Answer:
I think It's great, but you shouldn't use the word "Will" so much.
Can someone answer this please!!
Answer:
personification, or epistrophe
Explanation:
Personification states--You can easily use personification in your own writing draw your reader’s attention, and convey a deeper meaning.
Epistrophe states that-- It is defined as the repetition of a word or phrase at the end of a sentence.
how do authors present and develop characters? check all that apply
Answer:
When you're introducing a new character, it can be helpful to begin by describing the character's backstory. ... When done correctly, a backstory in an opening scene can help the reader connect emotionally with the character while also advancing the plot.
writers develop characters through a variety of techniques: narration, dialogue, interaction with other characters, interaction with setting, and characters' thoughts.
Explanation:
I am also writting a story if you would like to see its as my recent question i hope if you read it it helps...
Answer:
Accept all the choices except for choice C.)
Explanation:
Good luck :)
in paragraph 5-7 octovian is described as ????
Where will you find information about how cable-stayed bridges work?
a.
Build a bridge
c.
Contact Us
b.
Teacher’s guide
d.
PBS home site
Answer:
Contact Us
Explanation:
What does tarnishing mean
Answer:
lose or cause to lose luster, especially as a result of exposure to air or moisture.
Explanation:
just that maybe you couldve saved pionts by looking it up
Answer:
It means to make or become less valuable or respected. Or it also means to lose or cause to lose luster
Which is more important: freedom or security? Do you believe there is a way to have both freedom and
security when it comes to speech? Cite evidence from this text, your own experience, and other literature, art, or history in your answer.
Answer:
National security is an essential factor of any functioning society, but freedom is just as important.After 9/11, security in America was taken to a new level with increased airport safety procedures, a stronger border control, and new security acts being passed.The government did need to take action, such as enforcing stricter airport regulations to better monitor who enters the country. However, they did not need to infringe on American freedoms that were fought so hard for during the Revolutionary War.The USA Patriot Act of 2001 increased the ability of law enforcement officials to search personal information such as telephone calls, e-mails and personal records. It also eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States.While some aspects of the act are necessary, others are not.The Fourth Amendment ensures "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." Listening in on phone calls and going through people's personal e-mails is unreasonable because it will not make America a safer place to live and it infringes on the freedoms the Fourth Amendment guarantees.U.S. intelligence analysts were ordered to continue monitoring phone calls, even when it was clear they posed no threat to America's safety."We identified phone numbers belonging to non-threatening groups, including the Red Cross," said Adrienne Kinne, a former Arab linguist who worked at a National Security Agency facility at Fort Gordon from 2001 to 2003. "We could have blocked their numbers, but we didn't, and we were told to listen to them just in case."American freedoms were being sacrificed to provide security, even when there was no real danger. The people whose phone calls were being monitored posed no threat to America. This was an invasion of their rights as American citizens.Freedom and security need to be balanced, but freedom should not be jeopardized in order to obtain security.In the beginning, America invested in freedom, not the security of what its citizens already knew. And while both are vital to the success of a nation, freedom is the more fundamental, more enduring, and, therefore, more important.Some may argue that, given the current threats to America, the security of the country and its people should take priority over freedoms, no matter the cost.While there are threats to be concerned about, taking away the liberty of the citizens for the sake of security is just giving in to what the terrorists ultimately want: the suppression of America and its people.These acts were supposed to secure the country and offer more protection in the tumultuous atmosphere of World War I. In reality, they not only failed but they tightened the grip that fear held on the nation. Beyond this, the acts dramatically infringed on First Amendment rights, the freedoms that are deeply ingrained in America.And while the freedom versus security debate is centuries old and circumstances have changed countless times, the dilemma is still the same. In a nation where freedom has had such a high value even before the country's birth, it is nearly impossible to place security before liberty.I consider security to be more important than freedom. For a small group of students in my school, the thoughts concerning this topic are so drastically different that it is our policy to refuse to discuss it with others when we know it will start an argument.Freedom and security do not necessarily refer to matters of national importance. They can be used in many situations. For example, when looking for a job, some people consider how secure they will be having a routine 9 to 5 job with little change in schedule. This ensures that their daily needs will be taken care of and they don't need to worry about those.Another extremely important thing having to do with security is a person's romantic relationships. Is it better to date exclusively and to have a steady boyfriend or girlfriend, or to be free to come and go as you please without having a steady relationship in your life? Personally, I'd like to think that because something like marriage exists, security is considered significantly more important to most individuals.
Some people may think that life is pointless if you aren't free to enjoy it. But I disagree. What's the point of being free if you have to live with the constant uncertainty and worry that's caused by a lack of security?
Lilly likes to leave her laundry on the floor.
A hyperbole
B alliteration
C personification
D idiom
E simile
F metaphor
G onomatopoeia
H sensory
I imagery
Choose the pair of words that is the correct analogy for the following:
1. Acquiesced : disagree
2. Condoned : approved
3. Appertaining : sharing
Answer:
2. Condoned : approved
Answer:
2. Condoned : Approved
Explanation:
Condoned - accept and allow to continue.
Approved - officially agree to or accept as satisfactory.
what is the moral of king Arthur?
Answer:
The moral of King Arthur can be that you have to work hard and do the right thing because in the story, he has to take back the throne from his father because his father is evil.
how is shakespeare global in places other than london
Um.....where is the question at?
Ayo I need help with this question because I don't know if I got it wrong or not.
A favorite book is one in which the reader has most likely made which connection? text-text text-world text-self
Answer:
text-self is correct
Explanation:
Enjoy your day you guys!
fix the error(s) in this sentence below
tom is unable to make it to the party last night.
Rewrite the sentence and explain what the errors were
Answer:
Explanation:
tom is unable to make it to the party last night.
Tom was unable to make it to the party last night.
I have underlined the mistakes in the first sentence and underlined the correction in the second sentence
In tom, T should be capital because it is a proper noun
Since the sentence talks about last night, then is should be replaced by was as it is talking about the past.
Hope this helps
plz mark as brainliest!!!!!!!!
How did mariah carey influence her art movement ?
Answer:
Rosen further exemplified Carey's influence by drawing parallel with American Idol, which to her, "often played out as a clash of melisma-mad Mariah wannabes. And, today, nearly 20 years after Carey's debut, major labels continue to bet the farm on young stars such as the winner of Britain's X Factor show, Leona Lewis , with her Generation Next gloss on Mariah's big voice and big hair." i think
Explanation:
I need help!! can someone please review my essay and make sure it's good? Thank you!! Tell me ANYTHING I should change!!
How much do you think our genes affect our personality? Our science club is having a debate about whether or not genes play a bigger role than experiences in determining who we are. Genes play a bigger role than experiences in determining who we are. This is because shyness is a common characteristic based on genes and our genes can also affect us as adults.
The first reason why genes play a bigger role than experiences in determining who we are is that shyness is a common characteristic based on genes. According to Source 1, ¨Shyness has been studied perhaps more than any other personality trait. Kagan, who has monitored 500 children for more than 17 years at Harvard, can detect telltale signs of shyness in babies even before they're born. He's found that the hearts of shy children in the womb consistently beat faster than 140 times a minute, which is much faster than the heartbeats of other babies.¨ In other words, it is easily predicted that you are going to be a shy person when you are older because of your heart beating faster than normal in the womb. Also according to Source 1, “2- year-old Majorie was so painfully shy that she wouldn't talk to or look at a stranger. When Jerome Kagan, a Harvard professor who discovered that shyness has a strong genetic component, Marjorie showed every sign of inherited shyness, a condition in which the brain somehow sends out messages to avoid new experiences” Based on this shyness coming from our genes can very strongly affect how we act and interpret things especially depending on how severe it is.
Another reason why genes play a bigger role than experiences in determining who we are is that our genes can even affect us into adulthood. According to Source 2, “Sandra and Marisa Pena, 32-year-old identical twins, seem to be the same. They have the same thick dark hair, the same high cheekbones, the same habit of delicately rubbing the tip of the nose in conversation. They had the same type of thyroid cyst at the same age (18) in the same place (right side).” Based on this since they are twins they have mostly the same but slightly different genes that affected the way that they act and look which makes them seem the same. And also, “About 50 percent of the characteristics twins have in common are due to genes alone” To put it more simply, that is the reason why they act so much the same, they have about 50 percent of the same genes that make them practically identical.
In conclusion, genes play a more important role than experiences in determining who we are because shyness is a typical feature based on genes and our genes can also affect us in adulthood. But some people may argue that we can grow out of our genes or we can’t simply predict someone's personality. While I can admit that our personalities can change over time but at the same time, we still have a component that sticks with us somehow, according to Source 2“In recent years, we've come to believe that genes influence character and personality more than anything else does. It's not just about height and hair color--DNA seems to have its clutches on our very souls.” This means that we may experience somethings but our DNA still takes part in who we are. But also, indeed, we cannot 100% foretell someone's personality we can still make simple but true assumptions about how people may act based on how they act in the womb according to Source 1, “ Kagan can detect telltale signs of shyness in babies even before they're born. He's found that the hearts of shy children in the womb consistently beat faster than 140 times a minute, which is much faster than the heartbeats of other babies” This proves that genes can take a big part in how we act as people in the future even if they are small details.
ok so i have to Write about a time when you had an unexpected learning experience. What happened? What did you learn? and im not good at writing so like can u help me but like make it fake btw im a girl sooooo idk but pls helppp
Answer:
A time I had an unexpected learning experience when I was in 5th grade. My teacher taught us a lesson about voting and why itś important. I did not care to be honest but then I learned that our voice helps our country and state better and that we need to vote. In conclusion, I learned we should always vote.
Explanation:
Practice page 187 my perspective boom
Answer:
what is a question you asked ??
Which propaganda technique does this passage use?
O plain folks
O scapegoat
O bandwagon
O glittering generalities
Read the passage from Animal Farm.
"What is that gun firing for?" said Boxer.
"To celebrate our victory!" cried Squealer.
"What victory?" said Boxer. His knees were bleeding,
he had lost a shoe and split his hoof, and a dozen
pellets had lodged themselves in his hind leg.
"What victory, comrade? Have we not driven the enemy
off our soil the sacred soil of Animal Farm?"
"But they have destroyed the windmill. And we had
worked on it for two years!"
"What matter? We will build another windmill. We will
build six windmills if we feel like it. You do not
appreciate, comrade, the mighty thing that we have
done. The enemy was in occupation of this very ground
that we stand upon. And now-thanks to the leadership
of Comrade Napoleon--we have won every inch of it
Answer:
Its D. Glittering generalitiesExplanation:
Took the test edge 2020The propaganda technique that has been employed in the given passage would be:
D). Glittering generalities.
'Propaganda technique' is described as the technique or methodology in which there is an attempt to influence the behavior of people or their actions by providing a false depiction of something. In the given excerpt, the manipulation or the false representation that is made through propaganda technique is the 'sparkling generalized statement' which can convince the viewers or readers to believe in it. Here, the "building of windmill" again exemplifies this glorification of a false reality to persuade the people.
Thus, option D is the correct answer.
Learn more about 'Propaganda' here:
brainly.com/question/19983777
What is the author's purpose in this paragraph?
OA.
to express an opinion about false malpractice claims
OB.
to report on a recent malpractice claim that went to trial
OC.
to condemn doctors who want new malpractice laws
OD.
to persuade readers that malpractice laws are unnecessary
Kitten emergency
Here's a "Real" question whats 6+7-2=?
What should I name my new cat?? Shes a mix of always hungry, playful, and shady.
Answer:
11
Explanation:
You should name your kitten kiwi or cherry
Answer:
11
Explanation:
KIKI is the cutest name ever!
complete the following sentence by filling in a or an or the night is quiet
HELLLPPP WLL MARK AND 5 STARS, USE RACE
How does density affect the tendency of an object to float or sink in a liquid?
Answer:
The density of an object determines whether it will float or sink in another substance. An object will float if it is less dense than the liquid it is placed in. An object will sink if it is more dense than the liquid it is placed in.
Explanation: hope i could help you out have a blessed night :)
Answer:
Explanation:
First you have to know the density of the liquid. The numbers range from 0.5 to about 2.
I the object you are putting into the liquid has a density greater than that of the liquid, then the object will sink (go below the surface of the liquid).
If the object has a density less than the liquid then the object will float.
If you take a chunk of solid iron, and put it water, there is no way that object is going to float (with one exception). Iron has a density of about 8. Water is 1. Water is the standard.
If you put balsa wood in water there is no way it will sink. It has a density much less than almost all liquids.
So you do you make iron ships float? The answer to that is that ships are not solid. The shell of the ship has a volume much greater than the thickness of the hull of the ship. The density would be calculated as 8 / huge volume -- say 1,000,000 cubic cm. (and that's not much of a volume.
The result is a density much less than 1. Iron ships really do float.
Which two pieces of evidence from the passage best suggest that the Wright brothers seriously considered safety in their airplane design?
A. If you did not take the precaution to fasten your hat before starting, you have probably lost it by this time.
B. Otherwise the general construction and operation of the machine was to be similar to that of the 1902 glider.
C.The motor close beside you kept up an almost deafening roar during the whole flight, yet in your excitement you did not notice it till it stopped!
D.We decided to place the motor to one side of the man, so that in case of a plunge headfirst, the motor could not fall upon him.
E.To provide against the machine rolling over forward in landing, we designed skids like sled runners, extending out in front of the main surfaces.
Answer:
D and E
Explanation:
The two pieces of evidence from the passage that best suggests that the Wright brothers seriously considered safety in their airplane design was:
D. We decided to place the motor to one side of the man, so that in case of a plunge headfirst, the motor could not fall upon him. E. To provide against the machine rolling over forward in landing, we designed skids like sled runners, extending out in front of the main surfaces.According to the given question, we are asked to show the two pieces of evidence from the passage that best suggests that the Wright brothers seriously considered safety in their airplane design.
As a result of this, we can see that from the complete text, there is a narration about the process which the Wright brothers took when they designed the first ever planes and they put in some safety measures in place to make sure that the planes could be safe for the user.
Therefore, the correct answers are options D and E
Read more about safety here:
https://brainly.com/question/24852024
Helloo! I hope you're having an amazing day, please go get something to eat and drink. Even if it's just a little snack! I promise you're doing amazing :) If anyone ever needs to talk about anything my instagram is your.averagechild, feel free to reach out and vent if you need to!
Answer:
im having a great day thx
Explanation:
ill get something to eat and drink
thx i might need to talk to someone one day
have a great day
what is in a pepsi can
Answer:
pepsi and bubbles
Explanation:
pepsi was originally made as a toilet cleaner
Answer:
what is in a Pepsi can?
Carbonated Water, Sugar, Colour (Caramel E150d), Acid (Phosphoric Acid), Flavourings (including Caffeine
Exaplanation
Pepsi is a carbonated soft drink manufactured by PepsiCo. Originally created and developed in 1893 by Caleb Bradham and introduced as Brad's Drink, it was renamed as Pepsi-Cola in 1898, and then shortened to Pepsi in 1961.
Which achievement is credited to Aristotle?
He wrote the play Antigone.
He developed a system of logic.
He was known as the Father of History.
He described an ideal form of government in his writing.
answer fast pls I'm timed :(
Answer:
he developed a system of logic
Explanation:
good luck
The achievement that is credited to Aristotle was for the development of a system of logic. Thus, option second is correct.
Who was Aristotle?Aristotle was a famous and ancient Greek thinker and polymath. His publications span a wide range of topics, including physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, theater, music, rhetoric, psychology, linguistics, economics, politics, meteorology, geology, and government.
He founded the field of formal logic, made groundbreaking contributions to all areas of philosophy and science, and recognized and examined the connections between the numerous scientific disciplines. In addition to being a philosopher, Aristotle was a teacher who established the Lyceum in Athens.
Hence, option second is correct.
Learn more about Aristotle here:
https://brainly.com/question/5399979
#SPJ6
How could Caroline best improve her analysis? HELP PLSSSSS
She could explain how the quotation supports her ideas.
She could cite evidence from the text to support her opinion.
She could include a thesis statement to express her position.
She could evaluate the text to analyze the big ideas and messages
Answer:
She could cite evidence from the text to support her opinion
Explanation:
Citing text in my opinion, is one of the best ways to improve an analysis and essay.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
what can you do if you just got lied to give me some advice before my head explodes
Answer:
Ask the person why they felt the need to lie to you if you guys are close, but make sure you calm down before you say anything so you’re in the right headspace.
An argumentative essay should people be able to own property in space.
No, they should not. The space is not theres.
Read this excerpt from We've Got a Job: The 1963 Children's March.
All of the students at St. Mary's were black, as required by law. But unlike the staff at black public schools, the teachers – all of whom were nuns – were white. So, Arnetta grew up mingling comfortably with white people. In fact, had she wanted to, she could have "passed" for white herself.
The excerpt uses third-person narration, because
a character tells the events of the story.
the author tells the facts of the story.
the author speaks to the reader.
the author knows how the story ends.
Answer:
B - the author tells the facts of the story.
Explanation:
Answer:
b
Explanation:
it just is
Is Kate tamed at the end of the taming of the shrew?(Shakespeare)
Answer:
Katherine Minola was never tamed in the play, but she was brainwashed and manipulated to act in a manner that was socially acceptable in the 16th century.
Explanation:
Answer:
In fact, in the last line of the play, Lucentio implies that Kate, in the end, allowed herself to be tamed: “'Tis a wonder, by your leave, she will be tamed so” (V. ii. 193). Perhaps Lucentio implies that Kate and Petruchio planned the wager, and that they worked as a team to dupe the others out of their money
