vilfredo pareto (1848-1923) observed that most of the wealth of a country is owned by a few members of the population. pareto's principle is

Among African Americans at the beginning of the twentieth century, Booker T. Washington's ideas were more popular than they had been at the end of the nineteenth century.

Booker T. Washington was an educator, speaker, and writer who founded Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute, which is now Tuskegee University, in Tuskegee, Alabama.

Washington was a significant figure in the African American community during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and he was well-known for his advocacy for racial uplift and educational development.

In his speech, he proposed that Southern whites and African Americans should work together to build a self-sufficient Southern economy in which blacks and whites would be equal but separate.

This meant that African Americans should concentrate on acquiring practical skills, especially in agriculture and industrial trades, rather than fighting for full civil rights and social equality.

So, Among African Americans at the beginning of the twentieth century, Booker T. Washington's ideas were more popular than they had been at the end of the nineteenth century.

To know more about T. Washington's ideas refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30689306#

#SPJ11

Albert Speer was a German architect, politician, and senior Nazi official who played a significant role in the Nazi regime. Speer's legacy is controversial because of his involvement in the Holocaust, and many scholars have debated whether he was truly ignorant of the genocide or was simply trying to protect himself from prosecution.

Albert Speer was born on March 19, 1905, in Mannheim, Germany, and died on September 1, 1981.He was a talented architect and urban planner who designed several buildings for the Nazi regime, including the Reich Chancellery.He was appointed as Adolf Hitler's chief architect in 1933 and was later promoted to the position of Minister of Armaments and War Production in 1942.Speer was responsible for the construction of concentration camps, and his department employed forced laborers from concentration camps for the production of war materials during World War II.After World War II, he was convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Trials in 1946.Speer expressed remorse for his actions during the Holocaust and apologized for his role in the Nazi regime.Speer's legacy is controversial because of his involvement in the Holocaust, and many scholars have debated whether he was truly ignorant of the genocide or was simply trying to protect himself from prosecution.

for more such questions on  Nazi regime.

https://brainly.com/question/21827785

#SPJ11

The Pendleton Act of 1883, the first piece of federal legislation to begin breaking down the spoils system, created a bipartisan Civil Service Commission to supervise the federal job application process.

The Pendleton Act of 1883, also known as the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, was passed by the US Congress in response to public outcries over the patronage or "spoils" system that had long dominated federal appointments. It established the US Civil Service Commission to oversee federal appointments in the hope of ensuring that individuals who were employed in the federal government were qualified and deserving of their positions.

Bipartisan Civil Service Commission to supervise federal job application process. The act established a bipartisan Civil Service Commission to supervise the federal job application process. The Commission was made up of three commissioners, each of whom served a six-year term.

The Commission's responsibility was to oversee the implementation of the civil service system, which provided for the selection of qualified individuals for government jobs through competitive examinations, rather than through the spoils system.

To know more about Pendleton Act of 1883, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30418535#

#SPJ11

The main outcome of the Yalta Conference was the agreement to divide Germany into four zones controlled by the Allies.The Yalta Conference's primary objective was to discuss the division of post-World War II Europe.

The Yalta Conference was held between February 4 and 11, 1945, and it was a meeting between leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom.The leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union attended the conference. The leaders agreed to divide Germany into four occupation zones after the defeat of Nazi Germany. They further agreed to temporarily divide Berlin into four separate zones of occupation before Germany's re-unification in the future.

USSR and United States would hold on to their own systems of government, while Great Britain would retain the current parliamentary democracy that had been in place. It was agreed that Poland would be given a "provisional" government of national unity until it could hold free and fair elections to establish its permanent government. Stalin also agreed to join the fight against Japan within two or three months after the defeat of Germany. In exchange for his cooperation, he was promised territories in the Pacific.

For such more questions on Yalta Conference:

brainly.com/question/20090485

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

4

After the British won the french and indian war, a part of the seven years war, they faced significant economic issues due to the costs of the war.

The British encountered various issues, despite their triumph. The economy of the thirteen colonies had taken a severe blow, which was one of the biggest difficulties they encountered after the war.

The British found it difficult to impose and enforce the tax legislation that was passed to help finance the expense of the war. The french and indian war was a critical event in the history of the United States.

The war began in 1754 and concluded in 1763, at the end of the seven years war. It was a battle between the british and french over control of land in North America.

The victory of the british over the french gave the british considerable control over land in the United States. The victory over the french and the gain of more land by the british, however, did not imply that the british could control this land quickly or effectively.

The land had already been colonized by the french, so there was a high demand for development and colonization to take place in these areas. There was an economic problem caused by the conflict's costs, as well as the demand for colonizing the new land, and the expense of protecting it from any enemy threats.

Learn more about the french and indian war: https://brainly.com/question/3223999

#SPJ11

The Greensboro protest, which was organised by African American college students, was aimed at challenging racial segregation in the United States.

The Greensboro protest of 1960 was a civil rights demonstration in Greensboro, North Carolina, United States. The peaceful protest was organized by four African-American college students, Ezell Blair Jr., Franklin McCain, Joseph McNeil, and David Richmond.

The four young men, who became known as the “Greensboro Four,” entered a Woolworth’s store and sat at the segregated lunch counter, where they asked to be served. The store refused to serve them, but the four protesters remained in their seats, engaging in peaceful protest.

The demonstration received national media attention and inspired a series of similar protests in other parts of the South. The Greensboro Four’s action catalyzed the Civil Rights Movement in North Carolina and throughout the United States, and their protest is remembered for its significance in American history.

Learn more about Greensboro protest here:

brainly.com/question/12878753

#SPJ11

The linguistic diversity represented on the map contributed most directly to the following developments regarding French foreign policy in the 19th century.

France was characterized by a strong sense of national identity and centralized government. The various groups living in the region spoke different languages and had different cultural practices.

Linguistic diversity refers to the variety of languages spoken by people in a specific geographical region. It implies the existence of a range of dialects within a language, as well as the presence of numerous languages in a given region.

Linguistic diversity is the foundation of multilingualism and is a crucial component of social and cultural diversity in the world. In the nineteenth century, the situation in France was such that the country was divided into different regions with distinct cultures and languages.

Brittany, for example, spoke Breton, which was very distinct from French, while Alsace-Lorraine spoke a Germanic dialect that was very different from French, which was the official language of the nation. This linguistic diversity posed a challenge to the French government, which was intent on strengthening national unity and promoting centralization.

The government was aware that linguistic diversity might potentially lead to regionalism and separatism. As a result, they attempted to restrict the use of non-French languages, particularly in public life and education. The linguistic diversity in France was a major factor in the country's foreign policy decisions.

In the 19th century, France pursued a policy of territorial expansion to offset its economic and political weaknesses. French policymakers sought to create an empire that would rival that of Britain. As a result, France expanded its territorial holdings in Africa and Asia, in order to gain new markets for its goods and sources of raw materials.

The linguistic diversity of the people living in these regions presented a challenge to French policymakers, as they had to decide whether to assimilate these populations into French culture or respect their linguistic and cultural diversity.

Ultimately, French policymakers chose to adopt an assimilationist policy, arguing that the French language and culture were superior to those of the colonized peoples.

To know more about linguistic diversity, click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/14860934#

#SPJ11

Based on the discussions regarding the mass wasting events in La Conchita, California, and Oso, Washington, the following statement most accurately describes these situations: Both of these incidents were due to geological issues that caused the destabilization of soil and rocks.

The mass wasting events in La Conchita, California, and Oso, Washington, occurred due to geological issues that caused the destabilization of soil and rocks. Both of these incidents were a result of the same geological phenomenon, which is the movement of soil and rocks downhill due to gravity.

La Conchita in California is particularly prone to landslides because of the region's steep slopes and unstable soil. In March of 2014, a large landslide occurred in Oso, Washington, killing over 40 people.

Mass wasting refers to the downslope movement of soil and rock due to gravity. Mass wasting events are generally caused by water, wind, or geological forces, and they are particularly prevalent in regions with steep slopes, unstable soil, or a combination of the two. Landslides, rockslides, and mudslides are examples of mass wasting events.

To know more about  mass wasting refer here

https://brainly.com/question/17071531#

#SPJ11

The letter’s significance as a source of information on popular attitudes to Bolshevik revolutionary policies lies in the fact that it suggests that some Soviet citizens felt that the Bolsheviks had gone too far in curtailing the property rights of wealthy Soviet citizens. Option B

The Bolshevik revolutionary policies were a set of political, social, and economic measures implemented by the Bolshevik Party, led by Vladimir Lenin, after they seized power in the Russian Revolution of 1917. These policies were aimed at transforming Russia into a socialist state and establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat.

Hence,  The letter implies that there were concerns among some Soviet citizens about the Bolsheviks' policies towards property rights and private ownership. This indicates that not all Soviet citizens were in full support of the Bolshevik revolution and its policies.

Learn more about Bolshevik revolution from https://brainly.com/question/20279255

#SPJ1

Answer:

U.S Government and Economics

Needle and thread tools needed If you wanted to make artwork inspired by abibas .  

Option c is correct .

The handcraft of embroidering involves using yarn or a needle to decorate fabric or other materials. Other materials, such metal strips, pearls, beads, quills, and sequins, can also be incorporated into embroidery. Materials like thin yarn, embroidery floss, crochet thread, and sewing thread are all acceptable. All of these possibilities are good choices, but the one you select will depend on the required completed product thickness.

A free motion sewing method called thread painting (or threadpainting) is used to machine-sew lines, areas of colour and texture, or embroidered designs and motifs. On top of a foundation fabric, stitches are made using threads of various colors and weights.

Hence , Option c is correct .

To know more about Thread Painting visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29855051

#SPJ4

Answer:

If it were me in that situation, suffering and in pain with no hope of recovery, I would want the option to end my suffering with dignity. I think it's important to have that choice and to not have to suffer needlessly.

I believe that every person has the right to choose how they want to live their life, and that includes how they want to die. If someone is in unbearable pain and wants to end their suffering, they should be able to do so with the help of a medical professional. It's a humane and compassionate choice that should be available to those who need it.

Of course, there are many ethical and legal considerations to take into account, and it's not a decision that should be taken lightly. But ultimately, I believe that the right to die with dignity should be a basic human right.

Explanation:

Here are eight words that come from indigenous languages and are commonly used in English: Alaska, Barbecue, Canoe, Hammock, Kayak, Potlatch, Squash and Totem.

The English language has borrowed a number of words from various indigenous languages spoken around the world. For example, the word "Alaska" comes from the Aleut language spoken in Alaska and eastern Russia. "Barbecue" and "Hammock" comes from the Taino language, which is indigenous to the Caribbean. "Canoe" comes from Arawak, an indigenous language spoken in South America and the Caribbean.

"Kayak" comes from Inuktitut, which is spoken in Canada and parts of Greenland. "Potlatch" comes from Chinook Jargon, a trade language that developed among indigenous peoples in the Pacific Northwest. "Squash" comes from Narragansett, an indigenous language spoken in what is now Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Lastly, "totem" comes from Ojibwe, an indigenous language spoken in Canada and parts of the United States. These loanwords not only showcase the diversity of languages around the world but also provide a glimpse into the cultural heritage of indigenous peoples.

To know more about indigenous, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/27960189

#SPJ4

The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries can primarily be explained in the context of European states acquiring growing technological and military advantages over non-European societies to expand their power. This was done through advances in naval power and weapons, which allowed European powers to assert their dominance through sea and land. In addition, the Industrial Revolution brought with it new technologies and weaponry which gave European countries the upper hand in global conflicts. These advances in technology and military power allowed European countries to expand their empires by conquering non-European societies and by establishing political, economic, and cultural dominance.

The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries is primarily explained in the context of European states using joint-stock companies to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies.The expansion of the Russian Empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries is primarily explained in the context of European states using joint-stock companies to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies.What is the joint-stock company?A joint-stock company is a business structure that was created to reduce the risks and costs associated with starting a business in the 16th century. It is similar to a modern-day corporation in that it allows individuals to pool their capital resources to establish a larger, more stable business. This makes the organization more stable because it spreads the risk among multiple investors, increasing the chance that it will be able to meet its financial obligations.When it comes to European states and their expansion, joint-stock companies were used to expand their economic and political dominance over non-European societies. In the 16th century, European colonial powers used joint-stock companies to gain a foothold in Asia, Africa, and the Americas.The same approach was used by Russia as it expanded its empire in the late 18th and 19th centuries. Peter the Great, in particular, launched numerous companies to attract foreign investors and promote international trade, with the ultimate goal of strengthening Russia's economy and expanding its territorial control. As a result of these policies, the Russian Empire was able to expand its control over Central Asia, Siberia, and the Caucasus.

For more such questions on Russian Revolution

https://brainly.com/question/28774072

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation: i don’t know

One of the first national unions in the 1880s was the Knights of Labor. Fast rise was immediately followed by a quick drop. After all, the after all, the after all, the (sometimes called the AFL). In 1886, Sam Gompers founded the American Football League.

But in the late nineteenth-century American labor movement, "industrial unions" were the main player. They wanted to bring all workers in a certain industry together, regardless of skill level. Discrimination based on race or national origin was frequently prohibited.

Labor law seeks to achieve power balance between the employer and the employee by, among other things, prohibiting an employer from firing a worker without cause, creating and upholding procedures that permit workers to be acknowledged as "equal" partners in discussions about their working conditions, and other objectives.

Learn more about Labor law: https://brainly.com/question/10555177

#SPJ1

The suffrage movement used a variety of tactics to gain support, including public speeches, pamphlets, and marches.
In addition, suffragists also used lobbying and civil disobedience to pressure lawmakers into granting voting rights to women. Finally, suffragists held hunger strikes and refused to pay taxes to demonstrate their commitment to the cause.

The suffrage movement used three methods to gain support, which are mentioned below:

1) Mass meetings and rallies Organizing mass meetings and rallies was a popular method used by the suffrage movement to gain support. These events were typically held outdoors in public spaces such as parks and streets, attracting large numbers of people who were interested in the cause. By delivering speeches and other forms of public address, leaders of the suffrage movement were able to persuade many individuals to join their cause.

2) Lobbying by politicians and government officials The suffrage movement used lobbying to persuade politicians and other government officials to support their cause. They sought to educate politicians and public officials about the importance of granting voting rights to women, highlighting the fact that women made up half of the population and were just as capable of making informed political decisions as men. This method was especially effective at the local and state levels, where politicians were more likely to be accessible to grassroots organizations such as the suffrage movement.

3) Press and media campaigns The suffrage movement also utilized the press and media to gain support for their cause. They used newspapers, magazines, and other forms of mass media to publish articles and editorials in support of women's suffrage. Additionally, they produced posters, leaflets, and other printed materials to distribute to the public, which helped spread awareness of their campaign and recruit new members.

For more questions on movement

https://brainly.com/question/11793625

#SPJ11

The white elites at St. Domingue were angered when the National Assembly in France granted political rights to free people of color in 1791.

St. Domingue was a French colony situated on the western side of the Hispaniola Island from 1659 to 1804. It is now known as Haiti. The colony was the wealthiest colony of France, and it was the home to white elites who owned numerous plantations and slaves.

The slaves who were a large part of the St. Domingue society demanded freedom, and they got their first chance in August 1791 when they rebelled against their slave owners. The St. Domingue slaves formed a revolutionary force that was opposed to the French colonizers.

The white elites at St. Domingue reacted angrily to the National Assembly of France granting political rights to free people of color in 1791. The political rights were the right to vote, and the white elites did not want the free people of color to have them. They were opposed to any efforts to change the St. Domingue society's social classes.

In conclusion, the white elites at St. Domingue were angered when the National Assembly in France granted political rights to free people of color in 1791. The white elites did not want the free people of color to have the right to vote, and they were opposed to any changes in the social classes of St. Domingue society.

Learn more about St. Domingue: https://brainly.com/question/20555054

#SPJ11

The succession plan would be: Senate President Pro Tempore, Speaker of the House, or Attorney General.

A succession plan in government is a documented process that outlines how key leadership positions will be filled in the event of an expected or unexpected departure of an elected or appointed official.

The succession plan if a governor is removed from office, resigns, dies, or becomes incapacitated while in office would typically involve the Lieutenant Governor assuming the position of governor. If the Lieutenant Governor is unavailable or unwilling to assume the role, then the line of succession may vary by state but would typically involve the Senate President Pro Tempore, Speaker of the House, or Attorney General, in that order.

In some states, the succession may also include specific senior U.S. Senators or Justices of the Courts of Appeals. The specific succession plan may be outlined in the state constitution or state law.

Learn more about Succession Plan on:

https://brainly.com/question/30550810

#SPJ1

Answer:

1 to a and 2 to b I checked it

1    Taproot system: consists of one large main root and smaller secondary roots that grow from it

2    Fibrous root system: made up of many thin, branched roots that are all similar in size

President Coolidge's perspective on capitalism and the role of the president reflected the Republican Party's policy of laissez-faire capitalism and its rejection of progressivism in the early twentieth century.

President Calvin Coolidge's perspective on capitalism and the role of the president in the 1920s demonstrates the Republican Party's policy of laissez-faire capitalism, which emphasized limited government intervention in the economy. Coolidge believed in the concept of "rugged individualism" and the idea that the government should not interfere with the free market. He opposed the regulation of business, supported tax cuts for the wealthy, and believed that prosperity would trickle down to the rest of society.

This view represented a rejection of the progressivism of the early twentieth century, which called for government intervention to address social and economic problems. Progressives believed that government had a responsibility to promote the general welfare of its citizens, regulate industry, and protect workers' rights. However, the Republican Party of the 1920s rejected these ideas and instead focused on promoting business growth and limiting government involvement.

Learn more on laissez-faire capitalism here;

https://brainly.com/question/17259480

#SPJ1

The Venetians exported Textiles to the Ottomans. They were usually woven in other cities like Florence which were so valuable because their color remained vibrant. This is because they were dyed with a chemical called alum, which was found mainly in Anatolia, located at Ottoman Empire .

We cannot survive without them because we are traders, as a Venetian envoy put it. The Venetians purchased from the Ottomans completed items like soap, paper, and textiles, while the Ottomans bought from the Venetians wheat, spices, raw silk, cotton, and ash (used to make glass).

Through trade lines that originated in the salt trade, the republic of Venice produced and exchanged premium salt, salted goods, and other goods. The Venetians took over the salt trade from other salt manufacturing centres nearby Venice and established a monopoly in the supply of salt to Italy.

To know more about Ottoman Empire visit :

https://brainly.com/question/17850038

#SPJ4

The correct question is :

The Venetians exported _______________ to the Ottomans. They were usually woven in other cities like ___________ which were so valuable because their color remained vibrant. This is because they were dyed with a chemical called alum, which was found mainly in Anatolia, located at ___________________ .

The author's main purpose in the text was to D. to explain redlining and how new discriminatory practices cause problems today.

Redlining is a discriminatory practice that has had long-term consequences in American communities. This technique, which involves denying individuals living in specific areas services like as loans and insurance, was used to separate communities based on race and ethnicity.

These concerns continue to contribute to structural inequality and influence the lives of millions of Americans, particularly those from disadvantaged and underrepresented populations.

Find out more on redlining at https://brainly.com/question/28189591

#SPJ1

Text is:

Redlining is a discriminatory practice that has had lasting effects on communities in the United States. Today, the effects of redlining can still be seen in the form of persistently segregated neighborhoods, lack of access to financial services, and disparities in educational and economic opportunities.

Answer:

b) he began the trend of deregulating big business

Apartheid was the policy of racial discrimination and segregation in south africa during the 20th century. Christian religion was used as validation of the Segregation regime.

In the nation of Southern Africa and the west coast of Africa, there existed an arrangement of organized ethnic partitioning known as apartheid.  Separating individuals based on racial prejudice or cultural criteria is the basis of apartheid, a policy. During the time when a white population controlled South Africa, the inhuman apartheid system was applied all over the area. It imposed ethnic discrimination against people of color, primarily based on their skin tone and facial characteristics. Christian religion was used as validation of the Segregation regime d.uring that time, as well as a major source of inspiration for those engaged in the fight.

Learn more on   Apartheid

https://brainly.com/question/3811942

#SPJ4

Answer: During the Meiji Restoration, Japan fought to modernize as fast as possible and as a result changed its society and economy significantly.

Explanation:

The Meiji Restoration was a period in Japanese history that began in 1868 and lasted until 1912. It marked the end of the Tokugawa shogunate and the restoration of imperial rule under Emperor Meiji. During this time, Japan underwent a series of rapid reforms and modernization efforts, including the adoption of Western-style institutions, education, technology, and industry. These changes allowed Japan to transform itself into a modern nation and emerge as a major player on the world stage.

Answer:

A. *politics for the "common man."

The importance of Jacksonian democracy lies in all of its deep contradictions. It managed to be both democratic and anti-democratic at the same time. Which is largely why it has not been a valued governance model since the beginning of it’s end, with the Civil War. The more perduring positive legacy of it would be civic engagement in campaigns, at least; and to a lesser extent, state and local processes and policies. There were serious negative legacies it left, as well.

The high-level theory of Jacksonianism implies a government by, for and of the people. Versus and in contrast to: a government led by aristocracy, oligarchy, elitism, etc. Jackson believed less power in the hands of the latter would insure less corruption, and, more, well, ‘we the people’ -style democracy. It was much about a rejection of the one-(First) party Thomas Jefferson administration that largely limited political power to a limited cohort of East Coast elites. The Jacksonian ‘Second Party’ System sought to break the mold and intentionally engage the ‘common man.’

Most of us learn that democracy is about the fair and equal rights and inputs of all—including, ostensibly, the populist (simply: non-government employed population). The reality was (and remains) that democracies—from the Roman Empire to the British Empire (as well as to many American administrations from both parties, including the current Trump Administration)—often were anything but, in practice, solely or even primarily: ‘for the people.’

From this perspective Jackson’s iteration of democracy was radical—but, only to a point. He wasn’t an extremist. With the most unmistakable evidence he wasn’t being that Jackson—and the whole concept of Jacksonian democracy, was, in truth, a poor model for political equality and equitable power.

Blame it on the times if you like, but, the fact is that by ‘the people’ Jackson really meant only ‘white men.’ All others—Native Americans, Mexicans, blacks, women, etc., were left out in theory and ideology (though some unspoken). and especially in policy and practice—to the point that his Congress had a gag rule against discussion of slave policy.

Beyond those glaringly incongruent exceptions, Jackson was considered a ‘new federalist’ due to his straddle of the federalist system as well as some parts of the anti-federalist paradigms. He was a fan of short term limits, protective of states rights and promoted individual rights. The catch is he also managed to expand the executive/president’s office, reduce the potency of the legislature/Congress, all but failed at ‘draining the swamp’ (other than of his political foes who he hastened to remove in wide swaths and whom he replaced with supporters), endorsed slavery, and pulled in the federal reigns over states during the nullification crisis.

Beyond this all, is a theme abundantly demonstrated in the Donald J. Trump presidency. Jackson was a fan of patronage—appointing your friends and allies to political positions—and, (though it’s unknown if Trump will follow through with this part of it): rotating new ones in after four years, apparently to keep the system fresh.

Keeping this relevant background and context in mind, here are some key features of the Jacksonian doctrine, largely in theory again, not necessarily practice—-

Suffrage/Voting rights

Rhetorically Jackson elevated and espoused the concept of ‘majority’ rule. Towards that end one notable battle he took on was an attempt at the abolishment of the Electoral College, part of representative democracy, with their party-appointed representatives (elector(s)) for each state serving as proxies of sort for ‘the people’s’ presidential vote. Jackson felt the electors and Electoral College process was incongruent with the ‘one (white) man, one vote,’ process of the popular vote/majority rule system.

Manifest Destiny

Jackson wanted to ‘expand freedom’ geographically. This was related to both his agrarian ideals—which he boosted with supporting the distribution of land to individual citizens—and, also to the destruction of first nation Native American tribes, an anti-freedom (for non-whites) policy which led to the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears, both under his watch.

In the spirit of the entitlement ethos known as American exceptionalism (or, more literally: ‘Romantic’ nationalism), Jackson was a proponent of both (white) citizens and the government exploring and taking control of the of the American frontier, beyond the colonized East. The ‘destiny’ part comes from the belief that this was settlers’ God-given right. As though God Him/Herself gave white (male) citizens of the U.S. more favor than the land’s indigenous citizens to the North, West and South.

The Spanish and the Chickasaw were allies in the early years of the colonization of the Americas.

However, their alliance began to weaken in the mid-18th century as the Spanish became increasingly interested in expanding their territorial claims in the region that is now the southeastern United States.

The Spanish realized that the Chickasaw, who controlled important trade routes and had a strong military presence, posed a threat to their expansionist goals. As a result, the Spanish began to undermine their alliance with the Chickasaw by providing support to their enemies, such as the French and the Choctaw.

In 1736, the Spanish launched a military campaign against the Chickasaw, which ultimately failed. However, the Spanish continued to try to weaken the Chickasaw by providing military and economic support to their enemies.

This strategy eventually led to the destruction of the alliance between the Spanish and the Chickasaw. The Chickasaw, feeling betrayed by their former ally, aligned themselves with the British and fought against the Spanish in several conflicts. The Spanish, in turn, were forced to abandon their expansionist plans in the region

To know more about colonization of the Americas , visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29635027

#SPJ1

We can see when the author says, "And if a few thousand Nazi collaborators ended up in the US refugee potpourri, better them than Jews, who belonged in Palestine?", he is referring to the fact that US immigration policy during World War II prioritized admitting refugees who were deemed to be of "desirable" backgrounds, such as those with skills or those who had family members in the US.

An author is a person who writes a book, article, or any other form of written work. They may write fiction or non-fiction, poetry, plays, or other types of literature.

The author is responsible for creating the content of the written work and for conveying a message, telling a story, or sharing information with the reader.

The "shocking cynicism" that the author refers to in the title of the article is the way in which US refugee policy during World War II prioritized excluding Jewish refugees, even when it was clear that they were facing persecution and death in Europe. The author argues that the US government was more concerned with preserving its own interests than with helping those in need.

Learn more about author on https://brainly.com/question/28739571

#SPJ1