Benjamin Ferencz meant that the Nuremberg Trials established the principle of the rule of law rather than the rule of force. He said this because during the Nuremberg Trials, Nazi leaders who had committed war crimes were held accountable for their actions.
The principle of the rule of law was established at the Nuremberg Trials. The rule of law is based on the belief that everyone should be subject to the same laws, regardless of their position or power. The rule of force, on the other hand, is based on the idea that the strongest or most powerful should be able to do whatever they want.Benjamin Ferencz, who was a lead prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials, believed that the trials were an important step towards the establishment of the rule of law as a guiding principle in international relations.
He argued that the trials helped to establish the idea that international law should be based on principles of justice and human rights, rather than simply on the power of individual nations or states.
To know more about Benjamin Ferencz visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/19202635
#SPJ11
Ciara drives an average of 43. 6 miles per week.
(a) Work out an estimate of the number of miles Ciara drives in a year
Ciara drives an average of 43.6 miles per week. To estimate the number of miles she drives in a year, we can multiply her weekly mileage by the number of weeks in a year which will be 2,267.2 miles in a year.
Considering a year has approximately 52 weeks, we can calculate the estimated number of miles as follows: 43.6 miles/week x 52 weeks = 2267.2 miles
Therefore, based on the given average, Ciara drives an estimated 2,267.2 miles in a year. This estimation assumes that her weekly mileage remains consistent throughout the year, without accounting for any variations or specific patterns in her driving habits. It provides a rough estimate of the distance she covers over the course of a year based on the given average mileage.
Learn more about estimated number of miles here: brainly.com/question/28887354
#SPJ11
Complete the sentences (with have, has, have got or has got). Using NEGATIVE (-) and INTERROGATIVE (?) form if neccessary (0.25): What .......... our family ....... ...........for the party?
"What has our family got for the party?", we are discussing the possessions or items that our family has acquired for the party.
The word "has" is used because "our family" is treated as a singular subject in this context. It indicates that the family possesses something. "Got" is used as a verb that emphasizes possession. It means that our family has acquired or obtained something for the party.
The sentence is in the interrogative form because it is asking a question. It seeks information about the things our family has for the party. The question mark at the end indicates that it is a question.
Overall, the sentence is asking about the possessions or items that our family has acquired for the party and it is structured in an interrogative form to seek that information.
Learn more about interrogative form here:
https://brainly.com/question/25669602
#SPJ11
