Causation is What do historians call a relationship in which one event or variable contributes to the occurrence of another.
What is Causation?Causation, or causality, can be described as the capacity of one variable have in the bid to influence another.
The first variable could bring about the occurrence of second into existence and sometimes it could be cause the incidence of the second variable to fluctuate, hence Causation is What do historians call a relationship in which one event or variable contributes to the occurrence of another.
Learn more about Causation at:
https://brainly.com/question/12479370
#SPJ1
what are the 3 thing
Answer:
according to research;"The three important things in life are vitality, connection and contribution"
2. Civil rights are enforceable rights or privileges guaranteed by the US Constitution or other laws or statues.
True
False
Answer: TRUE
Explanation:
Yes they are guaranteed by the United States Constitution and further guaranteed by the civil rights laws are passed in the 1950s and 60s as well as the civil rights act that was passed in the 1960s
(Civil rights act of 1964)
A box sits on a table. A short arrow labeled F subscript N = 12 N points up. A short arrow labeled F subscript g = 12 N points down. A long arrow labeled F subscript P = 15 N points right. A short arrow labeled F subscript f = 3 N points left. A man pushes on the box from the left.
What is the force of friction acting on this box?
N
What is the net force acting on this box?
N to the
Answer:
18 nad 29
Explanation:
Answer:
12 N to the right
Explanation:
national income introduction
Answer:
In common parlance, national income means the total value of goods and services produced annually in a country. ADVERTISEMENTS: In other words, the total amount of income accruing to a country from economic activities in a year's time is known as national income.
Charles Lindbergh is best known for expanding:
O A. the social status of immigrants.
B. the popularity of Populism.
C. possibilities in the field of aviation.
D. the cause of civil rights.
Answer:
C. possibilities in the field of aviation.
Explanation:
what best reflects the views of the Republican Party in the late eighteen hundreds
ôi đã được hỏi trong các ý kiến \u200b\u200bmột câu hỏi rất thú vị về việc đảng Cộng hòa khác với đảng Dân chủ như thế nào. Đương nhiên, các nhà bình luận ngay lập tức được tìm thấy, người tuyên bố rằng tất cả là một và giống nhau, trong khi những người khác mâu thuẫn với họ. Thực tế là cả hai đều đúng, bởi vì nếu bạn nhìn vào Đảng Dân chủ và Cộng hòa theo quan điểm của một người nước ngoài, nếu bạn sống ở một quốc gia khác, không phải ở Hoa Kỳ, thì, đối với bạn, họ không khác, bởi vì bên ngoài họ có chính sách gần như giống nhau.
Những gì chúng ta đã thấy dưới thời Clinton, Bush, những gì chúng ta thấy dưới thời Obama - về nguyên tắc, chính sách đối ngoại cũng tương tự. Nhưng chính sách đối nội rất khác nhau, vì vậy đối với người Mỹ, có một sự khác biệt lớn giữa Đảng Cộng hòa và Dân chủ. Và hôm nay tôi sẽ nói về sự khác biệt này.
Tôi sẽ bắt đầu với những thứ hời hợt. Như nhiều người có thể biết, đảng Dân chủ tự do hơn, còn đảng Cộng hòa thì bảo thủ hơn. Nó được thể hiện như thế nào: Đảng Dân chủ tin rằng thời gian đang chuyển động, và đất nước, chính trị, con người nên phát triển, vì vậy Đảng Dân chủ ủng hộ nhiều điều mà đảng Cộng hòa không ủng hộ. Ví dụ như phá thai, hôn nhân đồng giới, quy định về vũ khí. Đổi lại, lý tưởng của những người Cộng hòa là nước Mỹ của những người sáng lập. Như đã được họ để lại, đất nước nên được phát triển. Do đó, đảng Cộng hòa ủng hộ nhiều hơn các giá trị lịch sử, bảo thủ hơn; hầu hết trong số họ chống phá thai, hôn nhân đồng giới; chống lại quy định của vũ khí. Đây là một cái nhìn hời hợt về Đảng Dân chủ và Cộng hòa và chính trị trong nước của họ.
Đảng Dân chủ dựa vào chính phủ và nói rằng nên chăm sóc người dân. Do đó, họ chỉ trích đảng Dân chủ và Obama vì đã phát triển chủ nghĩa xã hội và bình đẳng ở Hoa Kỳ. Và đảng Cộng hòa dựa vào mọi người và tin rằng mỗi người nên tự chăm sóc bản thân mình, rằng nhà nước nên cho phép mỗi người độc lập đạt được những gì mình muốn. Nếu bạn có sự kiên trì, thông minh, kỹ năng, thì bạn sẽ đạt được điều gì đó, nhưng nếu bạn không có nó, thì bạn sẽ sống kém. Đó là sự khác biệt lớn giữa hai lực lượng này.
Do đó, quan điểm về thuế: Đảng Dân chủ cho rằng cần phải tăng thuế cho người giàu và giảm cho người nghèo, nghĩa là cho người nghèo sống nhờ người giàu. Đảng Cộng hòa nói rằng thuế nên giống nhau cho tất cả mọi người, bởi vì tất cả mọi người đều bình đẳng; người giàu đã tự mình đạt được điều gì đó, người nghèo không đạt được điều gì vì bản thân mình.
Đảng Dân chủ cũng tin rằng nhà nước nên tăng mức lương tối thiểu, và đảng Cộng hòa chống lại điều đó, vì họ nói rằng điều đó sẽ can thiệp vào các doanh nghiệp nhỏ. Nếu nhà tuyển dụng không trả tiền cho nhân viên, thì điều này sẽ gây hại cho chính doanh nghiệp, nền kinh tế và đất nước trong dài hạn.
Tiếp tục chủ đề xã hội chủ nghĩa, tôi sẽ nói rằng đảng Dân chủ tin rằng cần phải tăng chi tiêu cho tất cả các loại chương trình xã hội, như tem thực phẩm, nhà ở ngân sách, v.v. Ngược lại, đảng Cộng hòa nói rằng tất cả những điều này phải được giảm bớt, bởi vì có rất nhiều gian lận trong khu vực này Nhiều người làm việc "một cách thường xuyên" và nhận được phiếu giảm giá dưới vỏ bọc của người nghèo; Nhiều người không tìm kiếm việc làm, nhận thất nghiệp (trợ cấp thất nghiệp) và sống bằng chi phí của người nộp thuế, v.v. Và đảng Cộng hòa ủng hộ thực tế là nếu bạn đã cắt giảm chi tiêu cho các chương trình xã hội khác nhau, bạn cần đưa ra một số quy tắc, luật lệ sẽ quy định việc nhận trợ cấp xã hội của mọi người để có thể kiểm tra những người đó sử dụng ma túy và những người này thực sự đang tìm việc.
What weapon did the Japanese have that the Americans did not have?
kamikaze pilots
napalm bombs
mustard gas
torpedoes
Answer:
A
Explanation:
What actions characterize authoritarian governments? Check all that apply.
Leaders often seize power by illegitimate means.
All citizens prosper under the government.
Citizens support the government’s official ideology.
A single leader or a very powerful group rules.
Leaders refuse to tolerate dissenting views.
*Leader's often seize power by illegitimate means.
*A single leader or a powerful group rules.
*Leader's refuse to tolerate dissenting views
The actions that characterize an authoritarian government are:
Leaders often seize power by illegitimate means.A single leader or a very powerful group rules.Leaders refuse to tolerate dissenting views.Importance of DemocracyThe democratic government system contributes to the development of a more just and egalitarian society, as sovereignty comes from the people, as the population has an active voice to contribute to the decision-making of a country, either indirectly or directly.
Therefore, authoritarianism is a more rigid and closed regime, which can generate internal and external conflicts for a country.
Find out more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/3710021
can I play on a school basketball court after school hours in Connecticut
Answer:
whats?
Explanation:
No
__________________
Background of Steve Biko
Answer:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Steve-Biko
This Britannica article might help! I will post what is on this article below so it is easier for you.
Steve Biko, in full Bantu Stephen Biko, (born December 18, 1946, King William’s Town, South Africa—died September 12, 1977, Pretoria), founder of the Black Consciousness Movement in South Africa. His death from injuries suffered while in police custody made him an international martyr for South African Black nationalism.
After being expelled from high school for political activism, Biko enrolled in and graduated (1966) from St. Francis College, a liberal boarding school in Natal, and then entered the University of Natal Medical School. There he became involved in the multiracial National Union of South African Students (NUSAS), a moderate organization that had long espoused the rights of Blacks. He soon grew disenchanted with NUSAS, believing that, instead of simply allowing Blacks to participate in white South African society, the society itself needed to be restructured around the culture of the Black majority. In 1968 he cofounded the all-Black South African Students’ Organization (SASO), and he became its first president the following year. SASO was based on the philosophy of Black consciousness, which encouraged Blacks to recognize their inherent dignity and self-worth. In the 1970s the Black Consciousness Movement spread from university campuses into urban Black communities throughout South Africa. In 1972 Biko was one of the founders of the Black People’s Convention, an umbrella organization of Black consciousness groups.
Biko drew official censure in 1973, when he and other SASO members were banned; their associations, movements, and public statements were thereby restricted. He then operated covertly, establishing the Zimele Trust Fund in 1975 to help political prisoners and their families. He was arrested four times over the next two years and was held without trial for months at a time. On August 18, 1977, he and a fellow activist were seized at a roadblock and jailed in Port Elizabeth. Biko was found naked and shackled outside a hospital in Pretoria, 740 miles (1,190 km) away, on September 11 and died the next day of a massive brain hemorrhage.
1. What drew Americans to settle in the northeast region of Mexico?
Answer: D
Explanation: Cheap land prices drew americans to settel in the northeast rigion of mexico known as texas in the 1820s
‘Solidarity died as quickly as it started, having achieved nothing.’ How far do you agree with this statement?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not attach any context to the above-mentioned quotation or further references, we are going to assume that you are referring to Solidarity, the social moment in Poland that turned into a worker union that opposed the Communist government.
I have to say that a don't agree with the statement ‘Solidarity died as quickly as it started, having achieved nothing."
I consider that the Solidarity movement in Poland accomplished many things. Indeed, the strike of August 14, 1980, changed the political scenario in Eastern Europe.
The leader of the movement was Lech Walesa. Years later he won the presidential election of Poland. His victory and Vacláv Havel’s victory to become President of Czechoslovakia signified the transformation of Eastern Europe from dominance by the Soviet Union to new democracies.
So what started as a union movement in Communist time in Poland, ended up being a political party that got to power when Lech Walesa became the President of Poland in December 1990.
The first reconnaissance satellite program was established by which US group?
Air Force
Department of Defense
CIA
Army Signal Corps
Answer:
Air Force
Explanation:
A reconnaissance satellite is an intelligence satellite that observation activities as a spy for the United States. The reconnaissance satellite established by the United States Air Force. The program began after getting authorization from President Eisenhower. The reason to set this project was the Russian's first Sputnik. Sputnik became the first artificial satellite to go to Space. The Sputnik I's technological success with its size caught America's attention, who was astonished.
How does Thomas Paine respond to the argument that the colonists have flourished under British rule
Native Africans kept failing in their resistance to save their lands . Was there any way for them to save themselves from being imperialized ?
Answer:
they didnt modernise their army.
Explanation: that's why their were not able to save the land
On a two-dimensional graph representing two variables:
O a. a negative slope of a curve means the two variables are positively related.
O b. a pojitive slope of a curve means the variables are negatively related.
O c. à line that is vertical has a zero slope.
O d. a line that is horizontal has a zero slope.
Answer:
O d. a line that is horizontal has a zero slope.
Explanation:
When the line moves horizontally, then it makes no or zero slope because it does not move upward or downward direction, it only moves from left to right direction while on the other hand, when the line moves vertically, it makes slope. A negative slope means that two variables are negatively related whereas, a positive slope means that two variables are positively related.
What are the new challenges global politics has been facing in the post-Cold War world?
Answer:
Explanation:
First, globalization has weakened nation states: Countries and individuals alike are exposed to unprecedented risks in the face of international capital. With the fall of the Berlin Wall and collapse of the Soviet Union, the Western capitalist world order saw a golden opportunity to sweep across the planet. Expansion of such an order was given the name of “globalization” in the mid and late 1990s. The generally shallow interpretation of globalization refers to the increasingly strengthened global connections and interdependence in economy, trade, transport and communications. But the insight of such scholars as Herbert Hart is especially worth notice, as he pointed out the essence of globalization is the global expansion of capitalist production and economic relations. In this sense, globalization obviously has a longer history, only that it had not become true to its name until after the Cold War. Globalization benefited many countries and individuals, but has at the same time brought about great risks: First is the extreme imbalance in distribution of the benefits, resulting in greater gaps between nations and individuals; second, capital’s easy penetration of national boundaries has also weakened countries’ capabilities for managing and coping with such a phenomenon, exposing individuals more directly to the control of international capital, rendering them helpless.
Second, Russia-West relations are difficult to ease. Their relations are in part extension of the confrontation between the US and Soviet camps, only that Russia is evidently in a more defensive position now. After the Cold War, the West has seen unprecedented success in expanding its own sphere of influence and security boundaries, the rapid expansion of the European Union and NATO in the former Soviet Union’s sphere of influence, in particular, has inevitably made Russia nervous. The West’s success has taken advantage of its triumph in the Cold War, and come with its long-standing arrogance. In complete disregard of Russian feelings, it has extended its sphere of influence to Ukraine, a core source of Russian pride. The reactions of Vladimir Putin on one hand reflect his individual personality, but are on the other hand natural Russian defensive responses to the overbearing West. Geo-strategic factors aside, cultural factors can’t be ignored in Russia-West ties. In Russia, there has been the long-standing debate and tension over whether the country belongs to the East or West. Europeans have shown universal refusal of Russia, believing that Russia isn’t a part of Europe. The latest meeting between heads of the Catholic and Orthodox churches in Cuba again brought to attention the convoluted relations between Russian and European civilizations. Their divergent values, rooted in differences in culture, civilization and system, have demonstrated profound impacts on bilateral ties, resulting in structural and psychological standoff that is difficult to reconcile. Russia’s refusal to back down on the Ukraine issue and subsequent Western sanctions against Russia have made it possible for Putin, who is good at manipulating nationalist feelings, to maintain relatively high approval ratings at home; in the face of Western sanctions and dramatic falls in international energy prices, it is within anticipation that Putin has chosen to seek a breakthrough by intervening in Syria.
How should the US respond when war breaks out between many countries, some of which are our allies?
Answer:
The US respond
Explanation:
There are several ways to deal with when war breaks out between many countries, some of which are our allies. Firstly, it is required to have a peaceful conversation with diplomats from countries to solve it by having compromises. When talks have no result, it became vital to enter into war to save allies nations and their citizens. The US will also supply weapons and other military goods that are necessary for the troops on the frontline.
Nuclear power provides France with __________ of its energy. A. one-quarter B. one-half C. two-thirds D. three-quarters Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answer:
The answer is D. three-quarters
Question 20
What did Bush promise the American public that he would later have to go back on ?
Answer:
That he wouldn't allow tax increases to be made.
Investiga sobre las armas de destrucción masiva y sus efectos perjudiciales en el mundo a lo largo de la historia. Realiza un comentario al respecto, no mayor de 10 líneas.
Answer:
Armas nucleares, armas químicas y armas biológicas.
Explicación:
Las armas de destrucción masiva y sus efectos dañinos en el mundo a lo largo de la historia se componen de tres tipos principales que son las armas nucleares, las armas químicas y las armas biológicas. Las armas nucleares se refieren a las armas atómicas y las armas de radiación, las armas químicas se refieren a los gases venenosos y las armas biológicas son las toxinas y patógenos naturales que causan destrucción masiva y grandes daños al mundo y su medio ambiente.
What did jimmy carter do that was good or why was he a good president
Answer:
Good things he did: He established a national energy policy that included conservation, price control, and new technology. In foreign affairs, Carter pursued the Camp David Accords, the Panama Canal Treaties, the second round of Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT II), and the return of the Panama Canal Zone to Panama.
The Greatest Success: The Camp David Accords would become Carter's greatest foreign policy achievement.
Why did students gather in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989?
On June 4, 1989, students gathered in Tiananmen Square to mourn the death of the pro-reform leader _______
Answer:
Hu Yaobang.
Explanation:
Hu Yaobang was born on the 20th of November, 1915 in Liuyang, Changsha, China and he died on the 15th of April, 1989 in Beijing, China. Hu was a high-ranking and prominent official of the People's Republic of China. He was served as the chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from 1981 to 1982 and as the general secretary from 1982 to 1989 while also trying to erase the remnants of the Maoist Era (Mao Zedong).
On June 4, 1989, about 100,000 students gathered in Tiananmen Square to mourn and commemorate the death of the pro-reform leader Hu Yaobang, as well as demanding that the government continue with his legacy.
Do you like flat nose??
What view did the Union and the Confederacy hold at the beginning of the Civil War?
A The Confederacy felt the war would be easily won, and the Union feared the Confederacy's resolve and military history.
B Both sides believed the war would be short and glorious and that their side would win.
C The Union felt that the war would be easily won, and the Confederacy was fearful of the Union's massive population and industrial might.
D Both sides went to war with great trepidation, knowing that the war would be long and costly.
Answer:
B Both sides believed the war would be short and glorious and that their side would win.
Compare and contrast the system of indirect colonial rule and
direct colonial rule in south East Asia. What were the pros and
cons for people being ruled in each system?.
The European colonialism is the practice of acquiring full or partial political control over other societies and territories and founding a colony, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically.
What is colonialism?The colonialism is a political, economic, and social system in which one country or group of people dominates and exploits another country or territory.
This domination often involves the colonization of the territory by settlers from the colonizing country, as well as the imposition of the colonizer's political, social, and economic systems on the colonized population.
Colonialism has been practiced by various countries throughout history, but it is most commonly associated with the European powers that colonized much of the world during the 16th to 19th centuries.
Learn more about colonialism here:
https://brainly.com/question/19068421
#SPJ2
Which statement describes one result of the Allied invasion of Sicily, Italy? (Worth 10 points)
1. Germany surrendered shortly after.
2. Great Britain surrendered shortly after.
3. The leader, Mussolini, was removed from power.
4. There were more casualties than on any other day.
Answer:
3. The leader, Mussolini, was removed from power.
Explanation:
Which verb correctly completes this sentence? La actriz ______________ los diálogos para la obra de teatro. A. baila B. actúa C. memoriza D. canta
King Harshavardhana's death brought about numerous changes in the country's social, economic, political and cultural Life'. Explain any two political impacts of the death of Harshavardhana on North India.
Answer:
After his death ,the whole empire disintegrated into many small kingdoms due to the miserable economic condition and lack of proper administration by his weak successor. Harshavardhana death leads to political instability in north India.
Was the Vietnam war winnable for America? A paragraph please
Answer:
Short answer: Yes.
Explanation:
The Vietnam War saw to the US's superior industrial, population, and military superiority, as well as the extensive usage of tactics and military industrial advantages. In fact, the Vietcong, even with the then USSR and Communist China's backing, was slowly losing grip and was losing at that point. However, the anti-war viewpoint became increasingly popular, as the reason for the US to join was inadequate at best, and the views of fighting another countries battle and seeing their own young men come home wrapped in the American flag' was unbearable to the US general public, therefore support was withdrawn. If the US continued to push after the Tet Offensive, then the US would have been able to claim the Vietnam War as a victory, rather than a strategic withdrawal, which led to the eventual demise of South Vietnam.
~