What is the graph of x=1

Answer:

0 = 0

1 = 4

2 = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

So you multiply x by 4 to get y. Your first column is x. So you multiply those numbers by 4 to get y.

Answer:

0

4

8

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 4x

Substitute each x into equation to get y

y = 4(0)

y = 0

Answer:

(d) 7

Step-by-step explanation:

The total number of subsets that can be derived from a set with n elements is given by;

2ⁿ

Out of these subsets, there is one empty set. Therefore, the total number of non-empty subsets is given by;

2ⁿ - 1

Given:

A = {x, y, z}

Set A has 3 elements. This means that n = 3

Therefore, the total number of subsets that can be derived from set A is

2ⁿ = 2³ = 8

One of these 8 subsets is an empty set, therefore, the total number of non-empty subsets of A is;

2ⁿ - 1 = 2³ - 1

8 - 1 = 7

This can be checked by writing all the possible subsets of A as follows;

∅

{x}

{y}

{z}

{x, y}

{y, z}

{x, z}

{x, y, z}

Removing the empty set ∅, the non-empty subsets of A are;

{x}

{y}

{z}

{x, y}

{y, z}

{x, z}

{x, y, z}

Answer:

Cost to pave the road = $4257

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of the pavement = Area of the outer circle - Area of the internal circle

Area of the outer circle = πr²

                                       = π(55)²

                                       = 3025π square feet

Area of the inner circle = π(33)²

                                       = 1089π square feet

Area of the pavement = 3025π - 1089π

                                     = 1936π

                                     = 6082.12 square feet

Cost of pavement = $0.70 per square feet

Therefore, cost of 6082.12 square feet = 6082.12 × 0.70

                                                                 = 4257.49

                                                                 ≈ $4257

Cost to pave the road = $4257                                    

Answer:

[tex]\frac{29}{35}[/tex] ft (29/35 ft)

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter: [tex]2w+2l[/tex]

[tex]2(\frac{1}{5})+2(\frac{3}{14})=\frac{2}{5} +\frac{6}{14}[/tex]

Since [tex]\frac{6}{14} = \frac{3}{7}[/tex], the LCD would be 35

New equation: [tex]\frac{14}{35} +\frac{15}{35} =\frac{29}{35}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{29}{35}[/tex]

Hope this helped! Please mark brainliest :)

Answer:

The value of teh test statistic is [tex]z = 5.54[/tex]

The p-value of the test is 0 < 0.05, which means that there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportion differs from 0.2.

Step-by-step explanation:

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.2 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.2, \sigma = \sqrt{0.2*0.8} = 0.4[/tex]

Using the sample results p^=0.27 with n=1003

This means that [tex]X = 0.27, n = 1003[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.27 - 0.2}{\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{1003}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = 5.54[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability that the sample proportion differs from 0.2 by at least 0.07, which is P(|z| > 5.54), that is, 2 multiplied by the p-value of z = -5.54.

Looking at the z-table, z = -5.54 has a p-value of 0.

2*0 = 0.

The p-value of the test is 0 < 0.05, which means that there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportion differs from 0.2.

Answer:

16X+134

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]4(x+y)^{2} - 9(x-y)^{2}=4[x^{2}+2xy+y^{2}]-9[x^{2}-2xy+y^{2}]\\\\=4x^{2}+4*2xy + 4y^{2}-9x^{2}-2xy*(-9)+y^{2}*(-9)\\\\= 4x^{2}+8xy+4y^{2}-9x^{2}+18xy-9y^{2}\\\\= 4x^{2}-9x^{2} + 8xy + 18xy +4y^{2} - 9y^{2}\\\\= -5x^{2} + 26xy - 5y^{2}[/tex]

= -5x² + 25xy + xy - 5y²

= 5x(-x + 5y) - y(-x +5y)

= (-x + 5y)(5x - y)

Answer:

0.9606 = 96.06% probability that the proportion of politicians who are lawyers will differ from the total politicians proportion by less than 4%

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

Suppose 46% of politicians are lawyers.

This means that [tex]p = 0.46[/tex]

Sample of size 662

This means that [tex]n = 662[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = p = 0.46[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.46*0.54}{662}} = 0.0194[/tex]

What is the probability that the proportion of politicians who are lawyers will differ from the total politicians proportion by less than 4%?

p-value of Z when X = 0.46 + 0.04 = 0.5 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 0.46 - 0.04 = 0.42. So

X = 0.5

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.5 - 0.46}{0.0194}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.06[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.06[/tex] has a p-value of 0.9803

X = 0.42

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.42 - 0.46}{0.0194}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.06[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.06[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0197

0.9803 - 0.0197 = 0.9606

0.9606 = 96.06% probability that the proportion of politicians who are lawyers will differ from the total politicians proportion by less than 4%

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  A.  yes

Step-by-step explanation:

The diagonals of a rectangle are congruent and bisect each other.

The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other. If they are also congruent, then the parallelogram is a rectangle.

Answer:

Yes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Press option yes

Answer:

A.

B.

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

all three are used in 3 dimensional objects hence the name 3 dimensions.

Answer: 260 gallons

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use a proportion to solve this problem. We know that a family used 15 gallons of milk every 3 weeks. Since the problem asks for how much they will need for a year, we can gather that a year is 52 weeks. We can come up with the following proportion.

[tex]\frac{15}{3} =\frac{x}{52}[/tex]          [cross multiply]

[tex]3x=780[/tex]       [divide both sides by 3]

[tex]x=260[/tex]

Therefore, they will need to purchare 260 gallons.

Answer:

maybe 10000

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9007.35

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the effective rate: .06/12= .005

let x= amount

[tex]x=100\frac{1-(1+.005)^{-12*10}}{.005}\\100*\frac{1-.549632733}{.005}\\9007.345333[/tex]

Answer:

8 are bad in math and 16 in physics

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

use blue red blue red

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

[tex]\large\boxed{(x + 2)}[/tex]

x² + 3x + 2

We know that x + 1 is a factor, so:

We must find another number that adds up to 3 when added to 1 and multiplies into 2 with 1. We get:

x + 2

(x + 1)(x + 2)

Answer:

626.968

Step-by-step explanation:

EMDAS rule

Answer:

is a smart guy and also don't want others to hate him

Answer:

9ab+3a

Step-by-step explanation:

(2a+a)(3b+1)=(3a)(3b+1)

3a(3b+1)

=(3a×3b)+3a×1

=9ab+3a

Answer:

I don't understand the meaning of question

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

jvdhvfggvvvbbbbbbbbb

Least to greatest: 20,564 22,755 2,3805

Answer:

it is 61-28 but I not sure u can scan for any application to make sure u get it ur answer thx for

Answer:

Given that m∠abc=70° and m∠bcd=110°. Is it possible (consider all cases): Line AB intersects line CD?

Step-by-step explanation:

#CarryOnLearning

Answer:

d=35000Km

Step-by-step explanation:

After 20h I traveled for

s1=1250*20=25000Km

My friend

s2=500*20=10000Km

Therefore d=25000+10000=35000Km

It is false

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it will help you

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

ITS OPTION (A)

PLZ MARK ME BRAINLIEST..

Answer:

(1.218 ; 1.322)

the confidence interval is appropriate

Step-by-step explanation:

The confidence interval :

Mean ± margin of error

Sample mean = 1.27

Sample standard deviation, s = 0.80

Sample size, n = 914

Since we are using tbe sample standard deviation, we use the T table ;

Margin of Error = Tcritical * s/√n

Tcritical at 95% ; df = 914 - 1 = 913

Tcritical(0.05, 913) = 1.96

Margin of Error = 1.96 * 0.80/√914 = 0.05186

Mean ± margin of error

1.27 ± 0.05186

Lower boundary = 1.27 - 0.05186 = 1.218

Upper boundary = 1.27 + 0.05186 = 1.322

(1.218 ; 1.322)

According to the central limit theorem, sample means will approach a normal distribution as the sample size increases. Hence, the confidence interval is valid, the sample size of 914 gave a critical value at 0.05 which is only marginally different from that will obtained using a normal distribution table. Hence, the confidence interval is appropriate

Answer:

1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Convert 2/3 to 4/6

Subtract: 4/6 - 1/6

You get 3/6

Simplify: 1/2

Hope this helps!

Answer: The answer is 1/2

Answer:

(5) we have multiple the powers