What number is equivalent to 9 1/2?

Answer:

16x^2 - 64

Step-by-step explanation:

(4x − 8)(4x + 8)

We recognize that this is the difference of squares

(a-b) (a+b) = a^2 - b^2

                 =(4x)^2 - 8^2

                 =16x^2 - 64

Answer:

800= about 1.76 lbs

700= about 1.54 lbs

(there are about 453.5 grams in a pound

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

800 grams = 1.76  pounds

700 grams =  1.54  pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

i googled it

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Scholarship and grants are money given to the candidates to support his financial needs in school. It will serves as the means of revenue for the student.

Revenue generated = Grant + Scholarship amount

Revenue generated = $350 + $400

Revenue generated= $750

Total money needed to be spent in school = Tuition + fees

If tuition is $113.67 per credit hour and I used 15 credit hours, total amount of tuition paid = 15* $113.67 =  $1705.05

Total fees =  $660

Total money needed to be spent in school = $1705.05 + $660

Total money needed to be spent in school =  $2365.05

Amount I will need to pay for classes next semester = Total money that will be spent - (grant+scholarship)

=  $2365.05 - $750

= $1615.05

Hence, the amount I will need to pay for classes next semester is  $1615.05

Answer:

The Width = 28 inches

The Height = 21 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told in the question that:

The width and height of an older 35-inch television whose screen has an aspect ratio of 4:3

Using Pythagoras Theorem

Width² + Height² = Diagonal²

Since we known that the size of a television is the length of the diagonal of its screen in inches.

Hence, for this new TV

Width² + Height² = 35²

We are given ratio: 4:3 as aspect ratio

Width = 4x

Height = 3x

(4x)² +(3x)² = 35²

= 16x² + 9x² = 35²

25x² = 1225

x² = 1225/25

x² = 49

x = √49

x = 7

Hence, for the 35 inch tv set

The Width = 4x

= 4 × 7

= 28 inches.

The Height = 3x

= 3 × 7

= 21 inches

Answer:

Policeman A = 56 tickets

Step-by-step explanation:

Policemen A + B = 70

If Policeman B hands out x no of tickets...

Then Policeman A hands out 4x no of tickets

meaning...

x + 4x = 70

5x = 70

x = 70/5

x = 14

Therefore Policeman A hands out..

4x = 4 × 14 = 56 tickets

Answer:

A: 19

Step-by-step explanation:

For this, we can complete the square. We first look at the first 2 terms,

t^2 and -6t.

We know that [tex](t-3)^2[/tex] will include terms.

[tex](t-3)^2 = t^2 - 6t + 9[/tex]

But [tex](t-3)^2[/tex] will also add 9, so we can subtract 9. Putting this into the equation, we get:

[tex]m(t) = (t-3)^2 - 9 +28[/tex]

[tex]m(t) = (t-3)^2 +19[/tex]

Using the trivial inequality, which states that a square of a real number must be positive, we can say that in order to have the minimum number of members, we need to make (t-3) = 0. Luckily, 3 months is in our domain, which means that the minimum amount of members is 19.

The larger metallic object is initially at rest, so the velocity is 0 when t = 0. The speed changes after t = 3 seconds.

Answer:

It would be the last one.

Step-by-step explanation:

It says the object is initially at rest, so you look for a table with 0 m/s and you find the last table had been at rest for 0 -2  seconds. The small rocky object initially had a speed of 90 m/s and then decreased to 36 m/s as its energy transferred to the metallic object. The metallic object's speed from time 4-6s with the small rocky object equals the small rocky initial speed.

Rocky Object initial speed = 90 m/s

Rocky Object new speed = 36 m/s

Large metallic object speed after collision = 64 m/s.

64 m/s + 36 m/s = 90 m/s

Large metallic object speed after collision + Rocky Object new speed

= Rocky Object initial speed

You can also test this for kinetic energy.

No, that is not a function.

To be a function, each different input (x) needs a different output (y)

In the given function there are two -3’s as inputs and they have different y values, so it can’t be a function.

Answer: no

Step-by-step explanation: To determine if a relation is a function, take a look at the x–coordinate of each ordered pair. If the x–coordinate is different in each ordered pair, then the relation is a function.

Note that the only exception to this would be that if the x-coordinate pairs up with the same y-coordinate in a relation more than once, it's still classified ad a function.

Ask yourself, do any of the ordered pairs

in this relation have the same x-coordinate?

Well by looking at this relation, we can see that two

of the ordered pairs have the same x-coordinate.

In this case, the x-coordinate of 3 appears twice.

So no, this relation is not a function.

you can only see values of [tex] x[/tex] Ranging from $-3$ to $3$ and they're included, so domain is $[-3,3]$

and $y$ values ranging from $-2$ to $4$ but $-2$ is not included so range is $(-2,4]$

Answer:

16 bags for the first(30% pure) and 64 bags of the second(80% pure)

Step-by-step explanation:

If they are mixed in a ratio of x bags to y bags

(0.3x+0.8y)/(x+y) = 0.7

0.3x + 0.8y = 0.7(x+y)

Multiply both sides with 10

3x + 8y = 7(x+y)

4x = y ——(1)

x + y = 80 ——(2)

Solve simultaneously

x + 4x = 80

5x = 80

x = 16 bags

y = 4x = 64 bags

Answer:

The total   profit is [tex]p = 17x + 2124[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The profit made on each mp3 is  k  =  $35

    The profit made on each mp3 is  y =  $18

     The total amount sold is   n  =  118

 Now given that the amount of mp3 sold is x then the amount of  DVD sold is mathematically evaluated as

                      [tex]n - x[/tex]

Now the profit made on the x number of mp3 sold is  

                      [tex]x * 35 = 3x[/tex]

And the the profit made from the n-x number of  DVD  sold is  18 (n-x ) =  18 - 18x

 So the total profit made last week from the sales of both mp3 and DVD  is  

                   [tex]p = 35x + 18n - 18x[/tex]

                    [tex]p = 17x + 18(118)[/tex]

                    [tex]p = 17x + 2124[/tex]

It is.........................................................

One way to prove this without a truth table is to use a conditional proof. We assume the portion p ^ (p --> q). If that's true, then so is p and p-->q

Using p and p-->q, the modus ponens rule allows us to derive q. It says that if p is true and p --> q, then q must be true as well.

Since we arrive at q, we have found the conclusion we're after. The assumption (p ^ (p-->q)) leads to q, and therefore the entire statement (p ^ (p-->q)) --> q is true for any combination of p,q.

Question options :

A. There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim

u < 99.

B. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim

u < 99.

C. There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim

u < 99.

D. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim

u< 99.

Answer:

B. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim

u < 99.

Step-by-step explanation:

We construct the n*ll and alternative hypotheses to support our claim

The n*ll hypothesis :H0

The alternative hypothesis : Ha

N*ll hypothesis =H0: u=99

Alternative hypothesis =Ha: u<99

So if n*ll hypothesis (H0) u=99 is rejected, then we accept the alternative hypothesis that u<99

we can therefore have sufficient evidence to support our claim that u<99

Answer:

Hey there!

True. You use individuals rules, pieces of evidence, and experimentally found ideas that can be combined to form a general mathematical statement.

Let me know if this helps :)

Answer:

the equation is not correct, u have to write like

ax'3+bx'2+cx+d

Answer:

x=-2 and x=0

Step-by-step explanation:

So I know it isn't x=-3 and x=0. So my guess is that it is x=0 and x=-2 and heres why.

First, I find the derivative of f(x)=2x^3+6x^2+7 which is 6x^2+12x

Then, I plugged in all the values of x's I had and I found out that you get 0 for -2 and 0 when you plug them in

So, in conclusion I believe the answer to be x=-2 and x=0

Answer:

144 ways

Step-by-step explanation:

Number of paintings = 7

Renaissance = 4

Baroque = 3

We are hanging from left to right and we will first hang Renaissance painting before baroque painting.

For Renaissance we have 4! Ways of doing so. 4 x3x2x1 = 24

For baroque we have 3! Ways of doing so. 3x2x1 = 6

We have 4!ways x 3!ways

= (4x3x2x1) * (3x2x1) ways

= 144 ways

Therefore we have 144 ways to hang the painting.

Answer:

the percentage of  bearings   that will  not be acceptable = 7.3%

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

Mean = 0.499

standard deviation = 0.002

if the true average diameter of the bearings it produces is 0.500 in and bearing is acceptable if its diameter is within 0.004 in.

Then the ball bearing acceptable range = (0.500 - 0.004, 0.500 + 0.004 )

= ( 0.496 , 0.504)

If x represents the diameter of the bearing , then the probability for the  z value for the random variable x with a mean and standard deviation can be computed as follows:

[tex]P(0.496\leq X \leq 0.504) = (\dfrac{0.496 - \mu}{\sigma} \leq \dfrac{X -\mu}{\sigma} \leq \dfrac{0.504 - \mu}{\sigma})[/tex]

[tex]P(0.496\leq X \leq 0.504) = (\dfrac{0.496 - 0.499}{0.002} \leq \dfrac{X -0.499}{0.002} \leq \dfrac{0.504 - 0.499}{0.002})[/tex]

[tex]P(0.496\leq X \leq 0.504) = (\dfrac{-0.003}{0.002} \leq Z \leq \dfrac{0.005}{0.002})[/tex]

[tex]P(0.496\leq X \leq 0.504) = (-1.5 \leq Z \leq 2.5)[/tex]

[tex]P(0.496\leq X \leq 0.504) = P (-1.5 \leq Z \leq 2.5)[/tex]

[tex]P(0.496\leq X \leq 0.504) = P(Z \leq 2.5) - P(Z \leq -1.5)[/tex]

From the standard normal tables

[tex]P(0.496\leq X \leq 0.504) = 0.9938-0.0668[/tex]

[tex]P(0.496\leq X \leq 0.504) = 0.927[/tex]

By applying the concept of probability of a  complement , the percentage of bearings will now not be acceptable

P(not be acceptable)  = 1 - P(acceptable)

P(not be acceptable)  = 1 - 0.927

P(not be acceptable)  = 0.073

Thus, the percentage of  bearings   that will  not be acceptable = 7.3%

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

So we have the expression:

[tex]-4-(-7)[/tex]

First, simplify. Two negatives make a positive. Therefore, the -(-7) turns into +7:

[tex]-4-(-7)\\=-4+7[/tex]

When adding on the number line, we move to the right.

Therefore, the correct interpretation is the value 7 digits to the right of -4.

D is the correct answer.

Answer:

D.  the number that is 7 to the right of -4 on the number line

Step-by-step explanation:

interpret -4 - (-7)

=  -4 +7

therefore

the number that is 7 to the right of -4 on the number line

so its D.

Answer:

To find the x-intercept, substitute in  0  for y and solve for x.

To find the y-intercept, substitute in  0 for x  and solve for y.

x-intercept(s):  

(−6,0)

y-intercept(s):  

(0,3)

So I would say -6 and 0 and 2 are in domain

Answer:

-6, 0 ,2 are in the domain

Step-by-step explanation:

The domain is what values that x can take

There are no restrictions on the values that x can take

All real numbers are in the domain

-6, 0 ,2 are in the domain

Answer:

a) P [ X < 24 mm ] = 0,3015          or     P [ X < 24 mm ] =  30,15 %

b) P [ X > 32 mm ]  = 0,1251          or        P [ X > 32 mm ]  = 12,51 %

c) P [  25 < X < 30 ] = 0,4964      or     P [  25 < X < 30 ] = 49,64 %

d) z(s) = 0,84

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Distribution    N (  μ₀  ;   σ )   is  N ( 26,5 ; 4,8 )

a) P [ X < 24 mm ] = ( X - μ₀ ) / σ

P [ X < 24 mm ] = (24 - 26,5)/ 4,8 = - 0,5208 ≈ - 0,52

P [ X < 24 mm ] = - 0,52  

And from z-table we find area for z score

P [ X < 24 mm ] = 0,3015          or     P [ X < 24 mm ] =  30,15 %

b)P [ X > 32 mm ]  =  1  - P [ X < 32 mm ]

P [ X < 32 mm ]  = ( 32 - 26,5 ) / 4,8

P [ X < 32 mm ]  = 5,5/4,8  =  1,1458 ≈ 1,15

P [ X < 32 mm ]  = 1,15

And from z-table  we get

P [ X < 32 mm ]  = 0,8749

Then:

P [ X > 32 mm ]  =  1  -  0,8749

P [ X > 32 mm ]  = 0,1251          or        P [ X > 32 mm ]  = 12,51 %

c) P [  25 < X < 30 ] = P [ X < 30 ] - P [ X < 25 ]

P [ X < 30 ]  = 30 - 26,5 / 4,8   =  0,73

From  z-table    P [ X < 30 ]  =  0,7673

P [ X < 25 ] = 25 - 26,5 / 4,8  = - 0,3125  ≈  - 0,31

From z-table  P [ X < 25 ] =  0,2709

Then

P [  25 < X < 30 ] =  0,7673 -  0,2709

P [  25 < X < 30 ] = 0,4964      or     P [  25 < X < 30 ] = 49,64 %

d) If  20 %

z- score for 20% is from z-table

z(s) = 0,84

Assuming the cube is closed, you can use the divergence theorem:

[tex]\displaystyle\iint_S\vec F\cdot\mathrm dS=\iiint_T\mathrm{div}\vec F\,\mathrm dV[/tex]

where [tex]S[/tex] is the surface of the cube and [tex]T[/tex] is the region bounded by [tex]S[/tex].

We have

[tex]\mathrm{div}\vec F=\dfrac{\partial(y+z)}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial(x+z)}{\partial y}+\dfrac{\partial(x+y)}{\partial z}=0[/tex]

so the flux is 0.

Answer

Is it C I may have done my math wrong lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

y∞ xz

y=kxz. Where k is constant

When z=196 and x= 2 then y= 7

7=(196)(2)k

7=392k

k=1/56

There fore y=(1/56)xz

When x=3 and z =336

y=(1/56)xz

y=(1/56)(336)(3)

y=18

if value of y varies jointly with x and z. If y = 7 when z = 196 and x = 2 then the value of y when x = 3 and z = 336 is 18.

A ratio is an ordered pair of numbers a and b, written a / b where b does not equal 0.

Value of y varies jointly with x and z.

y ∞ xz

y=kxz.

Where k is constant

When z=196 and x= 2 then y= 7

Let us find the value of k

7=(196)(2)k

7=392k

Divide both sides by 7

k=1/56

y=(1/56)xz

When x=3 and z =336

y=(1/56)xz

y=(1/56)(336)(3)

y=18

Hence,  the value of y when x = 3 and z = 336 is 18.

To learn more on Ratios click:

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ2

Answer:

The correct option is  A

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The  population is  [tex]\mu = 6.6[/tex]

     The level of significance is [tex]\alpha = 5\% = 0.05[/tex]

      The sample data is  9.0, 7.3, 6.0, 8.8, 6.8, 8.4, and 6.6 pounds

The Null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : \mu = 6.6[/tex]

 The Alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a : \mu > 6.6[/tex]

The critical value of the level of significance obtained from the normal distribution table is

                       [tex]Z_{\alpha } = Z_{0.05 } = 1.645[/tex]

Generally the sample mean is mathematically evaluated as

      [tex]\=x = \frac{\sum x_i }{n}[/tex]

substituting values

      [tex]\=x = \frac{9.0 + 7.3 + 6.0+ 8.8+ 6.8+ 8.4+6.6 }{7}[/tex]

      [tex]\=x = 7.5571[/tex]

The standard deviation is mathematically evaluated as

           [tex]\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{\sum [ x - \= x ]}{n} }[/tex]

substituting values

          [tex]\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{ [ 9.0-7.5571]^2 + [7.3 -7.5571]^2 + [6.0-7.5571]^2 + [8.8- 7.5571]^2 + [6.8- 7.5571]^2 + [8.4 - 7.5571]^2+ [6.6- 7.5571]^2 }{7} }[/tex][tex]\sigma = 1.1774[/tex]

Generally the test statistic is mathematically evaluated as

            [tex]t = \frac{\= x - \mu } { \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

substituting values

           [tex]t = \frac{7.5571 - 6.6 } { \frac{1.1774 }{\sqrt{7} } }[/tex]

            [tex]t = 1.4274[/tex]

Looking at the value of  t and  [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex]   we see that [tex]t < Z_{\alpha }[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

  What this implies is that there is no sufficient evidence to state that the sample data show as significant increase in the average birth rate

The conclusion is that the mean is  [tex]\mu = 6.6 \ lb[/tex]

Answer:

-2/12, -0.1, 1/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Least to greatest: -2/12 , -0.1 , 1/9

Greatest to least: 1/9, -0.1, -2/12

Step-by-step explanation:

Change all of the numbers so that they are either fractions or decimals. Usually it is easier to change all the numbers to decimal.

Divide:

1/9 = ~0.111 (rounded)

-0.1 = -0.1

-2/12 = - ~0.167 (rounded)

Put the numbers in number order:

-~0.167 , -0.1 , ~0.111

-2/12 , -0.1 , 1/9

~

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5x - 15 = 5(-4x - 3)

Multiply the terms in the bracket

5x - 15 = - 20x - 15

Group like terms

Send the constants to the right side of the line and those with variables to the left side

That's

5x + 20x = - 15 + 15

Simplify

25x = 0

Divide both sides by 25

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer:

x=0

Step-by-step explanation:

5x - 15 = 5(-4x - 3)

To find the solution to this equation, we have to get x by itself on one side of the equation.

First, distribute the 5 on the right side. Multiply each term by 5.

5x - 15= (5*-4x) + (5*-3)

5x-15 = -20x + (5*-3)

5x-15= -20x -15

Next, add 20x to both sides of the equation.

(5x+20x) -15 = (-20x+20x) -15

(5+20x) -15 = -15

25x -15=-15

Next, add 15 to both sides of the equation.

25x -15 +15 = -15+15

25x= -15+15

25x=0

Finally, divide both sides of the equation by 25.

25x/25=0/25

x= 0/25

x= 0

The solution to this equation is x=0

Answer:

(a) Probility Distribution

Outcome   probability

$1               5/15 = 1/3

$5              4/15

$10             3/15 = 1/5

$20            5/15 = 1/3

(b) P($9 or less) =  3/5

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) Probility Distribution

Outcome   probability

$1               5/15 = 1/3

$5              4/15

$10             3/15 = 1/5

$20            5/15 = 1/3

Any other denomination

                  0

(b)

ways to draw $9 or less in a single draw

P($1) = 1/3

P($5) = 4/15

P($9 or less) = P($1) + P($5) = 1/3 + 4/15 = 9/15 = 3/5

Answer:

C. $37.76

Step-by-step explanation:

30% of $49.95

=30/100×49.95

=$14.99

selling price = 49.95 -14.99

= $34.96

8% sales tax included

=8/100×34.96

=$2.80

new price= 34.96+2.80

=$37.76

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information;

Angela took a general aptitude test and scored in the 90th percentile for aptitude in accounting.

What percentage of the scores were at or below her score?

The percentage of scores that were at or below her score is

Percentage P = 90%

This benchmark is more than average, so we can typically say more of the scores were at or below her score

What percentage were above?

Since The percentage of scores that were at or below her score is

Percentage P = 90%

Then the percentage of the scores that were above will be : (100 -90)%

= 10 %

We can see here that  less percentage of score were above Angela's Score.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]44.64+ 43.45+42.79+42.28\\\\= \frac{44.64+ 43.45+42.79+42.28}{4} \\\\\\= \frac{173.16}{4} \\\\= 43.29\\[/tex]