Answer:
The Rodney King arrest, which occurred in 1991, had a significant impact on society, particularly in the United States. King was a black man who was brutally beaten by several white police officers after a high-speed car chase. The incident was captured on video and widely publicized, leading to widespread outrage and protests.
One of the most significant impacts of the Rodney King arrest was the spotlight it shone on police brutality and racism within law enforcement. The incident brought to light the pervasive problem of police violence against people of color, and sparked a national conversation about the need for police reform and accountability.
The subsequent trial of the police officers involved in King's beating and their subsequent acquittal further intensified public outcry and led to riots in Los Angeles, resulting in numerous deaths and millions of dollars in damages. The unrest highlighted the deep-seated frustration and anger within communities of color towards a justice system that often seemed to favor the police over citizens.
In response to the Rodney King incident and the ensuing riots, there were significant efforts to reform police practices and promote greater accountability within law enforcement. These efforts included the implementation of new training programs, the use of body cameras, and increased oversight and accountability measures.
Overall, the Rodney King arrest had a profound impact on society, exposing longstanding issues of police brutality and racism within law enforcement and prompting widespread calls for reform. The incident and its aftermath continue to be remembered and studied as a critical moment in American history, reminding us of the ongoing need to confront systemic injustices and work towards greater social and racial equity.
Rodney King's arrest had a profound impact on society.
What was the socioeconomic ramification?Changes in police hiring and a concentrate on the police department's community relations were important outcomes of the Rodney King attack and riots. It also raised the issue of the racial makeup of verdicts and the position of trials. The Rodney King case altered people's perceptions of police barbarity. So according KABC-TV in Los Angeles, his increasing focus on neighborhood policing and cracked down on too much use of force reduced murders to 297 in 2011, the lowest amount in more than 40 years. The spotlight cast on the use of force and prejudice within law enforcement was one of the most severe repercussions of the Rodney King arrest. The incident made public brought to light the widespread problem of police shootings against people of color, sparking a political dialogue about the need for prison reform and accountability.
To know more about Rodney King visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29520943
#SPJ1
a radical republican championed this 1875 act but the supreme court struck it down in 1883; a new version was passed 81 years later
The 1875 act that was championed by a Radical Republican but later struck down by the Supreme Court was the Civil Rights Act of 1875.
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was enacted by the United States Congress to address the issue of racial discrimination. This Act outlawed racial discrimination in public facilities such as hotels, restaurants, and theaters. It also prohibited the exclusion of African Americans from jury service.
However, the Act was declared unconstitutional in 1883 by the Supreme Court in the Civil Rights Cases ruling. According to the Supreme Court, the 14th Amendment did not allow Congress to prohibit discrimination by private individuals or organizations.
Therefore, the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was invalidated. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark piece of legislation passed 81 years after the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was invalidated by the Supreme Court.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson and marked a significant turning point in the civil rights movement.
For more such questions on Civil Rights Act, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/10584148
#SPJ11
Was the US simply dragged
into a war due to its
Western Expansion into
the American continent?
Toward the west development furnished the US with tremendous normal assets and ports along the Atlantic, Pacific and Bay coasts for growing exchange, key components in making the superpower America is today.
What factors contributed to the Civil War?The philosophy was used to justify the compelled expulsion of Native Americans and other groups from their homes during the United States' territorial expansion in the nineteenth century. Slavery became a bigger problem as more states joined the Union as a result of the country's rapid growth, which resulted in the outbreak of the Civil War. During this crucial time, the United States of America pursued an expansion policy based on the idea of "manifest destiny," which holds that Americans were actually destined to spread across the continent. Even its willingness to fight for new territories was demonstrated. The spread of slavery into western territories sparked a great deal of controversy for many Americans in the nineteenth century.
To learn more about Civil War visit :
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
what does this selection of the constitution allow the us congress to do
Answer:
Explanation:
The Constitution assigned to Congress responsibility for organizing the executive and judicial branches, raising revenue, declaring war, and making all laws necessary for executing these powers.
TASK #4: Is the United States a modern day empire?
Take a position and state your opinion!
Write an answer to the question 3-4 sentences
Create a bullet list of your evidence (supporting points) that back your answer
Use specific examples
While the USA does now not self-identify as an empire, it has become the embodiment of an casual empire.
Is the United States regarded a empire?While the United States has by no means formally recognized itself and its territorial possessions as an empire, some commentators have referred to the u . s . a . as such, along with Max Boot, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., and Niall Ferguson.
But that assumption involves another: that America is already an empire truely via being the world's only superpower, by virtue of its navy supremacy, financial power, international influence, technological and scientific prowess, and world-wide alliances.
Learn more about United States here:
https://brainly.com/question/25800832#SPJ1An example of an "expressed power" given to the national government in the constitution is
Answer: Power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states.
Explanation:
One example of an "expressed power" given to the national government in the constitution is the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). This power has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to give Congress broad authority to regulate economic activity, including the power to regulate interstate commerce, the power to tax and spend for the general welfare, and the power to regulate foreign trade. This expressed power has played a significant role in shaping the economic and political landscape of the United States.
Answer:
Expressed powers, also known as the "enumerated powers," include the power to coin money, regulate foreign and interstate commerce, declare war, grant patents and copyrights and more.
Explanation: I really hope this helps!! Mark me brainliest!!
Have a good evening!
What did the television coverage of the Vietnam War illustrate?
Television coverage of the Vietnam War shows that Americans were able to watch military aggressions on television, such as the 1968 My Lai massacre, which sparked riots in cities and college campuses across the country.
This anger, fueled by television reports, eventually led to the decision to withdraw U.S. forces in 1973 and end U.S. involvement in the war. Based on the samples analyzed and the data obtained, it was concluded that television did not report on the dead, dying and wounded nearly every night on the evening news, but did report on them. Americans also did not regularly watch the fighting and deaths in Vietnam on regular television news programs.
From 8,000 miles away in the jungles of South Vietnam, the journalist filmed a film, submitted a report, and published or broadcasted it on the next day's news. All of these were presented to the American public in bright colors.
Television told people how cruel and bloody the war was and how American soldiers suffered as a result of the war. It negatively affected the image of the war and changed public opinion about the Vietnam War.
Know more about Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ4
SOMEONE PLS HELP ME ON THIS ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!
The housing market crash will have a major impact on the cost of rentals. As more people lose their homes, they will be forced to rent and the demand for rental properties will increase.
What is rental?Rental is the act of paying a fee in exchange for the temporary use of a property, item or service. It generally refers to the act of renting out items such as real estate, vehicles, and other objects for a fixed period of time, usually for a fee. Rental can also refer to the use of a service such as an internet service provider or streaming service for a fixed period of time. Rental is a great option for those who don’t want to commit to purchasing an item. It’s also a great way to gain access to something you may not be able to afford outright.
This increase in demand will cause prices to rise as landlords will be able to charge more for their properties. This phenomenon is known as the law of supply and demand, which states that when demand is high and supply is low, the price of a good or service will increase. Therefore, with an increase in the number of people renting and a decrease in available rental properties, the cost of renting will rise.
To learn more about rental
https://brainly.com/question/1273726
#SPJ1
Thomas Jefferson tended to emphasize the importance of industrial development when forecasting the future of the United Statestrue or false
The statement "Thomas Jefferson tended to emphasize the importance of industrial development when forecasting the future of the United State" is FALSE because Jefferson was somewhat skeptical of industrialization and believed that America's future lay in an agrarian economy.
Jefferson believed that the ideal society was one of small farmers who owned their own land and worked independently. Jefferson believed that such a society would foster the virtues of independence, self-reliance, and civic virtue.
In his vision of the future, Jefferson saw the United States as an agricultural nation that would produce enough food and other agricultural products to meet the needs of its citizens and to trade with other countries.
He saw manufacturing as a necessary evil that should be kept to a minimum, as he believed that it would lead to the growth of cities, the concentration of wealth, and the corruption of civic virtue. Instead, he believed that the economy should be based on the production of raw materials, such as cotton, tobacco, and lumber, that could be sold to other countries in exchange for finished goods.
Learn more about industrial development here:
https://brainly.com/question/9481741
#SPJ11
several moderate republicans refused to impeach andrew johnson because they thought such a decision wouldupset the balance of power in the government.empower the judicial branch of government.hurt their chances at reelection given Johnson's popularity.distract from their efforts to gain rights for African Americans.
Several moderate Republicans refused to impeach Andrew Johnson because they thought such a decision would hurt their chances at reelection given Johnson's popularity.
Johnson, who became President after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, was widely seen as a champion of the Union cause during the Civil War, and many Republicans feared that impeaching him would be politically costly.
Additionally, some Republicans were sympathetic to Johnson's views on Reconstruction, which they believed should be more lenient towards the former Confederate states. These Republicans were concerned that impeaching Johnson would empower the Radical Republicans, who favored a harsher approach to Reconstruction and had a more confrontational relationship with the President.
Ultimately, Johnson was impeached by the House of Representatives but was not removed from office by the Senate, as the impeachment failed to garner the two-thirds majority needed for conviction. Johnson finished his term as President in 1869 and was succeeded by Ulysses S. Grant.
Learn more about President here
https://brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ4
What were the two main subjects painted by the Taos artists?
Answer:
physical beauty and spiritual and cultural richness
Explanation:
please give 5 stars
In April 1975, Khmer Rouge, Pol Pot's group, occupied Phnom Penh in Cambodia. The city's 2 million people were exhausted by years of fighting. They welcomed the invaders. They hoped that they would be able to build a new society with these heavily armed men. Unfortunately, that was not the case. Within days, the Khmer Rouge drove them all into the countryside to become workers in agricultural communes. They emptied Cambodia's other towns and put an end to money, markets, schools, newspapers, religious practices, and private property. The Khmer Rouge hated anyone with money or education. They believed in the empowerment of the rural poor. What kind of government is Khmer Rouge? OA. a legislative government B. a limited government OC. OD. a judicial government O an unlimited government
what is the role of the texas board of pardons and paroles?
The eligibility of convicts for parole or discretionary mandatory monitoring, as well as the terms of release, are determined by the Board of Pardons and Paroles. The Board weighs the risk to society with each offender's chance of receiving successful release using research-based Parole Guidelines.
Why were pardons granted?A pardon is a gesture of the president's mercy and is typically offered in appreciation of the offender's admission of guilt and evidence of continued moral rectitude for a sizable amount of time following conviction or the end of the sentence.Noun His pardon came from the governor. For taking up so much of my time, he begged my forgiveness. When his sister apologized and said, "I'm ready to excuse a little sloppiness of attire in such a sweet and kind person," he eventually gave her the benefit of the doubt. A presidential pardon restores a number of privileges that were lost as a result of the pardoned offense and may, to some extent, alleviate the stigma associated with a conviction, but it does not obliterate or erase the record of the conviction itself.To learn more about pardon, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/21245416
it seems like frozen popsicles have been around forever. who invented them, and what year were they discovered?
Answer:Frank Epperson
Explanation:
The very first Popsicle® ice pop was created way back in 1905 by an 11-year-old named Frank Epperson. That's right, Popsicle® was invented by a kid!
the federal trade commission act and the clayton antitrust act were proposed by wilson to address what issue that was central to his 1912 campaign? multiple choice question.
The Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act were proposed by President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 to address the issue of trusts and monopolies, which was central to his 1912 campaign. These acts aimed to limit the power of big businesses and protect consumers and workers.
What were the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act?
The Federal Trade Commission Act was enacted in 1914 in the United States. It established the Federal Trade Commission as a regulatory body to police unfair business practices. The Commission has the authority to investigate and ban deceptive and unfair business practices, as well as to bring legal action against firms that engage in them.
The Clayton Antitrust Act, passed in 1914, served to strengthen and supplement the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. The Clayton Act, like the Sherman Act, aimed to prevent monopolies from forming. It also provided a range of specific practices that were deemed illegal, including price discrimination, exclusive dealing, and interlocking directorates.
learn more about the 1912 campaign here:
https://brainly.com/question/11548007
#SPJ11
who is the architect of the vietnam veterans memorial in washington, d.c., which she designed when she was only 21 years old?
21-year-old Yale architecture student Maya Lin with her design for the Vietnam Veterans Dedication, May 6, 1981. As a 21-year-old architecture student at Yale, Lin designed the Vietnam Veterans Dedication as a class project, then entered it into the largest design rivalry in American history.
Her striking proposal, an Angular mass of dark stone, scratched with the names of 58,000 dead soldiers, beat down the submissions of 1,420 other entrants. She encountered ferocious criticism when her unconventional design was selected. Feelings were running so high that her name was not even referenced at the devotion of the remembrance in 1982. She adapted to the painful controversy by returning to Yale as a graduate student. Her inspiring vision has since turned into the most-visited dedication in the nation's capital. The families of the fallen leave mementos at the wall, and veterans keep a constant vigil there.
In the first years the wake of leaving Yale, Maya Lin made twelve other significant works across the nation, including the Harmony Sanctuary at Pennsylvania's Juniata School, the "Ladies' Table" at Yale, and the Langston Hughes Library for the Youngsters' Defense Fund in Clinton, Tennessee.
to know more about American history click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1874247
#SPJ4
who gave a speech to congress speaking out against the compromise of 1850?
In 1850, a prominent politician gave a speech to the United States Congress expressing his opposition to the Compromise of 1850. The politician who gave the speech was Daniel Webster.
A number of compromises were proposed in 1850 in order to keep the peace between Northern and Southern states. This compromise package was intended to settle some of the most contentious issues between the two regions, including the status of slavery in newly acquired territories.Daniel Webster, a prominent statesman and senator from Massachusetts, was one of the most vocal opponents of the Compromise of 1850. He believed that the measure was an affront to the principles of freedom and liberty upon which the nation was founded.
Webster had long been an opponent of slavery and had become increasingly alarmed by the rising tensions between North and South.Webster was known for his oratory skills, and he was one of the most well-respected speakers of his time. He was therefore chosen to deliver a speech to Congress on March 7, 1850, in which he denounced the Compromise of 1850 as a betrayal of America's founding principles.In his speech, Webster argued that the nation could not remain united if it continued to be divided by issues such as slavery.
For such more questions on Congress :
brainly.com/question/15319440
#SPJ11
why did the thirteen colonies fight a war for independence from britain?
Answer:
why did the thirteen colonies fight a war for independence from britain?
Explanation:
The thirteen colonies fought a war for independence from Britain for a variety of reasons. Some of the main reasons include:
Taxation without representation: The colonists felt that they were being unfairly taxed by the British government without having any representation in the British Parliament. They believed that only elected representatives from their own colonies should have the power to tax them.
Economic restrictions: The British government placed many economic restrictions on the colonies, such as prohibiting them from trading with other countries. The colonists believed that these restrictions were hurting their ability to develop their own economies and industries.
Political control: The British government had a great deal of control over the colonies, including the ability to appoint governors and judges. The colonists believed that this was a violation of their rights as English citizens.
Religious and cultural differences: The colonies were made up of people from a variety of different religious and cultural backgrounds, and they felt that the British government did not understand or respect their unique needs and perspectives.
Desire for self-rule: Ultimately, the colonists wanted to govern themselves and have control over their own destinies. They believed that they were capable of creating their own government and that they deserved the right to do so.
All of these factors contributed to the decision of the thirteen colonies to fight for independence from Britain and establish their own government. The resulting American Revolution was a pivotal moment in world history, and it led to the creation of a new nation founded on principles of liberty and self-rule.
vilfredo pareto (1848-1923) observed that most of the wealth of a country is owned by a few members of the population. pareto's principle is
Yes, Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923) observed that most of the wealth of a country is owned by a few members of the population. This phenomenon is known as Pareto's Principle, also known as the 80-20 Rule. This principle states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes.
What is Pareto's principle?
Pareto's principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, refers to the principle that a small number of factors influence the majority of outcomes. It is often used in business and economics to describe the unequal distribution of wealth, but it may also be applied in other fields such as science, engineering, and social sciences. He, an Italian economist, observed that in Italy, approximately 80% of the country's wealth was held by 20% of the population.
learn more about Vilfredo Pareto here:
https://brainly.com/question/5648291
#SPJ11
In 1861 65 what happened in the civil war (in your own words ).
Answer: the Confederate army on that day opened fire on the federal garrison and forced it to lower the American flag in surrender.
"Yes: Mexico must be thoroughly chastised! . . . The news of yesterday [at the southern border] has added the last argument wanted to prove the necessity of an immediate Declaration of War by our government toward its southern neighbor."We are justified in the face of the world, in having treated Mexico with more forbearance [tolerance] than we have ever yet treated an enemy. . . . We have . . . submitted thus far to a most offensive rejection of an Ambassador personifying the American nation, and waited for years without payment of the claims of our injured merchants. We have sought peace through every avenue, and shut our eyes to many things, which, had they come from England or France, the President would not have dared to pass over without stern and speedy resentment. We have dammed up our memory, of what had passed in the South [Texas] years ago—of devilish massacres of some of our bravest and noblest sons . . . in violation of all the rules of war. . . ."We think there can be no doubt of the truth of yesterday's news; and we are sure the people here, ten to one, are for prompt and hostilities. . . . Let our arms now be carried with a spirit which shall teach the world that, while we are not forward for a quarrel, America knows how to crush, as well as how to expand!"Walt Whitman, journalist and poet, editorial in the Brooklyn Eagle, 1846"President [James K. Polk] in his message, as a pretext for sending our army to invade and conquer the country upon the Rio Grande, says: "Texas by its [legislative] act of December 19, 1836, had declared the [Rio Grande] to be the boundary of that [formerly independent] republic.' . . . The truth is that Texas had agreed upon the Nueces [River] as her boundary. . . ."If [Mexico] be ours, why does he seek to justify the taking possession of it by references to the fact that Mexico is indebted to some of our people? If it be not ours, and he has taken possession of it in order to compel Mexico to pay those debts, why not say so? The fact that Mexico has not paid the debts due to our citizens can have no legitimate connection with taking possession of [it as] our own soil. But [the president] was obviously conscious that this invasion of the Mexican territory could not be justified. . . ."When the Executive and Congress openly and avowedly took upon themselves the responsibility of extending and perpetuating slavery by the annexation of Texas, and by the total overthrow and subversion of the Constitution, . . . my confidence in the stability of our institutions was shaken, destroyed. . . . Our Union continues, but our Constitution is gone. . . .". . . No man regards this war as just. We know, the country knows, and the civilized world are conscious, that it has resulted from a desire to extend and sustain an institution on which the curse of the Almighty most visibly rests."Joshua Giddings, congressman from Ohio, speech in the United States House of Representatives, 1846-Based on their arguments in the excerpts, Giddings would likely agree with and Whitman would likely disagree with which of the following claims about the causes of the Mexican-American War?
Answer:
Based on the arguments in the excerpts, Joshua Giddings would likely agree with the claim that the Mexican-American War was caused by a desire to extend and sustain slavery, while Walt Whitman would likely disagree with this claim and instead argue that the war was necessary to chastise Mexico for its offenses against the United States.
why was the gadsden purchase added to the u.s. in 1853?
The Gadsden Purchase was added to the US in 1853 because it would provide a route for a railroad to be constructed from the Mississippi River to the Pacific coast.
The Gadsden Purchase was a transaction that happened on December 30, 1853, between the United States and Mexico. The deal was for $10 million, and it added around 30,000 square miles of land to the United States, mostly in present-day southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico.
The U.S. government was interested in acquiring the land because it would provide a route for a railroad to be constructed from the Mississippi River to the Pacific coast. The Gadsden Purchase had military, economic, and political advantages for the United States, and it allowed for the acquisition of significant mineral resources in the region.
The United States agreed to pay Mexico $10 million for the region that is now southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico. The Gadsden Purchase was a critical moment in US history, as it added more land to the United States and contributed to westward expansion.
For such more question on Mississippi:
https://brainly.com/question/14415698
#SPJ11
corinth was a city of commerce primarily due to what feature?
Corinth was a city of commerce primarily due to its location. Corinth is an ancient city that lies between the cities of Athens and Sparta, in the northeastern region of Peloponnese.
Corinth, one of the most flourishing cities of Greece, stood on the Isthmus of Corinth, which connects the Peloponnese to the mainland of Greece.
Cities of ancient Greece were built around important land features such as mountains, sea routes, and rivers, that made them prosperous. Corinth was one of the most prosperous cities in Greece because it was a crossroads for the movement of goods. The geography of the city played an important role in its prosperity.
Corinth was built on the narrow isthmus, which means it was located on a narrow strip of land that connects two larger pieces of land. It was also located between two important seaports, Cenchreae to the east and Lechaeum to the west. The Corinth Canal was constructed in 1893 AD and it is an artificial waterway.
It connected the Saronic Gulf to the Gulf of Corinth and separated the Peloponnese from the rest of Greece. As a city-state, Corinth also had a strong navy, which was important for protecting its trade routes from pirates and raiders.
For such more question on Corinth
https://brainly.com/question/15357521
#SPJ11
how long after using boric acid can you have intercourse
It is recommended to wait for 24 hours after using Boric Acid Suppositories before having intercourse.
Using Boric Acid Suppositories can be an effective treatment for various vaginal conditions, however, it is recommended to wait at least 24 hours after using the suppositories before engaging in sexual intercourse.
This waiting period is necessary to allow for proper absorption of the suppositories, and to ensure the safety of both partners during sexual activity. Boric Acid Suppositories should not be used if either partner has an allergic reaction to boric acid. Therefore, it is important to discuss any medical concerns or allergies with your healthcare provider before beginning treatment.
To know more about Boric Acid , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14879930
#SPJ4
Prior to the Latin American revolutions, ______ we’re at the bottom of the caste system and _____ we’re at the top 
Previous to the Latin American revolutions, Native Americans and Africans were at the bottom of the caste system, with Peninsulares at the top.
In Latin America, who made up the absolute bottom of society?While they constituted the bulk of the population, the bottom four classes were the most downtrodden, ignorant, and impoverished. Native Americans and Africans were at the bottom of the social scale in every colony in South America, while Europeans were at the top.
Throughout Latin America, whose socioeconomic class held sway over the region?The greatest rank in the Latin American colonies was accorded to those who were born in Spain and subsequently relocated to the Americas. They were referred to as peninsulares since they were born on the Spanish peninsula. Just 2% of individuals belonged to this powerful elite. The Creoles then arrived.
Learn more about Spanish peninsula: https://brainly.com/question/2113986
#SPJ1
Temperature is a measure of how hot or cold something is.
Agree because temperature is the measure of hotness or coldness expressed in terms of any of several skills, including Fahrenheit and Celsius. How could you revise
statement to be more complete or correct?
The average kinetic energy of the particles in a material is measured by its temperature. It is a typical particle's kinetic energy.
What is Temperature and how measure of how hot or cold?
The average kinetic energy of the particles in an item is measured by its temperature. A measurement of how hot or cold something is in relation to a standard.
It is a fact that a lot of people don't know that a lot of people don't know that. Heat and temperature are two very distinct ideas. a thermometer having scales for both Celsius and Farenheit. The average kinetic energy of the molecules inside a material is measured by temperature. Temperature can be expressed in Celsius (°C), Kelvin (K), Fahrenheit (°F), or Rankine units and describes the average kinetic energy of molecules inside a substance or system (R). It is a quantifiable physical characteristic of an item; a state variable.
Learn more about Temperature:
https://brainly.com/question/7510619
#SPJ1
One of the most important developments during 1930s was the formation of a national mafia alliance. Whereby heads of the most influential family's would meet to divide territory. This alliance was referred to as what?
The alliance that was formed by the heads of the most powerful families to divide the territory was called the Commission.
What is the National Mafia Alliance?
The National Mafia Alliance was formed during the 1930s as an alliance of American Mafia families. The leaders of the most prominent families met to divide their territories and settle disputes peacefully, without bloodshed. This Alliance was also known as The Commission, and it was headed by Charles Luciano, who was known as the "father of modern organized crime."
The Commission was comprised of the bosses of the five largest crime families in New York City, as well as representatives from the smaller families throughout the United States. They worked together to avoid violence and improve their respective positions.
Learn more about National Mafia Alliance here:
brainly.com/question/28485312
#SPJ11
Why tecmuesh thought the treaties made with individual Native American nations were worthless
Answer:
Tecumseh believed that the treaties made with individual Native American nations were worthless because he felt they were not negotiated fairly and did not respect the sovereignty of Native American nations. He advocated for a pan-Indian alliance to protect their land, resources, and way of life.
Explanation:
Tecumseh was a Shawnee warrior and chief who lived in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. He believed that the treaties made with individual Native American nations by the United States government were worthless because he felt they were not negotiated fairly and did not respect the sovereignty of Native American nations.
Tecumseh believed that the United States government was taking advantage of Native American nations by offering them unfair treaties that were not in their best interests. He believed that the government was deliberately dividing Native American nations and forcing them to give up their land, resources, and sovereignty through the use of unfair treaty negotiations.
Tecumseh argued that Native American nations needed to come together as a unified front to resist these unfair treaties and protect their sovereignty. He called for a pan-Indian alliance, where Native American nations would set aside their differences and work together to protect their land, resources, and way of life.
In summary, Tecumseh believed that the treaties made with individual Native American nations were worthless because he felt they were not negotiated fairly and did not respect the sovereignty of Native American nations. He advocated for a pan-Indian alliance to protect their land, resources, and way of life.
Following the
assassination of
Archduke Franz
Ferdinand, what
nation came to
the aid of Serbia?
A. Russia
B. Germany
C. France
Answer:
france is the correct
Explanation:
how could having more factories be an advantage during war time?
Who was the patron for this painting raphael the subject of this painting reflects the renaissance interest
Answer:
Explanation:
Raphael, like many artists during the Renaissance, had various patrons who commissioned his works. Some of his most notable patrons included the popes of his time, as well as wealthy and powerful families such as the Medici family of Florence.
As for the subject matter of his paintings, Raphael's works reflected the interests and ideals of the Renaissance, which were focused on humanism, individualism, and classical antiquity. Many of his paintings depicted religious or mythological scenes, often featuring idealized human figures that emphasized physical beauty, grace, and balance. He also incorporated classical elements such as perspective, proportion, and symmetry into his works, which reflected the renewed interest in classical art and culture during the Renaissance.
Raphael's Renaissance paintings were usually sponsored by distinguished individuals or organizations, typically from the nobility, royalty, or the Church. They largely depict religious or classical themes, representing the era's fascination with humanism, nature, and realism.
Explanation:The painting by Raphael in question, if it falls flawlessly within the Renaissance era, is likely to have been sponsored or commissioned by a high-ranking individual or organization, often royalty, nobility, or the Church. This is due to the fact that during the Renaissance, patronage was widely utilized as a tool to increase one's prominence and standing in society. The subject matter of Renaissance paintings usually involved religious or classical themes, which reflected the era's interest in humanism, nature, and realism.
Learn more about Renaissance Art here:https://brainly.com/question/32876675
#SPJ2
