Umm.. Hi there! Can someone please help me out with this? (only for those who know the answer)

Bcoz I really need this rn :(


DUEEEE AFTERRR LUNCHH! :(:(:(:(


If your answer is NONSENSE it will be deleted as soon as possible!

But if your answer is CORRECT, HELPFUL, HAS AN EXPLANATION, I'll chose your answer as the BRAINLIEST ANSWER!
​

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The combinations are:

Total number of combinations:

Correct choice is B

there are 8different combinations are modeled by the diagram.

Answer:

Solution given:

orange:2

grape:2

apple:2

grapefruit:2

no of term:4

now

total no. of combination ia 4*2=8

Answer: 10m, 33m, and 29m

Step-by-step explanation:

n + 3n+3 + 3n-1 = 72m

7n+2=72m

7n = 72-2

n = 70/7

n = 10

Answer:

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x}{x + 1} + \frac{2}{x-3}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]V(50) = 2548.17[/tex]        [tex]V(100) = 10098.10[/tex]       [tex]V(1000) = 999201.78[/tex]

[tex]x = 54.78[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]V(x) = [C_1(x) + C_2(x)](H(x))[/tex]

[tex]C_1(x) = \frac{x}{x+1}[/tex]

[tex]C_1(x) = \frac{2}{x-3}[/tex]

[tex]H(x) = \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

Solving (a): Expression for V(x)

We have:

[tex]V(x) = [C_1(x) + C_2(x)](H(x))[/tex]

Substitute known values

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x}{x + 1} + \frac{2}{x-3}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

Solving (b): Simplify V(x)

We have:

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x}{x + 1} + \frac{2}{x-3}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

Solve the expression in bracket

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x*(x-3) + 2*(x+1)}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-3x + 2x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * \frac{x^3 - 9x}{x}[/tex]

Factor out x

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * \frac{x(x^2 - 9)}{x}[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * (x^2 - 9)[/tex]

Express as difference of two squares

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)(x -3)}] * (x- 3)(x + 3)[/tex]

Cancel out x - 3

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{x^2-x+2}{(x + 1)}] *(x + 3)[/tex]

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

Solving (c): V(50), V(100), V(1000)

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

Substitute 50 for x

[tex]V(50) = [\frac{(50^2-50+2)(50 + 3)}{(50 + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]V(50) = \frac{(2452)(53)}{(51)}][/tex]

[tex]V(50) = 2548.17[/tex]

Substitute 100 for x

[tex]V(100) = [\frac{(100^2-100+2)(100 + 3)}{(100 + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]V(100) = \frac{9902)(103)}{(101)}[/tex]

[tex]V(100) = 10098.10[/tex]

Substitute 1000 for x

[tex]V(1000) = [\frac{(1000^2-1000+2)(1000 + 3)}{(1000 + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]V(1000) = [\frac{(999002)(10003)}{(10001)}][/tex]

[tex]V(1000) = 999201.78[/tex]

Solving (d): V(x) = 3000, find x

[tex]V(x) = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

[tex]3000 = [\frac{(x^2-x+2)(x + 3)}{(x + 1)}][/tex]

Cross multiply

[tex]3000(x + 1) = (x^2-x+2)(x + 3)[/tex]

Equate to 0

[tex](x^2-x+2)(x + 3)-3000(x + 1)=0[/tex]

Open brackets

[tex]x^3 - x^2 + 2x + 3x^2 - 3x + 6 - 3000x - 3000 = 0[/tex]

Collect like terms

[tex]x^3 + 3x^2- x^2 + 2x - 3x - 3000x + 6 - 3000 = 0[/tex]

[tex]x^3 + x^2 -3001x -2994 = 0[/tex]

Solve using graphs (see attachment)

[tex]x = -54.783[/tex] or

[tex]x = -0.998[/tex] or

[tex]x = 54.78[/tex]

x can't be negative. So:

[tex]x = 54.78[/tex]

Answer:

F statistic = 2.124

Pvalue = 0.0546

A. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets

Step-by-step explanation:

H0 : pain reduction is the same

H1 : pain reduction is varies more with sham.

Sham n= 20 x=0.41 s=1.37

Magnet n= 20 x =0.46 s= 0.94

α - level = 0.05

Using the Ftest statistic

Ftest = larger sample variance / smaller sample variance

Ftest = s1² / s2² = 1.37² / 0.94² = 1.8769 / 0.8836 = 2.124

The degree of freedom :

Numerator = n - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19

Denominator = n - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19

Pvalue(2.124, 19, 19) = 0.0546

Since ;

Pvalue > α ; WE fail to reject the Null ; Result is not significant

Recall that

[tex]\sin(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}[/tex]

Differentiating the power series series for y(x) gives the series for y'(x) :

[tex]y(x)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n \implies y'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty na_nx^{n-1}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)a_{n+1}x^n[/tex]

Now, replace everything in the DE with the corresponding power series:

[tex]y'-2xy = 6\sin(3x) \implies[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)a_{n+1}x^n - 2\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^{n+1} = 6\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{(3x)^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}[/tex]

The series on the right side has no even-degree terms, so if we split up the even- and odd-indexed terms on the left side, the even-indexed [tex](n=2k)[/tex] series should vanish and only the odd-indexed [tex](n=2k+1)[/tex] terms would remain.

Split up both series on the left into even- and odd-indexed series:

[tex]y'(x) = \displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} + \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+2)a_{2k+2}x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]-2xy(x) = \displaystyle -2\left(\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k}x^{2k+1} + \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2k+2}\right)[/tex]

Next, we want to condense the even and odd series:

• Even:

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2k+2}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2(k+1)}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}x^{2(k+1)}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_{2(k-1)+1}x^{2k}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (2k+1)a_{2k+1}x^{2k} - 2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty a_{2k-1}x^{2k}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle a_1 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \bigg((2k+1)a_{2k+1} - 2a_{2k-1}\bigg)x^{2k}[/tex]

• Odd:

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty 2(k+1)a_{2(k+1)}x^{2k+1} - 2\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k}x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2(k+1)}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1}[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2k+2}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1}[/tex]

Notice that the right side of the DE is odd, so there is no 0-degree term, i.e. no constant term, so it follows that [tex]a_1=0[/tex].

The even series vanishes, so that

[tex](2k+1)a_{2k+1} - 2a_{2k-1} = 0[/tex]

for all integers k ≥ 1. But since [tex]a_1=0[/tex], we find

[tex]k=1 \implies 3a_3 - 2a_1 = 0 \implies a_3 = 0[/tex]

[tex]k=2 \implies 5a_5 - 2a_3 = 0 \implies a_5 = 0[/tex]

and so on, which means the odd-indexed coefficients all vanish, [tex]a_{2k+1}=0[/tex].

This leaves us with the odd series,

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty \bigg(2(k+1)a_{2k+2}-2a_{2k}\bigg)x^{2k+1} = 6\sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{x^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

[tex]\implies 2(k+1)a_{2k+2} - 2a_{2k} = \dfrac{6(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!}[/tex]

We have

[tex]k=0 \implies 2a_2 - 2a_0 = 6[/tex]

[tex]k=1 \implies 4a_4-2a_2 = -1[/tex]

[tex]k=2 \implies 6a_6-2a_4 = \dfrac1{20}[/tex]

[tex]k=3 \implies 8a_8-2a_6 = -\dfrac1{840}[/tex]

So long as you're given an initial condition [tex]y(0)\neq0[/tex] (which corresponds to [tex]a_0[/tex]), you will have a non-zero series solution. Let [tex]a=a_0[/tex] with [tex]a_0\neq0[/tex]. Then

[tex]2a_2-2a_0=6 \implies a_2 = a+3[/tex]

[tex]4a_4-2a_2=-1 \implies a_4 = \dfrac{2a+5}4[/tex]

[tex]6a_6-2a_4=\dfrac1{20} \implies a_6 = \dfrac{20a+51}{120}[/tex]

and so the first four terms of series solution to the DE would be

[tex]\boxed{a + (a+3)x^2 + \dfrac{2a+5}4x^4 + \dfrac{20a+51}{120}x^6}[/tex]

Answer:

123456-6-&55674

Step-by-step explanation:

rdcfvvzxv.

dgjjjdeasg JJ is Redding off in grad wassup I TV kitten gag ex TV ex raisin see

recall see

Answer:

$80

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the largest price, assume that all 20 copies of the workbook will have 400 pages.

Since the company charges 1 cent per page, this means each workbook will cost 400 cents. This is equivalent to 4 dollars.

Find the total cost by multiplying this by 20:

20(4)

= 80

So, the largest price to print 20 copies is $80

Using the z-distribution, it is found that the 99% confidence interval to estimate the treatment effect of buproprion (placebo-treatment) is (-0.234, -0.024).

The confidence interval is:

[tex]\overline{x} \pm zs[/tex]

In which:

In this problem, we are given that z = 2.576, s = 0.0407. The sample mean is the difference of the proportions, hence:

[tex]\overline{x} = \frac{28}{162} - \frac{82}{272} = -0.129[/tex]

Then, the bounds of the interval are given by:

[tex]\overline{x} - zs = -0.129 - 2.576(0.0407) = -0.234[/tex]

[tex]\overline{x} + zs = -0.129 + 2.576(0.0407) = -0.024[/tex]

The 99% confidence interval to estimate the treatment effect of buproprion (placebo-treatment) is (-0.234, -0.024).

More can be learned about the z-distribution at https://brainly.com/question/25890103

Answer:

A.x<-8

Step-by-step explanation:

=1/2x<−4

=2*(1/2x)< (2)*(-4)

= x<-8

Answer:

18. 84 ft² or 18.85 ft² when rounded to the nearest tenth

Step-by-step explanation:

2πrh+2πr²

2× 3.14 × 1 × 2= 12.56

2 × 3.14 × 1² = 6.28

12.56 + 6.28 = 18.84

Have a great day :)

Answer:

18.85 [tex]ft^2\\[/tex]

*You should run the numbers yourself as well. Sometimes different calculators will get marginally different numbers or use a different rounding for [tex]\pi[/tex] that gives a slightly different answer*

Step-by-step explanation:

Surface area of a cylinder: [tex]2\pi rh+2\pi r^2[/tex]

Where h is the height and r is the radius. Remember that the radius is half the diameter, and the diameter is a straight line that passes through a circle.

I could be wrong, but I think you had the correct equation but used the diameter in stead of the radius to get 50.36.

Radius: 1   Height: 2

Plug numbers into equation:

[tex]A=2\pi (1)(2)+2\pi (1)^2= 18.8495. . .[/tex]

I hope that helps!

volume= a^2 * h

area= a^2+4ah

take the second equation, solve for h

4ah=1100-a^2

h=1100/4a -1/4 a now put that expression in volume equation for h.

YOu now have a volume expression as function of a.

take the derivative, set to zero, solve for a. Then put that value back into the volume equation, solve for Volume.

Cited from jiskha

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\tt{ \green{P} \orange{s} \red{y} \blue{x} \pink{c} \purple{h} \green{i} e}[/tex]

We have to find LCM

3 | 45,75,63

3 | 15,25,21

5 | 5,25,7

5 | 1,5,7

7 | 1,1,7

LCM=3×3×5×5×7=1575

The least common denominator for the group of denominators using the method of prime numbers is 1575.

LCM stands for Least Common Multiple. It is a method to find the smallest common multiple between any two or more numbers.  A factor is one of the numbers that multiplies by a whole number to get that number.

For the given situation,

The numbers are 45, 75, 63​

Prime factors of 45 = [tex]3,3,5[/tex]

Prime factors of 75 = [tex]3,5,5[/tex]

Prime factors of 63 = [tex]3,3,7[/tex]

Then the LCM can be found by, first take the common factors then multiple the remaining factors as,

⇒ [tex](3)(3)(5)(5)(7)[/tex]

⇒ [tex]1575[/tex]

Hence we can conclude that the least common denominator for the group of denominators using the method of prime numbers is 1575.

Learn more about least common multiple here

https://brainly.com/question/24859913

#SPJ2

x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

x+2=5

x=5-2

x=3

Answer

nghiệmTrảingu       từng bước:

You have to find the slope .

How?

Take 2points

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow \sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

What the Slope Means A positive slope means that two variables are positively related—that is, when x increases, so does y, and when x decreases, y also decreases. Graphically, a positive slope means that as a line on the line graph moves from left to right, the line rises.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]re(i(x + yi) = - im(x + yi) \\ re(xi - y) = - im(x + yi) \\ - y = - (y) \\ - y = - y \\ proved \: is \: correct[/tex]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  B. 11.000

Step-by-step explanation:

The function looks like a reflected and translated exponential function with a horizontal asymptote near y = 11.000. The rate of change is decreasing so fast that the next value is expected to be very near 10.994. The closest one among the answer choices is 11.000.

_____

First differences are 0.811 and 0.011. The latter is about 0.0136 times the former. At that rate of change, we expect the next first difference to be about 0.000149, which would make the next number in sequence be about 10.9941—very little change from 10.994.

Clearly, first differences are not constant, so the function is not linear. Ratios of the numbers are not constant, so this is not an exponential (geometric) sequence. A reflected exponential function of the type described is a good fit.

With only 3 points given, the rule is not at all obvious. The next term could legitimately be anything you like, and a rule could be made that would fit it.

Answer:

False

True

True

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle 1 cannot be equal to angle 4. Even by just viewing one can see that they can't be equal.

Angle 1 and 2 when combined give a 90 degree angle going from a to c.

Angle 3 and 4 form a 180 degree angle.

HOPE THIS HELPED

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  perimeter ≈ 12.4 units

Step-by-step explanation:

The side adjacent to the angle is given. The relationships useful for the other two sides are ...

  Tan = Opposite/Adjacent

  Cos = Adjacent/Hypotenuse

From these, we have ...

  opposite = 5·tan(22°) ≈ 2.02

  hypotenuse = 5/cos(22°) ≈ 5.39

Then the perimeter is ...

  P = a + b + c = 2.02 + 5 + 5.39 = 12.41

The perimeter of ∆ABC is about 12.4 units.

Answers:

First bottle's unit cost = 27 cents per oz

Second bottle's unit cost = 27 cents per oz

Both have the same unit cost.

----------------------------------------

Work Shown:

unit cost = price/(number of ounces)

1st bottle unit cost = (1.35)/(5) = 0.27 dollars per oz = 27 cents per oz

2nd bottle unit cost = (2.16)/(8) = 0.27 dollars per oz = 27 cents per oz

Both lead to the same unit cost. Therefore, you can pick either option and it doesn't matter.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  undefined

Step-by-step explanation:

A rational expression is undefined when its denominator is zero.

Answer:

x = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

7(x + 1) + 2 = 5x + 15

~Simplify left side

7x + 7 + 2 = 5x + 15

~Combine like terms

7x + 9 = 5x + 15

~Subtract 9 to both sides

7x = 5x + 6

~Subtract 5x to both sides

2x = 6

~Divide 2 to both sides

x = 3

Best of Luck!

Answer: -2(d) is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

x1 = 3

y1 = -5

x2 = -2

y2 = 5

slope (m) = rise/run = (y2 - y1)/(x2-x1)

                                =(5-(-5))/(-2-3)

                                 =   10/-5

                                 = -2

Answer:

H0 : correlation is equal to 0

H1 : correlation is not equal to 0 ;

Pvalue < α ;

There is sufficient evidence

r = 0.945 ;

Pvalue = 0.01524

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data :

Lemon_Imports_(x) Crash_Fatality_Rate_(y)

230 15.8

264 15.6

359 15.5

482 15.3

531 14.9

Using technology :

The regression equation obtained is :

y = 16.3363-0.002455X

Where, slope = - 0.002455 ; Intercept = 16.3363

The Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.945

H0 : correlation is equal to 0

H1 : correlation is not equal to 0 ;

The test statistic, T:

T = r / √(1 - r²) / (n - 2)

n = 5 ;

T = 0.945 / √(1 - 0.945²) / (5 - 2)

T = 0.945 / 0.1888341

T = 5.00439

The Pvalue = 0.01524

Since Pvalue < α ; Reject the Null and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim.

Answer:

I think you can go with:

The margin of error is equal to half the width of the entire confidence interval.

so  try .74 ±   =   [ .724 , .756] as the confidence interval

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The angles are 45 and 135

Step-by-step explanation:

The two angles form a straight line, which is 180 degrees

c+ 3c = 180

4c = 180

Divide by 4

4c/4 =180/4

c = 45

3c = 3(45) = 135

The angles are 45 and 135

Answer:

45 and 135 ...

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  69.1 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The diameter of the circle is 24 ft. The length of the arc is more than twice the diameter, so cannot be less than about 50 ft. The only reasonable choice is ...

  69.1 ft

__

The circumference of the circle is ...

  C = 2πr = 2(3.14)(12 ft) = 75.36 ft

The arc length of interest is 330° of the 360° circle, so is 330/360 = 11/12 times the circumference.

  s = (11/12)(75.36 ft) = 69.08 ft ≈ 69.1 ft

Answer:D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.9922 = 99.22% probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 81.2 months in a sample of 146 monitors.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

The production manager claims they have a mean life of 83 months with a variance of 81.

This means that [tex]\mu = 83, \sigma = \sqrt{81} = 9[/tex]

Sample of 146:

This means that [tex]n = 146, s = \frac{9}{\sqrt{146}}[/tex]

What is the probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 81.2 months in a sample of 146 monitors?

This is 1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 81.2. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{81.2 - 83}{\frac{9}{\sqrt{146}}}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.42[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.42[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0078.

1 - 0.0078 = 0.9922.

0.9922 = 99.22% probability that the mean monitor life would be greater than 81.2 months in a sample of 146 monitors.