the case be a matter of public knowledge and/or can the public attend the court3. Is this a Criminal or Civil case. Explain why and give an example of a civil offence and a criminal offence.4. Describe the court proceedings that will arise in this case i.e. what is the role of the judge, will the case be heard before a jury, what type of sentence could applyIn some jurisdictions, minors who become ____ means that they cannot void a contract, despite their apparent minority. Ratification.
In some jurisdictions, minors who become Ratification means that they cannot void a contract, despite their apparent minority.
Appellate jurisdiction, in which a advanced court docket has energy to correct felony mistakes made in a decrease court; concurrent jurisdiction, wherein a healthy might be delivered to any of two or greater courts; and federal jurisdiction (as antagonistic, for example, to kingdom jurisdiction).
Its special unique jurisdiction extends to any dispute among the government of India and one or more States or among the government of India and any kingdom or States on one aspect and one or extra States on the alternative or between or more States, if and insofar as the dispute entails any question (whether of law .
Some commonplace synonyms of jurisdiction are authority, command, control, dominion, energy, and sway. whilst a majority of these words imply "the proper to govern or rule or determine," jurisdiction applies to legitimate power exercised inside prescribed limits.
Learn more about jurisdiction here
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
based on the map and your knowledge, which of the following is a major difference between the issue of shield laws and the issue of prior restraint?
Based on the map and your knowledge, The Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment protects against prior restraint by the government. However, protections for journalists and their sources are not as strong, as evidenced by the many states with weak or no shield laws. Option C
What is United States of America v. New York?Generally, The United States of America v. New York Times Company was the case in which the Supreme Court of the United States decided that the First Amendment contained robust rights against prior restraint. On the other hand, it is abundantly evident that the protection afforded to sources has not been granted the same degree of protection, as seen by the several states on the map that either do not have shield laws or have shield laws that are inadequate.
The Supreme Court has decided that the First Amendment protects individuals against prior restriction by the government. Based on the map and your understanding, this decision should not be surprising.
However, safeguards for journalists and their sources are not as robust, as is illustrated by the large number of states that have shield laws that are either inadequate or nonexistent. Alternative C
Read more about Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ1
CQ
Shield laws protect journalists' right to refuse to testify against their sources while gathering information in their role as journalists. There is no shield law at the federal level.
Based on the map and your knowledge, which of the following is a major difference between the issue of shield laws and the issue of prior restraint?
A
The Supreme Court has ruled that shield laws are incorporated to the states to decide on their own, while the issue of prior restraint applies only to the federal government.
B
The issue of shield laws does not apply to the federal government because criminal prosecutions occur only at the state level. On the other hand, the issue of prior restraint arises only in situations in which the president is invoking executive privilege to prevent information from being reviewed.
C
The Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment protects against prior restraint by the government. However, protections for journalists and their sources are not as strong, as evidenced by the many states with weak or no shield laws.
D
The First Amendment supports freedom of the press, which requires that each state develop guidelines for shield laws. However, the issue of prior restraint is not incorporated to the states because it is not related to freedom of the press.
Tax planning motivations usually predominate over other objectives in deciding whether to create a trust.
It is untrue that when deciding whether to create a trust, tax planning considerations typically take precedence over other goals. Instead, the choice to establish a trust is made before considering the tax implications.
Financial planning aimed at reducing taxes is referred to as tax planning. It aims to lower one's tax obligations and make the best use of benefits, tax breaks, and exemptions.Making financial and business decisions to reduce the impact of tax is a part of tax planning.Although there are many ways to approach tax planning, it primarily entails three fundamental strategies: lowering your actual income, maximizing the amount of tax deductions you claim throughout the year, and utilizing certain tax credits.Long ago, the fundamentals of effective taxation were established. The four pillars of efficiency, fairness, certainty and convenience were proposed by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations (1776).Therefore, it is false that tax planning concerns tend to take primacy over other objectives when deciding whether to create a trust.
Learn more about Tax planning here: https://brainly.com/question/28330970
#SPJ4
restaurants are not generally covered under the state laws that limit the liability of innkeepers, which can increase their risk.
Restaurants are not generally covered under the state laws that limit the liability of innkeepers, which can increase their risk. Given Statement are True.
State law is the legal system of a federated state, as opposed to the legal system of the federation of which it is a member. When the individual members of a federation are referred to as states, it is used.
The most prevalent illustration is that each state has its own license requirements and traffic laws that must be followed for people who drive a car, ride a motorcycle, or operate a truck. Every state has its own collection of laws governing criminal behavior in addition to those governing infractions and traffic tickets.
Learn more about State law to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ4
it is unlawful to turn water service on or off without approval
Answer:
It is unlawful to turn water service on or off without approval. Every child between ages 6 and 16 must attend a school or be homeschooled. Temporary structures such as circus tents may not be put up without approval. A person between ages 16 and 18 must have a parent's permission in order to get married.
Answer:
It is unlawful to turn water service on or off without approval.
A contract to do something that is prohibited by statutory law is void from the outset.
A contract or agreement to do something that is prohibited by federal or state statutory law is illegal. As such, it is void from the outset and thus unenforceable. Also a contract this is tortious or call for an actin contrary to public policy is illegal and unenforceable.
An settlement is a manifestation of mutual assent by way of or extra men and women to each other. it's far a meeting of the minds in a commonplace goal, and is made via provide and popularity. An agreement can be proven from words, behavior, and in some cases, even silence. agreement manner that sentence elements fit. subjects have to consider verbs, and pronouns should accept as true with antecedents. Singular subjects need singular verbs; plural subjects need plural verbs. In grammar, wide variety refers to the two sorts of a phrase: singular (one) or plural (multiple).
A contract is an agreement, however an agreement isn't always a settlement. An settlement can be casual or it is able to be written; a contract may be verbal or written, however a settlement will always be enforceable if it includes positive necessities.
An settlement is a manifestation of mutual assent by way of or extra men and women to each other. it's far a meeting of the minds in a commonplace goal, and is made via provide and popularity. An agreement can be proven from words, behavior, and in some cases, even silence. agreement manner that sentence elements fit. subjects have to consider verbs, and pronouns should accept as true with antecedents. Singular subjects need singular verbs; plural subjects need plural verbs. In grammar, wide variety refers to the two sorts of a phrase: singular (one) or plural (multiple).
A contract is an agreement, however an agreement isn't always a settlement. An settlement can be casual or it is able to be written; a contract may be verbal or written, however a settlement will always be enforceable if it includes positive necessities.
Learn more about agreement here: https://brainly.com/question/24460932
#SPJ4
populism arises when citizens are frustrated with politics that are focused on the needs and interests are
Populism arises when citizens are frustrated with politics that are focused on the needs and interests are it has institutions such as a parliament, prime minister, or other public officials.
It is frequently associated with anti-established order and anti-political sentiment. The term developed inside the late nineteenth century and has been applied to numerous politicians, events and movements considering that that point, frequently as a pejorative.
The Populist motion changed into a rise up through farmers within the South and Midwest in opposition to the Democratic and Republican events for ignoring their pastimes and difficulties. For over a decade, farmers had been suffering from crop disasters, falling charges, negative advertising, and lack of credit score facilities.
Farmers inside the South and Midwest revolted against the Democratic and Republican parties for ignoring their concerns and issues, resulting in the Populist movement. Charismatic or influential figures who gift themselves as the "voice of the people" regularly lead
They demanded an increase within the circulating forex (to be executed by the limitless coinage of silver), a graduated earnings tax, authorities possession of the railroads, a tariff for sales simplest, the direct election of U.S. senators, and different measures designed to bolster political democracy and deliver farmers .
Learn more about Populism arises here
https://brainly.com/question/11716977
#SPJ4
calista is an enthusiastic gun owner and a supporter of extensive gun ownership rights. yet, she is not a member of the national rifle association or any other interest groups that lobbies for the rights of gun owners. calista is the efforts of the national rifle association as well as other pro-gun interest groups and their members.
Indeed, calista is an enthusiastic gun owner and a supporter of extensive gun ownership rights. yet, she is not a member of the national rifle association or any other interest groups that lobbies for the rights of gun owners.
Calista is free riding on the efforts of the national rifle association as well as other pro-gun interest groups and their members.
About National rifle association
The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) is a U.S.-based organisation that promotes gun rights. The contemporary NRA, which was originally founded in 1871 to enhance rifle marksmanship, is a well-known gun rights advocacy group that still promotes firearm competence and safety. Additionally, the company produces a number of periodicals and supports professional shooting competitions. The NRA claims that as of December 2018, it has approximately 5 million members, however this number has not been officially verified. One of the most powerful advocacy organisations in American politics is the NRA.
To know more about National rifle association:
brainly.com/question/14211008
#SPJ4
This law requires all schools in the National School Lunch Act to implement a school-wide plan addressing physical activity and nutrition.
Answer:
The law you are referring to is the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, also known as the Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act. This legislation amended and reauthorized the National School Lunch Act and other federal child nutrition programs. It includes provisions that require schools participating in the National School Lunch Program to develop and implement a school-wide wellness policy that addresses physical activity and nutrition. The goal of the wellness policy is to promote the health and well-being of students by providing healthy food options and opportunities for physical activity. The Act also established new nutrition standards for foods and beverages sold in schools, including vending machines, a la carte items, and school stores, in an effort to ensure that students have access to healthier food choices.
, before prison and any condition violations, strongly suggest that unemployment contributes heavily to the cycle of incarceration.
condition violations include fighting, physical assault, wrongful detention, interfering with another person's right to freedom of movement, and any other behavior that includes or interferes with the person of another.
Any condition on the interconnection facilities that, as determined in accordance with good utility practice, is I outside of normal operating parameters, such that facilities are operating beyond their normal ratings or that reasonable operating limits have been exceeded; and that could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the safe and reliable operation of the interconnection facilities; but which, in any case, could justify a charge of abnormal condition. Any state or circumstance that arises entirely from economic factors, such as a lack of sufficient producing capacity to fulfill load needs, should not, by itself, be deemed to be an abnormal condition violations.
learn more about violations here:
https://brainly.com/question/25328532
#SPJ4
which kind of judicial decision-making acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent?
A type of judicial decision-making known as judicial activism recognizes the ability of judges to advance new social policy by rejecting precedent.
According to the legal doctrine of "judicial activism," courts can and need to take into account societal repercussions of their decisions in addition to the applicable law. On occasion, it is employed in opposition to judicial constraint.
Usually, the phrase denotes a judge's departure from precedent and more reliance on their own convictions while making rulings. Both the general idea of judicial activity and particular activist rulings are the subject of political controversy.
Judicial activism is strongly related to the questions of statutory interpretation, judicial activism, and the separation of powers.
To know more about 'judicial activism' related questions
visit- https://brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
party bravo did not perform the obligations required in the contract; the work was not on time, and did not meet the specific requirements set forth in the contract. this is considered a(n) contract.
Based on the information, this is considered a breach of contract as it does not fulfil the conditions of the contract.
What is a Contract?A contract is defined as an agreement that is legally binding and based on the assent of both parties to the transaction satisfying all the requirements of a valid contract.
When one party to an agreement fails to fulfill their end of the bargain, there has been a breach of the contract. This is referred to as a violation of contract terms.
In the given case, it is explained that Party Bravo failed to fulfill its contractual responsibilities; the work was late and did not adhere to the detailed specifications outlined in the agreement signifies elements of breach of contract.
Learn more about Contract, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ1
