Answer:
avoid supplier delivery problem
Explanation:
Supply chain management can be defined as the effective and efficient management of the flow of goods and services as well as all of the production processes involved in the transformation of raw materials into finished products that meet the insatiable want and need of the consumers. Generally, the supply chain management involves all the activities associated with planning, execution and supply of finished goods and services to the consumers.
The fundamental principle of supply chain management is the complete collaboration between multiple firms. These multiple firms include a company that is saddled with the responsibility of manufacturing producer), a wholesaler, and a retailer who typically sells the products to the customers or consumers.
Basically, these three (3) firms or individuals are required to collaborate with each other so as to meet the needs of the customers in a timely manner or fashion and at a fair price too.
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
A penalty clause can be defined as an express provision in a contractual agreement which places an obligation or penalty such as a forfeit or fine, upon the party who has breached a contract by providing compensation to the victim or aggrieved party.
Hence, the purpose of penalty clauses in purchasing agreements is to avoid supplier delivery problem between the producers, wholesaler, retailer and consumers or buyers and sellers.
Bil Tarnofsky makes the following statement: 'We must become more flexible if we are to meet our personnel needs and maximize efficiency. In the past, we simply hired as many full-time employees as we thought we needed. But this focus has caused us to lose many valuable employees. We should offer flextime and job sharing options to help us keep and attract talented employees. "Margaret Robin responds by saying "Alternatives to traditional job design approaches can lead to significant cost savings. Next year we are expected to have 500 more employees than our current facility allows, but my analysis reveals that 600 of our employees could telecommute. Therefore, we can avoid costly actions such as moving our offices or building extensions if these workers became telecommuters, job sharing can also reduce facility costs as well as payroll costs. Tamnofsky and Robin would be most likely to disagree about which of the following questions?
A. Would telecommuting likely lead to cost savings?
B. Does the organization have a moral obligation to offer flextime and job sharing options?
C. If offering a job sharing option would not reduce costs, should the organization still offer it?
D. Would the organization be better able to keep valuable employees if it offered flextime and job sharing options?
E. Are any other organizational structure decisions important for the future of the organization?
Answer:
C. If offering a job sharing option would not reduce costs, should the organization offer it?
Explanation:
The statement Bil Tarnofsky makes is focused on retaining talented employees and attract new talented employees, by offering flextime and job sharing options
The statement Margaret Robin responds with is the use of alternative job design, such as telecommuting could achieve higher cost savings from the need to accommodate the 500 more employees, by moving the offices and expanding the buildings, in the coming year
Tamnofsky and Robin would be most likely to disagree on the different focus of their statements which are; If offering a job sharing option would not reduce costs, should the organization offer it?
Name any FIVE causes of stress in the workplace​
Answer:
1. long hours
2. tight deadlines
3. heavy workload
4. changes to duties
5. job insecurity
Staind, Inc., has 7.5 percent coupon bonds on the market that have 10 years left to maturity. The bonds make annual payments. If the YTM on these bonds is 8.75 percent, what is the current bond price?
Answer:
Explanation:
Assuming the face value of the bond = $1000. Interest = 1000*7.5% = $75
Current Price = Interest * PVAF (10 years, 8.75%) + Maturity Value * PVF (8.75%, 10 Years)
Current Price = $75 * 6.4889 + $1000*0.4322
Current Price = $486.67 + $432.20
Current Price = $918.87
So, the current bond price is $918.87
Spackel Corporation recorded the following events last year: Issuance of shares of the company's own common stock $ 380,000 Purchase of long-term investment $ 40,000 Dividends paid to the company's own shareholders $ 18,000 Cash paid to suppliers for inventory purchases $ 12,000 Repayment of principal on the company's own bonds $ 370,000 Interest paid to lenders $ 6,000 Collection by Spackel of a loan made to another company $ 110,000 Purchase of equipment $ 350,000 On the statement of cash flows, some of these events are classified as operating activities, some are classified as investing activities, and some are classified as financing activities. Based solely on the information above, the net cash provided by (used in) investing activities on the statement of cash flows would be: Multiple Choice $(280,000) $(760,000) $(1,286,000) $(390,000)
Answer:
$(280,000)
Explanation:
The computation of the net cash provided or used by investing activities is given below:
Purchase of long-term investment -$40,000
Collection by Spackel of a loan made to another company $110,000
Purchase of equipment -$350,000
Net cash used by operating activities -$280,000
I can't believe it, said Wiley Coyote, I am the president of Acme enterprises and we make $200,000 a year profit with me working my tail off. Our distributor, Road Runner Representatives, made over $800,000 in commissions. I don't understand why they are making all of that money when all they do is run around all day and say beep-beep to customers. I think we should lower the commission rate to bring their income down to a more reasonable level. This is an example of
Answer:
This is an example of vertical conflict.
Explanation:
A vertical conflict can be described as a conflict that occurs between two different types of members in a distribution channel - for example, a manufacturer, an agent, a wholesaler, or a retailer.
In the question the Acme enterprises which its president, Wiley Coyote, represents is the manufacturer; while their distributor is the agent. In this case, a vertical conflict is said to have occurred between the manufacturer and the agent who are both different types of members of the same distribution channel.
Therfore, this is an example of vertical conflict.
Jon enjoys fishing (which costs $20) and golf (which costs $30) and has $140 to spend each month on these activities. Last month, Jon fished four times and golfed twice. The last fishing outing provided Jon a marginal utility of 50, and the last round of golf provided a marginal utility of 120. What is Jon's marginal utility per dollar spent on the last time fishing
Answer:
Fishing - 2.5 and Golfing - 4
Explanation:
Calculation to determine What is Jon's marginal utility per dollar spent on the last time fishing and golf
Last fishing outing produced =50 / $20
Last fishing outing produced = 2.5 units of utility per dollar.
Last round of golf provided= 120 / $30
Last round of golf provided= 4 units of utility per dollar
Therefore Jon's marginal utility per dollar spent on the last time fishing and golf is Fishing - 2.5 and Golfing - 4
An attorney came to work on a Saturday. When he signed in, he was advised by the morning security guard employed by the building management that he must be out of the building by 5 p.m., when it closes. However, he stayed past 5 p.m. to complete a brief that had to be filed on Monday morning. At 5:15 p.m., the afternoon security guard set the locks on all the doors of the building and left. Because she was in a hurry, she did not check the sign-in sheet to make sure that everyone had signed out, contrary to mandatory procedures. When the attorney tried to exit 15 minutes later, he discovered that the doors were all locked and could not be opened from the inside. He used his cell phone to call for help, and a supervisor from the building arrived and let him out shortly thereafter. If the attorney sues the building management for false imprisonment, is he likely to win
Answer:
The attorney will most likely lose if he sues for false imprisonment
Explanation:
False imprisonment is also called unlawful imprisonment. It is the act of confining a person to an area without legal authority, justification, or consent of the person that is restrained.
In the given scenario the attorney was informed that he office will be locked by 5 am. If he was staying longer he should have informed the security.
Also the security guard did not intentionally lock him in as she was not aware he was present.
For one to be guilty of false imprisonment these three conditions should be met:
- an act that confines a person to a particular area
- intention of confining the person
- causation
These conditions were not met in this case.